Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Congratulations! You're one of the 50 million or so Americans he has to pretend to care about so he won't get impeached, so you effectively are an advisor to Trump. Call 202-224-3121 and tell your Senator or congressperson that you think Trump should accept >$1 billion for fencing and drones in exchange for re-opening the government.
The best part of this is that even in this "plan" there is no mention of NAFTA part 2 paying for the wall like @butcher boy and others have been claiming was the plan all along
Congratulations! You're one of the 50 million or so Americans he has to pretend to care about so he won't get impeached, so you effectively are an advisor to Trump. Call 202-224-3121 and tell your Senator or congressperson that you think Trump should accept <$1 billion for fencing and drones in exchange for re-opening the government.
Maybe Flounder would be better paraphrased here. You
ed up, you trusted him...
He should be hammered. Every democrat should be in every show callingbfor McConnel to bring forward the legislation he voted for prior to Christmas. There should be no other talking point except this.
Yes but it's relevant today because today Trump said he never said Mexico was going to pay for the wall and he never meant that they would cut a check. When in fact his website said they would cut a check.
"Today we celebrate.... our Schnifddibendus tie!"
they all have to agree - they all have to sign right ? Right now, if 5 billion were added for a wall, how many Democrats and Republicans would vote YES and only Schumer and Pelosi leading the charge of NO ?
Did you read that article? You might want to read that article.
Democrats have long talked about borders and walls being a GOOD THING
cherry picked didn't you ?
"We do support border management measures at the external borders. This can be surveillance measures. It can be border control equipment... But fences, we do not finance," the European Commission spokesman Alexander Winterstein said, commenting on the issue.
Presidential Oath: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Bit of a correction here or maybe a correction on my previous wording if I was unclear. I've never believed or intended to imply that USMCA specifically mentions the wall in its language. What I've meant is that any additional revenue obtained as a result of its implementation can be applied to the wall as an indirect way of paying for it, even in the future. Similar to how having a wall and not having to assume the financial burden of illegal immigrants pouring in will result in savings that end up paying for it as well.The best part of this is that even in this "plan" there is no mention of NAFTA part 2 paying for the wall like @butcher boy and others have been claiming was the plan all along
Or that Hungary is currently under the control of a right wing authoritarian who is making the country so awful that people are actually fleeing in massive numbers. One thing about immigration- it does tend to go down when you mismanage your country to the point that like 10% of the people who are already there want to GTFO ASAP.
So, when the Senate passed these resolutions in December - they were breaking their oath?
What threat to the constitution are immigrants?
I’ve been trying to catch up with the last few pages but I had to stop here.
So you give human traffickers and drug traffickers, and other bad hombres a free pass. Sad.
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
But if we were, we'd get a pat on the back from a Russian government "news" source. I can think of one person in this country who would do almost anything for that.
Wait until you get to the "we need to be more like Hungary so Russia will print nice articles about us" post.
Why do you try to put words in people's mouths and just (I won't say falsehood) flat out lie?
The "supermajority of states" bit is the thirstiest posting in the forum in a bit. Divorcees singing "Son of a Preacher Man" on karaoke night aren't that desperate for attention.
Mitch needs to have a talk with Mr. Khan. Maybe he needs to borrow that pocket version of the Constitution. Either that, he recognizes that we're now a dictatorship.
