It seems very unlikely to me because he is so good at returns. If they did take him off of these roles it would because they intend to use him more on offense though.Any chance they take Lockett off special teams? Only reason I have him is because I'm in a return yardage league.
He ran out of the slot on 53% of his snaps last week which lead the team by a fair margin. He obviously gets a boost but you have to remember Baldwin was pretty high variance himself.kyoun1e said:And it's my understanding he should be running a great % of his routes out of the slot where Baldwin usually runs.
What am I missing here?
Lockett either blows up here or this entire organization and the fantasy community has misjudged his ability.
WR20 in my ppr + return league. Not bad for a round 11 pick4 targets is not encouraging. At all.
You don't appear to be missing anything (except I think Baldwin's preseason knee issue was blown out of proportion, however the MCL is concerning). Your last line sums it up perfectly. Time will tell, but I'm leaning towards him being a success, but prepared for the worst.kyoun1e said:Confused about this guy's potential.
Seattle extended him and invested quite a bit in Lockett. Graham and Richardson's targets need to get filled by somebody.
Baldwin already with one bad knee, now both.
And it's my understanding he should be running a great % of his routes out of the slot where Baldwin usually runs.
What am I missing here?
Lockett either blows up here or this entire organization and the fantasy community has misjudged his ability.
1. Lockett is more versatile than given credit for and if he's playing half his snaps from the slot, why wouldn't a 3 step drop be good for him?1. A lot of 3 step drops do not play to Lockett’s strength.
2. Just because GB beat Chicago does not mean that for any other team to win they have to copy GB’s play calling.
3. There is no reason to think Marshall cannot be successful against the Bears. He looked great last week.
Sure, on the surface but if you dig a little deeper it is pretty obvious:I will never understand TSP's fascination with this guy. It's like Lucy and Charlie Brown, every year.
This pretty much sums up where I am. If this year is more if the same then it's time to move on. But there is opportunity, and that's all a prayer needs sometimes.If this year doesn't work out, it's probably time to move on. However, there are a lot of signs pointing to this being a breakout year. Given the extremely low opportunity cost, I think people are crazy to pass on him for logic that usually boils down to "because box scores."
Freudian slip?This pretty much sums up where I am. If this year is more if the same then it's time to move on. But there is opportunity, and that's all a prayer needs sometimes.
Is this really something you are unsure about? Seems pretty obvious to me. You gotta bench Cooper and his 3 targets, but you also have to keep Davis and his 13 targets in your lineup. To me (at least for week 2): Davis > Lockett > Cooper.Might be starting him over Cooper or Corey Davis - One of them will be on the bench.
I get 0.04 points per return yard which only is an extra 2.5 points per game, but if he can get up to the 5-50 range, it'll be a nice floor.
@ Chicago on MNF - they might have to pass a lot.
Chris Hogan had 5 targets. 1 catch for 11 yards.4 targets is not encouraging. At all.
The big preseason play people linked to show he's back was also a major push off that wasn't called. Even during his one big season with the Jets (three years ago) he didn't gain much separation but Fitz forced the ball to him and he fought off smaller defensive backs (to his credit) but to your point he's clearly slowed down even more since then and the refs are going to start watching him closer if he keeps relying on offensive pass interference to make plays.3. Meh. He got called for offensive pass interference in the end zone once and he definitely pushed off on his TD. I'm not sure he can get separation anymore without pushing off.
also... dat scarf tho
That's the way I was leaning. Just murky situations all around - Davis (QB issues, lost two good lneman) However he lost Walker so in theory more targets.Is this really something you are unsure about? Seems pretty obvious to me. You gotta bench Cooper and his 3 targets, but you also have to keep Davis and his 13 targets in your lineup. To me (at least for week 2): Davis > Lockett > Cooper.
Draft Dominator had him WR24 with my settings. I thought about starting over Cooks but JWB makes good points about his ceiling. At flex I have Freeman, Barber, and Alex Collins. Likely starting him over all 3 of them as my flex. While each of those 3 have a much higher ceiling than Lockett, I feel like Lockett's floor is not as low as theirs, especially with return yardageFBGs with my return settings has him WR18 the ROS - I doubt he keeps that up as it's based off 1 game where they forgot to cover him for a 50+ score. Just funny to see his name above Sanders, Cooks, Davis, DT, Gordon.
Yeah, as soon as I hit submit I remembered you calling that out earlier in the thread (or maybe another thread) and regretting not linking that push off, too. I've only seen a few Marshall plays in Seattle and three of them have been push offs. Not encouraging.The big preseason play people linked to show he's back was also a major push off that wasn't called. Even during his one big season with the Jets (three years ago) he didn't gain much separation but Fitz forced the ball to him and he fought off smaller defensive backs (to his credit) but to your point he's clearly slowed down even more since then and the refs are going to start watching him closer if he keeps relying on offensive pass interference to make plays.
