Most 20 year olds are idiots.Probably not his fault up until about 18-20. After that it's on him. At 22 and succeeding there was every resource in existence available to him. He just made bad choices and paid for them. If he doesn't see it by now he deserves all he gets.
True story but they also don't have $20 million potential and every resource in the world available to them.Most 20 year olds are idiots.
Heck, most 30 year olds are idiots.
Actually, most people are idiots.
How are you possibly doing an "I told you so"? He's not in the NFL. The Browns were noncommittal on wanting him back. We have no idea what the reinstatement process is.I warned you all.
He just got out of 90 day rehab. Isn't he going to have to stay clean for a year? It's 2018 until he can return, at best.How are you possibly doing an "I told you so"? He's not in the NFL. The Browns were noncommittal on wanting him back. We have no idea what the reinstatement process is.
I think you took this cake out of the oven a bit soon.
I dunno about that - I think he was allowed to reapply on Sept 21st (according to his personal trainer/life coach) - but IIRC he also said that was going to happen weeks ago, and it didn't.He just got out of 90 day rehab. Isn't he going to have to stay clean for a year? It's 2018 until he can return, at best.
I hadn't heard that, but I'm not sure why since he's still suspended "indefinitely" right now. That's what he's being reinstated from. He is currently suspended.Anyone know if the rumors are true that, even if he reapplies and is miraculously and immediately reinstated... he still has a 4-game suspension to serve?
I think there's a difference from a suspension from all football-related activity and a game suspension. The former you're not even allowed at team facilities and the latter you're just not in pads on gameday.I hadn't heard that, but I'm not sure why since he's still suspended "indefinitely" right now. That's what he's being reinstated from. He is currently suspended.
Why would the NYG deal a lot for this guy? They're 0-5, and there's no way to know what he'd be able to contribute if they did get him.I dunno about that - I think he was allowed to reapply on Sept 21st (according to his personal trainer/life coach) - but IIRC he also said that was going to happen weeks ago, and it didn't.
As far as I know there's no requirement that Gordon stay clean for a year. And as good as it is that he went back to rehab (and I am genuinely happy for Gordon if his life is back on track) admitting that the 1st time was a publicity stunt may not endear him to Goodell.
It seems what's most relevant in order of importance is,
1. When Gordon applies for reinstatement, what priority will Goodell place on it.
2. Even if Goodell places a high priority on reinstatement, how long will that process take.
3. What will the Browns do? If they want him back (questionable, given their non-involvement with this process to date and their statements indicating otherwise) then he'll be back in _______ time, will take _______ time to get into football shape, and will take _______ time to learn the playbook?
3A. If the Browns do not want him back, then what? Do they release him? Trade him to another team? And if that happens, the same questions above about timing apply.
It's week 6. 1/3 of the way through the season. I bet the NY Giants would be willing to deal a lot for him if everything checks out?
Who is the market for a pill poppin, coke snortin, rootin tootin wide receiverThe Browns would have until three weeks from today to trade him. That's the trade deadline. I have no idea if players that are on indefinite suspension can be traded. I highly doubt he would be reinstated by then.
Yep - that adds complexity. So it seems the best case scenario for Gordon owners is that the Browns elect to keep him, and bring him up to speed on the playbook/conditioning. He had no preseason - I would think that'd be at least a 2-3 week process.The Browns would have until three weeks from today to trade him. That's the trade deadline. I have no idea if players that are on indefinite suspension can be traded. I highly doubt he would be reinstated by then.
So should he be reinstated after, the only team he could play for this year would be the Browns?The Browns would have until three weeks from today to trade him. That's the trade deadline. I have no idea if players that are on indefinite suspension can be traded. I highly doubt he would be reinstated by then.
Did I hear 6 weeks of play time in there? And with the trade to NE and Brady throwing him the pill? I'm INNNNNNNNNNNNYep - that adds complexity. So it seems the best case scenario for Gordon owners is that the Browns elect to keep him, and bring him up to speed on the playbook/conditioning. He had no preseason - I would think that'd be at least a 2-3 week process.
So again, time-line for best case scenario: he applies this week, the Browns opt to keep him, and it takes him 3 weeks to get on the field? He's back by week 9 - which is the Browns BYE. Sooooo he comes back week 10?
Hmmm
Did I hear 6 weeks? And with the trade to NE and Brady throwing him the pill? I'm INNNNNNNNNNNN
Except...Did I hear 6 weeks? And with the trade to NE and Brady throwing him the pill? I'm INNNNNNNNNNNN
He is facing a 4 game suspension after he gets reinstated for violating the substance abuse policy the last time. So absolute best case scenario you're getting him back around the timeframe you outlined above. Then we're plugging the guy into lineups fresh during the FF playoffs. I dropped him last week and I doubt I'll be picking him up again.Except...
in my timeline I left out that Goodell would have to immediately reinstate him which I find extremely unlikely.
more likely that’s a 2-3 week process.
so you’re looking at week 11-12-13.
God luck with that.
