Alex P Keaton
Footballguy
He's actually 29I don't know that Jennings isn't a long term answer at wideout. What is long term anymore? 3 years? He's only 30.
He's actually 29I don't know that Jennings isn't a long term answer at wideout. What is long term anymore? 3 years? He's only 30.
True...I think most are just saying 30 because he will be come September I believe.He's actually 29I don't know that Jennings isn't a long term answer at wideout. What is long term anymore? 3 years? He's only 30.
I view him as 30 but find it funny that it's considered old. I look at what Reggie Wayne has done in the 5 years since turning 30 and think if Jennings comes even close to that he's very, very valuable. The floor on him is a few 70/1000/7 type seasons (low WR2 numbers).True...I think most are just saying 30 because he will be come September I believe.He's actually 29I don't know that Jennings isn't a long term answer at wideout. What is long term anymore? 3 years? He's only 30.
Yup. Jennings is a superb technician, he has never been a pure burner. Steve Smith is much more of a pure speed guy, though also is a pretty darn good route runner. He turns 34 in 2 months, and he's done just fine since turning 30, despite playing either with brutal QBs or on a run-first offense.Wayne is another great compare. And if people are panicked about age, Andre Johnson turns 32 this summer.I view him as 30 but find it funny that it's considered old. I look at what Reggie Wayne has done in the 5 years since turning 30 and think if Jennings comes even close to that he's very, very valuable. The floor on him is a few 70/1000/7 type seasons (low WR2 numbers).True...I think most are just saying 30 because he will be come September I believe.He's actually 29I don't know that Jennings isn't a long term answer at wideout. What is long term anymore? 3 years? He's only 30.
Jennings is a "bridge." A potential 1,000+ yard "bridge," but a bridge nonetheless. The Vikings didn't have "Jordy Nelson" or "Randall Cobb" waiting in the wings (still not sold on Jones long-term). They think they've got something decent in JWright, and they'll be looking to draft at LEAST the next "Jennings" on Day 1 or 2 in April. But you don't waste ADP in his prime rolling with a hold-out/malcontent (Harvin), Simpson, and Jenkins at the WR position. Jennings will be night-and-day better with/for the team related to the intangibles that he brings off the field. And if he can teach JWright and their 1-2 WRs they draft in the top couple rounds even a few more things about what it takes to go from great in college to great in the pros, we've got a winner.Then the big problem is (and will continue to be) whether Ponder is a QB who can get it done and get those guys the ball. If Ponder was a legit threat to consistently hit our wideouts deep down the field? ADP might rush for 2,500 yards! Basically, put ADP on the Packers. Aaron Rodgers at QB, with Nelson/Cobb/Jones and Finley to keep defenses honest. Pick your poison. Shut down ADP, Rodgers and those WRs/TEs will SHRED you! Shut down the passing game? ADP will bend you over for 200 yards and two TDs. Either way, unless you can put up 30+ points, you lose. The Vikings are a "Rodgers" away from potentially going DEEP into January for the next several seasons. The Packers are an "ADP" away from needing to add a wing on to Lambeau to house all the new hardware they'd have on display. Ponder isn't 10% the QB that Aaron Rodgers is! But if he can at least grow/develop into 50-60% of Rodgers' game, the Vikings will be on to something. But better figure out if he can do it quick...as ADP's window is now.I don't know that Jennings isn't a long term answer at wideout. What is long term anymore? 3 years? He's only 30.
Greg Jennings made a bold decision when he signed with the Minnesota Vikings. He took the most money offered (five years, $47.5 million, $18 million guaranteed), but he said the Vikings made him feel wanted.
The Vikings, however, did not offer the most talented offense. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's Bob McGinn reported the Packers proposed a deal that averaged $8 million per year. McGinn added the New England Patriots were willing to put up $6 million per year.
So Jennings bypassed the opportunity to team up with two different quarterbacks who have regular season and Super Bowl MVP awards (Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady) for the unspectacular Christian Ponder - and possibly Matt Cassel.
