bigbrownbag
Footballguy
Scrotum
Re: this year:Just asked Sig about AdP's return next year.
This is his response.
Sigmund Bloom said:99% will play next year. not this yearBracie Smathers said:Dear Abbey,
Minnesota running back Adrian Peterson is still in his prime and still one of the best in the NFL.
This isn't a substance abuse issue so I think he has a zero chance of recidivism of future child abuse.
You're the lawyer so this is your bailiwick.
Not anticipating he has a chance to play this year but what is your best professional legal guestimate of him playing next year?
Signed Sad AdP Owner
If that's the case, then Peterson has no incentive to agree to a plea deal. Remember that he is getting paid his full salary this season, so it's in his best interest financially to avoid a plea agreement.That's why I said that he would only agree to a plea deal if he'd already had discussions with the NFL.Are we sure about this?IMO, he would only agree to a plea deal if he'd already been in discussions with the NFL to play right away.
How do we know the NFL didn't tell him, 'no way we can even discuss reinstatement until you get past your legal case'?
I doubt he's going to do that. Why would he make a plea deal that results in almost the same fine as if he's found guilty?Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
Yep, what you say makes sense.If that's the case, then Peterson has no incentive to agree to a plea deal. Remember that he is getting paid his full salary this season, so it's in his best interest financially to avoid a plea agreement.That's why I said that he would only agree to a plea deal if he'd already had discussions with the NFL.Are we sure about this?IMO, he would only agree to a plea deal if he'd already been in discussions with the NFL to play right away.
How do we know the NFL didn't tell him, 'no way we can even discuss reinstatement until you get past your legal case'?
I agree Joe, and on top of that I dont think the NFLPA will stand for a year punishment without a fight. Unions don't care about public opinion, they care about protecting themselves.I doubt he's going to do that. Why would he make a plea deal that results in almost the same fine as if he's found guilty?Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out payfor rest of yr. Returns 2015for the time he was out and plays after their Bye
Hasn't he already been paid, since he was on the exempt list he was getting paid, right? How would the NFL punish him in terms of gamechecks, or would they just not?Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out payfor rest of yr. Returns 2015for the time he was out and plays after their Bye
Yep sounds like what will go down & he'll be available Week 1 2015 with his new team.Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
The league could do anything they want but I'd at least expect them to have his give up 6 game checks.Hasn't he already been paid, since he was on the exempt list he was getting paid, right? How would the NFL punish him in terms of gamechecks, or would they just not?Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out payfor rest of yr. Returns 2015for the time he was out and plays after their Bye
Thats what Mort and Shefter just said on ESPN. The Commissioner Exempt list is just for this reason. Once his legal issues are resolved he will be removed. The league can decide its case then, and since the punishment for this crime is 6 games the chances of him playing again are likely if he can repay the 6 game checks. The league can only punish for weed if he is convicted of weed crimes or failed one of their tests. If they do not charge him of failing a weed test as part of the plea, the league cant use it as punishment.The league could do anything they want but I'd at least expect them to have his give up 6 game checks.Hasn't he already been paid, since he was on the exempt list he was getting paid, right? How would the NFL punish him in terms of gamechecks, or would they just not?Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out payfor rest of yr. Returns 2015for the time he was out and plays after their Bye
I think there is a 50/50 possibility he is playing week 11 @ the Bears..Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
I wonder who gives them a better chance of winning?I don't think the Vikings want him back. This is the Teddy show, the A.P. show has been cancelled. Building for the future, not looking to the past
until they take him out inside the 10 to let asiata fall forward.Honestly I'm using my #2 waiver on him. If by a miracle he plays this year you got yourself a top 5 running back of the waivers. I'll take the chances
Don't think that will happen to ap.until they take him out inside the 10 to let asiata fall forward.Honestly I'm using my #2 waiver on him. If by a miracle he plays this year you got yourself a top 5 running back of the waivers. I'll take the chances
-salty mckinnon owner
I don't think fans of the other teams in the NFC North want him back either, especially with Rudolph expected back week 11.I don't think the Vikings want him back. This is the Teddy show, the A.P. show has been cancelled. Building for the future, not looking to the past
To get it over with so he can try to play next year.I doubt he's going to do that. Why would he make a plea deal that results in almost the same fine as if he's found guilty?Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
Yes, it's possible but it's also possible that he's found not guilty at trial. I think the only way he takes a plea right now is if it's already arranged that he can return this year.To get it over with so he can try to play next year.I doubt he's going to do that. Why would he make a plea deal that results in almost the same fine as if he's found guilty?Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
Think about it: if a trial drags on beyond this season, he could be looking at a suspension next season.
Very few criminal defendants are found not guilty at trial. But the state can pump up its conviction rates via the plea bargain. In some cases, they threaten defendants to coerce the guilty plea.Yes, it's possible but it's also possible that he's found not guilty at trial. I think the only way he takes a plea right now is if it's already arranged that he can return this year.To get it over with so he can try to play next year.I doubt he's going to do that. Why would he make a plea deal that results in almost the same fine as if he's found guilty?Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
Think about it: if a trial drags on beyond this season, he could be looking at a suspension next season.
