az_prof
Footballguy
I think that's probably a good deal. Unless you think these injuries are presaging future injuries, Gronk is still the best TE going forward.1.07 + Vernon Davis for Gronk
I think that's probably a good deal. Unless you think these injuries are presaging future injuries, Gronk is still the best TE going forward.1.07 + Vernon Davis for Gronk
I mostly agree here. But when you want your player, go get your players!!!!!!!.. Where we probably agree most would be this............get them a different way instead of overpaying with a top 5 dynasty player.Just because you like two guys doesn't mean you should pay way over the odds for them. I have some optimism for Rueben Randle and Justin Hunter. If you offered me both of them for Julio Jones, I would turn you down in a second. There's a pretty fine line with this kind of a deal. If you're going to move an established property for a couple of prospects, I think you either need to nail your evaluations or you need to be getting elite prospects whose odds of success justify the trade.So what we have is an owner willing to pay a little above market value for two guys he believes are going to start shooting up the draft boards soon and there is nothing wrong with that at all. Does not always work out but I've never been afraid to make a trade offer I know may not be quite market value or that most people would think I got the worst side of the deal.
I kind of like Lamar Miller's chances in Miami, but even so he doesn't qualify as an elite prospect. Neither does Bell. To me this deal is an example of an owner putting a ton of stock in his evaluations and betting against the house based on that. That's fine as long as you get it right. Did he get it right here? I'm skeptical. I think Miller will have to be very lucky to match Richardson's career. Bell just looks like a plodder to me. He'll have redraft value by default because of his opportunity. I'm not sold on him as a long term solution.
Any time you can trade one good prospect and one decent one for one elite prospect, I think you've done well. Any time you move down a rung or two to get an extra piece of moderate quality, you're probably making a mistake.
Did lightning strike you when you accepted this deal?1.07 + Vernon Davis for Gronk
[SIZE=9.5pt]How in the world does losing one player "kill" your team? That being said this I would rather have the picks and flexibility although that is a personal preference[/SIZE]FFPC league
Never been a part of this big of a mega deal so not sure how to feel. Hernandez killed our team so we dumped Forte for 3 1st + K-Allen and was figuring on a rebuild but then got this offer and went 360 degree turn around.
Not sure how to feel about it right now.
Traded Away:Code:Ben Roethlisberger (PIT)
Code:Darrius Heyward-Bey (IND)
Code:Aaron Dobson (NWE)
Code:Keenan Allen (SDG)
Code:2014 Draft, Rnd 1 (from Big Baller)
Code:2014 Draft, Rnd 1 (from Shock and Awe)
Code:2014 Draft, Rnd 1
Code:2014 Draft, Rnd 1 (from Crunch Berries)
Code:2014 Draft, Rnd 1 (from Thunder Thrashers)
Code:Acquired:
Code:Drew Brees (NOR)
Code:Greg Jennings (MIN)
Code:Dennis Pitta (BAL)
Code:DeMarco Murray (DAL)
Code:Stevan Ridley (NWE)
Code:2014 Draft, Rnd 2
Well when that guy is 1 of your best players and this is a 1.5 TE PPR league and your only 2 RB's were Forte and Mathews and your QB was Roethlisberger and Vick and your top TE was Daniels is makes it hard to compete against the top teams in the league. We didn't want to try and struggle our way to maybe getting lucky and make the playoffs. We decided to blow it up and build for the future but when your offered this kind of deal you kind of have to take it. The 5 1st round picks are unknown value at this time. The 5 players we got are a known value for the most part. Also it really amazes me how much people love draft picks. If you compare where these 5 players are being drafted in FFPC startups right now and compare what random 2014 1st picks are worth this deal is insane value in our favor. I guess everyone just hates that Brees is old and everyone must hate Ridley and Murray even though they still are going in the 3rd round of startup drafts. In the latest FFPC startup draft I looked at Brees, Ridley and Murray all went in the 3rd round, Pitta in the 4th round, Jennings in the 7th round. I did not do a startup this year but last year when I was doing it I seen the following trades go down 2 1st round picks for a late 4th round pick (4.10) and usually a 1st round pick will net you a 7th round pick (in fact I tried to trade a 1st for a 7th and got shot down last year and another guy traded his 1st for an 8th round startup)[SIZE=9.5pt]How in the world does losing one player "kill" your team? That being said this I would rather have the picks and flexibility although that is a personal preference[/SIZE]FFPC league
Never been a part of this big of a mega deal so not sure how to feel. Hernandez killed our team so we dumped Forte for 3 1st + K-Allen and was figuring on a rebuild but then got this offer and went 360 degree turn around.