This isn't knocking the decision. NFL players have precious few opportunities to reach free agency in a league without fully-guaranteed contracts. Football is a violent game, and careers can end at any moment. Jennings saw this up close with safety Nick Collins. This is the last major deal that Jennings, 29, will get. I'm all for players maximizing what they can earn on the open market. Players have to do what's best for their families - and that includes factors beyond the football field.
The contrast in quarterbacks, however, is an interesting note.
There's definitely some risk but I put the downside at Wayne's 2011 (75/960/4, WR25) with Painter/Orlovsky.'jvdesigns2002 said:This is just my personal take--and I'm actually a Greg Jennings fan. I think the only way I would draft Greg Jennings this upcoming season is if I could get him as a very high upside wr3. It's not a knock on Jennings talent--but I don't trust Ponder at all. Ponder had a running back that had one of the best seasons in the history of the NFL--and still couldn't put up consistent numbers. With that kind of threat in the backfield--and the way that defenses game planned against AP--it was shocking to me that Ponder couldn't dink and dunk his way to at least halfway decent and consistent numbers. In my opinion, Percy Harvins athleticism actually inflated some of Ponders numbers. Harvin could make a 10-20 yard reception into a 40-70 yard gain. I'm not sure if Jennings is capable of the same type of thing. I see that a lot of people are comparing Jennings to Wayne--and I don't think that's a bad comparison in regards to those guys--but with wr's--you have to compare the qb's too. Ponder is not in the same neighborhood as Luck when it comes to talent. I could compare Larry Fitzgerald to other elite WR's because his talent and athleticism are comparable--but the fact that he has a horrid qb throwing him the ball vastly diminishes his upside and value.
You might have a point there--but there are some differences in my opinion. As bad as Ponder is--AP is soo good that I don't expect the vikes to get too far behind in games to where a guy like Jennings could be the beneficiary of garbage time "fluff" yards. Not only that, there is no doubt that the vikes will be a run heavy team--which means clock management comes into play--if they have longer possessions--the odds of them so far behind in games to where they need to abandon the run game is reduced. If I remember right-I don't believe the colts had much of a run attack in 2011-- and I imagine that they were probably behind in a lot of games with Painter/orlovsky under center--which means there was a heavy passing attack--and probably a healthy amount of prevent defense. If you really have faith in Jennings--on a good day an argument might be made for him being a mid level wr2--but I personally think the risk outweighs the reward there. Keep in mind--another factor to consider is his potential for touchdowns. Ap will be the clear first choice when it comes to getting the ball in the red zone for the vikes. Aside from him--Kyle rudolph did a lot of his damage catching touchdowns last year and is a big red zone target for ponder to throw to. You mix in the fact that he's on a run heavy offense, with a below average qb, and is at best the third option for td's on his team--I just think there are lots of factors that could limit his fantasy success. I could very well be wrong on this--but I personally plan on keeping these things in mind when my fantasy drafts get close.There's definitely some risk but I put the downside at Wayne's 2011 (75/960/4, WR25) with Painter/Orlovsky.'jvdesigns2002 said:This is just my personal take--and I'm actually a Greg Jennings fan. I think the only way I would draft Greg Jennings this upcoming season is if I could get him as a very high upside wr3. It's not a knock on Jennings talent--but I don't trust Ponder at all. Ponder had a running back that had one of the best seasons in the history of the NFL--and still couldn't put up consistent numbers. With that kind of threat in the backfield--and the way that defenses game planned against AP--it was shocking to me that Ponder couldn't dink and dunk his way to at least halfway decent and consistent numbers. In my opinion, Percy Harvins athleticism actually inflated some of Ponders numbers. Harvin could make a 10-20 yard reception into a 40-70 yard gain. I'm not sure if Jennings is capable of the same type of thing. I see that a lot of people are comparing Jennings to Wayne--and I don't think that's a bad comparison in regards to those guys--but with wr's--you have to compare the qb's too. Ponder is not in the same neighborhood as Luck when it comes to talent. I could compare Larry Fitzgerald to other elite WR's because his talent and athleticism are comparable--but the fact that he has a horrid qb throwing him the ball vastly diminishes his upside and value.
