Not Really Mel Kiper
Footballguy
Why should a team have to overcome?Seahawks had ample opportunity to overcome. They didn't especially look at Steven's stone hands and their clock management.
Why should a team have to overcome?Seahawks had ample opportunity to overcome. They didn't especially look at Steven's stone hands and their clock management.
Why should a team have to overcome?Seahawks had ample opportunity to overcome. They didn't especially look at Steven's stone hands and their clock management.
Tells me Pittsburgh made the plays and Seattle did not.Had Sea made plays they could have overcome several bad calls. What does that tell you about how Pit played?Not a fan of either team, but a poor game all around.The thread I was in in the FFA is gone now. I still don't see where the Seahawks lost bc of blown calls they lost bc of bad plays and missed opportunities.
Yup. A couple of questionable calls. Show me the game that hasn't had any. There were some much much MUCH worse officiating efforts during this year's playoffs. The bad calls tonite were not game changing nor of greater numbers than the average game. Its done. Sorry if you can't live with it.You're not allowed to tackle a guy below the waist? Good to know...X infinity.
The refs didn't cost anyone anything. The officiating was just fine tonite.
That one was a correct no-call. Pretty obvious on replay.And to pile on, it looked like Roth. stepped over the line of scrimmage during that marathon completion play to H Ward.
You are right that they shouldn't "have to." But they didn't get done in by the officials. There were some close calls that went the other way.I agree that the Hasselbeck "block below the waist" was phantom. That being said, Ward was so open on the next play it wouldn't have mattered.Why should a team have to overcome?Seahawks had ample opportunity to overcome. They didn't especially look at Steven's stone hands and their clock management.
Or better yet...Become an officialWrite them a letter:
NFL Officiating
280 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Yeah, didn't you see the replay with the red line of scrimmage? I don't think Rothy was even within a foot of it.That one was a correct no-call. Pretty obvious on replay.And to pile on, it looked like Roth. stepped over the line of scrimmage during that marathon completion play to H Ward.
Sorry, but that was a good call. DJax DID push off and it DID affect the TD. Had he not done that, the defender would have probably been in position to make a play on the ball.D Jax push off, B S and VERY late
Are you kidding? He got him from behind with no collar! I was more worried that Alexander might have had his ankle turned than that he was horse-collared.The refs called the low tackle on Hass but ignored the horse collar tackle on Alexander. It was like they were making up rules as the game went along. Horrible officiating.
X infinity.
The refs didn't cost anyone anything. The officiating was just fine tonite.
Michael "Playmaker" Irvin said it was a bad call. Shouldn't that be enough proof?Sorry, but that was a good call. DJax DID push off and it DID affect the TD. Had he not done that, the defender would have probably been in position to make a play on the ball.D Jax push off, B S and VERY late
You are wrong, he did not affect the defender's chance to catch the ball. It still was a good call, though. The reason it got called was bc Jackson's arm was extended enough to stop the defender. However, had he not done that, he still would have been in position to make the catch bc he had over a yard of separation.Sorry, but that was a good call. DJax DID push off and it DID affect the TD. Had he not done that, the defender would have probably been in position to make a play on the ball.D Jax push off, B S and VERY late
If Cokesniffer said it, it's good enough for me. My bad.Michael "Playmaker" Irvin said it was a bad call. Shouldn't that be enough proof?Sorry, but that was a good call. DJax DID push off and it DID affect the TD. Had he not done that, the defender would have probably been in position to make a play on the ball.D Jax push off, B S and VERY late
Obviously John Madden and myself saw it differentlyAre you kidding? He got him from behind with no collar! I was more worried that Alexander might have had his ankle turned than that he was horse-collared.The refs called the low tackle on Hass but ignored the horse collar tackle on Alexander. It was like they were making up rules as the game went along. Horrible officiating.
I'm not a fan of either team by any means, and probably more than any other super bowl I've ever watched, I was indifferent about the winner of this game. With that said, this was quite possibly the worst officiated game I've ever seen. Theres bad calls where you can understand how it is a tough call for the ref to make at game speed, and then theres calls that are made late, are made after looking at replay, or are just completely unfounded(penalty on Hasselbeck for tackling).Yup. A couple of questionable calls. Show me the game that hasn't had any. There were some much much MUCH worse officiating efforts during this year's playoffs. The bad calls tonite were not game changing nor of greater numbers than the average game. Its done. Sorry if you can't live with it.You're not allowed to tackle a guy below the waist? Good to know...X infinity.
The refs didn't cost anyone anything. The officiating was just fine tonite.
