What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR DJ Moore, CHI (3 Viewers)

We can blame it all on his QBs?
Quite a bit of it yes.

Look at his annual numbers - considering the lack of talent behind center he’s performed remarkably well.

I’m not sure what your issue with DJM’s game is. He’s done nothing but produce - what exactly are you “blaming”? Use your words.
I thought the subject was Claypool, since the hijack. Follow the conversation back to Claypool, then follow my responses
 
We can blame it all on his QBs?
Quite a bit of it yes.

Look at his annual numbers - considering the lack of talent behind center he’s performed remarkably well.

I’m not sure what your issue with DJM’s game is. He’s done nothing but produce - what exactly are you “blaming”? Use your words.
I thought the subject was Claypool, since the hijack
Oops - damn, I need to stop posting while working.

Talking about too many Bears receivers. Yes, Claypool.

Claypool had a very good rookie season. I’m not sure why you don’t like him either. He’s certainly flashed signs of being a competent WR.
 
We can blame it all on his QBs?
Quite a bit of it yes.

Look at his annual numbers - considering the lack of talent behind center he’s performed remarkably well.

I’m not sure what your issue with DJM’s game is. He’s done nothing but produce - what exactly are you “blaming”? Use your words.
I thought the subject was Claypool, since the hijack
Oops - damn, I need to stop posting while working.

Talking about too many Bears receivers. Yes, Claypool.

Claypool had a very good rookie season. I’m not sure why you don’t like him either. He’s certainly flashed signs of being a competent WR.
He hasn’t looked all that great since his rookie year. I read he wasn’t always on same page as his QB. How much of it is the QB, or the WR?
 
We can blame it all on his QBs?
Quite a bit of it yes.

Look at his annual numbers - considering the lack of talent behind center he’s performed remarkably well.

I’m not sure what your issue with DJM’s game is. He’s done nothing but produce - what exactly are you “blaming”? Use your words.
I thought the subject was Claypool, since the hijack
Oops - damn, I need to stop posting while working.

Talking about too many Bears receivers. Yes, Claypool.

Claypool had a very good rookie season. I’m not sure why you don’t like him either. He’s certainly flashed signs of being a competent WR.
He hasn’t looked all that great since his rookie year. I read he wasn’t always on same page as his QB. How much of it is the QB, or the WR?
I guess we’ll find out next year if DJM, Kmet, & Mooney are balling out & Claypool is stinking up the joint.
 
We can blame it all on his QBs?
Quite a bit of it yes.

Look at his annual numbers - considering the lack of talent behind center he’s performed remarkably well.

I’m not sure what your issue with DJM’s game is. He’s done nothing but produce - what exactly are you “blaming”? Use your words.
I thought the subject was Claypool, since the hijack
Oops - damn, I need to stop posting while working.

Talking about too many Bears receivers. Yes, Claypool.

Claypool had a very good rookie season. I’m not sure why you don’t like him either. He’s certainly flashed signs of being a competent WR.
He hasn’t looked all that great since his rookie year. I read he wasn’t always on same page as his QB. How much of it is the QB, or the WR?
I guess we’ll find out next year if DJM, Kmet, & Mooney are balling out & Claypool is stinking up the joint.
I suspect we know what Claypool is.
 
At first I was upset about this trade. I was thinking Dj Moore was finally going to get a decent qb. I figured car would trade up for stroud or young. But after careful consideration I firmly believe they gave that boatload up to acquire the qb with highest upside. Richardson… fortunately for Dj Moore his floor (in correlation with wr PPG) is way that of fields(only my opinion). Now, here I sit… happy as a Dj Moore owner and fan that he has fields thrown him the ball.
I also believe Dj will give fields higher floor and cieling rushing and passing.

This was a GREAT trade for chicago.
 
Kmet had 69 targets not catches, I'm going the other way on Kmet, I think he's gonna be spending more time blocking. I also think the 7 TDs were pretty fluky. Maybe 40-400-3.
Oh - oops. lol

I did not see the 7 TDs as flukey at all. He’s their best RZ target still.
Maybe some fluke there when you consider he had zero the year before. Kind of like the Miles Sanders of TEs. TDs are always going to be situational to some degree.
 
Kmet had 69 targets not catches, I'm going the other way on Kmet, I think he's gonna be spending more time blocking. I also think the 7 TDs were pretty fluky. Maybe 40-400-3.
Oh - oops. lol

I did not see the 7 TDs as flukey at all. He’s their best RZ target still.
Maybe some fluke there when you consider he had zero the year before. Kind of like the Miles Sanders of TEs. TDs are always going to be situational to some degree.
I thought the zero was more flukey than the 7

They also barely threw to him until his 2 TD week. They all of a sudden he was a weapon.
 
