knowledge dropper
Footballguy
It’s sad that there are actually people that get salty when Trump gets cheers.
I think everyone is just happy he could visit, place barely dodged that hurricane a couple months backIt’s sad that there are actually people that get salty when Trump gets cheers.
No wayNot that I care that much but fans definitely don’t drink before a football game.
It’s sad that there are actually people that get salty when Trump gets cheers.
I don't think people got salty over the fact he got cheers. It was the claim that these cheers in the deep south at a football game are representative of how "Real America" feels.It’s sad that there are actually people that get salty when Trump gets cheers.
The thread wasn’t about him getting booed but how you feel about booing the prez.
Its funny how they celebrate the liberal boos in DC and create threads about it but the positive doesn't get a peep or just the salty "well it's Alabama". Another great example of the interesting times we are in .
To be more fair they have one home game left against W Carolina. How many does anyone want to buy for $10? I can fill any number. That threat is more like a favor to the students because the refund would exceed the value.Well to be fair, the student were originally threatened that they would loose their tickets for the rest of the season if they booed him...although that was later walked back but maybe they felt it wasn't worth risking it
He’s terrified to go anywhere that might boo him or chant “lock him up”.I don't think people got salty over the fact he got cheers. It was the claim that these cheers in the deep south at a football game are representative of how "Real America" feels.
Let's say Trump attends the USC/UCLA game in Southern California on 11/23. If he were booed there would anyone seriously think or suggest that was a representation of how "Real America" feels about him?
Context is everything.
Better to call it your opinionHe’d been to like 3 sporting events prior to getting booed at the WS. Now he’s going to them weekly at venues where he feels he’ll be cheered.
These things don’t seem to be a coincidence.
Let’s call it an observation.
What? He’s gone to places where he has been booed.He’s terrified to go anywhere that might boo him or chant “lock him up”.
Some of the Trojan fans would cheer.Let's say Trump attends the USC/UCLA game in Southern California on 11/23. If he were booed there would anyone seriously think or suggest that was a representation of how "Real America" feels about him?
Context is everything.
To be fair...it’s Alabama.Video of crowd reaction to Trump
I'll respect the new rules and spare you the endzone dance, but this should be a wake up call for anyone who thinks Trump is in trouble for 2020.
I think this is correct.I know this is probably way outside the box...but MAYBE college students in Alabama respect the President?
Anybody who thinks Trump won’t win Alabama is crazy; anybody who thinks a WS game in DC is representative of the entire country is crazy; anybody who thinks a college football game in Alabama is representative of the entire country is crazy. He’s both widely popular and widely loathed.Bozeman Bruiser said:Video of crowd reaction to Trump
I'll respect the new rules and spare you the endzone dance, but this should be a wake up call for anyone who thinks Trump is in trouble for 2020.
It is a bit alarming how invested Democrats are in this. I hoped Obama got booed every place he went, but I didn’t plan my entire evening and dissect every different YouTube video of the event to score political points and make myself feel better.knowledge dropper said:It’s sad that there are actually people that get salty when Trump gets cheers.
I can speak for 3 Democrats, myself and my voting age daughters. They weren't even aware of this event until I brought it up, and I wouldn't be aware of it if not for the fact that I'm a football fan. It didn't affect my evening, and I haven't seen a single YouTube video. But I did enjoy the loss by Saban's team and watching a great performance by the future Dolphin QB.It is a bit alarming how invested Democrats are in this. I hoped Obama got booed every place he went, but I didn’t plan my entire evening and dissect every different YouTube video of the event to score political points and make myself feel better.
Trump is back at 49% approval (4pts higher than Obama at this point in his presidency). I love how wildly unpopular you guys think he is. Boozeman was right on the money up thread, Democrats better take this as a big wake up call.I can speak for 3 Democrats, myself and my voting age daughters. They weren't even aware of this event until I brought it up, and I wouldn't be aware of it if not for the fact that I'm a football fan. It didn't affect my evening, and I haven't seen a single YouTube video. But I did enjoy the loss by Saban's team and watching a great performance by the future Dolphin QB.
BTW, Trump's unpopularity extends outside the USA to almost every democracy, except for Israel. It's not just Democrats that disapprove or mock him.
