Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I have never read one of these and suggested a veto. This is a first, he needs to have a no trade clause being he's making deals like this, trade vetoed, and if he kicks and screams boot his ### with no refund. He literally ruining a league for his, own personal gain.And if he says he's staying he needs to pay next years fee now, much like trading away a 1st.
Even if you were worried that Bryant could be the next bonehead (a/k/a Josh Gordon), why would you give him away for basically nothing? The only valuable dynasty asset on the other side is the second round pick.
Freeze his teams. Him not caring about next year will ruin his leagues, and good luck trying to find some one to take over the messes he leaves behind.
It might already be too late, the balance of power may already be shifted in those leagues due to the trades he's made.UFFLCommish said:
By a bit??? He's worth a lot more than a late 1st/2nd/3rd. He went 1.01 and shouldn't have lost value at this stage
The people in those leagues (even the "shafted" trade partners) will have to understand that what that guy did was wrong. It would be terrible for the league to allow a guy that has announced he's leaving (even if that was discovered shortly after the fact) to ruin his team and the league because he doesn't care what happens down the road. Guy's a #####, keep his money and boot him.
It's human nature to be reactionary. A good dynasty owner needs to fight those urges. Sometimes you may miss out, but in the long run having some patience works best.
So does he know somethings about Calvin that we don't?
Love marshawn but Lewis and the pick by a good ways. Given the age and injury issues id value lynch pretty close to just Lewis or the pick straight up (not both).doubletrouble said:
Adams and the 1stDr. Octopus said:
Wow. Lewis should be commanding three to four times Justin Forsett at this point. I'd bet on him outscoring Forsett in every format going forward, and he's five years younger, to boot.
That is more than a nice haul, that is stealing. The first is more than enough for Taylor.
Yep, 1Qb start. I love Tyrod, but did not love him enough to turn down that deal.
I think your logic is a bit flawed. OBJ is clearly a superior talent to Moncrief. Drafted way higher. His team's clear #1 WR. Eli may not be as good as Luck but he has never had a problem feeding his #1 and #2 wrs. We are talking about a three game sample size of Moncrief's work also. Hilton's injury, Allen's injury, Andre's lack of production have all possibly played into padding Moncrief's stats a bit. He is very good, but we don't yet know the extent of how good or how much they will use him. Dorsett will be worked in some more, and I imagine the TEs will get more targets as well. I'm not sure Moncrief will ever have the consistency needed as true WR1.Sabertooth said:
Somebody likes Michael a little too much or is in too much of a rush...Should be able to do better than that for Spiller/Sproles in PPR
Sabertooth said:
Here is your recency bias theory courtesy of your own handSabertooth said:
