Ilov80s
Footballguy
I agree it’s easier but what do you do with that? Without landing spot and team fit especially.I think it is so hard to really know what these guys will do in the NFL. It might be easier to see what they don't do well.
I agree it’s easier but what do you do with that? Without landing spot and team fit especially.I think it is so hard to really know what these guys will do in the NFL. It might be easier to see what they don't do well.
Get an idea of what you don't like I guess.I agree it’s easier but what do you do with that? Without landing spot and team fit especially.
Yeah that’s part of the puzzle, but I’m usually trying to figure out what the player does well and how they can win at the NFL. I think I would prefer a player who does a couple things really well but isn’t complete than a jack of all trades master of none type.Get an idea of what you don't like I guess.
It’s very easy to get cloudy. Paralysis by analysis.Yeah that’s part of the puzzle, but I’m usually trying to figure out what the player does well and how they can win at the NFL. I think I would prefer a player who does a couple things really well but isn’t complete than a jack of all trades master of none type.
Walter did it all. He also completed 11/34 for 331, 8 TDs, 6 INTs. Lol I'm just kidding had to give a shameless plug for my boy. That did it all.There are flaws in ETN’s game but that’s true of any RB. Barry didn’t push the pile, would make negative plays looking to break the big run. Emmit didn’t have long speed. Henry doesn’t do anything in the passing game. I think it’s more important to look at what they do well and how they can win at the next level because there’s almost no such thing as a perfect player who can do everything.
Yeah he may have been the most complete back. LT was really well rounded also. There’s plenty of room for a RB to not be Payton but to still be an RB1 in fantasy.Walter did it all. He also completed 11/34 for 331, 8 TDs, 6 INTs. Lol I'm just kidding had to give a shameless plug for my boy. That did it all.
Pro Football Focus graded Clemson RB Travis Etienne as the best pass-catcher in the 2021 RB draft class.
The 2021 draft class has a handful of impressive pass-catchers at the top, so being that group is quite impressive. Etienne (5'10/205) held a 90.9 receiving grade, per PFF, which makes him the only RB in the class to clear the 90 mark. UNC's Michael Carter trails just behind at 88.6, with Alabama's Najee Harris coming in at third. Etienne needs to clean up his pass pro in the NFL, but it's clear his receiving ability will give him a role on third downs.
SOURCE: PFF College on Twitter
Mar 21, 2021, 1:07 PM ET
yikes., that's not a good thing. 4.1 yards and a cloud of dust, 41recs/yr.Looks like Melvin Gordon 2.0
I've never been a huge Mevin Gordon fan, but he's a stereotypic back with all the traits and there will be no question he'll get carries. Will be wholly dependent on what his o-line blocks for him.Tanner9919 said:yikes., that's not a good thing. 4.1 yards and a cloud of dust, 41recs/yr.
only one 1,000 yard season in 6 years in the NFL.
Fantasy scoring very, very heavily dependent on TDs.
no thanks
Why not? I don't understand the hate. This guy had one of the greatest careers in college football history.I don't think I've ever seen a RB with more group think than Etienne. I own him in one devy league and wouldn't touch him in any other draft if I have a top 6 pick.
Not everbody hates him. I sure don't. Do I like him as much as some of last year's backs? Probably not, but he's a surefire top five guy (and most would say top three or four) right now.Why not? I don't understand the hate. This guy had one of the greatest careers in college football history.
I would certainly think so.Not everbody hates him. I sure don't. Do I like him as much as some of last year's backs? Probably not, but he's a surefire top five guy (and most would say top three or four) right now.
That said, there's something about him that screams if he's not in the right situation, he might be in trouble. The draft and his landing spot will take care of that. He did have one of the best college careers ever, and I'm surprised he went back to school merely to upgrade his stock into the first round. Will the gamble pay off? We'll see. I do know one thing: coaches invest a whole lot more in you if they take you in the first than if they take you in the second, it seems.I would certainly think so.