Not sure how to feel about it right now.
Traded Away:Code:Ben Roethlisberger (PIT)
Code:Darrius Heyward-Bey (IND)
Code:Aaron Dobson (NWE)
Code:Keenan Allen (SDG)
Code:2014 Draft, Rnd 1 (from Big Baller)
Code:2014 Draft, Rnd 1 (from Shock and Awe)
Code:2014 Draft, Rnd 1
Code:2014 Draft, Rnd 1 (from Crunch Berries)
Code:2014 Draft, Rnd 1 (from Thunder Thrashers)
Code:Acquired:
Code:Drew Brees (NOR)
Code:Greg Jennings (MIN)
Code:Dennis Pitta (BAL)
Code:DeMarco Murray (DAL)
Code:Stevan Ridley (NWE)
Code:2014 Draft, Rnd 2
Dynasty or redraft?12 Team PPR
I traded Ray Rice & Chris Givens
I received SJax & David Wilson
This is probably the key. We got excellent value for the picks, we just didn't get the exact players most people on here would take at those spots in startups. But yeah, a 2-3 year rebuild is never appealing in a big money league. Also no guarantee you can deal the picks for players next offseason.It wasn't that we loved getting these exact 5 players but it was really a great value deal and now we can continue to build our team and compete this year instead of waiting for 5 future picks to mature next year wasting a season and then having to do what it takes to rebuild which is actually trading most of those picks anyway next year. With 20 man rosters and 14 man cut down each Feb it is tough to carry 5 rookies and expect to compete so if your plan was to draft 5 rookies and carry them all year your looking now at a 2-3 year rebuild instead of one and in this case we are looking at none.
I guess we are looking at things a lot different here than everyone else.
DynastyDynasty or redraft?12 Team PPR
I traded Ray Rice & Chris Givens
I received SJax & David Wilson
Depending on your league, I'm not sure how I feel about this.
You must be really high on Wilson or have very little feeling for Givens.DynastyDynasty or redraft?12 Team PPR
I traded Ray Rice & Chris Givens
I received SJax & David Wilson
Depending on your league, I'm not sure how I feel about this.
Why are you asking that in a thread entitled Off Season Dynasty Trade Thread?Dynasty or redraft?12 Team PPR
I traded Ray Rice & Chris Givens
I received SJax & David Wilson
Depending on your league, I'm not sure how I feel about this.
I am not high at all on Givens, so keep that in mind on this answer.12 Team PPR Dynasty
I traded Ray Rice & Chris Givens
I received SJax & David Wilson
I should have posted my team in the original post.I am not high at all on Givens, so keep that in mind on this answer.12 Team PPR Dynasty
I traded Ray Rice & Chris Givens
I received SJax & David Wilson
I think it's a good deal. Rice is going to outscore Jackson, but maybe not by a ton. I peg Rice for about 3 more top end years. Jackson one, maybe two very good years. Then there is Wilson that really has a shot to start scoring well this season, I put him at good RB-2 numbers with an increase in 2014 and beyond.
Basically, the downgrade from Rice to Sjax hurts some, but is made up some by the depth and potential of Wilson this season and next, with good potential to help your team starting 2015. So I don't think it hurts much, if at all, now, and helps starting in 2 years.
Considering what your roster was, I like the trade even more for your team now.I should have posted my team in the original post.
At RB all I had was Rice and Morris so I decided to trade Rice cause I feel Pierce will cut into his workload and this might be the last year of elite status for him. Better to trade a year early than a year late. I agree 100% on your time frame for SJax and I am very high on Wilson and think he could be an elite talent but I also understand he is unproven. Givens is ehhh to me and at best would only be a bye week fill in IMO.
New starters
RB: Morris, SJax, WIlson
WR: Nicks, Wayne, Brown (Gordon)
WinnerSent rookie Pick 19, Dwayne Harris and Travis Benajimin
For Benard Pierce and pick 48
cuff to Rice.
