What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR Odell Beckham, Jr., Free Agent (2 Viewers)

In response to the whole "Eli could be bad" type of logic with regards to ODB: I'm not sure how much Giants football yall watched, but Eli wasn't that great in 2014. His numbers were good for fantasy bc of Odell, but its not like Eli had this great year and thats why Beck was awesome. There is just as good (maybe better) a chance that Eli is markedly better in 2015 as there is that he's worse
So, Eli had the most attempts of a career, the most completions of his career, his highest single season completion %, 2nd highest yardage total, 2nd highest TD total, second lowest INT total, lowest INT rate, and he didn't have a great year?

2015 was Eli's 2nd best statistical year of his career. IMO, there is not "just as good (maybe better) a chance that Eli is markedly better in 2015."

 
Fwiw, deal in one of my leagues Yesterday:beckham, 1.12

for

Jeffery, 1.02, 4th round pick

not an overpay but seems fair imo
Fair but I prefer Jeffery/1.2.

Jeffery should approach 200 targets himself this year
Wat
Jeffery had 145 targets last year and Marshall's 106 targets are gone. Wilson and Bennett will pick up some of the slack but Jeffery is in line for an increase in targets.

 
In response to the whole "Eli could be bad" type of logic with regards to ODB: I'm not sure how much Giants football yall watched, but Eli wasn't that great in 2014. His numbers were good for fantasy bc of Odell, but its not like Eli had this great year and thats why Beck was awesome. There is just as good (maybe better) a chance that Eli is markedly better in 2015 as there is that he's worse
So, Eli had the most attempts of a career, the most completions of his career, his highest single season completion %, 2nd highest yardage total, 2nd highest TD total, second lowest INT total, lowest INT rate, and he didn't have a great year?

2015 was Eli's 2nd best statistical year of his career. IMO, there is not "just as good (maybe better) a chance that Eli is markedly better in 2015."
He also had a new offensive coordinator that brought in a quality system playing to Eli's strengths. Anyone who watched the Giants last year knows that the team faltered a lot, especially early on. Like I said, Eli's final numbers look strong because he played with Odell, not the other way around.

Case and point: Eli's numbers with and without Odell:

Without: 34.75 att per game, 7.02 YA, 243.5 yd per game, 1.8 TD/INT

With: 38.58 att per game, 7.46 YA, 285.58 yd per game, 2.3 TD/INT

Eli was worlds better with Beckham than without, and he wasn't on pace for anything earth-shattering before he arrived (3896/36/20)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I posted this before the draft and amazes me after what he did last year:

Beckham never led his college team in catches or TD's. He led the team in yards once - with 713 his sophomore year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I posted this before the draft and amazes me after what he did last year:

Beckham never led his college team in catches or TD's. He led the team in yards once - with 713 his sophomore year.
Even as an owner, this gives me some pause. Always has.

How could he have gone from a really good prospect, to arguably the best WR in football (some going as far as to say maybe the best ever) in just a few months.

It's scary. How perfect was the storm last season? Again, not arguing how good he is... He's phenomenal... But damn.

 
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.

 
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?

 
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
This is my problem with this argument as well... I said last year in a thread, might have been this one? Or maybe it was the Comeback PoY thread that Eli would have the best statistical season of his career. Simply because I felt that Gilbride has always been a horrible system for his talents. I felt like the West Coast offense played a lot more to his strengths as well as the WRs strengths. Looking at his stats now, I'd say that was fairly accurate. In only his first season in the McAddo system he posted arguably his best season as a pro. He posted a 63% Comp, 4400 yards, 30 TDs and 14 INTs. It was tied for the lowest INTs he's thrown his entire career except in 2008 when he only threw 10 INTs. Only difference being he attempted about 130 less passes in 2008 than last year.

I posted this before the draft and amazes me after what he did last year:

Beckham never led his college team in catches or TD's. He led the team in yards once - with 713 his sophomore year.
Even as an owner, this gives me some pause. Always has.

How could he have gone from a really good prospect, to arguably the best WR in football (some going as far as to say maybe the best ever) in just a few months.

It's scary. How perfect was the storm last season? Again, not arguing how good he is... He's phenomenal... But damn.
I wouldn't say it was a perfect storm, people apply too much correlation to College Production equaling pro production. Which is often not the case, if anything often college production leads to nothing in the NFL. Andre Williams was the leading NCAA running back in 2013, he wasn't even close to the first back to comeoff the board in the draft. Lets do a case study... here are the top WRS from each year from the past decade of NCAA play, you tell me how many pro bowlers appear.

2014: Rashard Higgins - Who? Is he even going to be drafted this year?

2013: Brandin Cooks - Played decent last year before the injury but he certainly wasn't a top 10 talent looking guy.

2012: Terrance Williams - Again, decent player but never going to be a WR1.

2011: Jordan White - Went on to become a 7th Round pick by the Jets the following year, hurt his foot and was released in 2013 never to be heard from again.

2010: Greg Salas - L-O-L

2009: Danario Alexander - Finally some talent here, if Alexander wasn't hurt so much he'd probably be a solid player in this league, easily the best WR talent on this board yet.

2008: Austin Collie - He was okay before his concussions but never a top end guy.

2007: Michael Crabtree - Probably the most productive of the bunch? Still, 6 year career and his best season was 85 rec for 1100 yards. He's never gone to a Pro Bowl.

2006: Chris Williams - Never heard of him

2005: Mike Hass - See above

I could really care less about college stats, its' about intangibles and ability. Beckham showed those in spades prior to the draft last season which was the reason everyone had him skyrocketing up draft boards all off season. Is there a chance it was a perfect storm and he was a one hit wonder in a similar vein as say Roy Williams? Of course, but I doubt it. And too try to prove he will be because he wasn't the top statistical player on his college team is down right silly. If you're reading this and you're in a dynasty league, I will gladly buy OBJ for a discount because you're afraid that Landry had better stats then him in college.

