squistion
Footballguy
You can say about every game for every week. If you make decisions in dynasty leagues based on the results of one week (in which one player rarely makes a difference as Adam Harstad mentioned in a thread awhile back) you probably shouldn't be playing dynasty IMO. It goes to dynasty strategy and you obviously have a different perspective, so we will have to agree to disagree.Very competitive 10 team league. Having Cooper next week vs not having D Thomas could mean the difference between winning and losing - and thus between playoffs and no playoffs. Team trading away Cooper (who's on bye this week) also has L Murray on bye - so he gets another option this week as well. The two players have similar fantasy points this season, but Cooper as a rookie has done it with far fewer targets.Hmmm...even though this could viewed as a lateral move, I don't see the logic of moving an elite player in a dynasty league because of bye week issues. And if two of your top three players are already going to be out, subbing Cooper for Thomas is probably not going to be the difference between winning and losing IMO.The rare player for player at the same position:
D Thomas
for
Amari Cooper
Team trading away D Thomas had a horrible bye week issue next week with him, Lacy and Forte all on bye.
Not really a bad trade but owner seems to have more of a redraft rather than a dynasty mentality.