Shoot yer picl over to me.Actually, come to think of it, I know what I'm going to pick. Anyone take a quick PM and I'll do write-up later?
its about 50% picl, 100% lack of picks in two days. I have blue picks.Does this have anything to do with El Floppo's picl?im gonna pick so hard. its gonna go everywhere.
No, not just good....greatposting.Yankee23Fan said:So, let me see if I have this straight.wikkid didn't like something flysack did and considered it arrogant some how. This coming from the same arrogant windbag that actually compared what he thought he went through in this thread to the Cain Mutiny, as if he and his opinions in this little exercise are actually worth something more then little ones and zeros flying through space to nowhere in particular. In between all this, we have another drafter actually losing sleep at night because he's trying to figure out how to draft the doggie style position for inventions, the smilie list for poetry, and his own schtick for novel. Then, back to the arrogant heavy weight ifight where something happened to make the arrogance get kicked up a notch like Emeril was there and threw igarlic on the ifire.Meanwhile, our commissioner has only threatened to quit 5 times, actually did quit twice, came back both times, attempted to resign, did resign, came back, tried to turn over the power to someone else, realized that it probably meant no one would then listen to anything he said and thought better of it and now is back, has promised to not quit again, will not resign and is on top of all things draft. Until the next time. And he doesn't like a certain group of p:eple that seem to have it out for him because that is the only reason why his team wouldn't make it out of the first round of voting - not the crappy craptastic picks he has made.DougB is probably sitting on a beach somewhere with a russian chick on one arm and a brazilian chick on the other, reading this thread and laughing at all of us. But then he realized that he had a russian chick on one arm and a brazilian chick on the other arm and all he could think about was reading this thread. So, that shotgun blast you just heard in the distance was DougB dropping out. I suggest we find a new drafter.Which again brings us back to the guy that came up with this idea, fora free flowing draft where ideas could be discussed and it could take a long time, who now is quitting because he doesn't like the ideas being discussed, it's taking too long, and no one seems to bow down to his surpeme intellect concerning all things in this draft, and therefore his greatness could be used elswhere. nufced. So, he's gone. We actually got a final I quit and I'm leaving post, which in usual FFA fashion will mean that he will post again within 5 days, give or take a day.And in the middle of all of this a poster that actually got married during a draft - no word yet if she actually had a laptop open while the vows were being shared - actually got her possibly real new husband to volunteer to be an actual judge in this thing which means she either held sex over his head until he did it, he isn't real, or she seriously married a and that is a low blow coming from someone who has now been a part of all three of these frackin drafts. If I asked my wife to be a judge here, she would very calmly go get a suitcase and leave. Hey, wait a minute..............ok, back. Didn't know you could fit that much......... never mind. Ok, and here we are. Somewhere close to halfway. We've lost one drafter, who happened to be the creator. We've got a possibly real outside real world spouse coming in to be a judge. We've got one owner who is laying in a pool of blood with a russian chick and brazilian chick going through his wallet, and flysack is still here, funny as ever. Has tim quit again yet?Have I missed anything that happened in just the past 48 frackin hours? Jeesh.
multiple partners krista? thats not safe.Thanks; sent my picl to both MisfitBlondes and El Floppo.
Do you like it? I just had it stuffed.steel of the draft. nice piclEl Floppo said:If this one has been taken or is out of context or whatever, let me know and I'll fight it for at least 6 pages before quitting and finally caving in.
30.10 Invention, Steel
some ladies prefer plantains to bananas. chin up.MisfitBlondes said:I'm not sure I can compete with someone named "El Floppo." :(multiple partners krista? thats not safe.Thanks; sent my picl to both MisfitBlondes and El Floppo.
Wrong. Studs & Duds has been optioned by Showtime. HBO is so 90's. nufced.Aaron Rudnicki said:Studs & Duds pick should have stood. You're going to be sorry when it gets turned into an HBO show.EDIT: nufcedtimschochet said:You're right; I screwd up. nufced.