 
I remember watching Mettenberger miss a wide open Kendall Wright multiple times on a Monday night last year. Maybe that has something to do with it.

 
too try to prove he will be because he wasn't the top statistical player on his college team is down right silly. If you're reading this and you're in a dynasty league, I will gladly buy OBJ for a discount because you're afraid that Landry had better stats then him in college.
as long as we both agree that this is 197% not my argument, ok.

I love beckham. He's my #2 wr from last year's draft, behind evans... Would take a mountain noone would offer to part with him.

i just think Ill never see last year's numbers again. which isnt shocking, and even a downgrade in his numbers are awesome... I just think a few ppl think last season is going to be the norm for him

 
jtd13 said:
I remember watching Mettenberger miss a wide open Kendall Wright multiple times on a Monday night last year. Maybe that has something to do with it.
I've been thinking about that, too. It seems too weird that Beckham, Landry, and even Jeremy Hill all seem better than people expected. I didn't watch or follow LSU but I can't help but wonder if Mett dragged them all down a bit.

 
Soulfly3 said:
Khy said:
too try to prove he will be because he wasn't the top statistical player on his college team is down right silly. If you're reading this and you're in a dynasty league, I will gladly buy OBJ for a discount because you're afraid that Landry had better stats then him in college.
as long as we both agree that this is 197% not my argument, ok.

I love beckham. He's my #2 wr from last year's draft, behind evans... Would take a mountain noone would offer to part with him.

i just think Ill never see last year's numbers again. which isnt shocking, and even a downgrade in his numbers are awesome... I just think a few ppl think last season is going to be the norm for him
Do I think Beckham will make a career out of averaging like 150 yards and 2 TDs a game as he did over the final stretch of last year? No, obviously not. That said, I see him as a year to year 80rec 1500+ yard 10+ TD guy, definitely. He's just too dynamic in space and too smooth in his routes to not get open consistently. He's not a guy that teams will "learn to defend", he's a player similar to Antonio Brown who is just so fluid and quick with him moves that it's really impossible to cover him every play. He's bound to blow out any corner several times a game.

Actually, my biggest fear for him from a statistical/fantasy standpoint is that the Giants end up drafting Amari Cooper or Kevin White if they fall to them. While I think that still leaves Beckham as the #1 on the team. I think if Cooper is drafted you see Beckham's receptions drop into the 60-65ish range with his yardage and TD projections above slightly lower but roughly the same and watch him become the big play guy while Cooper becomes the possession receiver. If White is drafted I think he becomes the 110+ rec guy who sees a steep drop off in TDs in more of the Wes Welker vein when Randy Moss was on the team.

 
Kool-Aid Larry said:
Shutout said:
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
I suppose so. I follow the logic of it but just to examine the flip side of that coin, how often do QBs that have been in the league a decade dramatically improve? If anything, they tend to regress as they learn the new stuff. If he were a second or third year QB and there was something about correcting things, sure. And it's Eli Manning, who has shown a pattern of being really good when he's on a good streak and really bad when he's not. And...it's Eli Manning. You don't think he of all people has access to people that might tell him a thing or two about playing QB? If it were a pure System thing, then I guess we will find out in pre-season because the NFl is a copycat league and if an OC can dramatically improve a 2-time SuperBowl winning QB, then I imagine there will be 31 other teams running his "system" this year.

I can buy that maybe Eli has been playing in a system that hasn't suited his strong suit and this is closer to what he can be. We will see but ok, if someone has been holding one of his hands behind his back for 5 years, then ok...but that guy didn't get fired, which is a miracle. But I think the reality is probably more somewhere in the middle where he was on a good roll and probably was abit more than the norm.

 
Soulfly3 said:
Khy said:
too try to prove he will be because he wasn't the top statistical player on his college team is down right silly. If you're reading this and you're in a dynasty league, I will gladly buy OBJ for a discount because you're afraid that Landry had better stats then him in college.
as long as we both agree that this is 197% not my argument, ok.

I love beckham. He's my #2 wr from last year's draft, behind evans... Would take a mountain noone would offer to part with him.

i just think Ill never see last year's numbers again. which isnt shocking, and even a downgrade in his numbers are awesome... I just think a few ppl think last season is going to be the norm for him
the allure of a guy who pops off elite numbers isn't that he can average peak production, it's that if he settles into 75% of that as an average then he's still great to own.

if some guy pops off 1200/10 one year, then collecting on 75% isn't as exciting for a wr1.

randy moss was dropping you a hint in his rookie year even though he 'underproduced' 1400/11 the following season.

 
Kool-Aid Larry said:
Shutout said:
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
I think the norm is what he has done over this career.

In the 4 games without Beckham, Eli threw the ball 34.8 times/game, completed 67% of his passes for a 7.00 YPC, and threw 9 TD vs 5 INT

In the 12 games with Beckham, Eli threw the ball 38.5 times/game, completed 62% of his passes for a 7.4 YPC, and threw 21 TD vs 9 INT.

Beckham's addition was pretty close to the same time Jennings got hurt (hurt early in week 5-didn't return till week 11; hurt again week 13).

Eli's completion % dropped, his TD rate dropped, while his attempts/game increased, his YPC increased, and his INT rate dropped. If you want to claim the YPC increase is due to Beckham's presence, I'd buy that, but I have a hard time believing that Beckham was the cause of fewer INTs for Eli. With regards to the increased yardage and attempts, those would seem to be caused by less of a running game.