Kmet had 69 targets not catches, I'm going the other way on Kmet, I think he's gonna be spending more time blocking. I also think the 7 TDs were pretty fluky. Maybe 40-400-3.
Oh - oops. lol

I did not see the 7 TDs as flukey at all. He’s their best RZ target still.
Maybe some fluke there when you consider he had zero the year before. Kind of like the Miles Sanders of TEs. TDs are always going to be situational to some degree.
I thought the zero was more flukey than the 7

They also barely threw to him until his 2 TD week. They all of a sudden he was a weapon.
Some of that "all of a sudden, he was a weapon" was because the guys around him were dropping like flies. Herbert and Mooney went on IR, and Claypool was banged up, and had trouble picking up the offense. Even Fields got banged up and missed time there. Kmet was certainly a better option than the likes of Dante Pettis or Equanimous St. Brown.

I would agree 0 TDs is more fluky than 7 (any starting TE having 0 in 17 games is fluky), but I think its very likely he splits the difference, with a lot more talent around him. I think its very easy to see him being 4th in the pecking order, and I wouldn't assume he's the preferred redzone option either.
 
Kmet had 69 targets not catches, I'm going the other way on Kmet, I think he's gonna be spending more time blocking. I also think the 7 TDs were pretty fluky. Maybe 40-400-3.
Oh - oops. lol

I did not see the 7 TDs as flukey at all. He’s their best RZ target still.
Maybe some fluke there when you consider he had zero the year before. Kind of like the Miles Sanders of TEs. TDs are always going to be situational to some degree.
I thought the zero was more flukey than the 7

They also barely threw to him until his 2 TD week. They all of a sudden he was a weapon.
Some of that "all of a sudden, he was a weapon" was because the guys around him were dropping like flies. Herbert and Mooney went on IR, and Claypool was banged up, and had trouble picking up the offense. Even Fields got banged up and missed time there. Kmet was certainly a better option than the likes of Dante Pettis or Equanimous St. Brown.

I would agree 0 TDs is more fluky than 7 (any starting TE having 0 in 17 games is fluky), but I think its very likely he splits the difference, with a lot more talent around him. I think its very easy to see him being 4th in the pecking order, and I wouldn't assume he's the preferred redzone option either.
IIRC he had his 5 TDs in 3 game streak before Mooney got hurt. I have them both in one league, along with Fields, so I had to watch more 2022 Bears than any human should have to reasonably absorb. 😬

It just seemed like the Bears remembered that he’s a good receiver. From there out he was a solid option for them.

Until I see differently, I’m going to believe he and Fields have chemistry - fields consistently looks for Kmet in the red zone, and I’m not sure why that would change unless the OC just wants to use him as a blocker. Which seems like an odd choice.
 
I have a ton of DJ Moore. I had quite a bit of Diggs before he was traded. I traded Diggs in all the leagues I had him after he was dealt to Buffalo. Obviously, I massively regretted that. I'm absolutely wary of dumping Moore.

Diggs finished as the WR18 in PPR in 2019, then was the WR3 when he was traded and has been top-7 since then. With Minnesota he finished as high as WR12, in 2018.

Moore finished as the WR10 in 2019, WR25 in 2020, WR16 in '21 and WR23 last year. His pre-trade finishes are absolutely comparable to Diggs's. Josh Allen was viewed as a downgrade for Diggs.

Moore already has a top-10 finish, when Kyle Allen started 12 games that season. I think a Diggs-like ascent is within his range of outcomes.
 
I have a ton of DJ Moore. I had quite a bit of Diggs before he was traded. I traded Diggs in all the leagues I had him after he was dealt to Buffalo. Obviously, I massively regretted that. I'm absolutely wary of dumping Moore.

Diggs finished as the WR18 in PPR in 2019, then was the WR3 when he was traded and has been top-7 since then. With Minnesota he finished as high as WR12, in 2018.

Moore finished as the WR10 in 2019, WR25 in 2020, WR16 in '21 and WR23 last year. His pre-trade finishes are absolutely comparable to Diggs's. Josh Allen was viewed as a downgrade for Diggs.

Moore already has a top-10 finish, when Kyle Allen started 12 games that season. I think a Diggs-like ascent is within his range of outcomes.
While a Diggs-like ascent isn't entirely out of the question, its not that similar of a path. Moore has been an unquestioned #1 in Carolina for years. Diggs had a 1A/1B thing going with Adam Thielen.
 
