InDitkaWeTrust
Footballguy
It's at least close enough to get the conversation started.So asking for Lamb + 1.12 for Chubb isn't out of line?
It's at least close enough to get the conversation started.So asking for Lamb + 1.12 for Chubb isn't out of line?
Identical, IMO. I could favor one or the other depending on the starting requirements of your league, but in a vacuum it's a pick 'em.Non-ppr...
Value of Chubb vs Lamb? Would one have to offer extra to the other? Or is it just close enough to do an even swap?
FYI - Well, this didn't get it done. He said since their points were roughly equal last year, that he thinks I might have to add something to MY side to get it done. After reminding him that Chubb missed four games with a tweaked knee, I said I could see a straight up deal but definitely not more added on my side.So asking for Lamb + 1.12 for Chubb isn't out of line?
Yeah I'd much rather have Lamb > Chubb.FYI - Well, this didn't get it done. He said since their points were roughly equal last year, that he thinks I might have to add something to MY side to get it done. After reminding him that Chubb missed four games with a tweaked knee, I said I could see a straight up deal but definitely not more added on my side.
I think it's a lost cause if they're citing total points and forgetting to account for the missed games.FYI - Well, this didn't get it done. He said since their points were roughly equal last year, that he thinks I might have to add something to MY side to get it done. After reminding him that Chubb missed four games with a tweaked knee, I said I could see a straight up deal but definitely not more added on my side.
He was good largely on volume last year, and Drake will cut into that. Didn't they move/lose some offensive linemen?Value check on Josh Jacobs after Drake was signed? I know Jacobs tends to be divisive as an FFL starter and with a better than average Drake coming in, his volume will certainly take a hit, but at what point is he a buy low?
Mahomes edge over AllenTeam A gives: Mahomes, Hopkins, 2022 1.xx
Team B gives: Josh Allen, Chubb, Lamb
choose your fighter
By a bunch.Team A gives: Mahomes, Hopkins, 2022 1.xx
Team B gives: Josh Allen, Chubb, Lamb
choose your fighter
Sounds like you should be trying to get his RB’s by offering him a WR that scores similarly.FYI - Well, this didn't get it done. He said since their points were roughly equal last year, that he thinks I might have to add something to MY side to get it done. After reminding him that Chubb missed four games with a tweaked knee, I said I could see a straight up deal but definitely not more added on my side.
Give me the Chubb side.Team A gives: Mahomes, Hopkins, 2022 1.xx
Team B gives: Josh Allen, Chubb, Lamb
choose your fighter
i think if 22 pick was 1.03 or higher you might have an even side. but even then i probably still take the allen sideTeam A gives: Mahomes, Hopkins, 2022 1.xx
Team B gives: Josh Allen, Chubb, Lamb
choose your fighter
My opinion on this comes down to the size of the league. 12 and under, give me the best player (Mahomes). Larger than that, give me the basket of players but I would be looking to flip Chubb before he turns into a pumpkin in other peoples' eyes.Team A gives: Mahomes, Hopkins, 2022 1.xx
Team B gives: Josh Allen, Chubb, Lamb
choose your fighter
Probably shoulda specified:My opinion on this comes down to the size of the league. 12 and under, give me the best player (Mahomes). Larger than that, give me the basket of players but I would be looking to flip Chubb before he turns into a pumpkin in other peoples' eyes.
I am team Mahomes, and in win-now mode. I’m not in a bug hurry to deal my two best players, but I’m also not in a hurry to have my team age (Hopkins at 28) out & I’d love to have Chubb since I’m a little thin at RB.Mahomes edge over Allen
Hopkins about equal to Lamb in dynasty depending on your timeline
Chubb >> an unknown 1st
Team B all the way
Superflex can change things dramatically, depending on how your league treats QBs and how balanced your scoring system is.Probably shoulda specified:
12-team superflex dynasty, PPR, 6 pt PaTd, passing yardage is .1/3 PaYd
Yeah dealing for Hopkins has to be a win now move. In a 12 team ppr league I was just offered Hopkins and 2021 2.07 for D Swift and 2021 1.03. I just took over this orphan team and it doesn't seem like the time to deal for Hopkins. I may counter with my 2.03 instead of 1.03 though and see what happens.I am team Mahomes, and in win-now mode. I’m not in a bug hurry to deal my two best players, but I’m also not in a hurry to have my team age (Hopkins at 28) out & I’d love to have Chubb since I’m a little thin at RB.