Eli's numbers last year were largely due to his number of attempts. His completion percentage with Beckham was similar to his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-59% vs 62%), his YPC with Beckham was pretty much his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-7.2 vs 7.4), his TD rate with Beckham was actually lower than his career rate (when you factor out his rookie year-.047 vs .045). His INT rate was the only thing that was significantly better with Beckham (when you factor out his rookie year-.034 vs .019), and I'm not willing to accept that Beckham's presence was the cause for fewer ELI INTs.

 
Soulfly3 said:
Khy said:
too try to prove he will be because he wasn't the top statistical player on his college team is down right silly. If you're reading this and you're in a dynasty league, I will gladly buy OBJ for a discount because you're afraid that Landry had better stats then him in college.
as long as we both agree that this is 197% not my argument, ok.

I love beckham. He's my #2 wr from last year's draft, behind evans... Would take a mountain noone would offer to part with him.

i just think Ill never see last year's numbers again. which isnt shocking, and even a downgrade in his numbers are awesome... I just think a few ppl think last season is going to be the norm for him
Do I think Beckham will make a career out of averaging like 150 yards and 2 TDs a game as he did over the final stretch of last year? No, obviously not. That said, I see him as a year to year 80rec 1500+ yard 10+ TD guy, definitely. He's just too dynamic in space and too smooth in his routes to not get open consistently. He's not a guy that teams will "learn to defend", he's a player similar to Antonio Brown who is just so fluid and quick with him moves that it's really impossible to cover him every play. He's bound to blow out any corner several times a game.

Actually, my biggest fear for him from a statistical/fantasy standpoint is that the Giants end up drafting Amari Cooper or Kevin White if they fall to them. While I think that still leaves Beckham as the #1 on the team. I think if Cooper is drafted you see Beckham's receptions drop into the 60-65ish range with his yardage and TD projections above slightly lower but roughly the same and watch him become the big play guy while Cooper becomes the possession receiver. If White is drafted I think he becomes the 110+ rec guy who sees a steep drop off in TDs in more of the Wes Welker vein when Randy Moss was on the team.
Given health, there is next to zero percent chance this happens. Beckham is not going to average 4 catches a game. To have a playmaker of that caliber, and not use him more than that would be insane. After last year's bye, the least amount of catches he had in a game was 6.

eta: Beckham averaged 9 catches per game after the bye last year. Projecting that out over a full season is nonsense numbers. I don't care if they add the biggest target hog in the league, Beckham is gonna get his looks this year. I think his floor is 80 catches, and more realistically 100+ should be your projection, even with another receiving threat.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kool-Aid Larry said:
Shutout said:
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
I suppose so. I follow the logic of it but just to examine the flip side of that coin, how often do QBs that have been in the league a decade dramatically improve? If anything, they tend to regress as they learn the new stuff. If he were a second or third year QB and there was something about correcting things, sure. And it's Eli Manning, who has shown a pattern of being really good when he's on a good streak and really bad when he's not. And...it's Eli Manning. You don't think he of all people has access to people that might tell him a thing or two about playing QB? If it were a pure System thing, then I guess we will find out in pre-season because the NFl is a copycat league and if an OC can dramatically improve a 2-time SuperBowl winning QB, then I imagine there will be 31 other teams running his "system" this year.
well, all these copycat teams have had plenty of chances to run this "system" following the success of bill walsh 30 years ago, if you don't feel like going back even further, so I'm not sure why ben mcadoo and eli manning would be starting any revolution.

it's not about improving anybody, it's about running a different offense which results in improved stats --- if you have other players like beckham who can execute it, of course.

 
Kool-Aid Larry said:
Shutout said:
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
I think the norm is what he has done over this career.

In the 4 games without Beckham, Eli threw the ball 34.8 times/game, completed 67% of his passes for a 7.00 YPC, and threw 9 TD vs 5 INT

In the 12 games with Beckham, Eli threw the ball 38.5 times/game, completed 62% of his passes for a 7.4 YPC, and threw 21 TD vs 9 INT.

Beckham's addition was pretty close to the same time Jennings got hurt (hurt early in week 5-didn't return till week 11; hurt again week 13).

Eli's completion % dropped, his TD rate dropped, while his attempts/game increased, his YPC increased, and his INT rate dropped. If you want to claim the YPC increase is due to Beckham's presence, I'd buy that, but I have a hard time believing that Beckham was the cause of fewer INTs for Eli. With regards to the increased yardage and attempts, those would seem to be caused by less of a running game.

Eli's numbers last year were largely due to his number of attempts. His completion percentage with Beckham was similar to his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-59% vs 62%), his YPC with Beckham was pretty much his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-7.2 vs 7.4), his TD rate with Beckham was actually lower than his career rate (when you factor out his rookie year-.047 vs .045). His INT rate was the only thing that was significantly better with Beckham (when you factor out his rookie year-.034 vs .019), and I'm not willing to accept that Beckham's presence was the cause for fewer ELI INTs.
You missed an entire half of his argument. The only part you're arguing here is Beckham. His argument and mine is that it wasn't Beckham that caused Eli to see a better season, but McAdoo. The argument was what is this norm you're expecting Eli to settle back into? He saw an upgrade in his offensive coordinator trading out Gilbride for McAdoo and an upgrade in his WR talent with Beckham.

And the high INT rate without Beckham is EASILY explainable if you watched any of those first 2 games. All of the WRs were learning an entirely new system, Eli included. Receivers were cutting the wrong way on option routes and just plain running the wrong routes period in those first few games. Hell, I won't forget that one play against DET, where Eli drops into the shotgun on an audible, snaps the ball and Randle and Cruz ran up and blocked at the line and Eli had to throw the ball away. Fact is, the numbers show that the team started to settle into the system after those first 2 games. After the 2nd game loss to Arizona I just downright assumed we were going 1-15, then we win 3 in a row on the back of amazing performances from Jennings and he gets hurt. Then Beckham has his breakout game and the following game Cruz tears his Patellar. Last year was a perfect storm of ####. But if you watched the team and Eli, the writing is on the wall this season.

