Concept Coop said:
humpback said:
If you really want to play the semantics game, I'd disagree that the seeking out only happens "where it's not needed".
My point is that he plays very aggressively, constantly trying to gain an extra yard, even when that means taking an extra hit (or 3). Welker, on the other hand, picks and chooses when to be physical and when to slide/get down. Taking more hits would seem to lead to an increased risk of injury over taking fewer hits.
I'm curious how an offensive player can seek out contact, when it's not need it, without it hindering his objective--score. Something Gronk does on close to 20% of his receptions.
If you're point is that he "fights for extra yards"--I'd say Welker is the exception then--If I were to agree with your statement on him; that's what football players do. Gronk doesn't do it anymore that most, to my eyes. He might be able to take more hits, but I have a hard time using his demi-godly build as a negative.
I'm still not sure what you mean by "when it's not needed". I mean, technically it's never
needed, a player could just fall down every time they get the ball.
My point is, when players are faced with a choice of whether to go down fairly easily/get out of bounds or fight, Gronk generally chooses to fight. To my eyes, he does that more than most, which leaves him open to more hits and potential injuries. You brought up the Welker comparison, I'm just saying Welker doesn't have the same aggressive style. I don't think most guys fight this hard:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJh7-pxrDy4