This was an opening salvo. Team Allen has Kupp, but at 27 that doesn’t really get me younger. But if it gets me Chubb it’s probably worth doing & trade calc has that as even.
Appreciate the response.
Yeah - and unfortunately several in my league use the Dynasty Dominator trade calculator app, which seems to heavily favor RB & severely underrate WRs, which is kind of stupid. so I keep getting what I think are lopsided lowball offers of scrubby RB for my “big 3” of Hopkins/Evans/ARob, and when I counter asking for a real RB they complain that I “overvalue” my WRs.Yeah dealing for Hopkins has to be a win now move. In a 12 team ppr league I was just offered Hopkins and 2021 2.07 for D Swift and 2021 1.03. I just took over this orphan team and it doesn't seem like the time to deal for Hopkins. I may counter with my 2.03 instead of 1.03 though and see what happens.
Also, I think this is a fair counter idea. I think Hopkins has more than a couple elite seasons left in him, but Swift & a 1st is too much.Yeah dealing for Hopkins has to be a win now move. In a 12 team ppr league I was just offered Hopkins and 2021 2.07 for D Swift and 2021 1.03. I just took over this orphan team and it doesn't seem like the time to deal for Hopkins. I may counter with my 2.03 instead of 1.03 though and see what happens.
He ended up selling Hopkins and the 2.07 pick for Chase Edmonds, Deebo Samuel and a 2022 2nd.Also, I think this is a fair counter idea. I think Hopkins has more than a couple elite seasons left in him, but Swift & a 1st is too much.
That’s...not a great return. It’ll look a lot better if Chase is the starter / 15-18 touch per week guy. I like Debo a lot & I get that the other pieces are to pad the value, but I’d want more for Hopkins.northern exposure said:He ended up selling Hopkins and the 2.07 pick for Chase Edmonds, Deebo Samuel and a 2022 2nd.
Hopkins will be 29 in June. At what point will there be a drastic fall? I’d say fantasy owners should be selling by this time next year, or before.That’s...not a great return. It’ll look a lot better if Chase is the starter / 15-18 touch per week guy. I like Debo a lot & I get that the other pieces are to pad the value, but I’d want more for Hopkins.
I'm planning on selling to a win-now team next year, or this if I have some bad injury luck and/or start off in a hole record-wise.Hopkins will be 29 in June. At what point will there be a drastic fall? I’d say fantasy owners should be selling by this time next year, or before.
What would it take to get him from you?I'm planning on selling to a win-now team next year, or this if I have some bad injury luck and/or start off in a hole record-wise.
He certainly hasn't slowed down at all, and he's in a good situation. It's not like he's dramatically out of shape & he has very little injury history in recent memory.
Right now? The Debo offer would do it if it was a RB we knew could be counted on as a RB2? Maybe like 2.x + Debo+Carson or something. Even a RoJo type where you know the production is guaranteed.What would it take to get him from you?
I would break my IPhone screen clicking accept if I checked my inbox and someone had offered me a 1st of any year for Thielen.What's an older, but still productive, WR like Adam Thielen worth as a one year rental - assuming you're trying to win it all this year or bust?
Future first? Current second?
So, a current 2nd then?I would break my IPhone screen clicking accept if I checked my inbox and someone had offered me a 1st of any year for Thielen.
Possibly, but I still wouldn’t do an early one. Too many good prospects in this draft that could still be on the board. Personally, I’m probably not even considering offering anything unless it’s like 2.05 or later.So, a current 2nd then?
I recently moved him on a team that won the league in 2020 - for a future second and James Washington. It was before free agency when I thought JJSS would surely be moving on. I didn't get much interest when I shopped him around. He's 31 and Cousins is coming off what I think will be his career year. Not sure Thielen sees double digit TDs again.What's an older, but still productive, WR like Adam Thielen worth as a one year rental - assuming you're trying to win it all this year or bust?
Future first? Current second?
If you're trying to move him I think it is best to package him. I moved him and Woods together for a younger WR and Hurts in SF. Who is going for something like a current to late mid 1st. Otherwise Thielen is almost unsellable. I wouldn't pay more than a 3rd and I'd hesitate even then. It's not that I don't like him for 2021 it's that I just don't like to buy old WRs and most don't either.What's an older, but still productive, WR like Adam Thielen worth as a one year rental - assuming you're trying to win it all this year or bust?
Future first? Current second?
