Kool-Aid Larry said:
Shutout said:
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.
If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?
I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham
so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
I think the norm is what he has done over this career.
In the 4 games without Beckham, Eli threw the ball 34.8 times/game, completed 67% of his passes for a 7.00 YPC, and threw 9 TD vs 5 INT
In the 12 games with Beckham, Eli threw the ball 38.5 times/game, completed 62% of his passes for a 7.4 YPC, and threw 21 TD vs 9 INT.
Beckham's addition was pretty close to the same time Jennings got hurt (hurt early in week 5-didn't return till week 11; hurt again week 13).
Eli's completion % dropped, his TD rate dropped, while his attempts/game increased, his YPC increased, and his INT rate dropped. If you want to claim the YPC increase is due to Beckham's presence, I'd buy that, but I have a hard time believing that Beckham was the cause of fewer INTs for Eli. With regards to the increased yardage and attempts, those would seem to be caused by less of a running game.
Eli's numbers last year were largely due to his number of attempts. His completion percentage with Beckham was similar to his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-59% vs 62%), his YPC with Beckham was pretty much his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-7.2 vs 7.4), his TD rate with Beckham was actually lower than his career rate (when you factor out his rookie year-.047 vs .045). His INT rate was the only thing that was significantly better with Beckham (when you factor out his rookie year-.034 vs .019), and I'm not willing to accept that Beckham's presence was the cause for fewer ELI INTs.