1- have you seen the broncos?2- tebow vs bradford?poor guy
1- have you seen the rams?1- have you seen the broncos?2- tebow vs bradford?poor guy
As a disappointed Lloyd owner, I am pretty happy right now. He will be the number one guy over there, will have a good qb, and of course a coach who is willing to sling the ball around.What do you think this does for Lloyd's value? He could be heavily targeted right away.
Yeah, but Lloyd + Bradford - McDaniels = $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$Lloyd + Bradford + McDaniels = $$$$$$$$$$$$$
Decker and Lloyd ownerDecker owner
agreedI'm also curious about the Rams' plan for Lloyd after 2011. The Rams are 1-5 so they clearly do not perceive Lloyd as a rental. I bet they lock him up and sign him as Bradford's future WR1 in Stl.
Except the Rams are 0-6agreedI'm also curious about the Rams' plan for Lloyd after 2011. The Rams are 1-5 so they clearly do not perceive Lloyd as a rental. I bet they lock him up and sign him as Bradford's future WR1 in Stl.
Can't see them trading Royal as well. That would leave them awfully thin at WR when you have Thomas not even back from injury yet.Royal could be next....
Rams are actually 0-5. Good for lloyd in fantasy, dumb move by inept Rams if this ends up a 1 year rental.I'm also curious about the Rams' plan for Lloyd after 2011. The Rams are 1-5 so they clearly do not perceive Lloyd as a rental. I bet they lock him up and sign him as Bradford's future WR1 in Stl.
For the BroncosGreat move.
Except the Rams are 0-5.I would assume MSW gets the boot to make room, as he was a "healthy scratch" yesterday, no?Except the Rams are 0-6agreedI'm also curious about the Rams' plan for Lloyd after 2011. The Rams are 1-5 so they clearly do not perceive Lloyd as a rental. I bet they lock him up and sign him as Bradford's future WR1 in Stl.
Yes. This definitely puts them over the top.No more excuses for Sam Bradford...
+1Lloyd was a flash in the pan. Broncos selling high.For the BroncosGreat move.
Lloyd/Bradford/Decker ownerAs a Lloyd owner, this is awesomeness.
I dunno, haven't seen him block enough to tell.Buy Denarious Thomas? How do his skills mesh with Tebow's?
He got dropped in my league last week. I don't have the money to get him after getting Tebow. I'm starting to regret the Tebow move. I agree Bradford could be real good the rest of the way.im gonna look into buying bradford now. with lloyd and clayton coming back, he could have a great 2nd half of the season
I wouldn't go that far. It wasn't so long ago Lloyd had made a career of making the impossible catch look routine and the routine catch an adventure. Let's keep in mind he's been the league for nine years and has a grand total of one good season.No more excuses for Sam Bradford...
They could have just signed him in the offseason.I'm also curious about the Rams' plan for Lloyd after 2011. The Rams are 1-5 so they clearly do not perceive Lloyd as a rental. I bet they lock him up and sign him as Bradford's future WR1 in Stl.
Demaryius - but yes. According to sources, Thomas will play for the Broncos in week 7. That, combined with the departure of Lloyd bodes well for his opportunity (and could suggest that he is healthier than some think). In terms of his abilities with Tebow - Tebow is rather innaccurate (at least currently) - D. Thomas at 6' 3" and 225 is a big target with good hands and a large catch radius. He's also tough to bring down. The Broncos should utilize a short passing game, which could very well play to Thomas' strengths (Tebow doesn't have to be quite as accurate, Thomas will catch it in even if Tebow's throws are a little off, then his YAC will come into play).I actually think that letting Lloyd go won't hurt the Broncos much at all - presuming the Thomas is healthy enough to contribute. Even if it is only at about 80-90% of what he looked like at times last season.Buy Denarious Thomas? How do his skills mesh with Tebow's?
perhaps they were able to work out an extension that they feel is favorable.They could have just signed him in the offseason.I'm also curious about the Rams' plan for Lloyd after 2011. The Rams are 1-5 so they clearly do not perceive Lloyd as a rental. I bet they lock him up and sign him as Bradford's future WR1 in Stl.
This and if another team had dealt for him, then no, they likely wouldn't have been able to sign him this offseason.perhaps they were able to work out an extension that they feel is favorable.They could have just signed him in the offseason.I'm also curious about the Rams' plan for Lloyd after 2011. The Rams are 1-5 so they clearly do not perceive Lloyd as a rental. I bet they lock him up and sign him as Bradford's future WR1 in Stl.
to save jobs....to help Bradford develop...to lock him up before he hits FA...Why is an 0-5 team giving away draft pick(s) for a 30 year old WR who will be a FA at season's end?
I think you hit the nail on the head with the bolded.Bradford is the franchise, and I'm sure the team does not want to kill his confidence any more than they might have with him running for his life and not having reliable receivers.to save jobs....to help Bradford develop...to lock him up before he hits FA...Why is an 0-5 team giving away draft pick(s) for a 30 year old WR who will be a FA at season's end?
haha!I dunno, haven't seen him block enough to tell.Buy Denarious Thomas? How do his skills mesh with Tebow's?
Me too, but I kept Decker, and traded away DeAngelo Williams to get him. Bradford + Lloyd + McD = awesomenessGlad I dealt for Lloyd about an hour ago.Sad I gave up Decker doing it...
Since people care about my transactions: added D. Thomas. I think that's a good move right now if you have the roster space. I was glad to drop Denarius Moore to do it. Thomas, IMO, will be way more valuable than Royal coming back (assuming he's not in awful shape).Me too, but I kept Decker, and traded away DeAngelo Williams to get him. Bradford + Lloyd + McD = awesomenessGlad I dealt for Lloyd about an hour ago.Sad I gave up Decker doing it...