They really think they are the ####. Jennings isn't dumb. The guy probably just laughed at that offer knowing that they would release him the minute the base salary started to increase. NE was probably a 1 year, let's #### this guy over, deal, then he will be 31 and really work cheap, look at us go. We are NE and we are the ####.'Kenny Powers said:at NE thinking he would go there for $6M. They really are full of themselves.
That is exactly the question. Jennings is a great route runner - he will be where he is supposed to be. Can Ponder deliver on time and on location? If yes, expect great things. If not, then just good things. Worst case Jennings will deliver 6td and 1000 yards receiving. Best case? 10+td'datonn said:Then the big problem is (and will continue to be) whether Ponder is a QB who can get it done and get those guys the ball.
That is a very good point. However, keep in mind VJAX from last year. Very similar in general terms: Great 29 year old receiver going from a playoff team to a lesser team and from a better to poorer QB.It's also important to remember that the bust rate for free agent WRs is significant, especially the ones who went to a lesser team with a lesser QB. Now, Jennings is no Javon Walker/Andre Rison/Jerry Porter/Alvin Harper/David Boston... etc. He is too talented to be a complete washout, but anyone who isn't at least a little bit concerned about going from Aaron Rodgers to Christian Ponder isn't being realistic.
There are ertain players in the NFL who just have the combination of factors that allow them to endure. When you look at guys like AJ, Wayne, Hines Ward, Derrick Mason and all those types, they were all guys who run good routes, never predicated the bulk of their game on speed, had really good hands, and by and large were just good workers, willing to go to work and not be prima donnas. Steve smith kinda breaks the mold for these guys because he does it despite having speed be a big factor of his game. AJ kind of breaks this mold because he has that Tony gonzalez body that will help him be productive in the next few years.Jennings, to me, is very much like these guys. I think he can linger and be efficient AND be a good veteran presence in the locker room and have a really good end of career run over the next 3-4 years. If you put him on your team wanting him to be what you anticipate Harvin to be in the next few years then, yeah, you are probably going to be disappointed. But if you put him on your team wanting hime to be what Wayne, Ward, and those guys were as they wound their careers down, then you're going to be steady.Yup. Jennings is a superb technician, he has never been a pure burner. Steve Smith is much more of a pure speed guy, though also is a pretty darn good route runner. He turns 34 in 2 months, and he's done just fine since turning 30, despite playing either with brutal QBs or on a run-first offense.Wayne is another great compare. And if people are panicked about age, Andre Johnson turns 32 this summer.I view him as 30 but find it funny that it's considered old. I look at what Reggie Wayne has done in the 5 years since turning 30 and think if Jennings comes even close to that he's very, very valuable. The floor on him is a few 70/1000/7 type seasons (low WR2 numbers).True...I think most are just saying 30 because he will be come September I believe.He's actually 29I don't know that Jennings isn't a long term answer at wideout. What is long term anymore? 3 years? He's only 30.
Tristan H. Cockcroft offers sound analysis on Greg Jennings' arrival in Minnesota, both from a fantasy and conventional standpoint. In short: Jennings will do more for quarterback Christian Ponder than Ponder will do for Jennings.
Here is how Cockcroft put it: "Jennings gives the Vikings a much-needed outside receiver, but his fantasy upside is worse in Minnesota than Green Bay, despite the lack of competition for targets. And let's not overlook this fact, lest we dive into overdrafting him: Jennings has appeared in just 21 of 32 scheduled games the past two seasons combined. He's actually more likely to give Ponder a fighting chance of keeping his job than Ponder is to feed Jennings the ball often enough to be a top-shelf fantasy option."
There are plenty of ways to be of fantasy value, but for a receiver, the easiest might be to have a quarterback who excels at throwing the deep ball. Last season, according to ESPN Stats & Information, Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers completed nearly four times as many passes of more than 20 yards than Ponder. Also, Ponder joined Arizona Cardinals quarterback John Skelton as the only qualified quarterbacks not to throw a single touchdown on such throws.
Wide receiver Percy Harvin was the Vikings' leading pass-catcher before his season-ending ankle injury in 2012, but from a fantasy perspective, it's worth noting that he had only three receiving touchdowns among 82 targets. After his injury, as the chart shows, Ponder's top target was tight end Kyle Rudolph. Ponder threw only three touchdowns to wide receivers over that span.