To be fair, even in his prime he always relied on his size advantage over corner backs to make plays (and he's good at it) - but was also a better deep threat back then. He may go on to have a nice season is Seattle based on volume and the fact that he can still "out-physical" most defensive backs but like I said I've seen every game he's played over the last three seasons and the last two he looked like a shell of himself. The Hawks don't have much else besides Marshall and Lockett with Baldwin out and with their defense in shambles the volume will be there at least - his owners will surely be frustrated when half his TDs get called back though.Yeah, as soon as I hit submit I remembered you calling that out earlier in the thread (or maybe another thread) and regretting not linking that push off, too. I've only seen a few Marshall plays in Seattle and three of them have been push offs. Not encouraging.
Yeah, I absolutely agree with the bolded, and you are correct he was a better deep threat, but the main difference is that he was better at getting just enough separation that he didn't have to push off. He was still winning jump balls on the Jets, but he wasn't pushing off with as much regularity as best I can recall (I had Decker on a lot of teams that year with Fitzmagic, so I watched a lot of those Jets games and highlights).To be fair, even in his prime he always relied on his size advantage over corner backs to make plays (and he's good at it) - but was also a better deep threat back then. He may go on to have a nice season is Seattle based on volume and the fact that he can still "out-physical" most defensive backs but like I said I've seen every game he's played over the last three seasons and the last two he looked like a shell of himself. The Hawks don't have much else besides Marshall and Lockett with Baldwin out and with their defense in shambles the volume will be there at least - his owners will surely be frustrated when half his TDs get called back though.
Yup.FBGs with my return settings has him WR18 the ROS - I doubt he keeps that up as it's based off 1 game where they forgot to cover him for a 50+ score. Just funny to see his name above Sanders, Cooks, Davis, DT, Gordon.
Yep one game. One game that looks like most of the rest of his career: 9 games in 2017 with 4 or fewer targets; 8 in 2016; 8 in 2015.Chris Hogan had 5 targets. 1 catch for 11 yards.
It’s one game.
I get it. This week might be rough too. Baldwin being hurt isn’t going to help him either. Is he a good wr for an NFL team? sure, but I agree, he’s not really a confidence play in fantasy.Yep one game. One game that looks like most of the rest of his career: 9 games in 2017 with 4 or fewer targets; 8 in 2016; 8 in 2015.
I'm looking for a sign that he's turned a corner or whatever, but so far he looks like the same player he's always been.
Schottenheimer.He just disappears for long stretches and I don't know why.
I think he will retain great value all year. It's MArshall who will be hurt by baldwin coming back. lockett is good for at least one deep play every week. He' the #2 WR when Baldwin comes back.I don't know what to think about Lockett. I was trying to trade him all week. Don't like the usage at all. Now he seems to be getting more targets.....idk...….Baldwin still coming back...…..I'm probably still a seller at this point but he's a talent for sure...….
Same. I benched him this week as thought the matchup wasn't great.I don't know what to think about Lockett. I was trying to trade him all week. Don't like the usage at all. Now he seems to be getting more targets.....idk...….Baldwin still coming back...…..I'm probably still a seller at this point but he's a talent for sure...….
This. I think Baldwin will help Lockett because he will draw the #1 and Lockett can do his thing.I think he will retain great value all year. It's MArshall who will be hurt by baldwin coming back. lockett is good for at least one deep play every week. He' the #2 WR when Baldwin comes back.
That’s a good name to drop. Everyone is all over Ridley’s nuts claiming he is a plug and play going forward but Lockett isn’t even rosterable, lol. It’s hilarious. I mean I get it, Ridley is a young stud and Lockett has always been kinda meh but I would be happy starting Lockett.Currently WR9 in my PPR with return points (25 yds/1 pt) league.
And it's not like he's Calvin Ridley and has one 40 point game and the rest garbage. He's been a legitimate starting WR every week so far.
He's starting for me until the above is not true
Fun fact: they are only 2 years apart in age.That’s a good name to drop. Everyone is all over Ridley’s nuts claiming he is a plug and play going forward but Lockett isn’t even rosterable, lol. It’s hilarious. I mean I get it, Ridley is a young stud and Lockett has always been kinda meh but I would be happy starting Lockett.
ETA: WR14 in our league.
Yeah sorry, I meant it more as “here’s this 6’2” physical specimen just out of Alabama and then there’s a guy who is 170lbs soaking wet” Not literally one is young and one is old.Fun fact: they are only 2 years apart in age.
Ditto.I don't know what to think about Lockett. I was trying to trade him all week. Don't like the usage at all. Now he seems to be getting more targets.....idk...….Baldwin still coming back...…..I'm probably still a seller at this point but he's a talent for sure...….
then for my sake please dont ever start himDitto.
Tried to package him the last couple weeks. Have a feeling he's finally caught other's attention so he probably could be sold higher now.
He can't get a 40-50 yard bomb every week.
I just know if I start him he goes 2-13.
Selling in redraft or dynasty?Ditto.
Tried to package him the last couple weeks. Have a feeling he's finally caught other's attention so he probably could be sold higher now.
He can't get a 40-50 yard bomb every week.
I just know if I start him he goes 2-13.