The statue of David, by Donatello, depicts a young David standing nude (it is the first large-scale bronze nude statue in the renaissance) and holding in his hand Goliath's sword, above the head of the dead Giant. As to its dating there is no agreement among the scholars, the most acceptable view suggest the statue to be from the 1440's. It is the same subject as his earlier marble statue of the same scene from 1408-9, however it displays a very different David than the well dressed victorious king. It is also different in the moment depicted because at the marble statue David still holds his slingshot, and hasn't taken up yet the Giant's sword in order to slay him.
Donatello's statue depicts a nude, with some feminine features. Having feminine body serves both as a possible explanation of Jonathan's love for him (because he was beautiful like a woman) as well as to show that his accomplishment in tossing the stone at Goliath was not a result of his feminine like physic but rather of God's will. As in Michelangelo's David , it could be demonstrated that the nudity of Donatello's David is a possible interpretation of the biblical text describing the biblical hero and future king in the time of the fight with Goliath (Follow the link to the article about Michelangelo's David for an explanation of David's nudity). David's nudity at the time of the battle is contrasted with Goliath's heavy armor, for the head, which is visible under the Hero's feet, is covered in the most part by an iron helmet.
However, Donatello's David unlike the later figure by Michelangelo, is not completely nude. David wears a hat, which has a laurel on top, and a pair of boots on his legs.
This might serve, as a kind of comic response to religious minded critics who might claim it is improper nudity of the Biblical hero and ancestor of Christ. For one could response: "he is not nude at all, he has his hat and boots on".
On the helmet of Goliath is depicted a scene of the ark of the covenant carried by angles, and above the ark are the priests Ophni and Pinnees given offerings from the angels of God. This scene is part of the battle in which the Israelites brought to the battle field with the Philistines their most holy object (the ark of the covenant), trusting that God would bring them victory, yet the Philistines were the victorious ones, and God did not help Israel (1 Samuel 4:3-22).
The hat David is wearing is a straw hat. Peasants, shepherds and others working in the open air wore these hats. Not being of much value in cold weather, the straw hat is aimed mainly to protect from the sun (for example in paintings of summer time). Therefor it is appropriate to David who came to fight Goliath from the desert and therefor was wearing indeed clothes for hot weather. Being mainly a practical garment of the lower classes, rather than a fashion statement, the straw hat had many varieties and shapes according to different regions. The laurel on top of the hat is the symbol for a victorious general in roman times.
It is uncertain whether the boots David wears are military gear or a shepherd's boots. It would seem plausible that they are not metallic for David had rejected the hero's armor because it was not comfortable to maneuver with it, so there is no reason to assume he would have left on a metallic foot-wear. The fact that they are open-toed suggests (as does the straw hat) a warm weather, and perhaps the sculptor's wish to have the toes visible.
Donatello most likely received the idea of Ancient time warriors fighting in the nude with helmet and boots from Greek Vase paintings depicting such scenes. However, at his time, it is unknown whether Donatello had available to him one of the Greek vases with such a depiction. Unlike, these ancient warriors, David has instead of a helmet (symbolizing the warrior) - the shepherd's hat, in order to identify him as a shepherd as well as a warrior.
Vasari relates a story by which a figure of Christ, Donatello made was said to look like a peasant by Brunelleschi. When Donatello saw a Christ made by Brunelleschi He said Brunelleschi will make Christs and he would make peasants. And so he made indeed his symbolic Christ (which David symbolizes) a peasant like with his straw hat (on the connection between the nude David and Jesus see the section on Michelangelo's David in this work).
nice selection30.14 (594th pick) - The Bronze David - Sculpture
Donato de'Bardi detto Donatello
Donatello's David (Bargello museum, Florence)
Two more angles
Detail of face
Site with numerous image links
The statue of David, by Donatello, depicts a young David standing nude (it is the first large-scale bronze nude statue in the renaissance) and holding in his hand Goliath's sword, above the head of the dead Giant. As to its dating there is no agreement among the scholars, the most acceptable view suggest the statue to be from the 1440's. It is the same subject as his earlier marble statue of the same scene from 1408-9, however it displays a very different David than the well dressed victorious king. It is also different in the moment depicted because at the marble statue David still holds his slingshot, and hasn't taken up yet the Giant's sword in order to slay him.
