STEADYMOBBIN 22
Footballguy
Bad human alert ÂYup. If for some reason I were on the jury and unable to get tossed from it, I would be voting guilty on the highest count, even if I thought he were innocent.
Bad human alert ÂYup. If for some reason I were on the jury and unable to get tossed from it, I would be voting guilty on the highest count, even if I thought he were innocent.
Very easy for you to say when you're not in that position. Or did you not here about witnesses for the defense being harassed.ÂThankfully most people aren't like you.
People that stand with their values have brought down the mob, gangs etc...it's how our justice system functions
Agree.  Very bad form by Fox.  Disrespectful.  And Greg Gutfeld just made a statement on Fox that may get him fired.  You’ll be seeing it over and over the next few days.There is a time and a place for it, and this is probably the wrong time and place to be covering another news anchors' masturbatory habits and #metoo'ing him on the news. Sort of a sliding scale of priorities would dictate that this story would be at the absolute bottom of all narrative constructs.
CNN are no angels when it comes to narrative, Fox's aside about that today is awful. That's my opinion.
So you asked a question and knew the answer?  Plenty wrong there.ÂI think very few if any truely defended that.  The overwhelming majority has stated they don’t support looting or violent protest.
So yeah. Nothing wring with me and please try keeping it civil
There were specific quotes from at least three people in favor of it. We found them at your behest, and you're still caterwauling to the contrary. Accept it and own it. It's personal because you keep obtusely making it that way about "your side." Get over it. There are people on your side that defended it. On this very board.I think very few if any truely defended that.  The overwhelming majority has stated they don’t support looting or violent protest.
So yeah. Nothing wring with me and please try keeping it civil
Least surprising thing ever in my opinion.  I run in some pretty Conservative circles and it’s been  universal disgust at this killing. ÂGreat outcome. Pleasantly surprised.
I think it was just. Nothing pleasant about it, really, though. Don't mean to scold, just my own personal opinion. I'm surprised people can't see the utter potential for disaster that was averted here, but aren't less sanguine that in future cases that are more controversial and with less evidence that threats of riots and burning don't become the standard.Great outcome. Pleasantly surprised.
I think deep down he had to know. ÂChauvin showed zero emotion as the verdict was read. Â
Dude, get help.  Seriously.I’m happy justice was served.Â
Â
@TakiTokiyou are a coward and should be ashamed of yourself. COWARD. Not a man and please dont have children.Â
He said "nothing wring there." He never said anything about anything being "wrong," per se.So you asked a question and knew the answer? Â Plenty wrong there.Â
Very commonChauvin showed zero emotion as the verdict was read. Â
The guy says he would send somebody to jail even if he didn’t think he was guilty and you want me to get help???Dude, get help.  Seriously.
Did I miss something?I’m happy justice was served.Â
Â
@TakiTokiyou are a coward and should be ashamed of yourself. COWARD. Not a man and please dont have children.Â
I think he's guilty of being premature, is all.urbanhack said:Great take. You are pathetic.
Yes.The guy says he would send somebody to jail even if he didn’t think he was guilty and you want me to get help???
I'm really not sure what makes me more disheartened. The fact that a large percentage of people will be celebrating that the system worked because it is actually broken or that a large percentage of people will be celebrating that the system worked because they perceive it to be broken.  Either option is frightening. ÂNBC saying Biden will speak tonight and call for peaceful protests.  What the hell are they protesting about today’s verdict?
How many people NOT committing arson, vandalism, burglary, and grand theft tonight will it take for you to say that you were wrong and unfairly made assumptions?So out of curiousity....Â
What is the acceptable amount of arson, vandalism, burglary, and grand theft tonight before it crosses from "celebrating" into "criminal riots"? Â
Sounds loaded but is an honest question of those in here who have defended previous riots/burning/looting.Â
ETA: I haven't been following the case too closely so I accept the jury's verdict as fair assessment and distribution of justice Â
I know this will be hard, but can you say why? Use your brain, not your emotions.ÂYes.
There is a signifficant blue lives matter crowd that think cops can do no wrong no matter how egregious the police overstep their bounds. ÂAre there any?
How many good cops are grouped in with Chauvin because they are a cop? Â Sorry but guilty by association.How many people NOT committing arson, vandalism, burglary, and grand theft tonight will it take for you to say that you were wrong and unfairly made assumptions?
Not my area, but:Those who are familiar with this stuff, what kind of sentence is he looking at here?
I keep hearing "40 years" as a max but no idea if that's true.Those who are familiar with this stuff, what kind of sentence is he looking at here?