Kmet had 69 targets not catches, I'm going the other way on Kmet, I think he's gonna be spending more time blocking. I also think the 7 TDs were pretty fluky. Maybe 40-400-3.
Oh - oops. lol

I did not see the 7 TDs as flukey at all. He’s their best RZ target still.
Maybe some fluke there when you consider he had zero the year before. Kind of like the Miles Sanders of TEs. TDs are always going to be situational to some degree.
I thought the zero was more flukey than the 7

They also barely threw to him until his 2 TD week. They all of a sudden he was a weapon.
Some of that "all of a sudden, he was a weapon" was because the guys around him were dropping like flies. Herbert and Mooney went on IR, and Claypool was banged up, and had trouble picking up the offense. Even Fields got banged up and missed time there. Kmet was certainly a better option than the likes of Dante Pettis or Equanimous St. Brown.

I would agree 0 TDs is more fluky than 7 (any starting TE having 0 in 17 games is fluky), but I think its very likely he splits the difference, with a lot more talent around him. I think its very easy to see him being 4th in the pecking order, and I wouldn't assume he's the preferred redzone option either.
IIRC he had his 5 TDs in 3 game streak before Mooney got hurt. I have them both in one league, along with Fields, so I had to watch more 2022 Bears than any human should have to reasonably absorb. 😬

It just seemed like the Bears remembered that he’s a good receiver. From there out he was a solid option for them.

Until I see differently, I’m going to believe he and Fields have chemistry - fields consistently looks for Kmet in the red zone, and I’m not sure why that would change unless the OC just wants to use him as a blocker. Which seems like an odd choice.
You are right about the TDs, but I was talking more about pecking order. Kmet had 2 games with more than 4 targets when Mooney went down, he only had 1 game with under 4 the rest of the season. Kmet had 69 targets last year, and 32 of them came in the 6 games Mooney was injured.
 
You are right about the TDs, but I was talking more about pecking order. Kmet had 2 games with more than 4 targets when Mooney went down, he only had 1 game with under 4 the rest of the season. Kmet had 69 targets last year, and 32 of them came in the 6 games Mooney was injured.
Be that as it may, why get away from something that works? They know he’s a weapon now. Why stop using him as such?

Also, IIRC Kmet was blocking more due to deficiencies / injuries to the OL. Early on they had shackles on Fields.

When the shackles came off in wee 7 (8?), they were getting Kmet more involved as well.

IMO If they shore up the OL, it frees up Kmet to be a bigger part of the receiving game. And with a better offense, it stands to reason that there might be more offensive plays called, = more targets for everyone.

I’m still optimistic about Kmet. I know how they used him early - but those first 6 games the Bears offense was crap. No way to sugar coat it. They changed philosophy, let Fields run & got their talented TE more involved.

I see no reason to put that genie back in the bottle.
 
2 games with over 200 passing yards last year for the Bears. We’re discussing a very small pie here and I don’t see that changing much. I see Fields like Lamar, in that they take so much passing out of the offence with their running that the passing upside is capped.
Maybe Moore salvages some value as a target hog, like Andrews for the Ravens, but giving Moore Andrews’s numbers puts him at what? A low end WR2, high end WR3?
 
2 games with over 200 passing yards last year for the Bears. We’re discussing a very small pie here and I don’t see that changing much. I see Fields like Lamar, in that they take so much passing out of the offence with their running that the passing upside is capped.
Maybe Moore salvages some value as a target hog, like Andrews for the Ravens, but giving Moore Andrews’s numbers puts him at what? A low end WR2, high end WR3

So basically the same as Moore has been? Andrews 2021, he had a higher ppg than DJ Moore has ever had.
 
Sorry if this was mentioned but I just found out that DJ Moore has more career receiving yards then the All-time leading Bears receiver. That's really crazy considering how long the Bears have been around.
 
NFC OTAs takeaways: Key Fantasy Football nuggets for redraft and Dynasty on D.J. Moore, Marquise Brown, more

Excerpt:

Justin Fields and new receiver D.J. Moore got the chance to finally work together in practice, and Fields was impressed with what Moore can do.

"Strength, speed, body control, great hands," Fields said of Moore in The Athletic. "I think he knows how to use his body to get open. I think that's a big part for receivers. He knows how to tip a route, so he's rarely ever going to be running a hundred percent on all the routes. He has that second gear to go get the ball. I think that's what makes him a great receiver, just his understanding of the coverages, seeing the defense well."

