BassNBrew
Footballguy
He's not getting more money this year.I disagree. He wants paid first, competetive second.
I think he sits out the playoffs
He's not getting more money this year.I disagree. He wants paid first, competetive second.
I think he sits out the playoffs
I'm sure he would make himself available to play, but is it a #### move akin to forcing a player to accept consecutive one year contracts while running him into the ground with no care for his long term outlook?Signing on Saturday to get the 900K while also being unable to play in the game would be a pretty big **** move.
You draft Bell with your first pick in that many leagues?Does anyone know how to set up a GoFundMe page?
Sure, I'd be willing to donate to the James Connor fund. I'd love to see him play 16 games.Does anyone know how to set up a GoFundMe page?
He can't play without knowing the game plan, line calls, etc. Remember they have a new OC this year. Also, I realize many people are fixated on the rear view mirror but I'm looking forward to how this can play out in the best interest of all parties. Bell has to play 6 games for the Steelers at some point or somehow force the Steeler to rescind the tender. Bell can hold out for 10 games as far as I am concerned, but my biggest issue with him right now is that he is making the process more toxic (again, I'm not looking at the rear view, we are here now even if the Steelers screwed him over). Just tell the Steelers when you plan to sign the tender, be upfront about the reasons, and go from there.I'm sure he would make himself available to play, but is it a #### move akin to forcing a player to accept consecutive one year contracts while running him into the ground with no care for his long term outlook?
Both sides are in the wrong here.
running backs just aren't worth what they think they are. if he was smart he would take the $15M, invest it and be very thankful. if i were the steelers i would cut him and use the cap money for more important positions. keep bringing in rookie galley slaves at running back on the cheap and use them till their bodies give out...I'm sure he would make himself available to play, but is it a #### move akin to forcing a player to accept consecutive one year contracts while running him into the ground with no care for his long term outlook?
Both sides are in the wrong here.
What's to see here?Same but I am looking at making a move for Samuels.
He made millions on those "forced" contracts.I'm sure he would make himself available to play, but is it a #### move akin to forcing a player to accept consecutive one year contracts while running him into the ground with no care for his long term outlook?
Both sides are in the wrong here.
RB/TE designation on YahooWhat's to see here?
3rd down/hurry up RB?
He needs the 6 games to be able to a FA next year. if he isn't on the roster for 6 games then this year does not count and he can be tagged again next year as Season 2 of the tag. He is currently in Season 2 of the tag. That was put into the system to prevent players who get tagged from just skipping a season completely and then becoming a FA.The 6 games is for the pension right? If he's willing to not make 14.5M this year, why would he really care about the pension year? It's going to be a lot less than 14.5M.
exactly. he is not at all hard done by. the only issue here is he thinks a superstar running back is worth more than NFL GM's think a superstar running back is worth. he will not win this war. a rookie RB is a way better option than a Bell will ever be when you consider the price tag.He made millions on those "forced" contracts.
Ah, thanks, that makes more sense.He needs the 6 games to be able to a FA next year. if he isn't on the roster for 6 games then this year does not count and he can be tagged again next year as Season 2 of the tag. He is currently in Season 2 of the tag. That was put into the system to prevent players who get tagged from just skipping a season completely and then becoming a FA.
Even if he is just COP guy that's better than most WW TEs. With the added upside of potential starting RB points at TE spot.I saw that ?
Sure - I’m not shedding tears for him but the Franchise Tag also restricted his true market value and while he made millions he also lost many more millions he could have potentially earned.He made millions on those "forced" contracts.
If all of this is over saving 20 touches on the season then that is just plain stupid in my opinion. I could at least understand the logic behind skipping 10 games, saving the mileage on the legs, reducing his risk of injury, etc.in exchange for a big payday next season with another team. But if he intends to report Saturday anyway and play out the rest of the year why not just tell everyone that? I'm failing to understand exactly what he gains by keeping his plans close to the vest if he is going to report in 2 to 3 days anyway? His idiot agent is on the radio talking #### about how he needs to put himself before the team, etc. He's alienating him from other players who are now annoyed with him and its getting ugly. Why let all that happen? It makes zero sense to me to let it all go this far if you're planning to report on Saturday anyway?Some analysts sound really confident he'll show up on Saturday. Miss out on 20 touches and still get paid. I'm not as sure, but that would be nice.
