Depends on how much you want him, and I suppose if it's a shark league. In my 12-team PPR this week he went 4.4. If you really want him, you probably need to take him at 4.4. If you are OK not getting him, then try to wait for 5.7.Trying to decide, I have the 7th pick. Do I take him at 4.6 or wait to 5.7.
If you really want him, take him in the 4th. You should still get a nice starter in the 5th.Trying to decide, I have the 7th pick. Do I take him at 4.6 or wait to 5.7.
When I hear stuff like this it is useless. If I told you I got Gronk in the 5th round is that going to mean anything to you? Are you going into your draft thinking you can get gronk in the 5th? I can tell you even with your post I am not going into my draft thinking I can get foster 3-4 rounds past where he is normally going.Had a draft monday night, 12 team 11 man rosters. 1/2/2/1 with flex, non ppr. Took AFoster 7.12 and loved it.
I'm guessing 3-5, leaning toward 5.Any predictions on how many weeks Foster will actually be out?
Wrong, wronger and wrongest.Either PUP'd. Or sooner. All that matters to me. PUP can be as long as 14 weeks, but only as short 7.
???Wrong, wronger and wrongest.Either PUP'd. Or sooner. All that matters to me. PUP can be as long as 14 weeks, but only as short 7.
They can't put him on the pup list, only ir designated to return. There's no way they'd put him on ir now.???Wrong, wronger and wrongest.Either PUP'd. Or sooner. All that matters to me. PUP can be as long as 14 weeks, but only as short 7.
If he is (ended up) on the pup... then I dont really want 'em.
Otherwise the team thinks he will be back before week 8 or so. Now we are talking real value.
Sorry, I meant IR designated top return. And threw out PUP thinking it was the proper monicker.They can't put him on the pup list, only ir designated to return.There's no way they'd put him on ir now.???Wrong, wronger and wrongest.Either PUP'd. Or sooner. All that matters to me. PUP can be as long as 14 weeks, but only as short 7.
If he is (ended up) on the pup... then I dont really want 'em.
Otherwise the team thinks he will be back before week 8 or so. Now we are talking real value.
Pup is 6 weeks, not 7.
just dont rush him and set him back even furtherAaron Wilson
✔@AaronWilson_NFLSources emphasize Arian Foster rehab from groin surgery progressing well, hope is he's back late September, early October at latest
11:17 AM - 5 Sep 2015
Agreed. But the fact that they aren't thinking IR/return is promising.just dont rush him and set him back even further
Aaron Wilson
✔@AaronWilson_NFL
Sources emphasize Arian Foster rehab from groin surgery progressing well, hope is he's back late September, early October at latest
11:17 AM - 5 Sep 2015
Wow. For the price of a 6th round pick a week ago, this guy may win some fantasy leagues.
Aaron Wilson
✔@AaronWilson_NFL
Sources emphasize Arian Foster rehab from groin surgery progressing well, hope is he's back late September, early October at latest
11:17 AM - 5 Sep 2015
Rush Arian Foster?just dont rush him and set him back even furtherAaron Wilson
✔@AaronWilson_NFLSources emphasize Arian Foster rehab from groin surgery progressing well, hope is he's back late September, early October at latest
11:17 AM - 5 Sep 2015
Arian Foster | Running Back
Team: Houston Texans
Age / DOB: (29) / 8/24/1986
Ht / Wt: 6'1' / 227
College: Tennessee
Contract: view contract details
Share:
Houston Texans
LATEST NEWS
RECENT NEWS
The Houston Chronicle's Aaron Wilson reported Arian Foster (groin surgery) is expected back by "early October at the latest."
The best case scenario is late September. Foster was originally expected to start the season on injured reserve/designated for return, but it now appears Week 3 against the Buccaneers is a real possibility. Considering he may only miss two games, Foster is a steal at his fourth-round ADP. Sep 5 - 2:26 PM
Source: Aaron Wilson on Twitter
Blue averaged 3.1 ypc, while Foster averaged 4.8 ypc behind the same line. Is there a better option for the Texans?10 team work league,
Took Foster as RB3 in the 9th then Blue in the 13th as RB5. Also got Brady in the 7th
I have the 1.02 in a 10-teamer and debating whether I am willing to use pick 42 on him or wait for the unlikely chance that he is still around at pick 59.Got him at 5.02 after taking AP and McCoy in the 1st and 3rd. Was pretty happy about it. We can keep anything past a 3rd rounder, so hoping he pans out at least for this year and perhaps will keep him or use him as trade bait later in the season.