Or more realistically he’s back in weeks 16-17 or not at all.He is facing a 4 game suspension after he gets reinstated for violating the substance abuse policy the last time. So absolute best case scenario you're getting him back around the timeframe you outlined above. Then we're plugging the guy into lineups fresh during the FF playoffs. I dropped him last week and I doubt I'll be picking him up again.
You're gonna get suspended for 4 games now, oh voice of REASON!He is facing a 4 game suspension after he gets reinstated for violating the substance abuse policy the last time. So absolute best case scenario you're getting him back around the timeframe you outlined above. Then we're plugging the guy into lineups fresh during the FF playoffs. I dropped him last week and I doubt I'll be picking him up again.
If Gordon gets reinstated after 10/31, he could still play elsewhere if the Browns opt to release him.So should he be reinstated after, the only team he could play for this year would be the Browns?
Part of what makes fantasy football fun. Everyone can make the obvious picks - it's the long shots that are interesting.16,156 replies
552,764 views
I can imagine that more than I can imagine him not lighting up and staying on the field. I mean he's lit up every other time he's returned, why not now?Part of what makes fantasy football fun. Everyone can make the obvious picks - it's the long shots that are interesting.
Can you imagine if Gordon came back in 2017 and lit it up? 1% chance, but more fun than Antonio Brown having the season everyone expects.
I think there is a greater chance that President Trump apologies to the players that knelt for the anthem than there is of Gordon outproducing Antonio Brown. But maybe that's just me.Part of what makes fantasy football fun. Everyone can make the obvious picks - it's the long shots that are interesting.
Can you imagine if Gordon came back in 2017 and lit it up? 1% chance, but more fun than Antonio Brown having the season everyone expects.
not saying this isn't true, but I haven't seen it anywhere. Wouldn't he have already served it with the indefinite suspension?What Anarchy99 said^^
...and he's still facing a 4 game suspension after he's reinstated. Just wanna drive that point home for anyone seriously considering a WW add
I dunno about that - I think he was allowed to reapply on Sept 21st (according to his personal trainer/life coach) - but IIRC he also said that was going to happen weeks ago, and it didn't.
As far as I know there's no requirement that Gordon stay clean for a year. And as good as it is that he went back to rehab (and I am genuinely happy for Gordon if his life is back on track) admitting that the 1st time was a publicity stunt may not endear him to Goodell.
It seems what's most relevant in order of importance is,
1. When Gordon applies for reinstatement, what priority will Goodell place on it.
2. Even if Goodell places a high priority on reinstatement, how long will that process take.
3. What will the Browns do? If they want him back (questionable, given their non-involvement with this process to date and their statements indicating otherwise) then he'll be back in _______ time, will take _______ time to get into football shape, and will take _______ time to learn the playbook?
3A. If the Browns do not want him back, then what? Do they release him? Trade him to another team? And if that happens, the same questions above about timing apply.
It's week 6. 1/3 of the way through the season. I bet the NY Giants would be willing to deal a lot for him if everything checks out?
Yes. All true.Except...
in my timeline I left out that Goodell would have to immediately reinstate him which I find extremely unlikely.
more likely that’s a 2-3 week process.
so you’re looking at week 11-12-13.
God luck with that.
I think you also mean every resource in the world falling all over themselves to get a piece of that $20 million dollar talent regardless if that means helping or enabling him.True story but they also don't have $20 million potential and every resource in the world available to them.
Yeah, but how much are those shoes really worth with splooge all over them?I'd bet every last pair of @Soulfly3's custom Josh Gordon kicks that there were far more enablers in the room.
Huh? Suspension after he is reinstated? What does that even mean?What Anarchy99 said^^
...and he's still facing a 4 game suspension after he's reinstated. Just wanna drive that point home for anyone seriously considering a WW add
Yeah, I'm not feeling that either. He's suspended indefinitely for missing the drug test - this rumor doesn't make sense.Huh? Suspension after he is reinstated? What does that even mean?
Look it up, it's in most of today's articles. He violated the drug policy last time around. Reinstatement just means he's eligible to be part of the NFL again. It appears that once he's cleared to even be considered an NFL player he still has to serve time for his previous violation.Huh? Suspension after he is reinstated? What does that even mean?
Ok, so throw out the 4 game suspension.Yeah, I'm not feeling that either. He's suspended indefinitely for missing the drug test - this rumor doesn't make sense.
What does make sense is Goodell taking 2-3 months to decide what to do.
Completely agree.Ok, so throw out the 4 game suspension.
Still looking at about 8 weeks for Goodell plus 1-2 weeks to get ramped up with a team. So 9-10 weeks, we are in week 6. Season over.
He was told he'd be served a 4 game suspension after being reinstated in 2016. Same thing this time around.He's not serving a suspension after his suspension.
That'd be ludicrous.
This is like those Japanese soldiers in the Pacific that don't know the war is over.
Not everyone.Had everyone conned with the it's just weed story.
I mean... he peed and took tests. So... The tests wouldve shown it. The league wouldve known it.Not everyone.