Oh and one other thing I forgot, McAdoo forced Eli to adjust his drop back, he swapped his feet. So after like 18 years of playing football (high school/college/NFL) Eli had to change his drop back foot. That takes a lot of adjustment getting the jump off your final drop to move force into your throw. Imagine if you got a new boss tomorrow and he came in and told everyone they need to write with their left hands now to improve productivity and he said don't worry, you'll get used to it.

 
Kool-Aid Larry said:
Shutout said:
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
I suppose so. I follow the logic of it but just to examine the flip side of that coin, how often do QBs that have been in the league a decade dramatically improve? If anything, they tend to regress as they learn the new stuff. If he were a second or third year QB and there was something about correcting things, sure. And it's Eli Manning, who has shown a pattern of being really good when he's on a good streak and really bad when he's not. And...it's Eli Manning. You don't think he of all people has access to people that might tell him a thing or two about playing QB? If it were a pure System thing, then I guess we will find out in pre-season because the NFl is a copycat league and if an OC can dramatically improve a 2-time SuperBowl winning QB, then I imagine there will be 31 other teams running his "system" this year.
well, all these copycat teams have had plenty of chances to run this "system" following the success of bill walsh 30 years ago, if you don't feel like going back even further, so I'm not sure why ben mcadoo and eli manning would be starting any revolution.

it's not about improving anybody, it's about running a different offense which results in improved stats --- if you have other players like beckham who can execute it, of course.
No, Beckham Eli and McAdoo are creating this new style of offense. It's not the West Coast it's called hte East Coast offense... and it'll sweep the nation!

Simple fact is, the argument being made was that the West Coast system simply fits Eli and the rest of the teams strengths better than Gilbride's convoluted option system.

 
Eli's numbers last year were largely due to his number of attempts. His completion percentage with Beckham was similar to his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-59% vs 62%), his YPC with Beckham was pretty much his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-7.2 vs 7.4), his TD rate with Beckham was actually lower than his career rate (when you factor out his rookie year-.047 vs .045). His INT rate was the only thing that was significantly better with Beckham (when you factor out his rookie year-.034 vs .019), and I'm not willing to accept that Beckham's presence was the cause for fewer ELI INTs.
if you read the cutler thread you will learn that int's are rarely the fault of the passer.

also, they are most likely correlated with adot, and this is exacerbated when your line is getting run over every other play --- give me the adot for gilbride's offense vs mcadoo.

 
Kool-Aid Larry said:
Shutout said:
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
I think the norm is what he has done over this career.In the 4 games without Beckham, Eli threw the ball 34.8 times/game, completed 67% of his passes for a 7.00 YPC, and threw 9 TD vs 5 INT

In the 12 games with Beckham, Eli threw the ball 38.5 times/game, completed 62% of his passes for a 7.4 YPC, and threw 21 TD vs 9 INT.

Beckham's addition was pretty close to the same time Jennings got hurt (hurt early in week 5-didn't return till week 11; hurt again week 13).

Eli's completion % dropped, his TD rate dropped, while his attempts/game increased, his YPC increased, and his INT rate dropped. If you want to claim the YPC increase is due to Beckham's presence, I'd buy that, but I have a hard time believing that Beckham was the cause of fewer INTs for Eli. With regards to the increased yardage and attempts, those would seem to be caused by less of a running game.

Eli's numbers last year were largely due to his number of attempts. His completion percentage with Beckham was similar to his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-59% vs 62%), his YPC with Beckham was pretty much his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-7.2 vs 7.4), his TD rate with Beckham was actually lower than his career rate (when you factor out his rookie year-.047 vs .045). His INT rate was the only thing that was significantly better with Beckham (when you factor out his rookie year-.034 vs .019), and I'm not willing to accept that Beckham's presence was the cause for fewer ELI INTs.
You missed an entire half of his argument. The only part you're arguing here is Beckham. His argument and mine is that it wasn't Beckham that caused Eli to see a better season, but McAdoo. The argument was what is this norm you're expecting Eli to settle back into? He saw an upgrade in his offensive coordinator trading out Gilbride for McAdoo and an upgrade in his WR talent with Beckham.

And the high INT rate without Beckham is EASILY explainable if you watched any of those first 2 games. All of the WRs were learning an entirely new system, Eli included. Receivers were cutting the wrong way on option routes and just plain running the wrong routes period in those first few games. Hell, I won't forget that one play against DET, where Eli drops into the shotgun on an audible, snaps the ball and Randle and Cruz ran up and blocked at the line and Eli had to throw the ball away. Fact is, the numbers show that the team started to settle into the system after those first 2 games. After the 2nd game loss to Arizona I just downright assumed we were going 1-15, then we win 3 in a row on the back of amazing performances from Jennings and he gets hurt. Then Beckham has his breakout game and the following game Cruz tears his Patellar. Last year was a perfect storm of ####. But if you watched the team and Eli, the writing is on the wall this season.

Oh and one other thing I forgot, McAdoo forced Eli to adjust his drop back, he swapped his feet. So after like 18 years of playing football (high school/college/NFL) Eli had to change his drop back foot. That takes a lot of adjustment getting the jump off your final drop to move force into your throw. Imagine if you got a new boss tomorrow and he came in and told everyone they need to write with their left hands now to improve productivity and he said don't worry, you'll get used to it.
You missed my point. Eli's stats year were compiled, more so than improved upon recent years. He had comparable statsto his career averages, except for the INT numbers, and the attempts. And untill Jennings got hurt, he wasn't on pace to throw nearly as much as he ended up having to. I don't know if he will throw as much next year.
 
