Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I don't see Gurley & Mixon as a "modest package". I see 2 potential multi-year stud RBs.
Mike Evans, who you wouldn't trade Hunt for, is worth 25 percent more than that package by himself. He also gets a 1st and Davante Adams in addition to Hunt.
Except you didn't say "quickly". You said sell high. There may be a high ceiling. Do you NEED to immediately deal him because the bottom is going to fall out?
So you make the trade.
His value is going to increase beyond the most valuable fantasy layer in all of dynasty? Ok... The point is that if you can get Mike Evans for him right now his value will never be higher. It's already been explained to you twice. I can't tell if you're just trolling now.
Your response makes zero sense, it contradicts what you said earlier about how valuable Hunt is. You sir, are exasperating and I return your wishes of good luck.
I was wondering the same about you.
Since I've never once trolled anyone on this forum, I suspect the latter.
It could possibly increase... But it's near the ceiling if you can get Mike Evans for him... How much higher can it get? Chances are about 1000 times higher that his value goes down from here. I don't see how it goes up without another 45 point performance.
So you obviously are just trolling. welcome to ignore. I take back wishes of luck and I hope your teams all go 2-14 this year.
You said I was contradicting when just a second ago you said "his value will never be higher"
You'll be able to get Evans and David Johnson if you just wait a week or two.
Oh right, how silly of me. I would not take that trade if I had Hunt. If I did have Hunt though, I wouldn't trade him for that cause I'd have to see the next 2 or 3 games.
Maybe Evans breaks his leg. Then that deal is possible.
How'd Tom Brady's career work out for a 7th round pick after Bledsoe got speared in the chest?
You're missing the point. IF he is already the most valuable player in fantasy, which others seemed to be saying, then no, he really is highly unlikely to get any more valuable than that. I honestly don't see what any of the players you listed have to do with this. None of those guys had a 45 point first game and could then be traded for any other player in Dynasty. If he doesn't go nuts again next week, his value plummets. That is my point.
And my point is that on that point you may be wrong. He can in fact increase his value simply by showing stability, without a monster game, thereby cementing in people's minds that he has a feature back role. Which I've patiently attempted to explain a few times now, without once personally attacking you.
I saw this still on page one and I was wondering what else is there to talk about? this was the perfect post to come in and read as the last made.God I love him. I wonder if he's thinking about me right now.
I think we are talking past each other, but I don't feel like you're intentionally misunderstanding me for the purpose of provoking me. You feel that Hunt's value can still get higher, from a point where some people won't trade him for David Johnson or Mike Evans right now? I'm not sure I can see the ways in which that might play out. I'm honestly confused by this... since a player could possibly be the next great story in FF after 1 game, we can't trade him for somebody that already IS the great story in FF and about the same age? If Mike Evans and Kareem Hunt both score 0 points next week, who loses more value?
Thanks for taking us back to reality. Sorry that I got a little wrapped up in the hyperbole. I shouldn't have taken the bait. His value isn't at Mike Evans or David Johnson levels and if you can get that you obviously take it - but you can't. Also obvious is that if you can't already trade him for a top 5 dynasty player, then his value can certainly get higher.
For the Nth time, I specifically said I wouldn't trade him for anyone not named David Johnson or Bell, but you didn't read that You only read what you wanted to see whether I said it or not.
Wow - great to see that you came around to my point & you now see that his value can in fact get higher. What a crazy turn of events.
"Future HOF" is kind of a silly premise. Not many active players will be HOF. That doesn't seem relevant to his value rising or falling in his rookie season.
I love them both - I want to go on long walks on the beach with them and tell them all of my tender secrets.
He has a hell of a head start.zoonation said:
Its not a terrible offer.
Never bench your studs.Sooooo, yeah ...... hmmmmm, I freaking sat Hunt on Thursday ..... I hope this is not a sign of how my season will go.
thanks bro!
I was gonna be a "wait & see" on Hunt until the hurricane caused me to bench my flex play Parker.Sooooo, yeah ...... hmmmmm, I freaking sat Hunt on Thursday ..... I hope this is not a sign of how my season will go.
I think you should reread HSGs post about how he wouldn't trade him for anyone not named Bell or DJ. Then reread my post about how I shouldn't have reacted to that. We don't even disagree because I don't think he's close to worth Evans. This whole thread went off the rails a while ago because I engaged in a stupid pissing match and I apologize. Never wrestle a pig.
I saw a determined runner who had great vision to see the hole, and subtle shiftiness that made defenders miss.also good power & will, turning a few runs that should have been negative into short gains. Also as smooth of a receiving RB as I've ever seen & ive been watching the NFL for 40 years.
Stiff arms a 330lb dude: http://i.imgur.com/rqK7gcY.gif
That was deep into the game when the Pats lost Hightower and looked completely gassed.
1. You're saying you hope all his teams make it to week 16 (fantasy championship)So you obviously are just trolling. welcome to ignore. I take back wishes of luck and I hope your teams all go 2-14 this year.
