pollardsvision
Footballguy
Only 3 hours left until we know which pick the Bobcats will screw up this year.
Of course you aren't to crazy about the 2-0 series. You are an optimistic OKC fan. In the context of the series the Spurs have dominated the Thunder. Spurs defensive tactics have been eye opening. And their offense has been equally impressive. I do not buy into the "holding serve" theory. The work started in Game 1 not the upcoming game 3. Its not over til the home team loses a game. Cmon. You can try to downplay the Thunder losing on the road. But you can not downplay the Spurs excellence.I try not to get too crazy about the home team winning Games 1 and 2 of a playoff series. It's not good for OKC that they've lost both games, but in the context of the series, SAS has just held serve and the real work starts on Thursday night.
Toni Kukoc was an excellent all around basketball player. And the Bulls had consumate role players. Great all around team with a top tier offensive scheme.The 1994 Bulls had three All-Stars. I think you're forgetting how good Horace Grant was overall and especially in the mid-90s. In 94, Grant was on a salary drive and since nothing motivates quite like money, he had a career year. After Grant cashed in signed with ORL, he was a key player on the last team to eliminate Michael Jordan from the playoffs. The 95 Bulls were just 47-35 and got knocked out in the second round again, even after getting a boost late in the year from the return of a pretty good SG who hadn't played in a while.5) Jackson won 55 games the year after Jordan retired the first time and was one win away from the ECF. Let's be honest. Those Bulls teams weren't THAT stacked with talent. Doing that well with Pippen as your only true star is pretty damn good.
Thanks. Every NBA fan has seen him sitting court side across the league.I am an infrequent visitor to this thread, so apologies if this has been posted before. Jimmy Goldstein is a friggin pimp.
Goldstein GQ blog part 1
Goldstein GQ blog part 2
Just to be clear are you talking about three guys on the all star team that year or guys who made the all star team in like, 1980?The 1994 Bulls had three All-Stars. I think you're forgetting how good Horace Grant was overall and especially in the mid-90s. In 94, Grant was on a salary drive and since nothing motivates quite like money, he had a career year. After Grant cashed in signed with ORL, he was a key player on the last team to eliminate Michael Jordan from the playoffs. The 95 Bulls were just 47-35 and got knocked out in the second round again, even after getting a boost late in the year from the return of a pretty good SG who hadn't played in a while.5) Jackson won 55 games the year after Jordan retired the first time and was one win away from the ECF. Let's be honest. Those Bulls teams weren't THAT stacked with talent. Doing that well with Pippen as your only true star is pretty damn good.
Pippen, BJ, GrantJust to be clear are you talking about three guys on the all star team that year or guys who made the all star team in like, 1980?The 1994 Bulls had three All-Stars. I think you're forgetting how good Horace Grant was overall and especially in the mid-90s. In 94, Grant was on a salary drive and since nothing motivates quite like money, he had a career year. After Grant cashed in signed with ORL, he was a key player on the last team to eliminate Michael Jordan from the playoffs. The 95 Bulls were just 47-35 and got knocked out in the second round again, even after getting a boost late in the year from the return of a pretty good SG who hadn't played in a while.5) Jackson won 55 games the year after Jordan retired the first time and was one win away from the ECF. Let's be honest. Those Bulls teams weren't THAT stacked with talent. Doing that well with Pippen as your only true star is pretty damn good.
Here's the point Ferris. Based on the history of Jackson coming to the Bulls and Jackson coming to the Lakers, I am going to make the following assumption:If Phil Jackson were the coach of the Oklahoma City Thunder, and had been all year, they would win this series against the Spurs, because the Thunder, besides being a more athletic team, would be a much better team, and Westbrook would know what to do. With Jackson as coach, the Thunder would get their rings, just as the Bulls and Lakers did. I'm not trying to diss Brooks here, but he is Doug Collins and Del Harris. He's got the talent, but doesn't know quite how to make it all work. Jackson would know.The 1994 Bulls had three All-Stars. I think you're forgetting how good Horace Grant was overall and especially in the mid-90s. In 94, Grant was on a salary drive and since nothing motivates quite like money, he had a career year. After Grant cashed in signed with ORL, he was a key player on the last team to eliminate Michael Jordan from the playoffs. The 95 Bulls were just 47-35 and got knocked out in the second round again, even after getting a boost late in the year from the return of a pretty good SG who hadn't played in a while.5) Jackson won 55 games the year after Jordan retired the first time and was one win away from the ECF. Let's be honest. Those Bulls teams weren't THAT stacked with talent. Doing that well with Pippen as your only true star is pretty damn good.