Kool-Aid Larry said:
Shutout said:
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
I think the norm is what he has done over this career.In the 4 games without Beckham, Eli threw the ball 34.8 times/game, completed 67% of his passes for a 7.00 YPC, and threw 9 TD vs 5 INT

In the 12 games with Beckham, Eli threw the ball 38.5 times/game, completed 62% of his passes for a 7.4 YPC, and threw 21 TD vs 9 INT.

Beckham's addition was pretty close to the same time Jennings got hurt (hurt early in week 5-didn't return till week 11; hurt again week 13).

Eli's completion % dropped, his TD rate dropped, while his attempts/game increased, his YPC increased, and his INT rate dropped. If you want to claim the YPC increase is due to Beckham's presence, I'd buy that, but I have a hard time believing that Beckham was the cause of fewer INTs for Eli. With regards to the increased yardage and attempts, those would seem to be caused by less of a running game.

Eli's numbers last year were largely due to his number of attempts. His completion percentage with Beckham was similar to his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-59% vs 62%), his YPC with Beckham was pretty much his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-7.2 vs 7.4), his TD rate with Beckham was actually lower than his career rate (when you factor out his rookie year-.047 vs .045). His INT rate was the only thing that was significantly better with Beckham (when you factor out his rookie year-.034 vs .019), and I'm not willing to accept that Beckham's presence was the cause for fewer ELI INTs.
You missed an entire half of his argument. The only part you're arguing here is Beckham. His argument and mine is that it wasn't Beckham that caused Eli to see a better season, but McAdoo. The argument was what is this norm you're expecting Eli to settle back into? He saw an upgrade in his offensive coordinator trading out Gilbride for McAdoo and an upgrade in his WR talent with Beckham.

And the high INT rate without Beckham is EASILY explainable if you watched any of those first 2 games. All of the WRs were learning an entirely new system, Eli included. Receivers were cutting the wrong way on option routes and just plain running the wrong routes period in those first few games. Hell, I won't forget that one play against DET, where Eli drops into the shotgun on an audible, snaps the ball and Randle and Cruz ran up and blocked at the line and Eli had to throw the ball away. Fact is, the numbers show that the team started to settle into the system after those first 2 games. After the 2nd game loss to Arizona I just downright assumed we were going 1-15, then we win 3 in a row on the back of amazing performances from Jennings and he gets hurt. Then Beckham has his breakout game and the following game Cruz tears his Patellar. Last year was a perfect storm of ####. But if you watched the team and Eli, the writing is on the wall this season.

Oh and one other thing I forgot, McAdoo forced Eli to adjust his drop back, he swapped his feet. So after like 18 years of playing football (high school/college/NFL) Eli had to change his drop back foot. That takes a lot of adjustment getting the jump off your final drop to move force into your throw. Imagine if you got a new boss tomorrow and he came in and told everyone they need to write with their left hands now to improve productivity and he said don't worry, you'll get used to it.
You missed my point. Eli's stats year were compiled, more so than improved upon recent years. He had comparable statsto his career averages, except for the INT numbers, and the attempts. And untill Jennings got hurt, he wasn't on pace to throw nearly as much as he ended up having to. I don't know if he will throw as much next year.
Huh? How was last year comaprable in any way to his career averages?

His career averages are: 321/560 57.3% Comp 3872 yards 25 TDs and 17.6 INTs and that's with removing his half season as a rookie

Last year he through about 40 more passes than his career average and turned that into 5% higher completion, about 550 yards, 5 TDs and 4 less INTs

I'd say that's a rather large increase of production and quality of play over his career averages. As for his pace prior to Jennings? He had two games he threw for 39 passes, one game at 33 passes and one at 28. The one at 28 was the Houston game where he didn't have to touch the ball because Jennings was able to do whatever he wanted in that game. He didn't have production like that the rest of the season, neither did Williams. McAdoo's system is designed to be fairly balanced. Odds are Eli still throws in the 570-580 range of attempts this season and odds are his completition percentage goes up slightly as he'll have someone besides Beckham to force the ball to with Cruz being back.

 
You missed my point. Eli's stats year were compiled, more so than improved upon recent years. He had comparable statsto his career averages, except for the INT numbers, and the attempts. And untill Jennings got hurt, he wasn't on pace to throw nearly as much as he ended up having to. I don't know if he will throw as much next year.
I don't understand what kind of sense this is supposed to make

with jennings in the game he threw 39x in weeks 2 + 4

with jennings in the game he threw 45, 40, and 34x in weeks 11-13

with andre williams averaging 21 carries/game eli threw 40x/game in weeks 14-17

eli actually had 4 of his 5 lowest attempt games with no jennings, or very minimal jennings

if you want to make the point that the defense should be better, resulting in fewer attempts, that might be a fair point, but I have no idea wtf you think jennings has to do with anything.

or, maybe mcadoo's offense is intrinsically a higher volume passing attack?

 
Kool-Aid Larry said:
Shutout said:
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
I think the norm is what he has done over this career.In the 4 games without Beckham, Eli threw the ball 34.8 times/game, completed 67% of his passes for a 7.00 YPC, and threw 9 TD vs 5 INT

In the 12 games with Beckham, Eli threw the ball 38.5 times/game, completed 62% of his passes for a 7.4 YPC, and threw 21 TD vs 9 INT.

Beckham's addition was pretty close to the same time Jennings got hurt (hurt early in week 5-didn't return till week 11; hurt again week 13).

