Fool-on-Stoopid
Footballguy
owner told Julio the contract update is in the endzone, Julio said he cant find that either"Julio".....is reportedly looking for a "correction or update" to his current deal
owner told Julio the contract update is in the endzone, Julio said he cant find that either"Julio".....is reportedly looking for a "correction or update" to his current deal
Julio Jones informed the Falcons he will not attend mandatory minicamp.
The Falcons previously told reporters they thought Jones would attend, but he was a no-show as players filed in on Monday. "We have been in contact with Julio and his representation," the Falcons said in a statement. "We will not discuss those conversations publicly except to say we feel they have been productive and constructive. We understand the concerns and thoughts from their perspective. Although not ideal, Julio informed us today he would not be attending mini-camp." This officially makes Julio a holdout. Jones is currently the NFL's eighth-highest-paid wide receiver.
Source: atlantafalcons.com
Jun 11 - 5:07 PM
The Athletic's Jeff Schultz reports the Falcons have informed Julio Jones he will not receive a new contract this year.
Jones skipped OTAs and minicamp to show displeasure with his contract, which makes him the league's eighth-highest-paid receiver behind Sammy Watkins, Jarvis Landry, and Davante Adams, among others. The Falcons told Jones they had "not budgeted" for Jones to receive a raise, and are hopeful he will report to training camp on time. Jones would put himself at risk of daily fines by skipping practices. LT Jake Matthews, FS Ricardo Allen, and DT Grady Jarrett are all considered higher-priority extension candidates; Julio is signed through 2020. The Falcons open training camp on July 27.
Source: The Athletic
Jul 18 - 11:01 PM
ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports Julio Jones will not report for training camp.
Jones skipped OTAs and minicamp to show his displeasure with his deal, but the Falcons reportedly informed him he will not get a new contract this year. Tom Pelissero reports Atlanta did promise to look at his contract after the season, but that clearly was not enough to appease the star receiver. Ian Rapoport added Jones "is comfortable sitting out the entire time" if Atlanta does not fix his deal. Even if he ends up skipping all of camp, Jones will still be an elite fantasy option worthy of a first-round pick.
Source: Chris Mortensen on Twitter
Jul 24 - 8:35 AM
He wasn't an elite fantasy option worthy of a first round pick before the holdout.Jones will still be an elite fantasy option worthy of a first-round pick.
Source: Chris Mortensen on Twitter
His average stat-line over the last four seasons:He wasn't an elite fantasy option worthy of a first round pick before the holdout.
He's allergic to the end zone, has been for almost his entire career.His average stat-line over the last four seasons:
102-1,579-5.75
At worst he's an early second round pick - last season's 3 TDs see abnormally low (although he's not a big TD guy generally)
You specifically said before the holdout.He's allergic to the end zone, has been for almost his entire career.
He is constantly battling ankle, foot, shoulder etc. injuries. His offensive coordinator doesn't inspire confidence either. And he's holding out.
He is definitely one of the very few guys who can go off for 250+ yards and three TDs any given week but I prefer to let him be someone else's headache.
That makes him even more valuable in best-ball.If Julio could play to his averages with a smaller week to week deviation it'd be great. But that's not what happens. His weekly totals swing wildly.
Yes I did. Then again he is holding out so it seems relevant to evaluating him, unless we are drafting for last year or course.You specifically said before the holdout.
Why are you concerned about the injuries he's "constantly battling" - once again: His average stat-line over the last four seasons: 102-1,579-5.75. Imagine what he would do if he was healthy!
He does not score as many TDs as the other top WRs but saying he's "allergic to the end zone" is misleading since he's scored at least 8 TDs is 3 out of his 7 seasons and scored 6 in 2 others. Last year looks like the outlier.
Most WRs are "boom/bust" types and studies show that those types are every bit as valuable as "steady eddy" types when it comes to HtH fantasy leagues.
I could see him dropping to round 2 this season but I think it's pretty harsh to say he "wasn't an elite fantasy option worthy of a first round pick before the holdout."
I'm sure you're perfectly fine with NFL teams cutting players with multiple years left on their contracts.Let me get this straight. Was Julio not aware of how many years the contract was for when he signed it??? Oh wait, he wanted security of multiple years but wants it renegotiated when it suits HIM. I hope the dope sits out all year, so stupid.
I'm not. A contract is a contract. Julio should honor his.I'm sure you're perfectly fine with NFL teams cutting players with multiple years left on their contracts.