He had separation because his hand was in the defenders chest. If he had "a yard of separation", how could he even be in contact with the defender?? That doesn't even make sense.You are wrong, he did not affect the defender. It still was a good call, though. The reason it got called was bc Jackson's arm was extended enough to affect the defender. However, had he not done that, he still would have been in position to make the catch bc he had over a yard of separation.Sorry, but that was a good call. DJax DID push off and it DID affect the TD. Had he not done that, the defender would have probably been in position to make a play on the ball.D Jax push off, B S and VERY late
Michael "Playmaker" Irvin said it was a bad call. Shouldn't that be enough proof?Sorry, but that was a good call. DJax DID push off and it DID affect the TD. Had he not done that, the defender would have probably been in position to make a play on the ball.D Jax push off, B S and VERY late
I watched it with the sound off. I'll confidently take my view any day and twice on Sunday. (more based on Madden then you).Obviously John Madden and myself saw it differentlyAre you kidding? He got him from behind with no collar! I was more worried that Alexander might have had his ankle turned than that he was horse-collared.The refs called the low tackle on Hass but ignored the horse collar tackle on Alexander. It was like they were making up rules as the game went along. Horrible officiating.
I'll give you the Hasselbeck tackle call. That was crap, but hardly effected the game. I didn't see anything else that wasn't a judgement call, and even the majority of those calls being questioned in here (the DJax PI call, Ben's TD gift), on the replay I could totally see where the refs were coming from.I'm not a fan of either team by any means, and probably more than any other super bowl I've ever watched, I was indifferent about the winner of this game. With that said, this was quite possibly the worst officiated game I've ever seen. Theres bad calls where you can understand how it is a tough call for the ref to make at game speed, and then theres calls that are made late, are made after looking at replay, or are just completely unfounded(penalty on Hasselbeck for tackling).Yup. A couple of questionable calls. Show me the game that hasn't had any. There were some much much MUCH worse officiating efforts during this year's playoffs. The bad calls tonite were not game changing nor of greater numbers than the average game. Its done. Sorry if you can't live with it.You're not allowed to tackle a guy below the waist? Good to know...X infinity.
The refs didn't cost anyone anything. The officiating was just fine tonite.
The bigger problem I have with the DJackson play was how late it was called...it was like once the ref realized that it was a TD, then he decided to throw it.Darrell Jackson did push off in the end zone. Was it very blatant? No. Could it have gone uncalled? Yes. But he did push off.
Sean Locklear did hold Clark Haggans on the pass to the 1. Was it the "there's holding on every play" type of hold? Perhaps. But he did hold.
These weren't blatantly blown calls that showed a misunderstanding of the rules. They were borderline judgment calls that happened to impact key plays.
I can agree with that. There are lots of calls that happen in every game that are tough to call. Sometimes going to be 50/50 that they get it right. Its not an easy job. Does it happen sometimes that you roll a die and it comes up even 3 out of 4 times? Sure it does. It happens.These weren't blatantly blown calls that showed a misunderstanding of the rules. They were borderline judgment calls that happened to impact key plays.
Obviously you have no knowledge of the horse collar rule.They did make a bad call on the Hass tackle. It was a 15 yard penalty after change of posession. Not exactly a game changer.The refs called the low tackle on Hass but ignored the horse collar tackle on Alexander. It was like they were making up rules as the game went along. Horrible officiating.
Didn't you say this in your locked thread already?My complaint is about those people who truly believe in their heart that the refs cost the Seahawks the title and refuse to say it publically because it is easier not to do so. That is not classy. Looking at the polls, the overwhelming majority of football fans feel that way. Its become a legitimate point and people should feel free to make it.
I bet you anything that there are many in the Steelers organization itself that feel this way too. If the NFL doesn't want a major PR mightmare on its hands, those people better be free to voice their feelings. Otherwise, with today's fan, I think it will permanently damage the game.
Does it matter? If it was a penalty, then call it. I would rather have ref think a little about a play before making a call then to make a split second decision.The bigger problem I have with the DJackson play was how late it was called...it was like once the ref realized that it was a TD, then he decided to throw it.Darrell Jackson did push off in the end zone. Was it very blatant? No. Could it have gone uncalled? Yes. But he did push off.
Sean Locklear did hold Clark Haggans on the pass to the 1. Was it the "there's holding on every play" type of hold? Perhaps. But he did hold.
These weren't blatantly blown calls that showed a misunderstanding of the rules. They were borderline judgment calls that happened to impact key plays.