Also, I think that if he does hold out and then skips the playoffs, whatever team signs him next definitely won't give him as much as if he had a great year. (presuming he could stay healthy)
It's to accrue this season and no longer be under the 2018 franchise tag.The 6 games is for the pension right?
This guy doesn't give 2 sh@@@ about playing for a ring.Well if he's traded week 10 the value of the contract is minimal for this year. I doubt Bell is going to miss a chance at ring if he's even remotely competitive.
Also though I’d give Bell a good chunk of the credit for how much more an elite dual threat rookie RB earns now, in upfront cash, since he’s shown the league the value of that type of player.exactly. he is not at all hard done by. the only issue here is he thinks a superstar running back is worth more than NFL GM's think a superstar running back is worth. he will not win this war. a rookie RB is a way better option than a Bell will ever be when you consider the price tag.
no disagreement here. i just think he is overvaluing his worth. the franchise tag is a huge gift IMO. he should be paid 4 x $5M. instead he gets offered 1 x $15M and says no? the reason he is saying no is he knows he is declining already and wants a long term deal because he may be worth 0 next year. if he knows this so do NFL GM's thats why he is not getting paid. if he were a free agent today he might get 4 x $8M tops.Also though I’d give Bell a good chunk of the credit for how much more an elite dual threat rookie RB earns now, in upfront cash, since he’s shown the league the value of that type of player.
Bell was signed to a 4 year contract for a little over 4 million dollars out of college but I’m not sure he got quite that much due to his injury. Barkley’s contract is a little over 31 million and it’s guaranteed money.
If Barkley has Bell’s career he’ll be thrilled so I don’t know if Bell will win this battle but I also don’t blame him for fighting it. He’s played a lot of football for the Steelers well below is market rate.
Sammy Watkins just signed a three-year, $48 million contract. The deal includes $30 million guaranteed. SAMMY WATKINS.he should be paid 4 x $5M.
RB and DL are waaaaay differently valued in today's NFLIf Bell wants to maximize his own gain at the Steelers expense, he should report Saturday, then refuse to go into games once he hits whatever he feels is too many touches each week (or even play up the nicks and bruises he'll invevitably receive to sit out). Get his $14 MM this year, stay healthy and move the #### on. If you think teams won't pay him as a result, that might be fair, but I don't think it's realistic. All it takes is two teams to say they understand his "plight" and are willing to do whatever it takes to gain his services in 2019 and beyond. This is quickly becoming a huge cluster#### for the Stillers.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again here... Khalil Mack showed Leveon that you can play hardball with a team and get what you want. You just have to be willing to put yourself first above your teammates, your fans and even your own public image. #### you, pay me!
Really? Even with the miles, he's 26...no disagreement here. i just think he is overvaluing his worth. the franchise tag is a huge gift IMO. he should be paid 4 x $5M. instead he gets offered 1 x $15M and says no? the reason he is saying no is he knows he is declining already and wants a long term deal because he may be worth 0 next year. if he knows this so do NFL GM's thats why he is not getting paid. if he were a free agent today he might get 4 x $8M tops.
Bell isn't trying to get Khalil Mack's deal. He's trying to use Khalil Mack's tactic to get Todd Gurley's deal.mr. peanut said:RB and DL are waaaaay differently valued in today's NFL
Conner is the back to own, but is likely already owned, so taking a flyer on samuels especially with a te designation is worth a spot.tombonneau said:Even if he is just COP guy that's better than most WW TEs. With the added upside of potential starting RB points at TE spot.