As soon as the NFL starts offering fully guaranteed contracts and allows compensation to be directly tied to the salary cap I will support your position. Until then good for Julio.I'm not. A contract is a contract. Julio should honor his.
Julio Jones and the Falcons have agreed on a contract adjustment, ensuring Jones will report to training camp on time.
There will be no holdout. Jones had fallen to the bottom of the ten highest-paid wide receivers after three seasons into his latest deal, and got his desired raise after finishing second in the NFL in receiving yards. Julio has incredibly topped 1,400 yards in four straight years. Behind Antonio Brown, he is squarely in the mix to be this year's No. 2-drafted wideout along with Odell Beckham and DeAndre Hopkins. The entire Falcons offense is primed for positive TD regression.
Jul 26 - 12:34 AM
Tell that that to the 147,323,293,289,311 NFL players whose contracts have not been honored by their respective NFL teams when the flip side of the argument was used by those teams.I'm not. A contract is a contract. Julio should honor his.
JUL 26 2018 Converted $1M of 2018 salary & $2M of 2019 salary into bonus, with no cap affectHaven't heard any actual numbers or details on his new deal. Can anyone shed light on it? Does this mean he is more likely to retire early? Or that the possibility is stronger now?
If the NFL teams have not been honoring NFL contracts then that is a matter for the courts.Ace08 said:Tell that that to the 147,323,293,289,311 NFL players whose contracts have not been honored by their respective NFL teams when the flip side of the argument was used by those teams.
You know what he means. The owners have the option of cutting bait on any player or contract at any time they see fit. Dez agreed to a 5 year $70 mill deal in 2015. He got $45 and is now unemployed. David Wilson suffered a catastrophic neck injury while working and it cost him $1.3 million because he couldn’t play anymore. Maclin signed a 5 year $55 million deal and 2 years later he was released missing out on $30 million dollars. In the NFL a long term contract isn’t a long term contract. Everything is always re-negotiable.If the NFL teams have not been honoring NFL contracts then that is a matter for the courts.
If Kirk Cousins lays a complete egg in MIN this season(doubtful but possible) will they not honor his contract and stop paying him?
Shouldn't be possible but it sounds like he was brokegump said:JUL 26 2018 Converted $1M of 2018 salary & $2M of 2019 salary into bonus, with no cap affect
I know there are a lot of opinions out there. But has anyone really knowledgeable and respected in the Xs and Os ever broken down Julio Jones ability/inability inside the 10? In other words, do the experts among 'experts' think its (a) something endemic in Jones' abilities, (b) something amiss with the Falcons' offensive scheme/playcalling, (c) something to do with passes Matt Ryan isn't comfortable with or can't make, or (d) something else altogether?
Still not in the red zone, though
Sarkisian's play calling in the red zone has been horribleI know there are a lot of opinions out there. But has anyone really knowledgeable and respected in the Xs and Os ever broken down Julio Jones ability/inability inside the 10? In other words, do the experts among 'experts' think its (a) something endemic in Jones' abilities, (b) something amiss with the Falcons' offensive scheme/playcalling, (c) something to do with passes Matt Ryan isn't comfortable with or can't make, or (d) something else altogether?
Would Julio Jones better in the red zone (esp goal-to-go situations) on a team like New Orleans or Green Bay, or with prime Peyton Manning with the Colts? Something like that?
Okay so how does that explain what happened the six seasons before Sarkisian arrived?Sarkisian's play calling in the red zone has been horrible
This could well be ... what does this mean, specifically?Julio has always sucked (for whatever reason) in goal line situations.
The Chewbacca Defense.This could well be ... what does this mean, specifically?
What does Jones not do that better goal-line WRs do do? Is he a terrible blocker, and thus a run-pass tell to the defense? Seems to me it's hard to be a high-yardage NFL receiver without some ability to fight for balls ... but still: is Jones to easy to cover in close quarters because of a lack of "aggression" when the ball's in the air? Is he bad at using his body to shield off defenders?
From a coaching, film-review standpoint, what are we looking at?
I think it's a combination of 3 things:This could well be ... what does this mean, specifically?
What does Jones not do that better goal-line WRs do do? Is he a terrible blocker, and thus a run-pass tell to the defense? Seems to me it's hard to be a high-yardage NFL receiver without some ability to fight for balls ... but still: is Jones to easy to cover in close quarters because of a lack of "aggression" when the ball's in the air? Is he bad at using his body to shield off defenders?
