AAABatteries
Footballguy
Is the phrase “turd in a punch bowl” off limits as well? If so, I’ll have to start thinking of new nickname for a certain Liverpool fan who shall remain namelessDon't call politicians (or anyone) turds. Thanks.
Is the phrase “turd in a punch bowl” off limits as well? If so, I’ll have to start thinking of new nickname for a certain Liverpool fan who shall remain namelessDon't call politicians (or anyone) turds. Thanks.
You may also need to consider the source - you may not agree with that approach but I think the moderators do (and from my perspective should).About as clear cut an example of bias as I’ve ever seen.
Trump is a turd.
nothing
AOC is a turd.
Ban!
I’ve just come to expect it. I’ve never seen it so blatant though. Seems silly not to point it out.
So did the person whose post was deleted by a moderator.No he didn’t. He advocated shooting people who assault others because of their attire.Yesterday, JohnnyU advocated shooting people who harass Trump supporters. When another user confronted Johnny with a hypothetical scenario which reversed the roles, that post was quietly deleted by a moderator. Yet's Johnny's post was allowed to remain.
Yesterday, Rohn Blutarsky used a prohibited phrase shortly after a moderator specifically warned him that using that phrase would result in a suspension. He was not suspended.
So......you can take your complaints of bias and shoot a few caps in its butt.
Are you referring to this poster?About as clear cut an example of bias as I’ve ever seen.
Trump is a turd.
nothing
AOC is a turd.
Ban!
I’ve just come to expect it. I’ve never seen it so blatant though. Seems silly not to point it out.
The General said:I am very happy in knowing Trump is a giant turd
Yes.Are you referring to this poster?
Is what a crisis? Yuma? No, doubtful as even the republican there admitted it wasn't really a crisis.Back to the topic. Have the Democrats agreeed it’s a crisis yet?
I really don’t think @The General was being malicious, more tongue in cheekThen action was taken there as well.
That’s kind of the point.You may also need to consider the source - you may not agree with that approach but I think the moderators do (and from my perspective should).
Do you agree or disagree there is a difference between the two referenced posters that goes beyond political affiliation?That’s kind of the point.
Some, but probably less than you do.Do you agree or disagree there is a difference between the two referenced posters that goes beyond political affiliation?
Content and overall tone of their postings?
Some? I would then suggest you aren't very familiar with FavreCo and LOD's body of work as compared to the General and the content he has posted on this board.Some, but probably less than you do.
The rule is the rule. Clayton and other mods have said don't do it. Do you think they were only talking to some posters?Do you agree or disagree there is a difference between the two referenced posters that goes beyond political affiliation?
Content and overall tone of their postings?
Wait , lod is FavreCoSome? I would then suggest you aren't very familiar with FavreCo and LOD's body of work as compared to the General and the content he has posted on this board.
Their contributions to this board are far different and go beyond differences in political affiliation or support. And again, as quoted already, action was taken on both.
I don’t follow whose alt is whose. I’m not sure how I would even know.Some? I would then suggest you aren't very familiar with FavreCo and LOD's body of work as compared to the General and the content he has posted on this board.
Their contributions to this board are far different and go beyond differences in political affiliation or support. And again, as quoted already, action was taken on both.
We need a sticky thread of forbidden words/phrasesThe rule is the rule. Clayton and other mods have said don't do it. Do you think they were only talking to some posters?
You wouldn't even need to know who LOD is...his work as LOD alone is far different than General's Its pretty simple.I don’t follow whose alt is whose. I’m not sure how I would even know.
And sho to provide us who get exceptionsWe need a sticky thread of forbidden words/phrases
Some have.Back to the topic. Have the Democrats agreeed it’s a crisis yet?
How Many at a port of entry?Some have.
Jeh Johnson, Obama’s Homeland Security director
Asked about border security on MSNBC on March 29, Johnson said, “On Tuesday there were 4,000 apprehensions. I know that 1,000 [apprehensions] overwhelms the system and I cannot begin to imagine what 4,000 a day looks like, so we are truly in a crisis.
The debate seems to be more about the use of emergency powers, not about whether there’s an actual crisis. The crisis is obvious.
You're wrong.About as clear cut an example of bias as I’ve ever seen.
Trump is a turd.
nothing
AOC is a turd.
Ban!
I’ve just come to expect it. I’ve never seen it so blatant though. Seems silly not to point it out.