So even if Jennings supplants Jarius Wright as the Vikings' most-targeted post-Harvin wide receiver, it's difficult to make much of a fantasy projection for him. Jennings can give the Vikings everything they want and still be a fantasy afterthought in Minnesota.
If I were a journalist I might consider a pseudonym. I never knew croft was a word before.Thank you Tristian H. Cockcroft for dropping the knowledge.
1. A small enclosed field or pasture near a house.
2. A small farm, especially a tenant farm.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/croft
Because it has never ever happened before where players out performed their draft spot.Thank you Tristian H. Cockcroft for dropping the knowledge. Who knew that Jennings fantasy would be less valuable in Minnesota than in Green Bay?
BTW: He is now being taken as the 29th wide receiver in mock drafts. He was getting drafted as a top 7 wide receiver last year.
I am not sure what you are talking about? This is the silly season when there absolutely no football being played or even practiced. You have writers who must be getting paid by the word because they are stating the obvious and pretending like it is good advice.Because it has never ever happened before where players out performed their draft spot.Thank you Tristian H. Cockcroft for dropping the knowledge. Who knew that Jennings fantasy would be less valuable in Minnesota than in Green Bay?
BTW: He is now being taken as the 29th wide receiver in mock drafts. He was getting drafted as a top 7 wide receiver last year.
I might be off but it sounds like you guys are on the same sideI am not sure what you are talking about? This is the silly season when there absolutely no football being played or even practiced. You have writers who must be getting paid by the word because they are stating the obvious and pretending like it is good advice.Because it has never ever happened before where players out performed their draft spot.Thank you Tristian H. Cockcroft for dropping the knowledge. Who knew that Jennings fantasy would be less valuable in Minnesota than in Green Bay?
BTW: He is now being taken as the 29th wide receiver in mock drafts. He was getting drafted as a top 7 wide receiver last year.
Not with ponder as qbBecause it has never ever happened before where players out performed their draft spot.Thank you Tristian H. Cockcroft for dropping the knowledge. Who knew that Jennings fantasy would be less valuable in Minnesota than in Green Bay?
BTW: He is now being taken as the 29th wide receiver in mock drafts. He was getting drafted as a top 7 wide receiver last year.
I thought with the acronym THC that it was a pseudonym.If I were a journalist I might consider a pseudonym. I never knew croft was a word before.Thank you Tristian H. Cockcroft for dropping the knowledge.
1. A small enclosed field or pasture near a house.
2. A small farm, especially a tenant farm.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/croft
Wide receiver Greg Jennings had a three-year stretch with the Packers where he played in all 48 games, had 224 receptions for 3,670 yards (16.4 YPC) and scored 25 touchdowns. Those three seasons coincided with Aaron Rodgers' rise to the starting gig, which began in 2008.
By 2011, Jennings' numbers were still impressive -- 64 catches, 949 yards, 9 TDs -- but Jordy Nelson emerged as Rodgers' favorite target. And last season, injuries limited Jennings to just eight games. Meanwhile, James Jones and Randall Cobb combined for 1,738 yards and 22 touchdowns. So it was hardly surprising when the Packers decided to let Jenning walk. He eventually signed a five-year, $47.5 million deal to join the Vikings.
And now he'll continue his NFL journey without one of the league's best quarterbacks. Instead, Jennings will have Christian Ponder throwing him the ball. But the veteran wide receiver says a team is more than its quarterback, a sentiment, frankly, that goes against everything the NFL has become. The last 10 Super Bowl winners have had franchise quarterbacks under center. There's a good chance that if Ponder struggles, he could be benched for offseason acquisition Matt Cassel.
Still, Jennings thinks winning is a collective effort, not a dynamic where it becomes The Star Quarterback … and everybody else.
“A lot of times when you have a guy who creates that spotlight for himself and establishes that and takes a lot of that, it becomes so-and-so and the team,” Jennings told the StarTribune.com's Dan Wiederer. “It should always be the team. …
“For me, I'm such a team person, I'm going to defer to my teammates,” Jennings said. “I'm going to defer to the team, to the team, to the team. And I think when you reach a point where you're not deferring any longer, it's no longer really about the team.”