How our draft went from 5.03 to 6.09:Long Ball Larry said:I have the 1.02 in a 10-teamer and debating whether I am willing to use pick 42 on him or wait for the unlikely chance that he is still around at pick 59.BroncoFreak_2K3 said:Got him at 5.02 after taking AP and McCoy in the 1st and 3rd. Was pretty happy about it. We can keep anything past a 3rd rounder, so hoping he pans out at least for this year and perhaps will keep him or use him as trade bait later in the season.
I had 1.03 in my draft last week and got him at 58, chat immediately exploded with everyone having him q'd as their next pick, woke up to a bunch of trade offers this morning (graham, hilton, morris) after news of his possible return. if you really want him then 42 is where you will probably have to take him (if he is still there).Long Ball Larry said:I have the 1.02 in a 10-teamer and debating whether I am willing to use pick 42 on him or wait for the unlikely chance that he is still around at pick 59.BroncoFreak_2K3 said:Got him at 5.02 after taking AP and McCoy in the 1st and 3rd. Was pretty happy about it. We can keep anything past a 3rd rounder, so hoping he pans out at least for this year and perhaps will keep him or use him as trade bait later in the season.
Based on those picks, Foster was a good pick. Murray might work out better with the extra weeks of production. Or Ryan if QB was a need pick. Other than that, I like it better than all othersHow our draft went from 5.03 to 6.09:Long Ball Larry said:I have the 1.02 in a 10-teamer and debating whether I am willing to use pick 42 on him or wait for the unlikely chance that he is still around at pick 59.BroncoFreak_2K3 said:Got him at 5.02 after taking AP and McCoy in the 1st and 3rd. Was pretty happy about it. We can keep anything past a 3rd rounder, so hoping he pans out at least for this year and perhaps will keep him or use him as trade bait later in the season.
5.03 43. Anderson,C.J. DEN RB Keeper
5.04 44. Abdullah, Ameer DET RB ®
5.05 45. Randle, Joseph DAL RB
5.06 46. Murray, Latavius OAK RB
5.07 47. Watkins, Sammy BUF WR
5.08 48. Evans, Mike TBB WR Keeper
5.09 49. Ellington, Andre ARI RB
5.10 50. Olsen, Greg CAR TE
6.01 51. Seahawks, Seattle SEA Def
6.02 52. Agholor, Nelson PHI WR ®
6.03 53. Ryan, Matt ATL QB
6.04 54. Gurley, Todd STL RB ®
6.05 55. Martin, Doug TBB RB
6.06 56. Yeldon, T.J. JAC RB ®
6.07 57. Landry, Jarvis MIA WR
6.08 58. Marshall, Brandon NYJ WR
6.09 59. Jackson, DeSean WAS WR
Like I said, he was probably a luxury pick for me at 5.02 as I had AP, McCoy Calvin and K. Allen and we can only start 2 RBs. And I was somewhat swayed by the fact hat he could be an excellent keeper next year as well. The only other player I was remotely considering was Watkins at the time and he got picked right after. I doubt that Forster would have made it back around to me in the 6th and I didn't want anyone else getting him. Too high of a ceiling.
Damn. I already assumed that was going to be the case, but now that it's been officially announced, his ADP will rise.Arian Foster won't go on IR, could be back in month:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000523487/article/arian-foster-wont-go-on-ir-could-be-back-in-month
Been doing it for weeks.Damn. I already assumed that was going to be the case, but now that it's been officially announced, his ADP will rise.Arian Foster won't go on IR, could be back in month:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000523487/article/arian-foster-wont-go-on-ir-could-be-back-in-month
I don't get why he's been drafted so far behind Bell. I mean, I get that Bell is better, younger, on a better offense, guaranteed to be back Week 3, and doesn't have a history of injuries. Still, imagine a draft where Bell wasn't suspended and Foster was healthy. Bell would be 1.01 and Foster would probably be in the back half of the first round. So now Bell gets suspended and he drops a couple spots, and Foster gets hurt and he drops four or five rounds? And they could both return the same week?
This is a huge inefficiency in the market. Sharks need to be exploiting it.
depends on format...but in my ESPN big money PPR league he went for 30ish.In an auction with a $200 cap, what would you value Foster at? He's so hard to forecast right now
Define "big money"depends on format...but in my ESPN big money PPR league he went for 30ish.In an auction with a $200 cap, what would you value Foster at? He's so hard to forecast right now
I generally agree with this, but suspensions also don't linger like groin injuries can, which explains some of how the market is reacting.Damn. I already assumed that was going to be the case, but now that it's been officially announced, his ADP will rise.Arian Foster won't go on IR, could be back in month:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000523487/article/arian-foster-wont-go-on-ir-could-be-back-in-month
I don't get why he's been drafted so far behind Bell. I mean, I get that Bell is better, younger, on a better offense, guaranteed to be back Week 3, and doesn't have a history of injuries. Still, imagine a draft where Bell wasn't suspended and Foster was healthy. Bell would be 1.01 and Foster would probably be in the back half of the first round. So now Bell gets suspended and he drops a couple spots, and Foster gets hurt and he drops four or five rounds? And they could both return the same week?
