What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

★☆★ NFL DRAFT Thread. ★☆★ (2 Viewers)

Network Timeout

The server at forums.footballguys.com is taking too long to respond.

The requested site did not respond to a connection request and the browser has stopped waiting for a reply.

* Could the server be experiencing high demand or a temporary outage? Try again later. * Are you unable to browse other sites? Check the computer's network connection. * Is your computer or network protected by a firewall or proxy? Incorrect settings can interfere with Web browsing. * Still having trouble? Consult your network administrator or Internet provider for assistance.

 
Of all times for this board to take a ####.

Vikes moved up 23 spots to the 1st. Eisen needs to give it a rest. They gave up a late 3rd and late 4th :shrug: And they arguably got the best WR in the draft.

 
Boy, did the Patriots rape the Vikings on this trade.
Disagree. The Vikings "gave up" a 3rd, 4th, and 7th. Lots of picks. But they are later.
And a 2nd.
That they would have used on a player anyway. I'm talking about what they "lost" or "gave up".
True but still.
It's like when they traded a 1st and two 3rds for Jared Allen. They "gave up" the two thirds. That was a good play for them.

If Patterson pans out, then "giving up" a 3rd/4th/7th is just as good of a deal.
This was a stupid trade for the Vikings. The Vikings could have gotten a really good WR at 52. This is a very deep WR class. You could have gotten a really good WR at 52 and had all those other picks. This draft is especially deep in the middle rounds. So the second, third, and fourth round picks were more valuable than normal.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also, leave it to the Pats to know how to make a draft day trade. Raiders should be ashamed.
Anyone run the trade calc numbers???
Chase tweeted the trade was basically according to the old trade chart. Though that trade chart is out of date with the new rookie salary structure. Chase said by the old chart the Patriots got $1.01 on the dollar, by his chart they got $1.59 on the dollar.

So by his new chart, WAY overpaid by 60%.

 
Boy, did the Patriots rape the Vikings on this trade.
Disagree. The Vikings "gave up" a 3rd, 4th, and 7th. Lots of picks. But they are later.
And a 2nd. Granted they are sliding 23 picks. But compared to what everyone else got, it is a haul this year.
23 spots is a lot more than other teams were moving up. Good trade by the Vikes.
I agree. 23 slots is fairly significant and while they gave up 2nd, 3rd, and 4th rounders, they were mid to late picks. On the surface, it looks bad but when you look at where the picks are, they aren't great picks so it wasn't a terrible trade for either side.
 
Also, leave it to the Pats to know how to make a draft day trade. Raiders should be ashamed.
Anyone run the trade calc numbers???
According to www.draftcountdown.com/features/Value-Chart.phpVikings29th = 640 pointsPats52nd = 38083rd = 175102nd = 92229th = 0Total = 647
OMGZ!!!1!111!!! VIKES GOT RAPED!!!11!BELECHICK RAMMED IT UP THEIR AZZES!!1!1!!ONE!
Well according to that formula.

3 - 2200 pts Miami

for

12 - 1200 pts Oak

42- 480 pts Oak

------------

1680 pts

-520 :shrug:

 
A free trip to NY is probably really cool for a lot of these college kids, but if I wasn't 100% positive that I would be drafted in the first round, I'd pass. Some guys may be able to take that feeling of walking out of the room without getting picked and use it as motivation, but I imagine the majority of the guys that have to come back for day 2 are more beat down by the process than motivated. It would be interesting to see the stats on guys who went to NY and weren't picked in the first day of the draft.

 
Also, leave it to the Pats to know how to make a draft day trade. Raiders should be ashamed.
Anyone run the trade calc numbers???
According to www.draftcountdown.com/features/Value-Chart.phpVikings29th = 640 pointsPats52nd = 38083rd = 175102nd = 92229th = 0Total = 647
OMGZ!!!1!111!!! VIKES GOT RAPED!!!11!BELECHICK RAMMED IT UP THEIR AZZES!!1!1!!ONE!
Well according to that formula.