Manning & Fleener by a mile... I am a believer in Fleener this year thoughNot involved:
Peyton Manning
Colby Fleener
For
Chris Givens
Luke Stocker
Rookie Picks 33, 45, 69
Keller might have stopgap value in 1.5 PPR leagues.12 team PPR (1.5 for TE)
Greg Jennings
Dustin Keller
for
Cecil SHorts
2014 2nd
I like Ivory, but I think you're overestimating his impact on your playoff chances. (Unless you think he pushes you from 97% odds to 99%.)az_prof said:I traded a 2014 First Round rookie pick (likely to be 1.08-1.12) for Chris Ivory and a 2014 second round pick (likely to be 2.4. to 2.08). I like this because this deal almost guarantees I make the playoffs...
This.ghostguy123 said:Considering what your roster was, I like the trade even more for your team now.xtreme11 said:I should have posted my team in the original post.
At RB all I had was Rice and Morris so I decided to trade Rice cause I feel Pierce will cut into his workload and this might be the last year of elite status for him. Better to trade a year early than a year late. I agree 100% on your time frame for SJax and I am very high on Wilson and think he could be an elite talent but I also understand he is unproven. Givens is ehhh to me and at best would only be a bye week fill in IMO.
New starters
RB: Morris, SJax, WIlson
WR: Nicks, Wayne, Brown (Gordon)
People getting what they can for Rice has been a common theme throughout this thread. Seems like the combination of his heavy workload and Pierce looking good has his owners really concerned. Not sure if I agree or disagree. Something to think about...xtreme11 said:I should have posted my team in the original post.ghostguy123 said:I am not high at all on Givens, so keep that in mind on this answer.xtreme11 said:12 Team PPR Dynasty
I traded Ray Rice & Chris Givens
I received SJax & David Wilson
I think it's a good deal. Rice is going to outscore Jackson, but maybe not by a ton. I peg Rice for about 3 more top end years. Jackson one, maybe two very good years. Then there is Wilson that really has a shot to start scoring well this season, I put him at good RB-2 numbers with an increase in 2014 and beyond.
Basically, the downgrade from Rice to Sjax hurts some, but is made up some by the depth and potential of Wilson this season and next, with good potential to help your team starting 2015. So I don't think it hurts much, if at all, now, and helps starting in 2 years.
At RB all I had was Rice and Morris so I decided to trade Rice cause I feel Pierce will cut into his workload and this might be the last year of elite status for him. Better to trade a year early than a year late. I agree 100% on your time frame for SJax and I am very high on Wilson and think he could be an elite talent but I also understand he is unproven. Givens is ehhh to me and at best would only be a bye week fill in IMO.
New starters
RB: Morris, SJax, WIlson
WR: Nicks, Wayne, Brown (Gordon)
I think it's because there are a few types of dynasty owners. Some sell players in anticipation of a soon to be value drop off, some sell when value starts to drop, some ride a player until the wheels fall off. Rice is a highly valued player who has had several productive seasons. Those who take the approach of better to sell a year too early over a year too late are probably now starting to look for deals for him.People getting what they can for Rice has been a common theme throughout this thread. Seems like the combination of his heavy workload and Pierce looking good has his owners really concerned. Not sure if I agree or disagree. Something to think about...xtreme11 said:I should have posted my team in the original post.ghostguy123 said:I am not high at all on Givens, so keep that in mind on this answer.xtreme11 said:12 Team PPR Dynasty
I traded Ray Rice & Chris Givens
I received SJax & David Wilson
I think it's a good deal. Rice is going to outscore Jackson, but maybe not by a ton. I peg Rice for about 3 more top end years. Jackson one, maybe two very good years. Then there is Wilson that really has a shot to start scoring well this season, I put him at good RB-2 numbers with an increase in 2014 and beyond.
Basically, the downgrade from Rice to Sjax hurts some, but is made up some by the depth and potential of Wilson this season and next, with good potential to help your team starting 2015. So I don't think it hurts much, if at all, now, and helps starting in 2 years.
At RB all I had was Rice and Morris so I decided to trade Rice cause I feel Pierce will cut into his workload and this might be the last year of elite status for him. Better to trade a year early than a year late. I agree 100% on your time frame for SJax and I am very high on Wilson and think he could be an elite talent but I also understand he is unproven. Givens is ehhh to me and at best would only be a bye week fill in IMO.
