Not surprised he isn't drawing more interest, he really needed to ball out more than he did last year. Once the Jaguars signed Gabe Davis, you knew Calvin Ridley wasn't coming back to Jacksonville. For any other WR, 76 / 1036 / 8 TD in 17 games would be great. But for a WR of Ridley's age and history, the bar is higher.
He is about a year younger than Mike Evans and people view that guy as ancient. Like most GMs, I surmise the don't want to sign him through his early 30s and end up paying an extravagant amount for 60 / 850 / 6 TD when he inevitably declines in the next couple years. He is not somebody I would trust giving the bag to and there are at least half a dozen WR in the draft that I feel have the same upside as this cat. Prepare to be humbled young man.
Ummmmmm, OK
I'm just saying they're paying Christian Kirk $14,500,000 this year and $15,500,000 next year. They just signed Gabe Davis on a 3-year $39,000,000 contract. They're already committed at least $27,500,000 to just those two WR for 2024. Ridley will want as much as Gabe Davis got, right?
So they're gonna pay $40,000,000 a year for these 3 WR, in a loaded WR draft class, and give up a 3rd Round pick to do it? I guess they could but it defies any conventional logic that I know of, unless I am mistaken:
Christian Kirk signed a 4 year, $72,000,000 contract with the Jacksonville Jaguars, including $20,000,000 signing bonus, $37,000,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $18,000,000. In 2025, Kirk will earn a base salary of $1,255,000, a restructure bonus of $14,245,000 and a workout...
www.spotrac.com
Gabriel Davis signed a 3 year, $39,000,000 contract with the Jacksonville Jaguars, including $11,000,000 signing bonus, $24,000,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $13,000,000. In 2025, Davis will earn a base salary of $1,500,000, a signing bonus of $10,000,000 and a workout...
www.spotrac.com
I was more referring to the comments of:
-People viewing Mike Evan as "ancient". The just hit age 30 is always a concern, but he has a couple good years left. Feel the same about Keenan Allen, even though they are totally different kind of receivers. Age 30 isn't a death sentence these days. Plus, basically sitting out for two years decreased wear and tear some.
-Saying Ridley needed to ball out more. He had a pretty nice year overall, considering how he was used. A couple of big drops on long TDs hurt a lot, but first year in new system after a year and a half out of the game wasn't bad. Expectations were a bit over the top right before the season started.
Hope he doesn't go to the Patriots because of the QB situation or lack of one currently. Would get a lot of targets, but not great quality ones IMO
I feel you, I'm just thinking like an NFL GM. The guy stepped away from football (quit on his team if you are a pessimist), then got suspended for gambling. He comes back and it takes him 17 games to get 1,000 yards. If you take away him quitting and the suspension, you can stomach his age, but an aging WR with character issues who failed to hit a common 1,000 yard mark barometer is going to scare away many GMs who would rather hitch their wagon to somebody else. Somebody like Gabe Davis for instance.
Evans is healthy, didn't quit, and is the Buccaneers' franchise guy. I call him old because people laugh at me when I try to offer him in dynasty. I've seen Reggie Wayne, Hines Ward, Larry Fitzgerald, etc ball out into their 30s. But those guys are all closer to Mike Evans than they are Calvin Ridley.
Calvin Ridley is much closer to being Tampa Mike Williams than those guys.
Ridley is already more than a 1 year wonder. So your comparisons don't make any sense.
Your posts seem way off to me.
Man, it's actually such a good comparison. Tampa Mike in college played seven games in 2009, he caught 49 balls for 746 yards and seven touchdowns but
quit the team due to a possible suspension after he violated team rules following a car accident.
Similar to Ridley quitting on his team. Both having off the field baggage. Ridley was suspended by the league in 2022, Williams was suspended by the league in 2015.
Tampa Mike played 5 seasons, 63 games and his stats were:
223 receptions / 3,089 yards / 26TD
Ridley played 5 seasons, 66 games and his stats are:
324 receptions / 4,358 yards / 36TD
Mike Evans who is a year older than Ridley has played 10 seasons and his stats are:
726 receptions / 11,680 yards / 94 TD
So again, Calvin Ridley is much closer to Tampa Mike Williams than those other guys who were more productive with no offense field issues (Mike Evans, Larry Fitzgerald, Hines Ward, etc). It's nothing profound but I don't think it's even a hot take.
Both had off the field issues, Williams issues ended his career but Ridley's did not. Tampa Mike didn't finish either his 4th or 5th season and if he did, his stats relative to Ridley would have been eerrily similar. Plus they played in different eras.
As far as Tampa Mike only having one good year, that's just patently false. He had two good years that you could argue were both better than Ridley's season last year:
Mike Williams 2010: 65 / 964 / 11TD
Mike Williams 2012: 63 / 996 / 9TD
Calvin Ridley 2023: 76 / 1010 / 8TD
Except Ridley had 17 games to do it. If you prorate Ridley's number over 16 games, his stats become:
76 / 950 / 8TD
So essentially, Ridley last year was statistically the same as the two-year wonder Tampa Mike. Actually, Tampa Mike's good seasons were better than Ridley from last year.
I don't know if you can find a better comparison than Tampa Mike based on situation and production, but hey, I'm not here to twist your arm, but if Tampa Mike had played 17 games those years his stats would have been than 2023 Ridley and their 5 year aggregate stats would be even closer than they are now. In fact, if you account for the extra game Ridley only has 1 season where he had more yards than Tampa Mike (2020, 1,375).
Otherwise Tampa Mike's 964 (2010) and 996 (2012) yardage wise are greater than every other season Ridley has played.
Not a perfect comparison, but I task you to give me a better one.