3 - 2200 pts Miami

for

12 - 1200 pts Oak

42- 480 pts Oak

------------

1680 pts

-520 :shrug:
So the Raiders got shorted an entire 2nd round pick.

 
Congrats Vikings! You may be a front runner for the April Super Bowl.

The real one... Not so much.

 
Also, leave it to the Pats to know how to make a draft day trade. Raiders should be ashamed.
Anyone run the trade calc numbers???
Chase tweeted the trade was basically according to the old trade chart. Though that trade chart is out of date with the new rookie salary structure. Chase said by the old chart the Patriots got $1.01 on the dollar, by his chart they got $1.59 on the dollar. So by his new chart, WAY overpaid by 60%.
Love to see the numbers on the Dolphins, Rams or Cowboys trade then.
 
I feel bad for Geno but this should be motivation. He's going to get drafted. Probably early tomorrow night.

 
Also, leave it to the Pats to know how to make a draft day trade. Raiders should be ashamed.
Anyone run the trade calc numbers???
According to www.draftcountdown.com/features/Value-Chart.phpVikings29th = 640 pointsPats52nd = 38083rd = 175102nd = 92229th = 0Total = 647
OMGZ!!!1!111!!! VIKES GOT RAPED!!!11!BELECHICK RAMMED IT UP THEIR AZZES!!1!1!!ONE!
Well according to that formula. 3 - 2200 pts Miami for 12 - 1200 pts Oak42- 480 pts Oak------------1680 pts -520 :shrug:
Yeah, even if BB didn't dominate per the trade chart, he still dominated per the rest of the trade downs in this draft.
 
Also, leave it to the Pats to know how to make a draft day trade. Raiders should be ashamed.
Anyone run the trade calc numbers???
According to www.draftcountdown.com/features/Value-Chart.phpVikings29th = 640 pointsPats52nd = 38083rd = 175102nd = 92229th = 0Total = 647
OMGZ!!!1!111!!! VIKES GOT RAPED!!!11!BELECHICK RAMMED IT UP THEIR AZZES!!1!1!!ONE!
Well according to that formula. 3 - 2200 pts Miami for 12 - 1200 pts Oak42- 480 pts Oak------------1680 pts -520 :shrug:
Yeah, even if BB didn't dominate per the trade chart, he still dominated per the rest of the trade downs in this draft.
oh please

 
Also, leave it to the Pats to know how to make a draft day trade. Raiders should be ashamed.
Anyone run the trade calc numbers???
According to www.draftcountdown.com/features/Value-Chart.phpVikings29th = 640 pointsPats52nd = 38083rd = 175102nd = 92229th = 0Total = 647
OMGZ!!!1!111!!! VIKES GOT RAPED!!!11!BELECHICK RAMMED IT UP THEIR AZZES!!1!1!!ONE!
Well according to that formula. 3 - 2200 pts Miami for 12 - 1200 pts Oak42- 480 pts Oak------------1680 pts -520 :shrug:
Yeah, even if BB didn't dominate per the trade chart, he still dominated per the rest of the trade downs in this draft.
oh please
BB always wins. Catch up.
 
Patriots always trade down and end up with little to show with it.

How they can be so good while drafting so poorly is kind of a mystery. Until you consider that they have Tom Brady...

 
Also, leave it to the Pats to know how to make a draft day trade. Raiders should be ashamed.
Anyone run the trade calc numbers???
Chase tweeted the trade was basically according to the old trade chart. Though that trade chart is out of date with the new rookie salary structure. Chase said by the old chart the Patriots got $1.01 on the dollar, by his chart they got $1.59 on the dollar. So by his new chart, WAY overpaid by 60%.
I don't quite understand this. How did the new salary structure make the 1st the Vikings got less valuable? I would think exactly the opposite.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top