BJ is a pretty weak all star selection. I didn't even think to look him up.Pippen, BJ, GrantJust to be clear are you talking about three guys on the all star team that year or guys who made the all star team in like, 1980?The 1994 Bulls had three All-Stars. I think you're forgetting how good Horace Grant was overall and especially in the mid-90s. In 94, Grant was on a salary drive and since nothing motivates quite like money, he had a career year. After Grant cashed in signed with ORL, he was a key player on the last team to eliminate Michael Jordan from the playoffs. The 95 Bulls were just 47-35 and got knocked out in the second round again, even after getting a boost late in the year from the return of a pretty good SG who hadn't played in a while.5) Jackson won 55 games the year after Jordan retired the first time and was one win away from the ECF. Let's be honest. Those Bulls teams weren't THAT stacked with talent. Doing that well with Pippen as your only true star is pretty damn good.
I assume you are rooting for OKC in this series. Making you an OKC fan at this point in the game. Who are you rooting for? I assumed because you seem to gloss over the spurs wins. You acknowledge the streak, but not the actual play in this series. And you do sound like an optimistic Thunder fan. My apologies if the thunder are not your home team. I see you are an NBA fan. Are you rooting one way or another in this series?And by no means have I declared the series over.I've too many playoff series, and made too much money fading the public overreacting from Games 1-2 of a playoff series, to make sweeping declarations before the road team wins one. And for those keeping track, the number of NBA franchises FFA users have accused me of being a biased homer for is now 9.Of course you aren't to crazy about the 2-0 series. You are an optimistic OKC fan.I try not to get too crazy about the home team winning Games 1 and 2 of a playoff series. It's not good for OKC that they've lost both games, but in the context of the series, SAS has just held serve and the real work starts on Thursday night.SAS played outstanding basketball in Games 1 and 2, just as they've been playing outstanding basketball ever since they got rid of that dead weight from the University of Arizona. (1)In the context of the series the Spurs have dominated the Thunder. Spurs defensive tactics have been eye opening. And their offense has been equally impressive.The most dominant I've ever seen an NBA team play a Game 1 was BOS in the 1985 Finals, the "Memorial Day Massacre". The Celtics destroyed the Lakers, 148-114, and broke a lot of Finals single-game scoring and shooting records in the process. It would have been easy and even reasonable to declare the Finals over after that game. But not only did BOS not win the title that year, the only other game they won in that series was on a Game 4 buzzer-beater by Dennis Johnson (2).I do not buy into the "holding serve" theory. The work started in Game 1 not the upcoming game 3. Its not over til the home team loses a game. Cmon.It's hard to take this criticism seriously when you snipped the part of my post where I talked about how historically great this 20-game winning streak SAS is on right now, as well as the 31-2 run they are on since getting the team reorganized after the trading deadline. -------------------(1) Some say fishing with dynamite is unsportsmanlike. Being a sportsman isn't the point; sometimes I just like to see explosions.(2) Make up your own snarky joke about Larry Bird shirking from the big moment and passing to DJ on that play. I've had a long day.You can try to downplay the Thunder losing on the road. But you can not downplay the Spurs excellence.
Thats a low blow. Brooks is a much better coach than Collins and Del Harris. Completely off based. Brooks has done a great job building and coaching up the Thunder and its young young players. Not many coaches have out coached popovich.Its a good possibility that Brooks doesn't have the answers because he lacks experience. Experience Phil Jackson has. The Spurs seem to have all the answers to the test. Spurs defense has been almost perfect in the first 2 games.Here's the point Ferris. Based on the history of Jackson coming to the Bulls and Jackson coming to the Lakers, I am going to make the following assumption:If Phil Jackson were the coach of the Oklahoma City Thunder, and had been all year, they would win this series against the Spurs, because the Thunder, besides being a more athletic team, would be a much better team, and Westbrook would know what to do. With Jackson as coach, the Thunder would get their rings, just as the Bulls and Lakers did. I'm not trying to diss Brooks here, but he is Doug Collins and Del Harris. He's got the talent, but doesn't know quite how to make it all work. Jackson would know.The 1994 Bulls had three All-Stars. I think you're forgetting how good Horace Grant was overall and especially in the mid-90s. In 94, Grant was on a salary drive and since nothing motivates quite like money, he had a career year. After Grant cashed in signed with ORL, he was a key player on the last team to eliminate Michael Jordan from the playoffs. The 95 Bulls were just 47-35 and got knocked out in the second round again, even after getting a boost late in the year from the return of a pretty good SG who hadn't played in a while.5) Jackson won 55 games the year after Jordan retired the first time and was one win away from the ECF. Let's be honest. Those Bulls teams weren't THAT stacked with talent. Doing that well with Pippen as your only true star is pretty damn good.