It's probably awfully easy to say something like you said when you're not under the pressure these people were under. That people can be honest with themselves about their own mortality and position is something that the system needs to address, not necessarily an indictment about his moral failings as a man. But perhaps it's because I'm disposed to like TakiToki as a poster that I feel this way.The guy says he would send somebody to jail even if he didn’t think he was guilty and you want me to get help???
Watching this from afar agreed. This seemed very likely. Fellow cops were telling the jury he’s guilty.ÂLeast surprising thing ever in my opinion.  I run in some pretty Conservative circles and it’s been  universal disgust at this killing. Â
So what’s the criteria for association?How many good cops are grouped in with Chauvin because they are a cop?  Sorry but guilty by association.
I can't find it now, but I saw 40/25/10 for the 3 charges.Those who are familiar with this stuff, what kind of sentence is he looking at here?
He would have known the outcome, by the quick return.Chauvin showed zero emotion as the verdict was read. Â
He'll likely be on suicide watch over the next few days if the state is wise.He would have known the outcome, by the quick return.
He has probably been psychologically preparing for this since he was arrested.
I understand why he did it but imo that makes it worse. Unforgivable.ÂIt's probably awfully easy to say something like you said when you're not under the pressure these people were under. That people can be honest with themselves about their own mortality and position is something that the system needs to address, not necessarily indictment about his moral failings as a man. But perhaps it's because I'm disposed to like TakiToki as a poster that I feel this way.
What I'm really trying to say is that it's easy to see one's self as honorable under any conditions when only words are at stake. Honest assessments in that regard are hard to come by. Not saying you wouldn't be fine with any conditions, but perhaps introspection and understanding our own potential frailties is what everyone is getting at, STEADY.
We'll have to see how he addresses this. When is this not seeing this announced anywhere.NBC saying Biden will speak tonight and call for peaceful protests.  What the hell are they protesting about today’s verdict?
You tell me, you made the statement using NOT.  That tells me “oh well, shame on them for doing that”.So what’s the criteria for association?
Whatever you do, do not read the quotes on the Fox News article of the guilty verdicts. Generally a good idea anyway. People are mad.There is a signifficant blue lives matter crowd that think cops can do no wrong no matter how egregious the police overstep their bounds. ÂAre there any?
Can he really be convicted of all three when the factual circumstances are the same? Is there a valid appeal issue here?Not my area, but:
Dressed in a gray suit, Chauvin eyes darted left as the judge announced that he was convicted of second- and third-degree murder, as well as second-degree manslaughter. He faces up to 75 years in prison when he returns for sentencing in eight weeks.
Second-degree murder carries a maximum sentence of 40 years.
Third-degree murder carries a maximum sentence of 25 years.
Second-degree manslaughter is punishable by up to 10 years.
He also tried to plea to 3rd degree murder on federal charges, and serve 10+ years.
Even if the judge gave him the max - the sentences would run concurrently - so 40 is the max.
Un-educated guess - he gets 20 years.
Ugh. That’s awful.ÂWhatever you do, do not read the quotes on the Fox News article of the guilty verdicts. Generally a good idea anyway. People are mad.
Probably - that seems like it should be good standard procedure for anyone convicted of a crime where the penalty will be a lengthy prison stay.He'll likely be on suicide watch over the next few days if the state is wise.
Broad daylight, face down, cuffed, with four cops holding him down, for nine minutes, with a group of passersby literally telling the cops they were killing him.This is the best case scenario. We al watched the video and I think everyone that has a heart, even the most racist of racists saw that video and cringed. It was awful.Â
He’s got several reasons for a appeal. That crooked congresswoman’s words alone.ÂCan he really be convicted of all three when the factual circumstances are the same? Is there a valid appeal issue here?
TakiToki didn't do anything, though. It was a hypothetical posed to him. He was just predicting and projecting what he would do. He was projecting his own moral failing, one presumes. It was an honest moment.I understand why he did it but imo that makes it worse. Unforgivable.Â
Thanks. I would say 20 years sounds about right. I'm one who thinks we sentence people way too long in this country..Not my area, but:
Dressed in a gray suit, Chauvin eyes darted left as the judge announced that he was convicted of second- and third-degree murder, as well as second-degree manslaughter. He faces up to 75 years in prison when he returns for sentencing in eight weeks.
Second-degree murder carries a maximum sentence of 40 years.
Third-degree murder carries a maximum sentence of 25 years.
Second-degree manslaughter is punishable by up to 10 years.
He also tried to plea to 3rd degree murder on federal charges, and serve 10+ years.
Even if the judge gave him the max - the sentences would run concurrently - so 40 is the max.
Un-educated guess - he gets 20 years.
again, what do you think people have to face in actual criminal trials where they are threatened with murder? ÂVery easy for you to say when you're not in that position. Or did you not here about witnesses for the defense being harassed.Â