1. these types of trials don't last for very long; maybe a couple weeks.2. if he's suspended next season he could actually save money, depending on how his contract is restructured.To get it over with so he can try to play next year. Think about it: if a trial drags on beyond this season, he could be looking at a suspension next season.I doubt he's going to do that. Why would he make a plea deal that results in almost the same fine as if he's found guilty?Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
Seems about right.Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
Any idea what percent of cases that aren't plead down are either dismissed or won by the defendant at trial?Jack White said:Very few criminal defendants are found not guilty at trial. But the state can pump up its conviction rates via the plea bargain. In some cases, they threaten defendants to coerce the guilty plea.
Not sure if that's happening in this case. But taking a plea now resolves the case and lets him move forward. It saves him time and money. It's all a game.
Was talking about a lost season for Peterson, not the Vikes. Gotta think whatever happens he'd like to be able to start next season without any more punishment looming...hence the incentive to get all of this over with now.Jerry Curl said:4-5 is a lost season? They are only just a game and a half back of the wild card.Houston turmOiler said:Or he wants to apply a potential suspension to this already lost season so he can start anew next season.Joe Summer said:IMO, he would only agree to a plea deal if he'd already been in discussions with the NFL to play right away.
It's cute people think that the Vikings will not let Adrian play this year if he is allowed. The Vikings are 4-5 and heading into their bye. Its amazing that some think the NFL has morals all of a sudden or that those morals top winning. Just like other players negotiated with the NFL when they made their legal pleas, ADP will do the same thing like Joe Summer said above.
Minnesota would love to have him back as soon as possible since they are 4-5 if they can speed up the process i bet they would.
He's not suspended, he's been paid all year. I don't think the Vikings or anyone else WANTS his return to be this year, any potential team would probably welcome the extra time to let people move on to some other story. Credit for time served would be the best of both worlds though, since teams could still wait until next year while not fearing any suspension carrying over into 2015.Jerry Curl said:Is there? Maybe he will get timed serve. He was forced to miss 7 games before he was convicted of anything.Yes, because there's still a suspension looming. 6 games minimum, I'd guess 8 is the final result. Very intriguing for keepers though, and I picked him up cheap as a hold target.Very interesting. As a McKinnon owner, I have my fingers cross the Vikes keep AP off the field.
Really amazing more people don't get this.He's not suspended, he's been paid all year.
Interesting article but it is all from the point of view of AP's attorney.snogger said:I think there is a 50/50 possibility he is playing week 11 @ the Bears..KellysHeroes said:Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
as this article points out there is a "Out" available..
If he agrees to give back the money he has received since his Suspended with pay , say he donates it to a charity.. Then in theory..He has already missed more than the six weeks required under NFL's bolstered domestic violence policy.
The Vikings and the NFL themselves would have a hard time keeping him off the field, the trade deadline has already passed.. So could see the Vikings reinstating him for the game in Chicago, get the media Scrutiny over with before the 3 home game stretch..
at 4-5 the Vikings don't scare anyone in the NFC North, and wins over TB, Washington, Atlanta, and the Rams don't make you a playoff team. The Lions and Packers are for real, the Vikings are playing for the future. Next three games at Bears, home Packers, home Panthers, Vikings will be 4-8 with or without A.P. Rookie QB, no WR's (yes I am including Patterson), Vikings are not playoff material this yearcstu said:I don't think fans of the other teams in the NFC North want him back either, especially with Rudolph expected back week 11.Gopher State said:I don't think the Vikings want him back. This is the Teddy show, the A.P. show has been cancelled. Building for the future, not looking to the past
If they have a shot at the playoffs, sponsors won't care. More exposure for their brand. Do corporations have morals?Interesting article but it is all from the point of view of AP's attorney.snogger said:I think there is a 50/50 possibility he is playing week 11 @ the Bears..KellysHeroes said:Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
as this article points out there is a "Out" available..
If he agrees to give back the money he has received since his Suspended with pay , say he donates it to a charity.. Then in theory..He has already missed more than the six weeks required under NFL's bolstered domestic violence policy.
The Vikings and the NFL themselves would have a hard time keeping him off the field, the trade deadline has already passed.. So could see the Vikings reinstating him for the game in Chicago, get the media Scrutiny over with before the 3 home game stretch..
What would the reaction of sponsors and fans be if he returned?
It's just that they reacted last time. The Vikes stood by AP, everyone freaked out, some sponsors threatened to pull support. Now maybe things might be different if he has pleaded and if fans and customers feel he has done his public penance sufficiently...If they have a shot at the playoffs, sponsors won't care. More exposure for their brand. Do corporations have morals?Interesting article but it is all from the point of view of AP's attorney.snogger said:I think there is a 50/50 possibility he is playing week 11 @ the Bears..KellysHeroes said:Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
as this article points out there is a "Out" available..