Donatello's statue depicts a nude, with some feminine features. Having feminine body serves both as a possible explanation of Jonathan's love for him (because he was beautiful like a woman) as well as to show that his accomplishment in tossing the stone at Goliath was not a result of his feminine like physic but rather of God's will. As in Michelangelo's David , it could be demonstrated that the nudity of Donatello's David is a possible interpretation of the biblical text describing the biblical hero and future king in the time of the fight with Goliath (Follow the link to the article about Michelangelo's David for an explanation of David's nudity). David's nudity at the time of the battle is contrasted with Goliath's heavy armor, for the head, which is visible under the Hero's feet, is covered in the most part by an iron helmet.
However, Donatello's David unlike the later figure by Michelangelo, is not completely nude. David wears a hat, which has a laurel on top, and a pair of boots on his legs.
This might serve, as a kind of comic response to religious minded critics who might claim it is improper nudity of the Biblical hero and ancestor of Christ. For one could response: "he is not nude at all, he has his hat and boots on".
On the helmet of Goliath is depicted a scene of the ark of the covenant carried by angles, and above the ark are the priests Ophni and Pinnees given offerings from the angels of God. This scene is part of the battle in which the Israelites brought to the battle field with the Philistines their most holy object (the ark of the covenant), trusting that God would bring them victory, yet the Philistines were the victorious ones, and God did not help Israel (1 Samuel 4:3-22).
The hat David is wearing is a straw hat. Peasants, shepherds and others working in the open air wore these hats. Not being of much value in cold weather, the straw hat is aimed mainly to protect from the sun (for example in paintings of summer time). Therefor it is appropriate to David who came to fight Goliath from the desert and therefor was wearing indeed clothes for hot weather. Being mainly a practical garment of the lower classes, rather than a fashion statement, the straw hat had many varieties and shapes according to different regions. The laurel on top of the hat is the symbol for a victorious general in roman times.
It is uncertain whether the boots David wears are military gear or a shepherd's boots. It would seem plausible that they are not metallic for David had rejected the hero's armor because it was not comfortable to maneuver with it, so there is no reason to assume he would have left on a metallic foot-wear. The fact that they are open-toed suggests (as does the straw hat) a warm weather, and perhaps the sculptor's wish to have the toes visible.
Donatello most likely received the idea of Ancient time warriors fighting in the nude with helmet and boots from Greek Vase paintings depicting such scenes. However, at his time, it is unknown whether Donatello had available to him one of the Greek vases with such a depiction. Unlike, these ancient warriors, David has instead of a helmet (symbolizing the warrior) - the shepherd's hat, in order to identify him as a shepherd as well as a warrior.
Vasari relates a story by which a figure of Christ, Donatello made was said to look like a peasant by Brunelleschi. When Donatello saw a Christ made by Brunelleschi He said Brunelleschi will make Christs and he would make peasants. And so he made indeed his symbolic Christ (which David symbolizes) a peasant like with his straw hat (on the connection between the nude David and Jesus see the section on Michelangelo's David in this work).
Catching up here.Just wanted to say I vote NOT to eject Krista.' said:I vote that this next round become Norwood's proposed Free For All RoundTM.
and also that krista be ejected from the draft
All in favor? I
One of my all-time favorite movies, and probably the most oft-quoted movie in business."Will you GO to lunch!" is great schtik when someone is being a PITA.The leads are weak.