Moore should be considered a low-end No. 2 receiver now that he's in Chicago, and the earliest he should be selected is Round 4 in the majority of leagues. While I like the pairing with Fields, I still want to be a little conservative with Moore in this offense. He has top-20 upside for sure, but I don't want to reach for Moore on Draft Day.
 
I think many are overly down on DJ Moore based on his situation, and perhaps not leaving room for the potential that Fields may improve as a passer and that the offense may not be quite as run heavy as last year. Could be a nice value pick IMO.
 
Moore has always been criminally undervalued because of Carolina. He is an elite talent.

problem for me is he went to probably the only worse passing team in the league.

Most of us who owned AJB and Tyreek last year were pretty down on their new homes. I do not expect Fields to be Hurts, and thinking that is likely biased, but I will reserve judgment on DJ Moore this year.
Do you think his targets will increase, decrease or stay the same? My biggest questions tied to his 2023 production are: do his targets increase and does his catchable/quality target rate improve?
 
Always believed in his talent he just has never had a QB.

you think he has one now?
Yea absolutely. Fields lack of passing numbers have been due to a weak supporting cast, and poor usage of his skill set. I think the supporting cast has got an upgrade with DJ Moore, and I actually think Foreman is an upgrade over Montgomery as well. When he took off last year you could tell the Bears started to loosen up the playcalling, and let him be himself. Getting DJ Moore as a weapon is a legitimate #1 WR which he has not had. He also is more comfortable in the offensive scheme this year, and is not having to learn a whole new offense this offseason which is huge for a young athletic QB so he is not overthinking too much.

I think Fields will look similar to Jalen Hurts in year 2 when we are all said and done. All reports in camp are that Fields looks to Moore early and often, and Fields has a pretty good deep ball as well. I think DJ Moore could break 100 receptions, and finally break the wall of 1200 yards with 6-8 TDs. The biggest reason that I like him is that his value is great. I do auction drafts only, and getting a guy with that potential in the $15-20 range is great

2023 FanNation Projection:
Justin Fields

317 completions in 488 passes, 64.9% accuracy
3,471 yards, 7.1 yards per attempt, 26 TDs, 13 INTs,
93.4 passer rating; 135 rushes
907 yards rushing, 6.9 yards per rush, 8 TDs.
 
Last edited:
I think Fields will look similar to Jalen Hurts in year 2 when we are all said and done. All reports in camp are that Fields looks to Moore early and often, and Fields has a pretty good deep ball as well. I think DJ Moore could break 100 receptions, and finally break the wall of 1200 yards with 6-8 TDs. The biggest reason that I like him is that his value is great. I do auction drafts only, and getting a guy with that potential in the $15-20 range is great
Fields does seem to be on that Allen/Hurts trajectory. I've had Moore since since I drafted him as a rookie in a salary cap/auction league and have his RFA rights this season since his league rookie contract just expired. I would love to be able to re-sign him for about 15% - 20% of our cap.
 
Moore's ADP and ranking seem about right to me.

I like him more than McLaurin, Ridley, Hopkins and Allen who are all going before him per FantasyPros ADp

I like him less than Williams and Jeudy who are going after him.


The only real question to me is will he get the target volume in this weird Bears offense?
 
The talent is there. Fields is likely the most talented QB he's ever played with. My initial thought is Chicago isn't going to throw it enough. But teams tend to throw more as they get better pass catchers. I Dont think he's going to see 150-160 targets.

His efficiency should be a lot better. He caught 53% of his targets. If you take out last season's debacle-he's at closer to 72% on his career. He'll command a high enough target share to have 80+ catches.
 
Courtney Cronin @CourtneyRCronin
DJ Moore is a believer in building chemistry w/ his QBs. He detailed how it's never too early to get there with Justin Fields (we saw quite a bit of it build in the spring) beginning tomorrow and then continuing on throughout camp.

Moore: "It’s never overrated to have chemistry

"with somebody. Me and Justin, we’ve got chemistry on and off the field, so that’s a plus. Same with me and P.J. It’s always a plus. It’s more than just football at the end of the day when you meet somebody. So forever going to be friends with Justin outside of here."
 
NFL Notifications @NFLNotify
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝘆𝗽𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹.#Bears Star QB Justin Fields has been shredding the Bears defense in camp. “I don’t remember the last time our offense beat our defense this decisively in camp.” “There’s a deep ball connection between Justin Fields and DJ Moore that’s been tough to stop. 𝗪𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗲-𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝗽𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗵.”
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top