If he agrees to give back the money he has received since his Suspended with pay , say he donates it to a charity.. Then in theory..He has already missed more than the six weeks required under NFL's bolstered domestic violence policy.
The Vikings and the NFL themselves would have a hard time keeping him off the field, the trade deadline has already passed.. So could see the Vikings reinstating him for the game in Chicago, get the media Scrutiny over with before the 3 home game stretch..
What would the reaction of sponsors and fans be if he returned?
But the state has morals, and their paying for a big share of that new stadium that's being built, the gov of MN has weighted in on this scandal and it was not good. Some local sponsors have pulled support for A.P. and the Vikes. Bigger deal then people think with the new stadium that the state is pouring money into.If they have a shot at the playoffs, sponsors won't care. More exposure for their brand. Do corporations have morals?Interesting article but it is all from the point of view of AP's attorney.snogger said:I think there is a 50/50 possibility he is playing week 11 @ the Bears..KellysHeroes said:Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
as this article points out there is a "Out" available..
If he agrees to give back the money he has received since his Suspended with pay , say he donates it to a charity.. Then in theory..He has already missed more than the six weeks required under NFL's bolstered domestic violence policy.
The Vikings and the NFL themselves would have a hard time keeping him off the field, the trade deadline has already passed.. So could see the Vikings reinstating him for the game in Chicago, get the media Scrutiny over with before the 3 home game stretch..
What would the reaction of sponsors and fans be if he returned?
Your over thinking it, The state cared because he wasnt being punished, Peterson will have served his punishment.But the state has morals, and their paying for a big share of that new stadium that's being built, the gov of MN has weighted in on this scandal and it was not good. Some local sponsors have pulled support for A.P. and the Vikes. Bigger deal then people think with the new stadium that the state is pouring money into.If they have a shot at the playoffs, sponsors won't care. More exposure for their brand. Do corporations have morals?Interesting article but it is all from the point of view of AP's attorney.snogger said:I think there is a 50/50 possibility he is playing week 11 @ the Bears..KellysHeroes said:Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
as this article points out there is a "Out" available..
If he agrees to give back the money he has received since his Suspended with pay , say he donates it to a charity.. Then in theory..He has already missed more than the six weeks required under NFL's bolstered domestic violence policy.
The Vikings and the NFL themselves would have a hard time keeping him off the field, the trade deadline has already passed.. So could see the Vikings reinstating him for the game in Chicago, get the media Scrutiny over with before the 3 home game stretch..
What would the reaction of sponsors and fans be if he returned?
Even if you're right, and I think you are, the Vikings still likely want to get everything they can possibly get in trading him.Gopher State said:I don't think the Vikings want him back. This is the Teddy show, the A.P. show has been cancelled. Building for the future, not looking to the past
The state has morals?But the state has morals, and their paying for a big share of that new stadium that's being built, the gov of MN has weighted in on this scandal and it was not good. Some local sponsors have pulled support for A.P. and the Vikes. Bigger deal then people think with the new stadium that the state is pouring money into.If they have a shot at the playoffs, sponsors won't care. More exposure for their brand. Do corporations have morals?Interesting article but it is all from the point of view of AP's attorney.snogger said:I think there is a 50/50 possibility he is playing week 11 @ the Bears..as this article points out there is a "Out" available..KellysHeroes said:Reaches plea deal, get suspended w/out pay for rest of yr. Returns 2015
If he agrees to give back the money he has received since his Suspended with pay , say he donates it to a charity.. Then in theory..He has already missed more than the six weeks required under NFL's bolstered domestic violence policy.
The Vikings and the NFL themselves would have a hard time keeping him off the field, the trade deadline has already passed.. So could see the Vikings reinstating him for the game in Chicago, get the media Scrutiny over with before the 3 home game stretch..
What would the reaction of sponsors and fans be if he returned?
Today's NFL has been built on a litany of terrible precedents. Where's the harm in one more? Still better than the Thursday night football we're now subjected to on a weekly basis.I think that allowing AP to "donate" his way out of a mandatory league suspension based on "time served" resulting from a team imposed action would be a terrible precedent for the NFL to set.
It's also telling that he's not suspended by the league, but is on the 'Exempt List' by the Vikings. The league knows it's in an awkward position and faces a nasty battle if they try to tack on a suspension after he pleads guilty to a misdemeanor charge.The thing is the AP incident with his kid happened before the New Domestic Violence Policy was announced. Therefore, under the old rules it is likely he would not have been suspended at all for a misdemeanor first offense.
The league really doesn't have much legally they can do to AP without risk being sued and taken to court again and probably losing.
However, this situation raises the question as to why the team and not the league was doing the suspending in the first place. I am not sure why but the league must not have felt it was in a position to do it. Maybe because the legal proceeding had to be resolved.I think that allowing AP to "donate" his way out of a mandatory league suspension based on "time served" resulting from a team imposed action would be a terrible precedent for the NFL to set.