What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

⚽ Soccer Match-day Thread (5 Viewers)

El Floppo said:
I'm sure there's something in there about intent... well... kinda sure
Click to expand...
There is - and should have been a straight red.  But, the FA will only review incidents not seen by the match officials.  Here the match officials saw the incident - but did not see it clearly.  Ref awarded the free kick showing he saw a foul - but decided it was not worthy of a card.  Ref was wrong, but I am pretty sure the FA does not review "wrong" decisions.

Maybe if the ref puts the incident in his match report - claiming he saw a foul by Zlatan, but did not see an elbow thrown - but even then I don't think its reviewable.

 
El Floppo said:
So what about the stomp? Also a play on the ball, nothing called. Same situation?
Click to expand...
Stomp could be different - no indication that Ref saw that.

Of course, Bournemouth would raise holy hell if the FA issued a retroactive ban for violent conduct for that incident and not Zlatan's elbow...

 
Sinn Fein said:
Stomp could be different - no indication that Ref saw that.

Of course, Bournemouth would raise holy hell if the FA issued a retroactive ban for violent conduct for that incident and not Zlatan's elbow...
Click to expand...
There's no indication the ref saw the elbow either

 
Reddit to the rescue:

The latest changes cover "acts of violent conduct that occur secondarily to a challenge for the ball" and "in off-the-ball incidents where one or more match official did see the players coming together, but the match officials' view was such that none of them had the opportunity to make a decision on an act of misconduct that took place within that coming together".

 
Sinn Fein said:
Reddit to the rescue:

The latest changes cover "acts of violent conduct that occur secondarily to a challenge for the ball" and "in off-the-ball incidents where one or more match official did see the players coming together, but the match officials' view was such that none of them had the opportunity to make a decision on an act of misconduct that took place within that coming together".
Click to expand...
So... Banished? (Pronounced Shakespeare like with "Ed" separated at the end)

 
Am I the only one who thinks that yellow on Surmans challenge on Shaw was harsh?

Sure, it was strong... but all ball. Took Shaw out after winning the ball.

 
:lol:  Man U need another sub...

ETA - and ref jumping over the injured player - only needed a head stomp to make this game complete.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

JAA
Has anyone spoke to their kids varsity sports coach? How did it go?
2
Replies
56
Views
2K
cheese
cheese
[icon]
OFFICIAL - Buying / Selling / Moving Thread
2 3 4
Replies
154
Views
3K
Chadstroma
Chadstroma
Courtjester
Board Games--I know there is another thread but I can't find it
Replies
18
Views
469
Wildcat
Wildcat

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
Top