He’s wildly popular and wildly unpopular.Trump is back at 49% approval (4pts higher than Obama at this point in his presidency). I love how wildly unpopular you guys think he is. Boozeman was right on the money up thread, Democrats better take this as a big wake up call.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_nov08?fullbrowser
41.4% approval per Nate Silver. Here's a handy link: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/Trump is back at 49% approval (4pts higher than Obama at this point in his presidency). I love how wildly unpopular you guys think he is. Boozeman was right on the money up thread, Democrats better take this as a big wake up call.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_nov08?fullbrowser
I believe that as impeachment goes on Trump’s approval will actually go up a bit because many Republicans who are not Trump supporters will unify with the party- while not fans of Trump’s actions they will regard the Democrats as overreaching- we already see some of that taking place.Trump is back at 49% approval (4pts higher than Obama at this point in his presidency). I love how wildly unpopular you guys think he is. Boozeman was right on the money up thread, Democrats better take this as a big wake up call.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_nov08?fullbrowser
I think one of the most interesting aspects of that page - just how consistently unpopular Trump is, and has been from the start.41.4% approval per Nate Silver. Here's a handy link: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/
Indeed, see "Lock Her Up!"you can boo for somebody
I think when its a coordinated act though, where the crowd is led into a chant .... that's pathetic IMO and not indicative of the crowd but rather the puppet masters pulling the strings behind it.
Symptom, not catalyst.The alternative is that Trump has broken us.
What is concerning is Trump won the majority of states quite easily 30-20. Will that hold up again? I am worried if this impeachment fails it will bite the Dems big in the rear end next year. It will be 4 years of wasted time, energy and $$$ trying to remove Trump.I think one of the most interesting aspects of that page - just how consistently unpopular Trump is, and has been from the start.
The unpopular aspect is somewhat easy to understand - a majority of voters voted against him in 2016. But, the consistency I think shows the polarization of the country - in ways it has not been in the past.
Nothing Trump says or does moves the needle up or down. When you compare that to past presidents, they all had their ups and downs - suggesting that people were less polarized then, and reacted according to specific things/policies - rather than a blanket approval/disapproval no matter what the president did.
I am sure the Trump supporters will point to that as proof the Deep State, and left-leaning media are out to get Trump - but I think this shows that the polarization is unique to Trump, and that when Trump leaves office we will return to normal divisiveness - at least we all better hope so. The alternative is that Trump has broken us.
I don't think so - at the very least is a little of both. Obama had peaks and valleys which suggests that his support was not lock-step partisanship. Yet, Trump is consistently unpopular - despite what he calls a great economy - which is usually a good indicator of presidential popularity.Symptom, not catalyst.
I’d argue it’s more an issue of fatigue than brokenness.I don't think so - at the very least is a little of both. Obama had peaks and valleys which suggests that his support was not lock-step partisanship. Yet, Trump is consistently unpopular - despite what he calls a great economy - which is usually a good indicator of presidential popularity.
Trump's week in sports can be summed up with Marvel.cobalt_27 said:To be fair...it’s Alabama.
Trump will win a majority of states quite easily.What is concerning is Trump won the majority of states quite easily 30-20. Will that hold up again? I am worried if this impeachment fails it will bite the Dems big in the rear end next year. It will be 4 years of wasted time, energy and $$$ trying to remove Trump.
Fair enough. You might be very well right. I just saw these seeds being sown from 1992 onward, with the rise of the Reform Party and the constant Iowa success of economic populists on the right. Mix that with evangelical support for justices and you've got the perfect intractable firestorm that divides along support/non-support lines for one person and one person alone. if Donald Trump seems authoritarian, it's because he's tapped into a weird coalition of voters. Think of his coalition as almost parliamentary in nature, and you've got a better grasp of the situation. (Not you as in you, but you as in "if one...".)I don't think so - at the very least is a little of both. Obama had peaks and valleys which suggests that his support was not lock-step partisanship. Yet, Trump is consistently unpopular - despite what he calls a great economy - which is usually a good indicator of presidential popularity.