Eli's completion % dropped, his TD rate dropped, while his attempts/game increased, his YPC increased, and his INT rate dropped. If you want to claim the YPC increase is due to Beckham's presence, I'd buy that, but I have a hard time believing that Beckham was the cause of fewer INTs for Eli. With regards to the increased yardage and attempts, those would seem to be caused by less of a running game.

Eli's numbers last year were largely due to his number of attempts. His completion percentage with Beckham was similar to his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-59% vs 62%), his YPC with Beckham was pretty much his career average (when you factor out his rookie year-7.2 vs 7.4), his TD rate with Beckham was actually lower than his career rate (when you factor out his rookie year-.047 vs .045). His INT rate was the only thing that was significantly better with Beckham (when you factor out his rookie year-.034 vs .019), and I'm not willing to accept that Beckham's presence was the cause for fewer ELI INTs.
You missed an entire half of his argument. The only part you're arguing here is Beckham. His argument and mine is that it wasn't Beckham that caused Eli to see a better season, but McAdoo. The argument was what is this norm you're expecting Eli to settle back into? He saw an upgrade in his offensive coordinator trading out Gilbride for McAdoo and an upgrade in his WR talent with Beckham.

And the high INT rate without Beckham is EASILY explainable if you watched any of those first 2 games. All of the WRs were learning an entirely new system, Eli included. Receivers were cutting the wrong way on option routes and just plain running the wrong routes period in those first few games. Hell, I won't forget that one play against DET, where Eli drops into the shotgun on an audible, snaps the ball and Randle and Cruz ran up and blocked at the line and Eli had to throw the ball away. Fact is, the numbers show that the team started to settle into the system after those first 2 games. After the 2nd game loss to Arizona I just downright assumed we were going 1-15, then we win 3 in a row on the back of amazing performances from Jennings and he gets hurt. Then Beckham has his breakout game and the following game Cruz tears his Patellar. Last year was a perfect storm of ####. But if you watched the team and Eli, the writing is on the wall this season.

Oh and one other thing I forgot, McAdoo forced Eli to adjust his drop back, he swapped his feet. So after like 18 years of playing football (high school/college/NFL) Eli had to change his drop back foot. That takes a lot of adjustment getting the jump off your final drop to move force into your throw. Imagine if you got a new boss tomorrow and he came in and told everyone they need to write with their left hands now to improve productivity and he said don't worry, you'll get used to it.
You missed my point. Eli's stats year were compiled, more so than improved upon recent years. He had comparable statsto his career averages, except for the INT numbers, and the attempts. And untill Jennings got hurt, he wasn't on pace to throw nearly as much as he ended up having to. I don't know if he will throw as much next year.
Huh? How was last year comaprable in any way to his career averages?

His career averages are: 321/560 57.3% Comp 3872 yards 25 TDs and 17.6 INTs and that's with removing his half season as a rookie

Last year he through about 40 more passes than his career average and turned that into 5% higher completion, about 550 yards, 5 TDs and 4 less INTs

I'd say that's a rather large increase of production and quality of play over his career averages. As for his pace prior to Jennings? He had two games he threw for 39 passes, one game at 33 passes and one at 28. The one at 28 was the Houston game where he didn't have to touch the ball because Jennings was able to do whatever he wanted in that game. He didn't have production like that the rest of the season, neither did Williams. McAdoo's system is designed to be fairly balanced. Odds are Eli still throws in the 570-580 range of attempts this season and odds are his completition percentage goes up slightly as he'll have someone besides Beckham to force the ball to with Cruz being back.
I am not sure where you are getting those averages since his career completion % is 59.0% and his 9 games as a rookie was 48.2%. That said, if you look at the last 6 years, his totals are much closer to last year.

Last 6: 339- 554 61% 4189 yards 7.6 YPA 25 TDs and 18 INTs - This is really skewed TD and INT wise from his horrible 2013. He averaged 29 TDs the other 5 years and while his 14 INTs look great compared to 2013, he had 14-16 INTs in 4 of the past 6 years. Ignoring 2013, his yardage has ranged from 3948-4933, TDs from 26-31 and completion % from 59.9-63.1%.

IMHO, in the past 6 years, if you look past the horrific 2013, his 2014 stats aren't really much of an outlier from 2009-2012 and in some cases aren't even as good. Honestly, I think people got burned by him so bad in 2013 that they forgot how consistent he was from 2009-2012 and how 2014 was actually just getting back to that consistency.

*Note, I think I see what you did wrong with completion %. You removed 95 completions from the rookie year, but forgot to remove 197 attempts.

 
Soulfly3 said:
cstu said:
I posted this before the draft and amazes me after what he did last year:

Beckham never led his college team in catches or TD's. He led the team in yards once - with 713 his sophomore year.
Even as an owner, this gives me some pause. Always has.

How could he have gone from a really good prospect, to arguably the best WR in football (some going as far as to say maybe the best ever) in just a few months.

It's scary. How perfect was the storm last season? Again, not arguing how good he is... He's phenomenal... But damn.
Real NFL QB, coaching? Who knows. We saw what we saw, and we saw a stud who is only gonna be derailed by injury or mental illness.

 
Soulfly3 said:
cstu said:
I posted this before the draft and amazes me after what he did last year:

Beckham never led his college team in catches or TD's. He led the team in yards once - with 713 his sophomore year.
Even as an owner, this gives me some pause. Always has.

How could he have gone from a really good prospect, to arguably the best WR in football (some going as far as to say maybe the best ever) in just a few months.