New starters
RB: Morris, SJax, WIlson
WR: Nicks, Wayne, Brown (Gordon)
I havent seen anyone selling "low" though. I don't think people are scared off or anything. I'm sure not. Rice has 300 touches coming his way for a few more years.People getting what they can for Rice has been a common theme throughout this thread. Seems like the combination of his heavy workload and Pierce looking good has his owners really concerned. Not sure if I agree or disagree. Something to think about...
I have Fleener and have been thinking about moving him for a WR. Trying to ascertain market value. This trade seems horrible. I can't imagine giving Manning and Fleener for Givens and Stocker (who is he???) and a bunch of garbage picks.xtreme11 said:Manning & Fleener by a mile... I am a believer in Fleener this year thoughGottabesweet said:Not involved:
Peyton Manning
Colby Fleener
For
Chris Givens
Luke Stocker
Rookie Picks 33, 45, 69
Yeah, looking at this one it pretty much looks like he got Manning for free.I have Fleener and have been thinking about moving him for a WR. Trying to ascertain market value. This trade seems horrible. I can't imagine giving Manning and Fleener for Givens and Stocker (who is he???) and a bunch of garbage picks.xtreme11 said:Manning & Fleener by a mile... I am a believer in Fleener this year thoughGottabesweet said:Not involved:
Peyton Manning
Colby Fleener
For
Chris Givens
Luke Stocker
Rookie Picks 33, 45, 69
Not a fan of this deal. Cobb > Harvin if only because of Harvin's injury history. He still hasn't played a whole season in 4 years. Add in that he was traded to a running dominant team and yea. Cobb should top 85-90 receptions minimum.I gave: Randall Cobb, Chris Ivory
I got: Percy Harvin
Ivory was my RB5 in a start 1 RB league and was never going to see my lineup. I like Percy more than Cobb. Gives me WR core of Dez/DT/Harvin.
I agree with that, I wouldn't take Ivory and Harvin for Cobb, I think his injury problems are too much risk for me.Not a fan of this deal. Cobb > Harvin if only because of Harvin's injury history. He still hasn't played a whole season in 4 years. Add in that he was traded to a running dominant team and yea. Cobb should top 85-90 receptions minimum.I gave: Randall Cobb, Chris Ivory
I got: Percy Harvin
Ivory was my RB5 in a start 1 RB league and was never going to see my lineup. I like Percy more than Cobb. Gives me WR core of Dez/DT/Harvin.
Non-PPR? If so I like Harvin, if not it's more of a toss up.I agree with that, I wouldn't take Ivory and Harvin for Cobb, I think his injury problems are too much risk for me.Not a fan of this deal. Cobb > Harvin if only because of Harvin's injury history. He still hasn't played a whole season in 4 years. Add in that he was traded to a running dominant team and yea. Cobb should top 85-90 receptions minimum.I gave: Randall Cobb, Chris Ivory
I got: Percy Harvin
Ivory was my RB5 in a start 1 RB league and was never going to see my lineup. I like Percy more than Cobb. Gives me WR core of Dez/DT/Harvin.
I personally like the Harvin side better but won't kill anyone for taking Cobb.Non-PPR? If so I like Harvin, if not it's more of a toss up.I agree with that, I wouldn't take Ivory and Harvin for Cobb, I think his injury problems are too much risk for me.Not a fan of this deal. Cobb > Harvin if only because of Harvin's injury history. He still hasn't played a whole season in 4 years. Add in that he was traded to a running dominant team and yea. Cobb should top 85-90 receptions minimum.I gave: Randall Cobb, Chris Ivory
I got: Percy Harvin
Ivory was my RB5 in a start 1 RB league and was never going to see my lineup. I like Percy more than Cobb. Gives me WR core of Dez/DT/Harvin.
Give me the Broyles side but I am not a fan of FleenerTeam A Trades:
Coby Fleener
Team B Trades:
Ryan Broyles
2014 2nd Rd Pick
Will take team A all day.Team A Trades:
Montee Ball
Team B Trades:
Antonio Brown
Zac Stacy
Joseph Randle
First worthy post ever by you on this board.If harvin is injury prone, so is basically the entire league.
This isn't gonna help.First worthy post ever by you on this board.If harvin is injury prone, so is basically the entire league.
Thanks man (or maam). That's all I was striving for. ONE worthy post before I die.First worthy post ever by you on this board.If harvin is injury prone, so is basically the entire league.