30.15 Jack Lemmon, Glengarry Glen Ross (Acting Performance)
First Part of The Film
You're a real creep.30.17 Soap (invention)Soap is an anionic surfactant used in conjunction with water for washing and cleaning, which historically comes either in solid bars or in the form of a viscous liquid.Soap consists of sodium or potassium salts of fatty acids and is obtained by reacting common oils or fats with a strong alkaline solution (the base, popularly referred to as lye) in a process known as saponification. The fats are hydrolyzed by the base, yielding alkali salts of fatty acids (crude soap) and glycerol.The earliest recorded evidence of the production of soap-like materials dates back to around 2800 BC in Ancient Babylon. A formula for soap consisting of water, alkali and cassia oil was written on a Babylonian clay tablet around 2200 BC.The Ebers papyrus (Egypt, 1550 BC) indicates that ancient Egyptians bathed regularly and combined animal and vegetable oils with alkaline salts to create a soap-like substance. Egyptian documents mention that a soap-like substance was used in the preparation of wool for weaving.If you're curious about the necessity of this particular invention, try seeing how long you can go without it.
or armadillossome ladies prefer plantains to bananas. chin up.MisfitBlondes said:I'm not sure I can compete with someone named "El Floppo." :(multiple partners krista? thats not safe.Thanks; sent my picl to both MisfitBlondes and El Floppo.
I never ruled out either of those inventions. Wikkidpissah did. It was my contention, upon taking over the draft, that those inventions are perfectly acceptable, though not taken together.Why is soap allowed but not central heat & air? Serious question here.Try seeing how long you can go without your air conditioner in August.
great pickThe leads are weak.
30.15 Jack Lemmon, Glengarry Glen Ross (Acting Performance)
First Part of The Film
The importance of this “great work” is that it basically founded the historical method in Western culture. It is the first consciously recorded history. Secondly, it’s a delight to read. Like the very best historians, Herodotus was a master storyteller and didn’t shy away from the juicer customs he came across.The Histories of Herodotus of Halicarnassus is considered the first work of history in Western literature. Written about 440 BC in the Ionic dialect of classical Greek, The Histories tells the story of the Greco-Persian Wars between the Achaemenid Empire and the Greek city-states in the 5th century BC. Herodotus travelled extensively around the ancient world, conducting interviews and collecting stories for his book. At the beginning of The Histories, Herodotus sets out his reasons for writing it:
“Herodotus of Halicarnassus here displays his enquiry, so that human achievements may not become forgotten in time, and great and marvellous deeds – some displayed by Greeks, some by barbarians – may not be without their glory; and especially to show why the two peoples fought with each other.”
The rise of the Persian Empire is chronicled, and the causes for the conflict with Greece. Herodotus treats the conflict as an ideological one, frequently contrasting the absolute power of the Persian king with the democratic government of the Greeks.
This is all a rather mute point, don't you think?timschochet -
Page 1 correction: s/b Inalienable Rights not Inaliable
Also, we do not receive french benefits
I think you are subverting my attempted theme - this, along with To Kill a Mockingbird, have you taken from me, without remorse30.19 - What A Wonderful World - Louis Armstrong - Song
One of my favorite songs of all time and one of the most moving. Whenever I'm down, I can throw this song on and it always peps me up.
Link
Strongly considered this. No doubt that Lemmon's performance is the standout of the movie.The leads are weak.
30.15 Jack Lemmon, Glengarry Glen Ross (Acting Performance)
First Part of The Film
Sorry, GB. Just taking things I personally like and these two are right at the top of the things I most enjoy.I think you are subverting my attempted theme - this, along with To Kill a Mockingbird, have you taken from me, without remorse30.19 - What A Wonderful World - Louis Armstrong - Song
One of my favorite songs of all time and one of the most moving. Whenever I'm down, I can throw this song on and it always peps me up.
Link
MisfitBlondes said:Yes, ma'am.Wait, I'm just now up? El Floppo and MisfitBlondes, STAND DOWN! I'll make the pick with a wee write-up in a minute.
For the record, I did almost take it just to spite you. Also, it is indeed a phenomenal movie.I have to go ahead and take my favorite movie here; leaving it on the board is too risky considering some of the great movie picks that have been made.
