Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I’ll take Barkley. Not been a Penny believer and Kamara though I love carries more risk to me than Barkley.donnie baseball said:
The only reason I take the Kamara side is if I know I can flip Penny into a player I like a lot more. Considering he was going 1.3 in many drafts, that might be possible but for the recent negative press. But if forced to keep Penny, I'll take Barkley for sure.
Seems light (but not outrageously so) for Coleman who could have his own gig next year. Even in the smaller end of a timeshare he’s produced.
1. Shaheen (and I’m a Burton believer)
B/B/A I don't really like any of these players *much*. I'll take the 1st and 2nd over Gesicki by a lot, and I do kind of like him.
agreed, so I backed out last second and was able to do:
I'll take Team B easily. great tradetombonneau said:
Seems you've posted more than once now about deals that later changed (such as above) or "fell through".
thanks. this trade was completed verbally. but I appreciate your comment. there are several others who have said the same thing, so I look forward to you pointing this out to them too.
So you backed out after verbally committing? Seems kind of in poor form. I have to be honest if you committed to a trade with me and then came back to try and squeeze more before it was "official", I'd walk away. I'm not judging you - just telling you how it would rub me. Obviously the other guy was ok with it.
thanks for the feedback. I agreed to it and then backed out yes. I'm well within my right to do so until that accept button is pressed. he wanted a 4th this year and next year to balance his roster out. i didnt want to do that and asked for a 1st. so I guess i thought it was agreed to verbally but then not. I'll have to only post here after it goes through officially to keep those who are a bit uptight satisified
Like I said, it wasn't accepted and you posted here.
GianMarco is right. You are wrong. It’s that simple. Post completed trades here only. Your credibility was already low, you are making yourself look even more foolish than before. But you do you.
This is very simple. Don't post trades in this thread that are not completed threads. If you are able to back out of a verbal trade acceptance then it is not a completed trade and has no business being posted here. Take those trades to the AC Forum in the future. Please quit wasting everyone's time on your trade offers you are trying to get help on.
Meaning you posted a trade offer as a completed trade to ask for input, then when it was negative, rejected the offer you led everyone to believe was a done deal. Please don't do this again. This is not a trade advice thread. You can go to the internet and put up a poll for that and not waste everyone's time here.
what kind of 1st is that? if it is 1.1 - 1.5 or so i don't hate it but if it is late you sold too cheap and I'm not a Green fan. Have a feeling majority will think you sold Green cheap
Other team finished 10/12 last season so it might be higher. 
You still sold cheap. Did you really shop around to every team? Did you make it clear to each team you were shopping him around to other teams? Taking 30 seconds to send out a mass email goes a long way when dealing away a guy like Green.
I like Green but three of his last four seasons haven't matched his reputation.
People keep saying this about Green. Where's the proof? Are there other completed trades with Green that show someone getting better value? Normally when this is said is because the perception is that a guy is worth more. This seems particularly the case with Green. Things are worth what people are willing to pay, not way you want people to pay.
I’m as high as anyone on Shepard so I’m fine with the deal. If you got yourself a guy in your 15-20 WRs dynasty tier, the deal is reasonable.
Startup drafts. What is Green's ADP? What is SHeperd? What is the 10th or so rookie?
I have no idea what you even mean here.. Are you talking about people making offers on the site and competing against each other with each offer being seen by the other owners?
1) So none in actual existing dynasties? Only startups?
Yes, yes it is. I think you should put one of your top players on the block and see what happens. You expect nothing but crickets?? If so thats a real fun league I bet.
This is the problem with looking at startups for value vs existing leagues. It may give a rough estimate but you can't always apply directly.
And each of those three teams could offer up more than his market value to not only get them, but keep him away from the other two teams. It can work both ways. I have not only paid for a player in that same scenario, but also received more because a couple teams who were competing with each other wanted to get stronger and also keep the other team from getting stronger.
This is an outstanding description of the situation. Well said.