So what does this have to do with Rodgers?
“Don't get me wrong, ‘12' is a great person," Jennings continued. "But when you hear all positives, all positives, all positives all the time, it's hard for you to sit down when one of your teammates says ‘Man, come on, you've got to hold yourself accountable for this.' It's hard for someone to see that now because all they've heard is I'm doing it the right way, I'm perfect. In actuality, we all have flaws.”
This is where we point out that Jennings will have Ponder -- or Cassel! -- throwing him passes this season. Dealing with Rodgers' ego (perceived or otherwise) seems like a small price to pay to win.
But Jennings reiterates that winning is bigger than one person, even if that one person -- the quarterback -- plays the most important position on the field.
“I'm not saying that if I had wrote a script, this would hands down be the ideal position for me to be in,” Jennings said. “I don't know. Only God knows that. But for me, it's a challenge. It's a change of gear to where now I don't have that [established] quarterback. That's what everybody is saying. But in my mind, I don't need that quarterback for us to be successful.
“It's not about me. It's not about just Christian. It's about us.”
We'll find out soon enough.
Vincent Jackson did the same thing when he came to the Bucs. Hell he is still doing it. Worked out pretty well for them.As a Vikings fan, Jennings seems like he doth protest too much. He can just keep his mouth shut and play, and see how Ponder is. Instead he seems to almost be trying to convince himself about Ponder via the media. That makes me nervous. Almost like the dreaded vote of confidence.
Sounds to me like Jennings thinks Rodgers is a bit arrogant. Not a real shock.mr roboto said:As a Vikings fan, Jennings seems like he doth protest too much. He can just keep his mouth shut and play, and see how Ponder is. Instead he seems to almost be trying to convince himself about Ponder via the media. That makes me nervous. Almost like the dreaded vote of confidence.
That part is not the shock...that he continues on with it as if Rodgers does not talk about the team and his guys seems quite misguided. Considering nearly every Rodgers press conference he praises his guys when the team wins and so on...and usually takes more of it on himself when they lose.Sounds to me like Jennings thinks Rodgers is a bit arrogant. Not a real shock.mr roboto said:As a Vikings fan, Jennings seems like he doth protest too much. He can just keep his mouth shut and play, and see how Ponder is. Instead he seems to almost be trying to convince himself about Ponder via the media. That makes me nervous. Almost like the dreaded vote of confidence.
Wasn't it Jennings' sister who was tweeting last year that Rodgers didn't throw the ball enough to him? Yeah, Jennings is such a team player and unselfish.Sounds to me like Jennings thinks Rodgers is a bit arrogant. Not a real shock.mr roboto said:As a Vikings fan, Jennings seems like he doth protest too much. He can just keep his mouth shut and play, and see how Ponder is. Instead he seems to almost be trying to convince himself about Ponder via the media. That makes me nervous. Almost like the dreaded vote of confidence.
There has been meaningful noise about whether or not Rodgers is a "leader" over the past couple seasons. This isn't new.That part is not the shock...that he continues on with it as if Rodgers does not talk about the team and his guys seems quite misguided. Considering nearly every Rodgers press conference he praises his guys when the team wins and so on...and usually takes more of it on himself when they lose.Sounds to me like Jennings thinks Rodgers is a bit arrogant. Not a real shock.mr roboto said:As a Vikings fan, Jennings seems like he doth protest too much. He can just keep his mouth shut and play, and see how Ponder is. Instead he seems to almost be trying to convince himself about Ponder via the media. That makes me nervous. Almost like the dreaded vote of confidence.
Have never heard another player claim Rodgers is a "me" kind of player. So, pretty interesting to hear Jennings question his leadership.
Not sure how meaningful...it has typically come from someone mad they are not getting the ball enough (Finley and now Jennings)There has been meaningful noise about whether or not Rodgers is a "leader" over the past couple seasons. This isn't new.That part is not the shock...that he continues on with it as if Rodgers does not talk about the team and his guys seems quite misguided. Considering nearly every Rodgers press conference he praises his guys when the team wins and so on...and usually takes more of it on himself when they lose.Sounds to me like Jennings thinks Rodgers is a bit arrogant. Not a real shock.mr roboto said:As a Vikings fan, Jennings seems like he doth protest too much. He can just keep his mouth shut and play, and see how Ponder is. Instead he seems to almost be trying to convince himself about Ponder via the media. That makes me nervous. Almost like the dreaded vote of confidence.