Wow, the Calculus in this post is horrible.mr. peanut said:no disagreement here. i just think he is overvaluing his worth. the franchise tag is a huge gift IMO. he should be paid 4 x $5M. instead he gets offered 1 x $15M and says no? the reason he is saying no is he knows he is declining already and wants a long term deal because he may be worth 0 next year. if he knows this so do NFL GM's thats why he is not getting paid. if he were a free agent today he might get 4 x $8M tops.
usually not a good idea to get into a battle with a child here but i'd like to ask why you feel my math is off?Wow, the Calculus in this post is horrible.
usually not a good idea to get into a battle with a child here but i'd like to ask why you feel my math is off?
i feel he is worth 4 x $8M on the open market. maybe 4 x $10M if we want to be generous. if we assume 4x$10M open market, taking a $15M franchise tag and then signing a 3 x $7M deal still is better than the 4x$10M deal no?
should be easy to get a 3x$7M next year unless he knows he is done and wants long term money locked up before others realize it.
although you could just be a frittata that thinks a RB is worth $10M+/year
I think he will play a minimum of 8 games. I think that those numbers will be easy for a guy coming in fresh late in the season playing for a franchise trying to use his talent. Easy.irish eyes said:You are crazy if you think he is coming anywhere close to those numbers. He won't be there anytime soon, so why would they even play him when he is worried about getting hurt.
I mean, to start, what you feel here is really irrelevant and doesn't reflect reality. The Steelers offered him $14MM a season over 5 years that he turned down before the deadline, so while your feelings are $8MM or possibly $10MM, the reality of an actual offer from an NFL franchise was 40% higher than your stretch valuation.usually not a good idea to get into a battle with a child here but i'd like to ask why you feel my math is off?
i feel he is worth 4 x $8M on the open market. maybe 4 x $10M if we want to be generous. if we assume 4x$10M open market, taking a $15M franchise tag and then signing a 3 x $7M deal still is better than the 4x$10M deal no?
should be easy to get a 3x$7M next year unless he knows he is done and wants long term money locked up before others realize it.
although you could just be a frittata that thinks a RB is worth $10M+/year
You almost have it right. He thinks a superstar running back is worth more than Pittsburgh's GM thinks a superstar running back is worth.mr. peanut said:exactly. he is not at all hard done by. the only issue here is he thinks a superstar running back is worth more than NFL GM's think a superstar running back is worth. he will not win this war. a rookie RB is a way better option than a Bell will ever be when you consider the price tag.
I mean, to start, what you feel here is really irrelevant and doesn't reflect reality. The Steelers offered him $14MM a season over 5 years that he turned down before the deadline, so while your feelings are $8MM or possibly $10MM, the reality of an actual offer from an NFL franchise was 40% higher than your stretch valuation.
I get that you are trying to make a point about RB value, but you are wrong, and using ridiculous numbers that are easily, factually disproved merely emphasizes that point.
Bell is MUCH closer to Gurley's 4 year/$57M contract than he is to your 4 year/$20M idea.
5 million a year for one if the best offensive weapons in the league.mr. peanut said:no disagreement here. i just think he is overvaluing his worth. the franchise tag is a huge gift IMO. he should be paid 4 x $5M. instead he gets offered 1 x $15M and says no? the reason he is saying no is he knows he is declining already and wants a long term deal because he may be worth 0 next year. if he knows this so do NFL GM's thats why he is not getting paid. if he were a free agent today he might get 4 x $8M tops.
THIS ISN'T HOW ROOKIE CONTRACTS WORK.jtp1982 said:Also though I’d give Bell a good chunk of the credit for how much more an elite dual threat rookie RB earns now, in upfront cash, since he’s shown the league the value of that type of player.
Bell was signed to a 4 year contract for a little over 4 million dollars out of college but I’m not sure he got quite that much due to his injury. Barkley’s contract is a little over 31 million and it’s guaranteed money.