You must of not watched ANY play off game. In comparison, the Super Bowl was a delight. Some close calls but besides the phantom Hasselback below the knee call (???) It wasn't all that bad.And COntroversy? There wont be no controversy. Steelers won. PERIOD. Congrats to the steelers, they did whatever it took to win. Seattle didn't.I'm not a fan of either team by any means, and probably more than any other super bowl I've ever watched, I was indifferent about the winner of this game. With that said, this was quite possibly the worst officiated game I've ever seen. Theres bad calls where you can understand how it is a tough call for the ref to make at game speed, and then theres calls that are made late, are made after looking at replay, or are just completely unfounded(penalty on Hasselbeck for tackling).Yup. A couple of questionable calls. Show me the game that hasn't had any. There were some much much MUCH worse officiating efforts during this year's playoffs. The bad calls tonite were not game changing nor of greater numbers than the average game. Its done. Sorry if you can't live with it.You're not allowed to tackle a guy below the waist? Good to know...X infinity.
The refs didn't cost anyone anything. The officiating was just fine tonite.
If the NFL had a choice on who they would want to win the super bowl they would not have choose the seahawks
When he contacted the defender, the defender didn't even move. Plus, the ball was thrown to Jackson's side. So when DJ broke for the ball, he easily had a yard of separation. Their contact had no affect on the defender's chance at the ball.That being said, it's the right call bc he touched the defender w his arm outstretched while breaking the other way. There is no way for the official to see what we saw without slo-mo. He made the right call.He had separation because his hand was in the defenders chest. If he had "a yard of separation", how could he even be in contact with the defender?? That doesn't even make sense.You are wrong, he did not affect the defender. It still was a good call, though. The reason it got called was bc Jackson's arm was extended enough to affect the defender. However, had he not done that, he still would have been in position to make the catch bc he had over a yard of separation.Sorry, but that was a good call. DJax DID push off and it DID affect the TD. Had he not done that, the defender would have probably been in position to make a play on the ball.D Jax push off, B S and VERY late
Link?If the NFL had a choice on who they would want to win the super bowl they would not have choose the seahawks
The argument is not about a call being questionable, the issue is that the calls were questionable at crucial junctures in the game.No delay of game is a big deal.Yup. A couple of questionable calls. Show me the game that hasn't had any. There were some much much MUCH worse officiating efforts during this year's playoffs. The bad calls tonite were not game changing nor of greater numbers than the average game. Its done. Sorry if you can't live with it.You're not allowed to tackle a guy below the waist? Good to know...X infinity.
The refs didn't cost anyone anything. The officiating was just fine tonite.
If the NFL had a choice on who they would want to win the super bowl they would not have choose the seahawks
Check that replay and tell me how many of the Steelers O-lineman were beyond it illegally. I think you'll be surprised.Yeah, didn't you see the replay with the red line of scrimmage? I don't think Rothy was even within a foot of it.That one was a correct no-call. Pretty obvious on replay.And to pile on, it looked like Roth. stepped over the line of scrimmage during that marathon completion play to H Ward.
Well I'll add that the NFL has to do something here and something big. There's just been far too many bad calls in general lately. Either a major revamp of the referee crews, or getting rid of instant replay in its current form, or something. This was bad news for the NFL and they need to get on top of it.Didn't you say this in your locked thread already?My complaint is about those people who truly believe in their heart that the refs cost the Seahawks the title and refuse to say it publically because it is easier not to do so. That is not classy. Looking at the polls, the overwhelming majority of football fans feel that way. Its become a legitimate point and people should feel free to make it.
I bet you anything that there are many in the Steelers organization itself that feel this way too. If the NFL doesn't want a major PR mightmare on its hands, those people better be free to voice their feelings. Otherwise, with today's fan, I think it will permanently damage the game.![]()
Doesn't matter if he didn't move. He was stopped from moving with DJax. It makes a HUGE difference. His contact DID have an affect. I know it's not the same game, but I play flag football almost every week. When a WR pushes an arm against you, it does make a big difference on what play you can make on the ball.When he contacted the defender, the defender didn't even move. Plus, the ball was thrown to Jackson's side. So when DJ broke for the ball, he easily had a yard of separation. Their contact had no affect on the defender's chance at the ball.That being said, it's the right call bc he touched the defender w his arm outstretched while breaking the other way. There is no way for the official to see what we saw without slo-mo. He made the right call.He had separation because his hand was in the defenders chest. If he had "a yard of separation", how could he even be in contact with the defender?? That doesn't even make sense.You are wrong, he did not affect the defender. It still was a good call, though. The reason it got called was bc Jackson's arm was extended enough to affect the defender. However, had he not done that, he still would have been in position to make the catch bc he had over a yard of separation.Sorry, but that was a good call. DJax DID push off and it DID affect the TD. Had he not done that, the defender would have probably been in position to make a play on the ball.D Jax push off, B S and VERY late
Watch it, some might think you are a Patriot fan in disguise! lolYou always hate to lose because of the Zebras...but it is a true statement of fact that they can change the pace of the game based on their calls.The argument is not about a call being questionable, the issue is that the calls were questionable at crucial junctures in the game.No delay of game is a big deal.Yup. A couple of questionable calls. Show me the game that hasn't had any. There were some much much MUCH worse officiating efforts during this year's playoffs. The bad calls tonite were not game changing nor of greater numbers than the average game. Its done. Sorry if you can't live with it.You're not allowed to tackle a guy below the waist? Good to know...X infinity.
The refs didn't cost anyone anything. The officiating was just fine tonite.
A 1/2 yard run that was about to be spotted at the 3 inch mark making it 4th and goal but magically turns into a TD as the Ref goes to spot it is a big deal.
a ticky tack push off that negates a TD is a big deal.
A missed holding call when Randel El throws the TD is a HUGE deal.
A phantom holding call that costs the seahawks 30 yds and a 1st and goal is monumental.
Yes every game has mistakes by the Refs, but when one team consistantly comes out on the short end of calls that come at crucial moments in the game, there is reason to complain.
Biggest travesty in sports since the Don Denkinger World Series in 1985.
No, if you actually pay attention to the replay you'll see that the official reached for the flag and went through the motion of throwing it but missed. He had to reach back down to grab the flag to throw it.The bigger problem I have with the DJackson play was how late it was called...it was like once the ref realized that it was a TD, then he decided to throw it.Darrell Jackson did push off in the end zone. Was it very blatant? No. Could it have gone uncalled? Yes. But he did push off.
Sean Locklear did hold Clark Haggans on the pass to the 1. Was it the "there's holding on every play" type of hold? Perhaps. But he did hold.
These weren't blatantly blown calls that showed a misunderstanding of the rules. They were borderline judgment calls that happened to impact key plays.
I noticed that too, he did seem to have trouble getting the flag out.No, if you actually pay attention to the replay you'll see that the official reached for the flag and went through the motion of throwing it but missed. He had to reach back down to grab the flag to throw it.The bigger problem I have with the DJackson play was how late it was called...it was like once the ref realized that it was a TD, then he decided to throw it.Darrell Jackson did push off in the end zone. Was it very blatant? No. Could it have gone uncalled? Yes. But he did push off.
Sean Locklear did hold Clark Haggans on the pass to the 1. Was it the "there's holding on every play" type of hold? Perhaps. But he did hold.
These weren't blatantly blown calls that showed a misunderstanding of the rules. They were borderline judgment calls that happened to impact key plays.
Ah...good point. Never did look at that, no. I'd ask anyone here with Tivo to let me know if that were true but I'm sure half the crew would say yes and the other half would say no.Check that replay and tell me how many of the Steelers O-lineman were beyond it illegally. I think you'll be surprised.Yeah, didn't you see the replay with the red line of scrimmage? I don't think Rothy was even within a foot of it.That one was a correct no-call. Pretty obvious on replay.And to pile on, it looked like Roth. stepped over the line of scrimmage during that marathon completion play to H Ward.
Well, watch the replay again. He was already on his heels when DJ's arm touched him. I can't imagine that if DJ had kept his arms at his side, that the defender would have had any better chance at that ball.Doesn't matter if he didn't move. He was stopped from moving with DJax. It makes a HUGE difference. His contact DID have an affect. I know it's not the same game, but I play flag football almost every week. When a WR pushes an arm against you, it does make a big difference on what play you can make on the ball.When he contacted the defender, the defender didn't even move. Plus, the ball was thrown to Jackson's side. So when DJ broke for the ball, he easily had a yard of separation. Their contact had no affect on the defender's chance at the ball.That being said, it's the right call bc he touched the defender w his arm outstretched while breaking the other way. There is no way for the official to see what we saw without slo-mo. He made the right call.He had separation because his hand was in the defenders chest. If he had "a yard of separation", how could he even be in contact with the defender?? That doesn't even make sense.You are wrong, he did not affect the defender. It still was a good call, though. The reason it got called was bc Jackson's arm was extended enough to affect the defender. However, had he not done that, he still would have been in position to make the catch bc he had over a yard of separation.Sorry, but that was a good call. DJax DID push off and it DID affect the TD. Had he not done that, the defender would have probably been in position to make a play on the ball.D Jax push off, B S and VERY late