30.20 Au Hasard Balthazar - directed by Robert Bresson (movie)
It seems like a few of Bresson's other excellent films (which I won't name to avoid spotlighting) are more well-known, though this one is considered his masterpiece. It is currently ranked #19 on Sight & Sound's every-decade critics' poll of the best movies in history, and yet few non-movie-critics seem to have seen it.
I think it might be that, until a few years ago, no good print of the movie was available. But in 2005, a new restored print was released in art-house theatres and later on a Criterion Collection DVD. I was lucky enough to see it at Music Box Theatre, my favorite Chicago theatre, on a huge screen. I've never been so profoundly moved by a movie on first viewing. From the first moment, when you simply hear the sound of a donkey braying, to the last scene (which I won't describe so as not to spoil it), I was transfixed, and when the movie was over, I was exhausted and felt like I was taking my first breath in 90 minutes.
Jean-Luc Godard said about this movie: "Everyone who sees this film will be absolutely astonished...because this film is really the world in an hour and a half."
It's hard to find a review of this that doesn't contain too many spoilers, so I'll post this and look around some more for one that's safe.
Good lord. Terminator Salvation is seriously only 1% better than Paul Blart: Mall Cop on Rotten Tomatoes? Brutal.Sad to say, I never heard of it, but 100 on Rotten Tomatoes is 67 better than Mall Cop so it must be really really good.
MisfitBlondes said:Damn, I did too.For the record, I did almost take it just to spite you. Also, it is indeed a phenomenal movie.I have to go ahead and take my favorite movie here; leaving it on the board is too risky considering some of the great movie picks that have been made.
30.20 Au Hasard Balthazar - directed by Robert Bresson (movie)
It seems like a few of Bresson's other excellent films (which I won't name to avoid spotlighting) are more well-known, though this one is considered his masterpiece. It is currently ranked #19 on Sight & Sound's every-decade critics' poll of the best movies in history, and yet few non-movie-critics seem to have seen it.
I think it might be that, until a few years ago, no good print of the movie was available. But in 2005, a new restored print was released in art-house theatres and later on a Criterion Collection DVD. I was lucky enough to see it at Music Box Theatre, my favorite Chicago theatre, on a huge screen. I've never been so profoundly moved by a movie on first viewing. From the first moment, when you simply hear the sound of a donkey braying, to the last scene (which I won't describe so as not to spoil it), I was transfixed, and when the movie was over, I was exhausted and felt like I was taking my first breath in 90 minutes.
Jean-Luc Godard said about this movie: "Everyone who sees this film will be absolutely astonished...because this film is really the world in an hour and a half."
It's hard to find a review of this that doesn't contain too many spoilers, so I'll post this and look around some more for one that's safe.
Four versions:Woody's:Its lyrics were written by Woody Guthrie in 1940 on an existing melody, in response to Irving Berlin's "God Bless America", which Guthrie considered unrealistic and complacent. Tired of hearing Kate Smith sing it on the radio, he wrote a response originally called "God Blessed America for Me". Guthrie varied the lyrics over time, sometimes including more overtly political verses than appear in recordings or publications.