Have never heard another player claim Rodgers is a "me" kind of player. So, pretty interesting to hear Jennings question his leadership.
I think you guys are reading a little too much into his comments. Rodgers is a superstar QB so it does become all about him most of the time. That's the nature of the beast.That part is not the shock...that he continues on with it as if Rodgers does not talk about the team and his guys seems quite misguided. Considering nearly every Rodgers press conference he praises his guys when the team wins and so on...and usually takes more of it on himself when they lose.Sounds to me like Jennings thinks Rodgers is a bit arrogant. Not a real shock.mr roboto said:As a Vikings fan, Jennings seems like he doth protest too much. He can just keep his mouth shut and play, and see how Ponder is. Instead he seems to almost be trying to convince himself about Ponder via the media. That makes me nervous. Almost like the dreaded vote of confidence.
Have never heard another player claim Rodgers is a "me" kind of player. So, pretty interesting to hear Jennings question his leadership.
“Don't get me wrong, ‘12' is a great person," Jennings continued. "But when you hear all positives, all positives, all positives all the time, it's hard for you to sit down when one of your teammates says ‘Man, come on, you've got to hold yourself accountable for this.' It's hard for someone to see that now because all they've heard is I'm doing it the right way, I'm perfect. In actuality, we all have flaws.”I think you guys are reading a little too much into his comments. Rodgers is a superstar QB so it does become all about him most of the time. That's the nature of the beast.That part is not the shock...that he continues on with it as if Rodgers does not talk about the team and his guys seems quite misguided. Considering nearly every Rodgers press conference he praises his guys when the team wins and so on...and usually takes more of it on himself when they lose.Sounds to me like Jennings thinks Rodgers is a bit arrogant. Not a real shock.mr roboto said:As a Vikings fan, Jennings seems like he doth protest too much. He can just keep his mouth shut and play, and see how Ponder is. Instead he seems to almost be trying to convince himself about Ponder via the media. That makes me nervous. Almost like the dreaded vote of confidence.
Have never heard another player claim Rodgers is a "me" kind of player. So, pretty interesting to hear Jennings question his leadership.
Press conferences are not the only place where Rodgers speaks. I'm pretty sure that Jennings has heard Rodgers speak a minimum of 100X more than you have.“Don't get me wrong, ‘12' is a great person," Jennings continued. "But when you hear all positives, all positives, all positives all the time, it's hard for you to sit down when one of your teammates says ‘Man, come on, you've got to hold yourself accountable for this.' It's hard for someone to see that now because all they've heard is I'm doing it the right way, I'm perfect. In actuality, we all have flaws.”I think you guys are reading a little too much into his comments. Rodgers is a superstar QB so it does become all about him most of the time. That's the nature of the beast.That part is not the shock...that he continues on with it as if Rodgers does not talk about the team and his guys seems quite misguided. Considering nearly every Rodgers press conference he praises his guys when the team wins and so on...and usually takes more of it on himself when they lose.Sounds to me like Jennings thinks Rodgers is a bit arrogant. Not a real shock.mr roboto said:As a Vikings fan, Jennings seems like he doth protest too much. He can just keep his mouth shut and play, and see how Ponder is. Instead he seems to almost be trying to convince himself about Ponder via the media. That makes me nervous. Almost like the dreaded vote of confidence.
Have never heard another player claim Rodgers is a "me" kind of player. So, pretty interesting to hear Jennings question his leadership.
Now, part of this is odd since he now refers to Rodgers as "12" or "that guy they have now". But those are his quotes.
But not sure I have seen any post game pressers where Rodgers does not hold himself accountable for mistakes.
No doubt...but if in public he is taking it on himself...it sort of makes Jennings' words look hollow to people who have heard Rodgers talk like that.Press conferences are not the only place where Rodgers speaks. I'm pretty sure that Jennings has heard Rodgers speak a minimum of 100X more than you have.