I agree. He has Alabama locked up.Bozeman Bruiser said:Video of crowd reaction to Trump
I'll respect the new rules and spare you the endzone dance, but this should be a wake up call for anyone who thinks Trump is in trouble for 2020.
He has been to how many UFC events before this one?Bozeman Bruiser said:1. World Series in DC for first time in 86 years? Trump attends.
2. Trump has been good friends with Dana White, president of UFC for nearly 20 years. He gave them a shot by hosting an event at Taj Mahal when most of America was trying to shut them. Trump attending a UFC event in NYC has been in the works for several years. Interview with Dana White
3. Attending the Bama-LSU game has likely been on the schedule for months as well, considering LA has an election for governor next weekend. Trump held a rally a few weeks ago in Lake Charles, this week in Monroe, and next week in Bossier City. Attending the game would be a boost for LA and AL. A potential AL Senate candidate was in the booth with him as well, Tommy Tuberville.
While it is cute that some of you live in a world where everything is dictated by CNN talking points and hatred of Trump, the reality is that he is a hard working, loyal, smart businessman. So he might attend some events that involve his longtime friends (Dana White) or constituents with important elections (LA and AL) on the horizon.
Did I really need to state that this is my opinion?Gopher State said:Better to call it your opinion
glad he found his safe spaceknowledge dropper said:It’s sad that there are actually people that get salty when Trump gets cheers.
And the other polls and aggregate polling?Trump is back at 49% approval (4pts higher than Obama at this point in his presidency). I love how wildly unpopular you guys think he is. Boozeman was right on the money up thread, Democrats better take this as a big wake up call.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_nov08?fullbrowser
Great post here. Well saidI think one of the most interesting aspects of that page - just how consistently unpopular Trump is, and has been from the start.
The unpopular aspect is somewhat easy to understand - a majority of voters voted against him in 2016. But, the consistency I think shows the polarization of the country - in ways it has not been in the past.
Nothing Trump says or does moves the needle up or down. When you compare that to past presidents, they all had their ups and downs - suggesting that people were less polarized then, and reacted according to specific things/policies - rather than a blanket approval/disapproval no matter what the president did.
I am sure the Trump supporters will point to that as proof the Deep State, and left-leaning media are out to get Trump - but I think this shows that the polarization is unique to Trump, and that when Trump leaves office we will return to normal divisiveness - at least we all better hope so. The alternative is that Trump has broken us.
if that was at a baseball game etc yes, I disagree with that tooIndeed, see "Lock Her Up!"
That’s very debatable but at least you admit to your side.if that was at a baseball game etc yes, I disagree with that too
both sides of this political spectrum have reduced themselves to trash .... neither has a moral or ethical up on the other right now :(
its actually not debatable at allThat’s very debatable but at least you admit to your side.
Who paid false accusers. That seems like an accusation here that should be backed up. Can you please provide a link to that?its actually not debatable at all
Trump is an antagonist, and the GOP will use anything they can to attack and destroy a Democrats
Democrats will stop at nothing to get to Trump - paying false accusers, trying the Russia angle, tax angle, now this lol "whistleblower" angle .... and they will use anything they can to attack and destroy a Republican
What if ... in the coming Presidential debates, policy only was talked about and no mud slinging, no personal attacks etc etc? That's be awesome wouldn't it? but it won't happen, both parties have degraded themselves to slum levels :(
Who were the false accusers that the Democrats paid?its actually not debatable at all
Trump is an antagonist, and the GOP will use anything they can to attack and destroy a Democrats
Democrats will stop at nothing to get to Trump - paying false accusers, trying the Russia angle, tax angle, now this lol "whistleblower" angle .... and they will use anything they can to attack and destroy a Republican
What if ... in the coming Presidential debates, policy only was talked about and no mud slinging, no personal attacks etc etc? That's be awesome wouldn't it? but it won't happen, both parties have degraded themselves to slum levels :(
So how do you label the residents of Alabama?I don't know if we should be labeling the residents of the state ranked near the bottom in most measureables of modernity as "regular everyday people. " Alabama seems to be an outlier by any reasonable definition.
A little too obsessed with college football and Paul FinebaumSo how do you label the residents of Alabama?
Are you talking about Alabama or Georgia?A little too obsessed with college football and Paul Finebaum