31.01 This Land Is Your Land song by Woody Guthrie
Hippy anthem31.01 This Land Is Your Land song by Woody Guthrie
History
Main article: History of beer
Egyptian wooden model of beer making in ancient Egypt, Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum, San Jose, California
Beer is one of the world's oldest beverages, possibly dating back to the early Neolithic or 9000 BC, and is recorded in the written history of ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia.[8] The earliest Sumerian writings contain references to a type of beer. A prayer to the goddess Ninkasi, known as "The Hymn to Ninkasi", serves as both a prayer as well as a method of remembering the recipe for beer in a culture with few literate people.[5][6]
As almost any substance containing carbohydrates, mainly sugar or starch, can naturally undergo fermentation, it is likely that beer-like beverages were independently invented among various cultures throughout the world. The invention of bread and beer has been argued to be responsible for humanity's ability to develop technology and build civilization.[9][10][11] The earliest known chemical evidence of beer dates to circa 3500–3100 BC from the site of Godin Tepe in the Zagros Mountains of western Iran.[12]
Beer was spread through Europe by Germanic and Celtic tribes as far back as 3000 BC,[13] though it was mainly brewed on a domestic scale.[14] The product that the early Europeans drank might not be recognised as beer by most people today. The early European beers might contain alongside the basic starch source: fruits, honey, numerous types of plants, spices and other substances such as narcotic drugs.[15] What they did not contain was hops, as that was a later addition—first mentioned in Europe around 822 by a Carolingian Abbot[16] and again in 1067 by Abbess Hildegard of Bingen.[17]
Beer produced before the Industrial Revolution continued to be made and sold on a domestic scale, although by the 7th century AD, beer was also being produced and sold by European monasteries. During the Industrial Revolution, the production of beer moved from artisanal manufacture to industrial manufacture, and domestic manufacture ceased to be significant by the end of the 19th century.[18] The development of hydrometers and thermometers changed brewing by allowing the brewer more control of the process and greater knowledge of the results.
Today, the brewing industry is a global business, consisting of several dominant multinational companies and many thousands of smaller producers ranging from brewpubs to regional breweries.[19] More than 133 billion liters (35 billion gallons) are sold per year (the equivalent of a cube 510 metres on a side), producing total global revenues of $294.5 billion (£147.7 billion) in 2006.
31.03 BEER - invention
History
Main article: History of beer
Egyptian wooden model of beer making in ancient Egypt, Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum, San Jose, California
Beer is one of the world's oldest beverages, possibly dating back to the early Neolithic or 9000 BC, and is recorded in the written history of ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia.[8] The earliest Sumerian writings contain references to a type of beer. A prayer to the goddess Ninkasi, known as "The Hymn to Ninkasi", serves as both a prayer as well as a method of remembering the recipe for beer in a culture with few literate people.[5][6]
As almost any substance containing carbohydrates, mainly sugar or starch, can naturally undergo fermentation, it is likely that beer-like beverages were independently invented among various cultures throughout the world. The invention of bread and beer has been argued to be responsible for humanity's ability to develop technology and build civilization.[9][10][11] The earliest known chemical evidence of beer dates to circa 3500–3100 BC from the site of Godin Tepe in the Zagros Mountains of western Iran.[12]
Beer was spread through Europe by Germanic and Celtic tribes as far back as 3000 BC,[13] though it was mainly brewed on a domestic scale.[14] The product that the early Europeans drank might not be recognised as beer by most people today. The early European beers might contain alongside the basic starch source: fruits, honey, numerous types of plants, spices and other substances such as narcotic drugs.[15] What they did not contain was hops, as that was a later addition—first mentioned in Europe around 822 by a Carolingian Abbot[16] and again in 1067 by Abbess Hildegard of Bingen.[17]
Beer produced before the Industrial Revolution continued to be made and sold on a domestic scale, although by the 7th century AD, beer was also being produced and sold by European monasteries. During the Industrial Revolution, the production of beer moved from artisanal manufacture to industrial manufacture, and domestic manufacture ceased to be significant by the end of the 19th century.[18] The development of hydrometers and thermometers changed brewing by allowing the brewer more control of the process and greater knowledge of the results.
Today, the brewing industry is a global business, consisting of several dominant multinational companies and many thousands of smaller producers ranging from brewpubs to regional breweries.[19] More than 133 billion liters (35 billion gallons) are sold per year (the equivalent of a cube 510 metres on a side), producing total global revenues of $294.5 billion (£147.7 billion) in 2006.
Ah, beer. The cause of and the solution to all of life's problems.31.03 BEER - invention
If you have enough beer, you don't really miss having soap. No matter how much soap you have, you'd always miss beer.Soap is more important than beer.Well, maybe not...
Ah, beer. The cause of and the solution to all of life's problems.31.03 BEER - invention