Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I’m in that league. He offered me quite a few trades for Fournette including Thielen, Richard and 1.10.
Not that I hate Diggs, but that seems like a high price to pay for a guy who has yet to finish a full season, go multiple times over 1000 yards, or ever have double digit TD's.
Feel the same.
I don't even know if i'd give a second for Baldwin right now. I think he's just done. I'm not saying he can't contribute ever again, but he's 31, dealing with his second year of off season injuries that aren't healing well, and when he did play last year he was terribly inconsistent. He's had two 1000 yard seasons in his career plus a 991/8 season in 2017 but i think the memory of that end of season stretch run in 2015 when he absolutely went off to finish the season is keeping people from giving up.
Baldwin is 30, but turns 31 end of September.
Love that haul for Ridley.
I like both of these deals for you. Kirk could breakout a bit with Murray, that's gonna be a very interesting offense. Diggs feels to me like he'll never take the WR1 leap. Good value for both deals IMO.
He was 10th in my ppr league, but only 266 points. Sorry, but I don't generally sort WR 1s and 2s based on strictly top 12/24. Last year there were 9 guys between 292 and 337 points...those would be my WR1s. There were 13 between 207 and 266 points, those would be my WR2s. And that's not even looking at PPG and time missed, which could add to both categories in my mind.
I recall hearing similar things about D. Adams LY. I get the durability concerns but Diggs is still relatively young. His numbers have trended up every year. That said I would likely move him for that package.
There's probably a better chance that ends up being 0 long term starters than it is that it ends up being 5.
Definitely would not be enough for me to part with OBJ, but I like Sony, Golladay, and Woods. It doesnt seem terrible.
Agreed. My 1st rounders the next couple of years hopefully get me a Sony Michel level player to add to my OBJ, instead of trying to find the next OBJ with my 1sts.
It means I slide either Crowder or Shepard over as my #3 WR starter (instead of Lockett) but also address my TE need and then can go WR or RB in the draft with that 1.7 (I was thinking I may have to go TE before)
I don't see anyway Lockett repeats his efficiency from last year, which was actually historically good. And that offense wants to be run first. Not to mention he's pretty frail and injury prone.
Agreed. Dude's team is *really* bad. Typically inactive owner, too. Richard might be his best new RB.
No offense to @barackdhouse but I don't see any of that league's trades being really relevant to this topic - since in essence anyone not operating their team in that league as if it's now just a redraft league is doing it wrong.
Yeah I hear you. I think transitioning from last season to this one definitely raises the question more than ever. I have wondered if it makes sense to post these or not, and at least up until now I have decided that at the very least I should put the disbanding qualifier in there. But maybe you are right and I should not post them anymore.
I honestly don't care if you do, but just pointing out that dynasty people should be looking at them differently.
Yeah it's an important qualifier for sure. Even owners in this league don't look at it the right way, IMO. Many are still stuck in a dynasty frame of mind with it.Dr. Octopus said:
6 year plan. We had our startup in 2015. I guess more and more leagues are doing the empire style, in one similar form or another, where the pot grows each year for some kind of finale. But as we approach the end in 2020 and can see the light at the end of the tunnel, it *does* make it weird. 2020 rookie picks still have a bit of value, and they are shiny to offer in trades, but you're definitely going for the impact rookies there, and the value that comes from longevity doesn't exist. A young stud QB is absolutely not worth more than a Brees or Brady, assuming they both make it to 2020!bostonfred said:
Wow. From what I have seen this offseason, Evans is equal to Allen and the 1.2 by himself.