Pretty sure you can find my posts where I go into detail on Etienne. Not going to rehash it over and over. I'm not saying he will be a failure, but I like the other two RBs more and even the top 4 WRs and Pitts.Why not? I don't understand the hate. This guy had one of the greatest careers in college football history.
@JohnnyU - If you had the 1.08 pick and the other two RBs were gone along with the top 4 WRs and Pitts, would Etienne be the easy choice for you, or would you have other players who you would consider for that pick?Pretty sure you can find my posts where I go into detail on Etienne. Not going to rehash it over and over. I'm not saying he will be a failure, but I like the other two RBs more and even the top 4 WRs and Pitts.
That's fine, I haven't kept up too closely on the thread. But I'm just amazed at the hate I see everywhere. I get that not everyone is going to see him as a perfect prospect but to say he's outside the top 6 is pretty extreme in my view, and I don't really understand. I realize he's not a can't-miss or anything, because who is?, but I think people are overthinking this.Pretty sure you can find my posts where I go into detail on Etienne. Not going to rehash it over and over. I'm not saying he will be a failure, but I like the other two RBs more and even the top 4 WRs and Pitts.
I think this is pretty unique to Johnny U and ETN and I am not sure what Johnny Us motivation is here honestly.That's fine, I haven't kept up too closely on the thread. But I'm just amazed at the hate I see everywhere. I get that not everyone is going to see him as a perfect prospect but to say he's outside the top 6 is pretty extreme in my view, and I don't really understand. I realize he's not a can't-miss or anything, because who is?, but I think people are overthinking this.
Not doing that at all. I feel he is the RB #3 and I like the big 4 WRs over him. I don’t think that is so unbelievable. I just feel ETN lacks wiggle and vision. I could be wrong. He seems to be a straight line guy. I’m not saying he won’t have value, especially in PPR leagues. He’s an excellent receiver out of the backfield. I just see him in a 50/50 or at best a 60/40 timeshare in the NFL. He is definitely landing spot dependent IMO. I have ETN in one dynasty league and I’m not shopping him currently.I think this is pretty unique to Johnny U and ETN and I am not sure what Johnny Us motivation is here honestly.
He thinks ETN doesnt run well between the tackles and he would like to see him make defenders miss more in space. The criticisms are fair but the conclusion (would take 4 WR ahead of ETN) is not in my view.
If I didnt know better it almost seems like Johnny U is trying to depress the perceived value of ETN by posting negative things about him all the time.
Johnny is entitled to his opinion and I'm glad that everyone doesn't see things the same way..Ok the 4 WR you think you would select over ETN are they all going to be top 12 WR for fantasy?
Who do you think has a better chance of being top 12 at their position for fantasy? ETN or those 4 WR?
I am an advocate for the long term value of WR over RB in dynasty but I still like to win and there is no way I would select any of these WR over ETN
https://twitter.com/ff_marvine/status/1375809900463415303?s=21Marvin Elequin @FF_MarvinE
Travis Etienne’s career production vs 2021 class
RB3 w/ 18.6 Breakout Age
RB2 in YDs/Tm Play (1.50)
RB3 in PPR/Gm (21.2)
RB1 in YDs/Touch (7.75)
+60% RB dominator in final 3 seasons
Since 2015, here are the only prospects that are graded higher in my RB model:
Chase/Smith/Waddle... who's number 4?Pretty sure you can find my posts where I go into detail on Etienne. Not going to rehash it over and over. I'm not saying he will be a failure, but I like the other two RBs more and even the top 4 WRs and Pitts.
For me it's easy. Bateman. After that you have to look at Terrace Marshall and Elijah Moore. Yes, I ranked both of those players over Rondale Moore.Chase/Smith/Waddle... who's number 4?
Why do people always assume Pittsburgh is a great landing spot, me included? Didn't their line suck last year?Pitt? I see people getting excited there
you figure with those receivers, you are going to see a lot of 6 and 7 man fronts, I guess.Why do people always assume Pittsburgh is a great landing spot, me included? Didn't their line suck last year?