It's scary. How perfect was the storm last season? Again, not arguing how good he is... He's phenomenal... But damn.
Real NFL QB, coaching? Who knows. We saw what we saw, and we saw a stud who is only gonna be derailed by injury or mental illness.
Seriously. Was he or wasn't he the best WR in football for most of last year? College is irrelevant (also 12th overall not like he's some udfa)

 
Soulfly3 said:
cstu said:
I posted this before the draft and amazes me after what he did last year:

Beckham never led his college team in catches or TD's. He led the team in yards once - with 713 his sophomore year.
Even as an owner, this gives me some pause. Always has.

How could he have gone from a really good prospect, to arguably the best WR in football (some going as far as to say maybe the best ever) in just a few months.

It's scary. How perfect was the storm last season? Again, not arguing how good he is... He's phenomenal... But damn.
Real NFL QB, coaching? Who knows. We saw what we saw, and we saw a stud who is only gonna be derailed by injury or mental illness.
Seriously. Was he or wasn't he the best WR in football for most of last year? College is irrelevant (also 12th overall not like he's some udfa)
We all know how talented he is so there must be some explanation why he never had a TD against a ranked team in college.

 
Soulfly3 said:
cstu said:
I posted this before the draft and amazes me after what he did last year:

Beckham never led his college team in catches or TD's. He led the team in yards once - with 713 his sophomore year.
Even as an owner, this gives me some pause. Always has.

How could he have gone from a really good prospect, to arguably the best WR in football (some going as far as to say maybe the best ever) in just a few months.

It's scary. How perfect was the storm last season? Again, not arguing how good he is... He's phenomenal... But damn.
Real NFL QB, coaching? Who knows. We saw what we saw, and we saw a stud who is only gonna be derailed by injury or mental illness.
Seriously. Was he or wasn't he the best WR in football for most of last year? College is irrelevant (also 12th overall not like he's some udfa)
We all know how talented he is so there must be some explanation why he never had a TD against a ranked team in college.
There really doesn't need to be... he was a highly touted prospect coming out of college. He was sky rocketing up draft boards leading up to the draft because of his physical gifts. He grew up playing football with the Manning's in the summer. He considers Shaq an Uncle. This kid has had sport greatness around him his entire life and to boot is one of the best athletic specimens in the game and that was before he was even drafted. You act like he was a 3rd round pick and did what he did. He was highly touted for his athletic ability and refined route running. All he did last year was show everyone that the things listed under his strengths prior to the draft last year were true; big hands, smooth refined route runner, immense athletic ability. I think a lot of people forget how big of a deal route running is and how being an elite route runner can make you unstoppable. Hell, Jerry Rice made an entire career based solely on his hands and route running. Imagine if you gave Jerry Rice OBJs athletic gifts? There are A LOT of factors that can contribute to someone being a not so productive college player but an amazing NFL player and we see them every year.

 
We all know how talented he is so there must be some explanation why he never had a TD against a ranked team in college.
There really doesn't need to be... he was a highly touted prospect coming out of college. He was sky rocketing up draft boards leading up to the draft because of his physical gifts. He grew up playing football with the Manning's in the summer. He considers Shaq an Uncle. This kid has had sport greatness around him his entire life and to boot is one of the best athletic specimens in the game and that was before he was even drafted. You act like he was a 3rd round pick and did what he did. He was highly touted for his athletic ability and refined route running. All he did last year was show everyone that the things listed under his strengths prior to the draft last year were true; big hands, smooth refined route runner, immense athletic ability. I think a lot of people forget how big of a deal route running is and how being an elite route runner can make you unstoppable. Hell, Jerry Rice made an entire career based solely on his hands and route running. Imagine if you gave Jerry Rice OBJs athletic gifts? There are A LOT of factors that can contribute to someone being a not so productive college player but an amazing NFL player and we see them every year.
Oh, so he felt entitled and never needed to give his best effort in college...thanks for clearing that up!

 
We all know how talented he is so there must be some explanation why he never had a TD against a ranked team in college.
There really doesn't need to be... he was a highly touted prospect coming out of college. He was sky rocketing up draft boards leading up to the draft because of his physical gifts. He grew up playing football with the Manning's in the summer. He considers Shaq an Uncle. This kid has had sport greatness around him his entire life and to boot is one of the best athletic specimens in the game and that was before he was even drafted. You act like he was a 3rd round pick and did what he did. He was highly touted for his athletic ability and refined route running. All he did last year was show everyone that the things listed under his strengths prior to the draft last year were true; big hands, smooth refined route runner, immense athletic ability. I think a lot of people forget how big of a deal route running is and how being an elite route runner can make you unstoppable. Hell, Jerry Rice made an entire career based solely on his hands and route running. Imagine if you gave Jerry Rice OBJs athletic gifts? There are A LOT of factors that can contribute to someone being a not so productive college player but an amazing NFL player and we see them every year.
Oh, so he felt entitled and never needed to give his best effort in college...thanks for clearing that up!
And the 2015 Award for Putting BS Words into Someone's Mouth goes to...

**drumrolllllll**

CTSU!

Seriously, how is that what you drew up from what I said?

 
Kool-Aid Larry said:
Shutout said:
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
The completion percentage is very likely a result if the new offense. In fact all offseason they stated the goal of the new offense was to increase Manning's completion percentage. The new offense is a variation of a WCO while Gilbride was more of a downfield passer.

The fact that Beckham was basically uncoverable helped tremendously as well. Eli has always been at worst a very good QB - so it's not like last season came out of nowhere.

 
I suppose so. I follow the logic of it but just to examine the flip side of that coin, how often do QBs that have been in the league a decade dramatically improve?
I don't think it was a "dramatic" improvement if you look at many of his other seasons. The "lowest" amount of interceptions were in fact tied for the second lowest total in actuality for one thing (so he actually had a season with less and another season with the same) and the improvement in completion % was expected.