From a coaching, film-review standpoint, what are we looking at?
Well for one thing, each of Atlanta's last two games have ended with Julio unable to beat single coverage from inside the 5 yard line and make a play on a catchable ball.This could well be ... what does this mean, specifically?
What does Jones not do that better goal-line WRs do do? Is he a terrible blocker, and thus a run-pass tell to the defense? Seems to me it's hard to be a high-yardage NFL receiver without some ability to fight for balls ... but still: is Jones to easy to cover in close quarters because of a lack of "aggression" when the ball's in the air? Is he bad at using his body to shield off defenders?
From a coaching, film-review standpoint, what are we looking at?
Both of the passes that ended the last two games were fine, Julio just didn't make the play. And let's not forget that Brady's fade in OT of their last Super Bowl win should have been an easy pick.3) Ryan, from what I can see, isn't a good "fade" passer.....like Tom Brady is. Sure it helps to have Gronk be almost uncoverable down there, but Brady always throws it to where only Gronk can get it.
that pass last night was terrible, what are you watching?Both of the passes that ended the last two games were fine, Julio just didn't make the play. And let's not forget that Brady's fade in OT of their last Super Bowl win should have been an easy pick.
Last night, Ryan threw that ball out of bounds. Not sure what you expected Julio to do there.Both of the passes that ended the last two games were fine, Julio just didn't make the play. And let's not forget that Brady's fade in OT of their last Super Bowl win should have been an easy pick.
The even more incredible stat on this (according to STATS Inc.) is that of the last 21 throws that Matt Ryan has targeted Julio Jones in the end zone, they've only connected on one of them.TD % on targets thrown from inside the 5 yard line since Julio entered the league in 2011. List includes the top 15 in targets over that span.
Dez Bryant: 49%
Demaryius Thomas: 34%
Jordy Nelson: 51%
Brandon Marshall: 38%
Eric Decker: 48%
Calvin Johnson: 48%
Antonio Brown: 40%
Julio Jones: 24%
Larry Fitzgerald: 36%
AJ Green: 33%
Michael Crabtree: 56%
Roddy White: 50%
Emmanuel Sanders: 52%
Randall Cobb: 70% (not a typo!)
Pierre Garcon: 33%
So not only is he easily last on that list of the 15 guys with the most targets inside the 5, perhaps more noteworthy is that Roddy White was pretty good at it with the same QB, which goes a long way towards ruling out Matt Ryan as being the problem.
Would it be fair to say that White was getting softer coverage?TD % on targets thrown from inside the 5 yard line since Julio entered the league in 2011. List includes the top 15 in targets over that span.
Dez Bryant: 49%
Demaryius Thomas: 34%
Jordy Nelson: 51%
Brandon Marshall: 38%
Eric Decker: 48%
Calvin Johnson: 48%
Antonio Brown: 40%
Julio Jones: 24%
Larry Fitzgerald: 36%
AJ Green: 33%
Michael Crabtree: 56%
Roddy White: 50%
Emmanuel Sanders: 52%
Randall Cobb: 70% (not a typo!)
Pierre Garcon: 33%
So not only is he easily last on that list of the 15 guys with the most targets inside the 5, perhaps more noteworthy is that Roddy White was pretty good at it with the same QB, which goes a long way towards ruling out Matt Ryan as being the problem.
Yep, should have been the easiest TD of the game. Awful throw by Ryan.On that disputed catch, Julio burned the CB on a double move, the safety already fell down, and Julio had at least 2 steps on the CB. Most of the time that would lead to a 70 yard TD. But Matt Ryan blew the throw. We can dispute the catch all we want, but Julio should have been walking into the endzone with a 70 yard TD.
That's the first thought I had.Would it be fair to say that White was getting softer coverage?
There wasn't even a high safety on that play either. He bit short.On that disputed catch, Julio burned the CB on a double move, the safety already fell down, and Julio had at least 2 steps on the CB. Most of the time that would lead to a 70 yard TD. But Matt Ryan blew the throw. We can dispute the catch all we want, but Julio should have been walking into the endzone with a 70 yard TD.
Why? White was Atlanta's wr1 for the majority of those targets.Would it be fair to say that White was getting softer coverage?
No he wasn'tWhy? White was Atlanta's wr1 for the majority of those targets.