Ito Smith is gar-bage'you figure with those receivers, you are going to see a lot of 6 and 7 man fronts, I guess.
Atlanta would be nice if you think Smith is a placeholder and not a starter.
Mike smith? I think they signed him, didn't they?Ito Smith is gar-bage'
They signed Mike DavisMike smith? I think they signed him, didn't they?
How so? I don't think they play alike at all.Looks like Melvin Gordon 2.0
Group think? No more than Najee or Chase. These guys all have obvious cases for being in play at 1.01.I don't think I've ever seen a RB with more group think than Etienne. I own him in one devy league and wouldn't touch him in any other draft if I have a top 6 pick.
It did but I think it's two things. One, the organization is well ran so people have faith they will fix the line. Second, they have a coach who has shown he still prefers having a single workhorse RB.Why do people always assume Pittsburgh is a great landing spot, me included? Didn't their line suck last year?
Maurkice Pouncey retired this offseason tooWhy do people always assume Pittsburgh is a great landing spot, me included? Didn't their line suck last year?
IDK. Aging Big Ben wouldn't (couldn't???) throw deep. Essentially they were seeing a loaded box with safeties and DBs playing so close to the LOSyou figure with those receivers, you are going to see a lot of 6 and 7 man fronts, I guess.
Atlanta would be nice if you think Smith is a placeholder and not a starter.
Chase and Pitts looked great but supply and demand to me says RBs should be top 2 picks. RB really falls off fast both in rookie drafts and dynasty in general where as WR is really deep. I love Pitts but TE in the top 5 of non TE premium is too rich for me.With Pitts and Chase having the pro days they just had, Etienne probably is now in the top five range only, and may not be a surefire top three guy.
I generally agree with these as dream landing spots, especially the Jets and Hubbard, whom I'd linked them to in the Jets thread for that exact reason. The need to run stretches and one cut and go in that offense might be ideal for his long speed.My realistic RB landing spots that I would really like for fantasy are:
Rd 1 Najee Harris to Pitt (seems high for the Steelers who have a few needs- maybe the Steelers could trade back a few picks if a playoff team wanted to move up for an OL or Edge who slipped a bit farther than expected) Harris brings a lot of the same traits Bell and Conner did. He's probably somewhere between them talent wise.
Rd 2 Arizona trades up for ETN, stylistically and skill wise ETN is like the super version of Drake
Rd 2 Denver takes Williams, Gordon is in the last year of his deal and Lindsay is gone.This team has a lot of really good pieces in place and if they get the right CB, this could be a high powered offense. I could easily see Williams doing what Lindsay did last year and then in 2022 doing what Gordon has.
Rd 3 Atlanta takes Kenny Gainwell, he can ease his way in with Davis heading the committee, Gainwell could provide an explosive punch that Atlanta hasn't had in the backfield in a few years
Rd 3 Miami takes Jermar Jefferson and he has the chance to pass up Gaskins as the lead back pretty quickly, Miami RBs were pretty productive last season
Rd 3 Jets pick Chuba Hubbard , I assume they are going to try a Shanny like system where a one cut and go RB can thrive, that is the system Hubbard likely needs
You're going to have to drag me kicking and screaming to Pitts at five, but I think you can get me there as long as you're willing to put up with me during the ride.Chase and Pitts looked great but supply and demand to me says RBs should be top 2 picks. RB really falls off fast both in rookie drafts and dynasty in general where as WR is really deep. I love Pitts but TE in the top 5 of non TE premium is too rich for me.
I'm seriously thinking about him at 3 in a TE premium league and already have Kittle and Andrews and can only start 2 TEs and I need RBs. I would most likely draft Williams or Harris at 3 if there, but if I had to choose between ETN, Pitts, and Chase, that is where it gets interesting between Chase and Pitts.You're going to have to drag me kicking and screaming to Pitts at five, but I think you can get me there as long as you're willing to put up with me during the ride.