I normally wouldn't buy either. But this is a league I'm pretty sure I'm quitting after this year. So, one last run...If you're trying to move him I think it is best to package him. I moved him and Woods together for a younger WR and Hurts in SF. Who is going for something like a current to late mid 1st. Otherwise Thielen is almost unsellable. I wouldn't pay more than a 3rd and I'd hesitate even then. It's not that I don't like him for 2021 it's that I just don't like to buy old WRs and most don't either.
3 first round picks should get it done then, imo.I normally wouldn't buy either. But this is a league I'm pretty sure I'm quitting after this year. So, one last run...
The uncertainty of Edmonds playing time is a big gamble. I don't know if I would move Samuel for him even with the 2nd rounder.Edmonds owner is interested for Curtis Samuel.
I love Samuel’s new situation, but I’m pretty thin at RB. Thin enough that I’m considering offering Samuel for Edmonds and either 2.06 or 2.08 (he has both)
am I asking too much for Samuel or paying too much for Edmonds?
I’ve seen word that Edmonds will be starting, but I’m not yet convinced that will actually happen.
my WRs are M.Evans, Hopkins, ARob, Fuller & Samuel with rags behind them, so it’s not like I’m that deep at WR either.
I guess this depends on how likely people think Edmonds will be to have RB2 value in 2021 & beyond, because I feel like a Samuel will have WR3 value at least. (Meaning a FF roster’s 3rd WR, for those who are very literal)
HSG knows this, but I do, too. I think it's going to wind up how the draft falls to AZ, but I expect them to add a back unless they're going analytics on us and deciding backs just aren't important or they feel comfortable with Eno Benjamin and Jonathan Ward in case of injury to Edmonds.The uncertainty of Edmonds playing time is a big gamble. I don't know if I would move Samuel for him even with the 2nd rounder.
I really expect ARZ to draft a RB and at least RBBC.
Completely agree ... how the players fall in the draft will dictate so much....HSG knows this, but I do, too. I think it's going to wind up how the draft falls to AZ, but I expect them to add a back unless they're going analytics on us and deciding backs just aren't important or they feel comfortable with Eno Benjamin and Jonathan Ward in case of injury to Edmonds.
Yeah, the guy has really put him in a position of speculating about what AZ is going to do in the draft. I don't like that bet.Completely agree ... how the players fall in the draft will dictate so much....
And to add to the original question, IMO, Yes, this is over pay for Edmonds and the risk is all on HSG side of the deal.
I think after the draft, Samuel will have more value to this owner. I suggest waiting ...
Not only that, but assuming how AZ will use Edmonds regardless. The talk lit of AZ now is “We think Edmonds can be a feature back.”Yeah, the guy has really put him in a position of speculating about what AZ is going to do in the draft. I don't like that bet.
can't understand why? 1.3 is gold and this is not near value for it. Chase's year 1 will dwarf Cook's 2021 season. Right. Out. The. Gate.Price check on Brandin Cooks?
I mentioned interest to the Cooks owner and he came back with Cooks, 2.12 and 3.10 for my 1.3 rookie pick. He states Cooks is a proven 1000 yd WR every season and his trade calculator () tells him the deal is slightly in my favor.
I rejected the offer, he can't understand why. 12 tm ppr.
Whoa. Don't do that offer. Cooks is a concussion away from never playing again. Not to mention that it's Houston. That might be what his calculator says, but I want to know what calculator he's depending on. And if every calc says that, then the calcs are wrong.Price check on Brandin Cooks?
I mentioned interest to the Cooks owner and he came back with Cooks, 2.12 and 3.10 for my 1.3 rookie pick. He states Cooks is a proven 1000 yd WR every season and his trade calculator () tells him the deal is slightly in my favor.
I rejected the offer, he can't understand why. 12 tm ppr.
Tell him to get a new calculator. His is broke.and his trade calculator () tells him the deal is slightly in my favor.
I had owner try to ship him to me a few days ago for a similar unrealistic price. When I rejected and told him not interested, he acted incredulous that I wouldn’t want him. And I quote: “Cooks is only 27 and has been in the top 12 5 out of the last 6 years.” I don’t get points from the past.Price check on Brandin Cooks?
I mentioned interest to the Cooks owner and he came back with Cooks, 2.12 and 3.10 for my 1.3 rookie pick. He states Cooks is a proven 1000 yd WR every season and his trade calculator () tells him the deal is slightly in my favor.
I rejected the offer, he can't understand why. 12 tm ppr.