This is a huge inefficiency in the market. Sharks need to be exploiting it.
I actually agree with your take on the injury aspect--but I wanted to tangent off of your comment on the market reacting. The fantasy community is just like our economic markets. We doesn't just "react"--rather we tend to notoriously "over-react". We tend to over-celebrate good news and tend to over-dramatize bad news and the fantasy community is no different. With the amount of "shared" fantasy information that is out there available for everybody--the skill gap between a fantasy "shark" and the normal fantasy player is shrinking. However, in my opinion one way the sharks can expand this skill gap again is to take advantage of these market swings and over-reactions to their benefit. This season we have seen it with Foster, Abdullah, Davonte Adams, Brady, Christine Michael, Doug Martin, Martavis Bryant...etc. I personally think that timing the right move, and acting one way or another on some of these market over-reactions will probably go much further in dictating fantasy champions this season more than some current ADP or rankings lists.I generally agree with this, but suspensions also don't linger like groin injuries can, which explains some of how the market is reacting.Damn. I already assumed that was going to be the case, but now that it's been officially announced, his ADP will rise.Arian Foster won't go on IR, could be back in month:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000523487/article/arian-foster-wont-go-on-ir-could-be-back-in-month
I don't get why he's been drafted so far behind Bell. I mean, I get that Bell is better, younger, on a better offense, guaranteed to be back Week 3, and doesn't have a history of injuries. Still, imagine a draft where Bell wasn't suspended and Foster was healthy. Bell would be 1.01 and Foster would probably be in the back half of the first round. So now Bell gets suspended and he drops a couple spots, and Foster gets hurt and he drops four or five rounds? And they could both return the same week?
This is a huge inefficiency in the market. Sharks need to be exploiting it.
as the news of his early return keeps getting more mainsteam, you'll be lucky to get him at 4.01. If he's there, you take him.I disagree. Foster going into the season healthy would still be back of the first round early second material because he tends to get hurt or worse, flirts with GTD and puts his owners in a bind. Now you have the situation where he started the season hurt, and worse, it is a groin injury (something that tends to linger). So the overreaction (taking him down to the 7th round) was probably spot on in the idea that he became a better version of the late round handcuff who can explode (Ryan mathews et al). Now he looks like he will be gone about the same amount of time as Lev bell (maybe a game or two more) but, unlike bell, he is still a back who has hammy and groin issues and who seemed to be on the injury report every week last year.
That makes him a RB#2 who you better have another option for. Somewhere in the 5s is about right at this point. I am picking 12th in a league tomorrow and have to decide do I want him at 4.01 or am I essentially not getting him. Don't see him getting to 5.12.
Does your league have an unusual scoring setup? If not, I'm having trouble imagining which 10 players your league mates thought were better than AP.I took him in the 6th after being afforded the luxury of my league letting me get AP at 1.11 and Gronk at the turn at 2.01. (Seriously, Peterson at 11) if he returns to form I have an awesome combo at running g back. Took lots of depth after ward to cushion the wait
I'm in the same camp. I can't imagine spending serious draft capital on Foster coming off groin surgery when I could be using it on players I plan to lean on week in, week out. Foster is one of the best RBs in the league, no doubt, but when his biggest red flag is already being waved I'll largely pass..even in the 5th. I think the market reaction has been appropriate.I disagree. Foster going into the season healthy would still be back of the first round early second material because he tends to get hurt or worse, flirts with GTD and puts his owners in a bind. Now you have the situation where he started the season hurt, and worse, it is a groin injury (something that tends to linger). So the overreaction (taking him down to the 7th round) was probably spot on in the idea that he became a better version of the late round handcuff who can explode (Ryan mathews et al). Now he looks like he will be gone about the same amount of time as Lev bell (maybe a game or two more) but, unlike bell, he is still a back who has hammy and groin issues and who seemed to be on the injury report every week last year.
That makes him a RB#2 who you better have another option for. Somewhere in the 5s is about right at this point. I am picking 12th in a league tomorrow and have to decide do I want him at 4.01 or am I essentially not getting him. Don't see him getting to 5.12.
And Gronk wasn't even one of them. I guess in a 2QB league, it could happen.Does your league have an unusual scoring setup? If not, I'm having trouble imagining which 10 players your league mates thought were better than AP.I took him in the 6th after being afforded the luxury of my league letting me get AP at 1.11 and Gronk at the turn at 2.01. (Seriously, Peterson at 11) if he returns to form I have an awesome combo at running g back. Took lots of depth after ward to cushion the wait