“Don't get me wrong, ‘12' is a great person," Jennings continued. "But when you hear all positives, all positives, all positives all the time, it's hard for you to sit down when one of your teammates says ‘Man, come on, you've got to hold yourself accountable for this.' It's hard for someone to see that now because all they've heard is I'm doing it the right way, I'm perfect. In actuality, we all have flaws.”I think you guys are reading a little too much into his comments. Rodgers is a superstar QB so it does become all about him most of the time. That's the nature of the beast.That part is not the shock...that he continues on with it as if Rodgers does not talk about the team and his guys seems quite misguided. Considering nearly every Rodgers press conference he praises his guys when the team wins and so on...and usually takes more of it on himself when they lose.Sounds to me like Jennings thinks Rodgers is a bit arrogant. Not a real shock.mr roboto said:As a Vikings fan, Jennings seems like he doth protest too much. He can just keep his mouth shut and play, and see how Ponder is. Instead he seems to almost be trying to convince himself about Ponder via the media. That makes me nervous. Almost like the dreaded vote of confidence.
Have never heard another player claim Rodgers is a "me" kind of player. So, pretty interesting to hear Jennings question his leadership.
Now, part of this is odd since he now refers to Rodgers as "12" or "that guy they have now". But those are his quotes.
But not sure I have seen any post game pressers where Rodgers does not hold himself accountable for mistakes.
I'm just keeping in mind that, right or wrong, Jennings probably feels like he was run out of GB after putting up great years before and after Rodgers. I think it's best if he stops talking about it from now on.“Don't get me wrong, ‘12' is a great person," Jennings continued. "But when you hear all positives, all positives, all positives all the time, it's hard for you to sit down when one of your teammates says ‘Man, come on, you've got to hold yourself accountable for this.' It's hard for someone to see that now because all they've heard is I'm doing it the right way, I'm perfect. In actuality, we all have flaws.”I think you guys are reading a little too much into his comments. Rodgers is a superstar QB so it does become all about him most of the time. That's the nature of the beast.That part is not the shock...that he continues on with it as if Rodgers does not talk about the team and his guys seems quite misguided. Considering nearly every Rodgers press conference he praises his guys when the team wins and so on...and usually takes more of it on himself when they lose.Sounds to me like Jennings thinks Rodgers is a bit arrogant. Not a real shock.mr roboto said:As a Vikings fan, Jennings seems like he doth protest too much. He can just keep his mouth shut and play, and see how Ponder is. Instead he seems to almost be trying to convince himself about Ponder via the media. That makes me nervous. Almost like the dreaded vote of confidence.
Have never heard another player claim Rodgers is a "me" kind of player. So, pretty interesting to hear Jennings question his leadership.
Now, part of this is odd since he now refers to Rodgers as "12" or "that guy they have now". But those are his quotes.
But not sure I have seen any post game pressers where Rodgers does not hold himself accountable for mistakes.
Hope it's sooner than later. Just picked him up along with Jennings.I think the whole team benefits from Freeman tbh.
I think it is valid. Even planning on starting him this week.So.
Cassel is looking like he will get another start, as discussed in the Ponder thread, and there may be more after that.
Jennings had a very nice line this weekend.
It could be good to remember that Cassel once had a reliable connection with Bowe, and I can even recall waaaayyyy back when when Cassel was actually good enough to win an AFC player of the month award with the Chiefs, not to mention some decent games with the Pats.
A lot has happened since then, his rep is trashed, and well he was terrible most of the time in KC.
And PIT is bad this year etc. etc. but maybe Jennings has a shot to do something now. He could be a buy low, considering if people thing that was a one-off week, or he could even be on waiver wires here or there.
Point is, maybe Jennings has a chance to keep going after the bye if Cassel is in there. Valid?
Fwiw her's another thread on Jennings' comeback chances.
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=687541&hl=Jennings
Please don't do this. I beg you.PPR I put him in over G. Olsen as my what-the-heck-flex. I think we could be surprised how inept Ponder made that passing game. Cassel is no savior, but a bigger upgrade than we are giving him credit for.