BJ started that allstar game.BJ is a pretty weak all star selection. I didn't even think to look him up.Pippen, BJ, GrantJust to be clear are you talking about three guys on the all star team that year or guys who made the all star team in like, 1980?The 1994 Bulls had three All-Stars. I think you're forgetting how good Horace Grant was overall and especially in the mid-90s. In 94, Grant was on a salary drive and since nothing motivates quite like money, he had a career year. After Grant cashed in signed with ORL, he was a key player on the last team to eliminate Michael Jordan from the playoffs. The 95 Bulls were just 47-35 and got knocked out in the second round again, even after getting a boost late in the year from the return of a pretty good SG who hadn't played in a while.5) Jackson won 55 games the year after Jordan retired the first time and was one win away from the ECF. Let's be honest. Those Bulls teams weren't THAT stacked with talent. Doing that well with Pippen as your only true star is pretty damn good.
Nope.Okafor should be on the block now. Is there anybody who would take on his 2 years and $28m and give the Hornets anything of worth?
If the Warriors can get healthy, I think Barnes would be a very good fit for them. Curry, Thompson, Barnes, Lee and Bogut seems like a pretty good starting lineup.DX has Harrison Barnes listed at #7.
actually, i think it would have been a bigger conspiracy if the Nets got the 1, Benson already bought the Hornets for any real theories to start ala the Ewing onesLet the conspiracy theories begin.
Adam Morrison is available.Okafor should be on the block now. Is there anybody who would take on his 2 years and $28m and give the Hornets anything of worth?
"Hey Tom - take NO off our hands and we'll throw you a franchise center."actually, i think it would have been a bigger conspiracy if the Nets got the 1, Benson already bought the Hornets for any real theories to start ala the Ewing onesLet the conspiracy theories begin.
yep. I like Barnes a lot. He'll be a good pick if the Dubs get him at 7.If the Warriors can get healthy, I think Barnes would be a very good fit for them. Curry, Thompson, Barnes, Lee and Bogut seems like a pretty good starting lineup.DX has Harrison Barnes listed at #7.
Or not.LeBron is very good when left uncovered running to the hoop.
An combo guard that's too small to be a good SG and doesn't have real PG skills?You're kidding yourself if you think Jordan passes on that.Hope this means Beal to the Cavs.
Double Wade and dont let everyone else kill you. Not a bad plan so far. Hell Allen just hit a jumper... things must be gong well.Doc Rivers obviously made some adjustments tonight.
Seriously has Wade always handled double teams this poorly? Seems impossible.Double Wade and dont let everyone else kill you. Not a bad plan so far. Hell Allen just hit a jumper... things must be gong well.Doc Rivers obviously made some adjustments tonight.
I would think that, in the years prior to LeBron coming over, Wade was double-teamed every night.Seriously has Wade always handled double teams this poorly? Seems impossible.Double Wade and dont let everyone else kill you. Not a bad plan so far. Hell Allen just hit a jumper... things must be gong well.Doc Rivers obviously made some adjustments tonight.
Chalmers is the only reason you haven't won it by now. You might've expected that too, but not quite in this manner.When i bet the over 16 bigest lead of the game prop... this isnt quite what I had in mind.
James leaves Cleveland they get the #1 pickPaul leaves NO they get the #1 pick Who's next? Orlando?"Hey Tom - take NO off our hands and we'll throw you a franchise center."actually, i think it would have been a bigger conspiracy if the Nets got the 1, Benson already bought the Hornets for any real theories to start ala the Ewing onesLet the conspiracy theories begin.
/haterHeat are putting on a hell of a show here in the 3rd.
Fouls aren't helping either, as aggressive as Boston is playing offensively it's crazy that they have 21 fouls to 12.Heat are putting on a hell of a show here in the 3rd.
I think Barnes is one of the most overrated players in the draft'Kev4029 said:If the Warriors can get healthy, I think Barnes would be a very good fit for them. Curry, Thompson, Barnes, Lee and Bogut seems like a pretty good starting lineup.'Good said:DX has Harrison Barnes listed at #7.