 
Kool-Aid Larry said:
Shutout said:
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
The completion percentage is very likely a result if the new offense. In fact all offseason they stated the goal of the new offense was to increase Manning's completion percentage. The new offense is a variation of a WCO while Gilbride was more of a downfield passer.

The fact that Beckham was basically uncoverable helped tremendously as well. Eli has always been at worst a very good QB - so it's not like last season came out of nowhere.
It didn't come out of nowhere. Again, his 2009-2012 seasons weren't really that far removed from 2014 (some were better in some spots). I think the 2013 horror show really tainted everyone's view of Eli and made them forget how the prior four seasons he had taken that jump from his first 5 seasons. He went from mediocre to being good, but below the top QBs to horrific in 2013, back to good+ again.

 
I suppose so. I follow the logic of it but just to examine the flip side of that coin, how often do QBs that have been in the league a decade dramatically improve?
I don't think it was a "dramatic" improvement if you look at many of his other seasons. The "lowest" amount of interceptions were in fact tied for the second lowest total in actuality for one thing (so he actually had a season with less and another season with the same) and the improvement in completion % was expected.
Yep, just look at the numbers I posted above. His 2014 really wasn't all that different from what he averaged the prior 5 years (especially when you remove the 2013 fiasco).

 
FWIW, I recently turned down the following offer (in a non-PPR) in which I would have gotten OBJ:

OBJ

for

1.01/1.03/2016 1st (likely late as I was in the Super Bowl this year)

 
FWIW, I recently turned down the following offer (in a non-PPR) in which I would have gotten OBJ:

OBJ

for

1.01/1.03/2016 1st (likely late as I was in the Super Bowl this year)
Interesting. Gurley / Cooper / x vs OBJ. I still think I slide with OBJ there especially if it was PPR.

 
We all know how talented he is so there must be some explanation why he never had a TD against a ranked team in college.
I know a few reasons why that doesn't matter now though
Why would it not matter? Do we not evaluate prospects every year?
The answer to your 2nd question is yes, obviously we evaluate prospects every year. Obviously the NFL does also, and they saw past any possible reason for OBJ not scoring a TD against a ranked team and made him a high pick in the NFL draft.

As for the first question, it doesnt matter because his play in the NFL trumps anything college related 100-fold, so the reasons..........as I said.........don't matter.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not to drastically change the conversation, but im at the point now where I think ODB's lack of dominating college production is on Les Miles. LSU was bad despite having tons of pros, especially on offense. Also could be an indictment on mett. My thoughts

 
Not to drastically change the conversation, but im at the point now where I think ODB's lack of dominating college production is on Les Miles. LSU was bad despite having tons of pros, especially on offense. Also could be an indictment on mett. My thoughts
You are probably correct. Some college coaches get by on recruiting alone and compete/win despite their actual abilities. Way back before I moved and before I started to loathe Jerry Jones, I actually like the Cowboys. I look at Barry Switzer and Jimmy Johnson as two guys with lots of college success and SB wins, but there is no way anyone could ever convince me that Jimmie Johnson wasn't a way better "coach" than Switzer. Some guys can get the talent together and win because of the talent and some guys can pull talent together and make that talent better. Miles is likely the former, not the latter.

 
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
The completion percentage is very likely a result if the new offense. In fact all offseason they stated the goal of the new offense was to increase Manning's completion percentage. The new offense is a variation of a WCO while Gilbride was more of a downfield passer.

The fact that Beckham was basically uncoverable helped tremendously as well. Eli has always been at worst a very good QB - so it's not like last season came out of nowhere.
I'm as big a Giants homer as there is....but no, this is not correct. Eli has a high ceiling (see playoffs), and has had some years where he was very good, but I would say that in a typical year, Eli is an average QB, with a ceiling of being very good.

 
Some post here crack me up. "Perfect storm"?

You mean the season where as a rookie he missed all of traing camp, had virtually no reps with his QB until 5th game of the season and missed a 3rd of the season.

Yeah he had that going for him at least. I defiantly see how that was a perfect storm of a saeson.

 
I read somewhere (probably IN this thread somewhere) where someone mentioned that, in addition to the ridiculous perfect storm of events that befell Beckham last year, Eli also had his lowest Int count and highest completion %.

If NOTHING else changed, I would expect to Eli to come back to the norm. I can't label it or categorize it but there is something about Eli Manning that has always kept all of us from labeling him as a perennial top ff QB. He just doesn't maintain from season to season to season. For that reason, if nothing else, you have to temper your expectations.
don't you think some of that is the result of beckham and a different offense?

I think somebody in here even posted the stats with and without beckham

so, what is the 'norm' he's coming back to in 2015 --- gilbride and no beckham?
The completion percentage is very likely a result if the new offense. In fact all offseason they stated the goal of the new offense was to increase Manning's completion percentage. The new offense is a variation of a WCO while Gilbride was more of a downfield passer.

The fact that Beckham was basically uncoverable helped tremendously as well. Eli has always been at worst a very good QB - so it's not like last season came out of nowhere.
The goal of the new offense was to improve on the completion percentage. They still take shots down field. Things were simplified for the WRs. Gilbride had complicated reads for the WR and he mentioned several times that it took about 2-3 seasons for WRs to learn his offense. That really sucks for younger players, especially if they miss time with injuries.

They also reintroduced the WR/RB screen back into the offense. I'm unsure of how well they got to running those with how bad the line was.

 
Rotoworld:

Odell Beckham hopes to control his emotions better in 2015.

Beckham's emotions weren't a serious problem as a rookie, but perhaps the only touch of gray on his otherwise brilliant campaign. Despite his pint size, Beckham has emphatically proven he has No. 1 overall upside as a fantasy receiver.

Source: Dan Graziano on Twitter
Apr 23 - 1:46 PM
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top