Judge Smails
Footballguy
We had a trade that raised suspicions from the start but allowed it. Owner A was the commish receiving Michael Thomas. Checked scores and it turns out he lost by 1 point Monday night. Benched a healthy Michael Thomas and instead started backup Alexander Mattison in the flex. What? 8th ranked WR vs 55 ranked RB. 25th overall in flex vs 170 or something. Thomas scored a lousy 2, but Mattison 0 and owner lost by 1. After heavy questioning owners admitted side deal was made to not start Thomas that week since they were playing each other. They think nothing was wrong. Rest of the league is incensed. What say you? Don't do a lot of polls so sorry if not framed correctly.
Last edited by a moderator: