NCCommish
Footballguy
He has terrible feet. Unless he can drastically improve them he will not be a tackle in the NFL. Not for long anyway.I think he's supposed to play at RT.
Last edited by a moderator:
He has terrible feet. Unless he can drastically improve them he will not be a tackle in the NFL. Not for long anyway.I think he's supposed to play at RT.
With a fifth round grade at that. I don't understand how you don't take Clemmings, but then again I'm not evaluating these guys for a living. I just hope DG hasn't let his success turn him into one of those guys who thinks he's a far superior talent evaluator. We drafted a LB/S, a WR/TE, and now a OT/G.We traded up for a projected guard? 3 picks? Did we really need a guard and I missed it? Quite the head scratcher at this point.
What an awful draft. We trade up and miss every time. To think, if we had traded up well we could have ended up with Landon Collins, DGB and Clemmings. Pretty sure all of us would have thought we hit a HR and filled 3 spots. I think this is a drafts we look back on in a few years and give ourselves an F on and wonder what would have been.With a fifth round grade at that. I don't understand how you don't take Clemmings, but then again I'm not evaluating these guys for a living. I just hope DG hasn't let his success turn him into one of those guys who thinks he's a far superior talent evaluator. We drafted a LB/S, a WR/TE, and now a OT/G.We traded up for a projected guard? 3 picks? Did we really need a guard and I missed it? Quite the head scratcher at this point.
Three days ago you would have been laughed at for tossing out a scenario where we got three first round picks.What an awful draft. We trade up and miss every time. To think, if we had traded up well we could have ended up with Landon Collins, DGB and Clemmings. Pretty sure all of us would have thought we hit a HR and filled 3 spots. I think this is a drafts we look back on in a few years and give ourselves an F on and wonder what would have been.With a fifth round grade at that. I don't understand how you don't take Clemmings, but then again I'm not evaluating these guys for a living. I just hope DG hasn't let his success turn him into one of those guys who thinks he's a far superior talent evaluator. We drafted a LB/S, a WR/TE, and now a OT/G.We traded up for a projected guard? 3 picks? Did we really need a guard and I missed it? Quite the head scratcher at this point.
Yep, and we were one slot away from making that a reality with no problem at all. Ugh. Could have been a phenomenal draft. I don't mind Shaq and Funchess, they have potential. If they got Clemmings. Is be ok.Three days ago you would have been laughed at for tossing out a scenario where we got three first round picks.What an awful draft. We trade up and miss every time. To think, if we had traded up well we could have ended up with Landon Collins, DGB and Clemmings. Pretty sure all of us would have thought we hit a HR and filled 3 spots. I think this is a drafts we look back on in a few years and give ourselves an F on and wonder what would have been.With a fifth round grade at that. I don't understand how you don't take Clemmings, but then again I'm not evaluating these guys for a living. I just hope DG hasn't let his success turn him into one of those guys who thinks he's a far superior talent evaluator. We drafted a LB/S, a WR/TE, and now a OT/G.We traded up for a projected guard? 3 picks? Did we really need a guard and I missed it? Quite the head scratcher at this point.
Another LB. To small to play LB, to slow to play safety.coming nup on our two comp picks in the fifth here
Seriously, I'm not making this stuff up.Small-school linebacker who´s likely to serve on special teams, possibly on the practice squad.
TOO!!!!!Another LB. To small to play LB, to slow to play safety.coming nup on our two comp picks in the fifth here
He had several games with 20 or more tackles I think he can play. Still does seem like an odd pick. I like the RB pick though.Seriously, I'm not making this stuff up.Small-school linebacker who´s likely to serve on special teams, possibly on the practice squad.
Between our FA acquisitions and this draft, we should have the best special teams in the league.
You'd love it if they picked Hannah Montana, Mickey Mouse, and Manti Te'o's girlfriend.I love this draft
Sam Mills was told by several that he was too small to play LB too, and he was smaller than Mayo. It took some time, but Mills went on to prove them wrong. Mayo won the Sun Belt Conference Defensive Player of the Year. He was second in the nation in tackles. In time, he may end up to be quite good for the Panthers. For now, he won't cost much, and he could provide good depth.Another LB. To small to play LB, to slow to play safety.coming nup on our two comp picks in the fifth here
It's not IMO. We need to accept the fact that this organization isn't going to entertain guys like DGB. They just aren't. That said, I have watched Funchess since he was in high school. Being a Michigan fan, this kid has all the necessary tools to get it done at the NFL level. What you see right now in him, is what he was in high school. Michigan did very little to develop him. Any sort of progress he's made over time has been because of his own work ethic. It's really embarrassing to see how little was done with him. Then they moved him to WR and the wheels came off. They really doubled down on stupid in his development. So I am excited to see Ricky P get his hands on him. NOTHING was done with his receiving mechanics, at all, ever at Michigan. I have the confidence in Ricky to mold this guy into what he can be. He was a beast as a blocker his freshman year just for his sheer size against the defensive backs and LBs. There's really no need to go into "hips", "stride", "breaks" or whatever else the "technicians" will talk about. I'm conceding all that garbage now for the reasons state above. I still like him much better at the TE position, but he can play the WR also. It's going to be interesting to see what they do with this kid.BassNBrew said:Good point. That said, don't you think the drop from DGB to Funchess is enormous?simey said:I recall last year a bunch of people carrying on about how Benjamin would be a bust, and he wasn't. To move up in the draft to get Funchess, I assume they feel he will be a good fit with Cam, and they were right last year about Benjamin. They also have Ginn, Cotchery, and the alleged new improved Hill (and Olsen).spider321 said:So the plan is for Funchess to put on more weight and play tackle, right?
Right?!?!
It's absolutely true. Trust meIf what you said about coaching is true I'm even more excited to get him in here and let Ricky go to work. If what he shows was all raw ability we may have stolen one here.
That sure seems like the right approach here. Fans don't really have to understand the logic, if the players pan out the Panthers are one of the best teams in the nfl. They have Some holes for sure but most teams do.After reading a bit, the best word to describe my opinion of this draft initially is "befuddled". I'm sure there's some logical progression here, but I'm not seeing it. The picks seem to trail off a bit after the first two. I can't throw DG out on his head yet though. Two good drafts gives him a lot of patience on my part. We also need to see what happens during the summer free agent period. I'm reserving judgement at this point.
I don't question any of the picks they made. They spend a lot of time researching players that they feel would be the right fit for the team. Gettleman, who at one time was a scout, said that they only drafted five players, but quality is more important than quantity. There also hasn't been a big turnover of the roster this past year, so most are back. They have a plan, and hopefully the players they drafted will pan out. Nobody is a sure thing, even in the top 10.That sure seems like the right approach here. Fans don't really have to understand the logic, if the players pan out the Panthers are one of the best teams in the nfl. They have Some holes for sure but most teams do.After reading a bit, the best word to describe my opinion of this draft initially is "befuddled". I'm sure there's some logical progression here, but I'm not seeing it. The picks seem to trail off a bit after the first two. I can't throw DG out on his head yet though. Two good drafts gives him a lot of patience on my part. We also need to see what happens during the summer free agent period. I'm reserving judgement at this point.
Is this a Marty Hurney alias?!I'm quite happy with the draft overall.
Shaq Thompson may appear to be a bit of a head scratcher in the first, but it's worth noting that once Humphries was off the board, there wasn't a tackle left that likely has the ability (at least from what I've seen) to be a LT starter. Thompson offers flexibility and will strengthen our strongest position. That's a good thing. It also gives us some room to breath if something were to happen to Davis or Klein. If you want to see how important it was to strengthen the line, look at the Panthers during the games that Thomas Davis missed last year. It was really ugly.
On that subject, David Mayo is a true MLB who can be a decent backup to Keuchly in the middle and he is an excellent tackler. That's special teams gold...and exactly what you look for in the later rounds.
Funchess is the one pick that I have some concerns about, mostly because of his hands. With Benjamin already having rough hands, I worry that combined, we're going to see a lot of drops. Proehl is the right coach to work with both guys though, and Funchess is a little faster than Benjamin (on tape/real situations). Ginn, Brown, and MAYBE Hill can help with speed, so I wasn't someone who thought we had to have a speed guy...but I would have preferred Strong over Funchess. Still, nothing to be too upset about.
As for the other two guys...
I LOVE Darryl Williams. He was a very solid RT in college and while I am a fan of Remmers, this brings some competition and likely sets us up to have a starter for many years at the position. Yeah, it sucks we didn't get an LT, but as soon as Humphries went off the board, that plan was shot anyway.
Likewise, I"m a bit fan of Artis-Payne. From everything I saw of him in college, I was a big fan. He's older than I would like (going to be 25 before the season starts), which is likely why he was even available where we drafted him anyway. He's a great compliment to Stewart and I see him as a potential replacement in a year or two.
I see a lot of complaining about trading, but I have no issues with that. We have a very young and talented team, with limited roster spots avaialble. If we drafted 9, or even 7, it's unlikely more than 4-5 would have made the team anyway. I do think we paid too much to move up for Funchess, and would have liked to have that third round pick...but all in all, I'll accept it.
One other note, I see a lot of fans who complain about how we took guys who were "valued at" certain levels. Fans, analysts, etc. have no idea where these players are valued. They are taking guesses based on their personal beliefs. Every NFL team has a staff larger than ESPN, CBS, etc. committed to scouting these players to finding the best fits for their team. The talking heads are evaluating players in general terms and have no true knowledge of what a team is looking for, needs, or covets. Just because Kiper and others have a third round grade on a guy we took in the first doesn't mean that the player is worth any less. Plus, the two picks that were panned the most, Thompson and Funchess are tweeners...guys who many don't know where they project in the NFL. Those guys are notoriously hard to grade and are often discounted as a result. It's the reason Jimmy Graham was available where he went in the draft. It's the reason people said that we "reached" for Thomas Davis many years ago.
As a final thought about draft grades, rankings, etc, I'll leave you with this...
Our 2010 draft received a draft grade of a B from Mel Kiper and glowing reviews from many others. We were declared a "Big Winner" for that year. It's the best grade Kiper has given us in the past 7-8 years. That wonderful class had Jimmy Clausen, Armanti Edwards, Brandon Lafell, David Gettis, Jordan Pugh, Tony Pike, RJ Stanford, and Robert McClain. Oh, and the guy that Kiper said was "just ok" was Greg Hardy...the only guy from that draft that was anything more than a bit player.
Our 2012 class received C's across the board, mostly dropping our rating because we took a guy named Luke Keuchly in the first at LB...a position that wasn't a need for us.
Our 2013 and 2014 classes also received C's and D's. The classes that gave us Star, Short, Klein, Benjamin, Ealy, Bene, etc.
I'm ok with C grades.
PLAYER PLAUDITS
--ESPN analyst and two-time All-Pro linebacker Tedy Bruschi loved the first-round selection of linebacker Luke Kuechly: "He's smart. He's instinctive. This guy is going to be a star."
--Peter King of SI.com called guard Amini Silatolu, the Panthers' second-round selection, the best offensive pick of the entire draft: "Multiple teams targeted him late in the first round, and GM Marty Hurney got a great value here. He'll bring an attitude and versatility to the Panthers and should be a 10-year starter wherever Carolina needs him."
ESPN draft analyst Todd McShay seconded that by labeling Silatolu as the most impactful player in the Panthers' draft: "I think he is a phenomenally talented offensive guard. Should be a starter Day One."
--Michael Lombardi of the NFL Network described defensive end Frank Alexander, whom the Panthers traded up to grab in the fourth round, one of the top 12 value picks of the entire draft: "Alexander has great arm length and inside quickness, and he seems to have a knack for making plays. The ex-Sooner should be able to contribute to the Panthers defense right away."
--Pete Priscoe, senior NFL columnist for CBSSports.com, labeled wide receiver Joe Adamsas the Panthers' best pick and did so without even noting his exceptional ability as a punt returner: "Fourth-round receiver Joe Adams is a nice player. He has the look of a good slot receiver."
--McShay said cornerback Josh Norman was the Panthers' most intriguing pick, saying he could be a steal. Priscoe called Norman a "Third-Day Gem": "Fifth-round corner Josh Norman comes from small-school Coastal Carolina. He impressed during the season, but didn't have a great Senior Bowl week. Some scouts think it was too big for him. But he has the ability if he can adjust."
OVERALL GRADES
--Vinnie Iyer of Sporting News, while categorizing the Panthers among "this year's playoff contenders", gave their draft an A-: "Kuechly and Silatolu bring much-needed physical nastiness to each side of the ball, and Adams was a nice gift for Cam Newton."
--Priscoe gave the Panthers a B : "General manager Marty Hurney had a heck of a draft. It started with linebacker Luke Kuechly in the first round and it continued all the way through it. I love Adams and Norman on the final day."
--Lombardi also gave it a B : "I think it's a really nice, complete draft."
--ESPN draft analyst Mel Kiper gave the Panthers a B- while adding a bold prediction about how quickly the draft class will help: "I'll go with Carolina as the team that wins the division."
--Will Brinson, senior blogger for CBSSports.com, didn't offer letter grades but included the Panthers among five "winners" in the draft: "They took a big step addressing their rush defense by adding Luke Kuechly, they found Cam Newton a sneaky weapon in the fourth round in Joe Adams, and Amini Silatolu could end up ultimately replacing Jeff Otah at right tackle. Frank Alexander and Josh Norman are nice depth on defense, too."
I like the Peters kid from.Clemson. Was very highly rated by PFF. Does need some coaching though. Still may have stolen a starter here.Panthers sign UDFA Brandon Wegher
A longshot but I like him. A bigger Danny Woodhead?
Collins was regarded as a high character guy. Never even a hint of trouble. I think it is really unlikely he was involved. Still couldn't draft the uncertainty. I hope they go for it when he is cleared. We had no shot in the draft in the end this may work out for us at least.On the La'El Collins front... I know Jonathan Jones posted an article about how it was too similar to Rae Carruth and Carolina likely wouldn't have much interest. Not sure I buy that if Collins is completely exhonorated.
I get why no one drafted him... that's not worth the risk of the PR hit if he was involved in anyway - not in today's NFL. But if the man is innocent, I think Carolina would have a good shot at him. He's friends with Trai Turner and keeps in touch. The Carolina coaches showed heavy interested in him at the Senior Bowl and worked with him as much as anyone. The team was reportedly keeping close tabs on him the entire draft process. Add in the fact that if I'm Collins and I want to 1) play for a winner, and 2) play ASAP... how does it get any better than Carolina where the OT need is apparent, it's a playoff team, and you've got Super Man behind you to cover up any mistakes you make with his legs.
I think if he's cleared completely (which say what you will about that), that he makes a whole, whole lot of sense in Carolina.
same here. I think Peters makes this team and was a little surprised he wasn't drafted.I like the Peters kid from.Clemson. Was very highly rated by PFF. Does need some coaching though. Still may have stolen a starter here.Panthers sign UDFA Brandon Wegher
A longshot but I like him. A bigger Danny Woodhead?
He does have a tendency to grab receivers. But a lot college guys do that. Not sure why he fell out of the draft as that was the only real knock on him I found. I wouldn't be at all surprised if he ends up as the starter.Jayrok said:same here. I think Peters makes this team and was a little surprised he wasn't drafted.NCCommish said:I like the Peters kid from.Clemson. Was very highly rated by PFF. Does need some coaching though. Still may have stolen a starter here.FDC said:Panthers sign UDFA Brandon Wegher
A longshot but I like him. A bigger Danny Woodhead?
The only way they were going to get an LT was to trade up in the first. There were only a couple in this draft. People don't seem to understand that there are very few LTs in this draft. The best o-libeman in the draft is probably going to play guard. I don't know who we were supposed to be targetting.I like the idea of less defensive subbing, it is a good counter to the hurry up as well as a coverage upgrade in general. But I don't feel so great about Thompson's run defense. So how is that deal gonna work?
I complained, yes, about the third. I am frustrated at the lack of a successful strategy to acquire a LOT. Nothing against Funchess per se, but his hands... I wanted a guy who catches everything to counter the drops we already have rather than add to the total. I do have a lot of respect for Proehl though. maybe it will be good.
I will have to look for what Funchess said about his coaching in college.
They feel they got enough in Oher and Martin. Both of whom are upgeades over Bell.I understand the number of guys who were said to be qualified fwiw. I know, for another year, we weren't in great shape to get one. I got frustrated with the reality playing out.
But also, what I am getting out of this is that Gettleman is sold on Oher just like he was sold on Chandler/Bell last year. I do have small hope that he is possibly the blind squirrel finding a nut this time, I think it's a little better bet, but if he is wrong it will suck. And Gettleman's (admittedly short) track record on judging OL talent isn't confidence inspiring.
My point on the trade/giving up the 3rd is, we were willing to move up significantly to get another WR. The difference in moving up from 25 to say, 19 or 20, is roughly equivalent to going from 57 to 41 according to the value charts I have seen. I don't know that they tried to move for OT but have not heard any talk that they considered it. I would like for them to have at least made the attempt, show me it is important to them. More important than throwing projects and retreads at the problem. I can accept it not working out, if I know they are trying. What I saw, was them trying harder for a WR than for a LOT.
Funchess may turn out to be great, Shaq may be as well. I guess it boils down to I would rather have a great OL than two great WRs or three great LBs, even though really I would like all three.