If Barkley has Bell’s career he’ll be thrilled so I don’t know if Bell will win this battle but I also don’t blame him for fighting it. He’s played a lot of football for the Steelers well below is market rate.
not all GMs are dumb enough to give a Gurley deal. I don't think 1 player makes the market. I would say Freeman is a better comparison here and that was a huge overpay. Smart GM's do not pay $10M+ on a RB. no need to. there are practice squad guys that can step in and compete with the right opportunity. no such luck with OL, DL or QB.Given the most recent comparable (Gurley), how would you meaningfully argue an RB of a certain level of talent is NOT worth $10+M/year?
Gurley is 24 (actually just turned 24 last month), while Bell is 27 two weeks after the Super Bowl. Gurley also has zero off the field issues, for whatever that's worth. I also believe that Gurley was paid way too much (nearly 75% more than the next highest paid guy at the same position, in terms of average $ per year). I think 10 a year for 3 (depending on how many years and how it's guaranteed) is about right.Given the most recent comparable (Gurley), how would you meaningfully argue an RB of a certain level of talent is NOT worth $10+M/year?
It also makes a huge difference that they're paying their QB on his rookie salary. They have way more money to divvy out, they can afford to overpay compared to the market.not all GMs are dumb enough to give a Gurley deal. I don't think 1 player makes the market. I would say Freeman is a better comparison here and that was a huge overpay. Smart GM's do not pay $10M+ on a RB. no need to. there are practice squad guys that can step in and compete with the right opportunity. no such luck with OL, DL or QB.
He may be there for 8 games but why would they use him. He has already said needs to take care of himself and stay healthy. No way would I run him out there, he could care less what the team does.I think he will play a minimum of 8 games. I think that those numbers will be easy for a guy coming in fresh late in the season playing for a franchise trying to use his talent. Easy.
Barkley definitely got drafted higher because of Bell. Not just Bell but the whole recent trend of dual threat RBs Bell is the prime example of.THIS ISN'T HOW ROOKIE CONTRACTS WORK.
They're 100% based on the CBA. Bell had 0 to do with how much Barkley is making, it's 100% due to his draft slot. No rookie has benefited from Bell, except if you think they got drafted higher because Bell is good. If he can reset the market value of RBs then he has a shot at affecting their 2nd contract, but he hasn't and won't affect any rookie contracts. That's just silly.
Who's to say what quality of life is worth? Surly not you or I. We do not play this game and don't cash the checks. He is due what he is due or he'll try to make more for his inability to literally potentially walk away from this game and play with his kids and grandchildren. FF don't mean ####.Gurley is 24 (actually just turned 24 last month), while Bell is 27 two weeks after the Super Bowl. Gurley also has zero off the field issues, for whatever that's worth. I also believe that Gurley was paid way too much (nearly 75% more than the next highest paid guy at the same position, in terms of average $ per year). I think 10 a year for 3 (depending on how many years and how it's guaranteed) is about right.
Not sure what you are getting at with this replyBassNBrew said:He's not getting more money this year.
True that. I honestly can't say I'd carry the ball 400 times against NFL defenders for any amount of money.Who's to say what quality of life is worth? Surly not you or I. We do not play this game and don't cash the checks. He is due what he is due or he'll try to make more for his inability to literally potentially walk away from this game and play with his kids and grandchildren. FF don't mean ####.
Even w/o the TE designation he is if you have the room. Yahoo is the only place that has him as a TE FYIConner is the back to own, but is likely already owned, so taking a flyer on samuels especially with a te designation is worth a spot.
this guy gets it. gurley is a one off not a market rate. it was a dumb contract for the Rams but they can get away with it. bell and his agent are idiots if they hold out. his market rate is not what he thinks it is. market rate is not determined by production, it is determined by supply and demand like anything else. there are hundreds of guys that can be running backs in the NFL. there are not hundreds of guys that can be OL,DL or QB in the NFL.It also makes a huge difference that they're paying their QB on his rookie salary. They have way more money to divvy out, they can afford to overpay compared to the market.