grateful zed
Footballguy
Mike Boone - RB Vikings
This and there are a lot of good streaming defense optionsMike Boone - RB Vikings
Inman got signed to Indy too. I don’t suggest playing him but I’ve always found he’s a great bench guy-brings good ju-ju to the team.oh and Hilton if he makes it through the game heathy. Hope dropping him doesnt come back to bite me in the ###.
If you're starting guys off the waiver wire in week 16 you probably did something right to get to that point.JohnnyU said:If you’re starting guys off the waiver wire in week 16 you’re probably in trouble anyway.
great time to add in dyno. the other owners are sleeping.JohnnyU said:If you’re starting guys off the waiver wire in week 16 you’re probably in trouble anyway.
I got beat by Aaron Stecker off the week 16 WW one yearJohnnyU said:If you’re starting guys off the waiver wire in week 16 you’re probably in trouble anyway.
If you're starting guys off your waiver wire in Week 16 it means you're in the playoffs or super bowl in your league. And that you've probably been good working the waiver wire during the year.JohnnyU said:If you’re starting guys off the waiver wire in week 16 you’re probably in trouble anyway.
I started Perriman this week. Higbee this week and last. I benched Metcalf and Crowder. Crowder is my whack a mole this year. I technically didn't miss because he got outscored despite having a big game.JohnnyU said:If you’re starting guys off the waiver wire in week 16 you’re probably in trouble anyway.
Ive been starting WR 3s all year from the WW.....I finished top scorer and #1 in the regur season. Im in the championship game after scoring in the 160s which is a very good score for our leagueJohnnyU said:If you’re starting guys off the waiver wire in week 16 you’re probably in trouble anyway.
Not if it's TE or DJohnnyU said:If you’re starting guys off the waiver wire in week 16 you’re probably in trouble anyway.
Saints?I got beat by Aaron Stecker off the week 16 WW one year
Melvin has had 11.2 fantasy points or more in each of his last 8 games. Christian McCaffrey is the only other running back who can claim that. Ekeler does hurt Gordon's ceiling a little bit but Gordon is still the 12th highest scoring fantasy running back since Week 7.I'd love to replace Melvin G with someone. Can't trust that cat now.
I hear you but I'm in a non-ppr and the fumbles worry me. But yea, best to just roll him out there again, he's been a great #2 back for me.Melvin has had 11.2 fantasy points or more in each of his last 8 games. Christian McCaffrey is the only other running back who can claim that. Ekeler does hurt Gordon's ceiling a little bit but Gordon is still the 12th highest scoring fantasy running back since Week 7.
Not true. I have Cook and Mattison both hurt.JohnnyU said:If you’re starting guys off the waiver wire in week 16 you’re probably in trouble anyway.
LADELL BETTS owned some folks years back in the playoffs and especially week 16.I got beat by Aaron Stecker off the week 16 WW one year
Yep...2007 in a home loss to the Eagles. It was my 3rd year playing FF that team only lost 2 games all year including the 'Ship game. Had I started the Bears D over the Packers in a cold Brett Favre mail it in game, Ida won. I'm still not bitter...reallySaints?
You are right, I am wrong. Yes, there can be WW 16 guys that can make a difference.Not true. I have Cook and Mattison both hurt.
I also like to block my opponent who lost Godwin, so I'm grabbing Perriman ahead of him.
Tell that to the guy that just eliminated my best team with Breshad Perriman.JohnnyU said:If you’re starting guys off the waiver wire in week 16 you’re probably in trouble anyway.
ok boomerJohnnyU said:If you’re starting guys off the waiver wire in week 16 you’re probably in trouble anyway.
I believe I already said I was wrong about that, yet you pile on afterwards.ok boomer
it's all good, old timer.I believe I already said I was wrong about that, yet you pile on afterwards.
I'm holding you to this.If you're TE mandatory and have a bad matchup Hollister will score at least once vs AZ. Maybe twice.
I am choosing between Higbee and Hollister, and I'm bound to play the wrong one and, in the words of your namesake, I'll get nothing and like it.If you're TE mandatory and have a bad matchup Hollister will score at least once vs AZ. Maybe twice.
Always a good post -- the trick is threading the needle between the first two and picking up someone you think can help your opponent.My drops:
Honestly, anyone you:
- don't intend to use this week
- don't think could burn you by being on your opponents team this week,
- think could trick your opponent into adding that will screw them over
Without the 2 fumbles he'd have 11PTS in my league which he's gotten to constantly over the last few weeksI'd love to replace Melvin G with someone. Can't trust that cat now.
I got Gordon/Ekler and then Freeman as my Flex. Ertz at TE and Landry and Sutton my WRs right now with JuJu warming the pine for most of the year (It's a keeper league or I'd have cut him already in redraft). I got Noah Fant and Micheal but I got JJAW and Guice with Ridley in my IR spot so I'm trying to drop JJAW and or Guice for both Higbee and Ward. I'm also trying to get Boston Scott for kicks and giggles.Perriman and Higbee are still out there. Playoff teams were set at TE, or so they thought. Trying to get both, will start Higbee over Henry if I get him.
Could start Perriman over one of Boyd, Sutton or McLaurin, Need 2WR besides Hill. At worst my opponent cant use them. This is the last week, so I'm dropping my backup QB, I will not need him at this point.
I'm in a keeper league and some of the guys I could drop are at least keeper worthy to a roster. I mean we only keep 4 but I got a few owners in my league who could be suckered into taking 1 of the guys I would drop do to their own keeper issues.I am choosing between Higbee and Hollister, and I'm bound to play the wrong one and, in the words of your namesake, I'll get nothing and like it.
Always a good post -- the trick is threading the needle between the first two and picking up someone you think can help your opponent.
I have the luxury of shedding Engram, so I'll be gunning for Perriman or Boone, in that order (esp. since my opponent is likely trotting out Winston). I want to pick them both up to get the second guy, will need to drop Laird, who isn't a world-beater, but may actually have a good game.
This might not be the best example as Cook somehow may still go and they have Mattison (and Abdullah for that matter, who might be sneaky if both Cook and Mattison don't go).
But point stands that this week, with the ship on the line, playing keep-away while not arming your opponent makes for some hard decision -- anyone got some choices they are agonizing over in this regard?
Interesting...is it because of the matchups (SF/AZ)?I am choosing between Higbee and Hollister, and I'm bound to play the wrong one and, in the words of your namesake, I'll get nothing and like it.