GregR
Footballguy
Hey Alluro, I think you are missreading me here.Are you basing this wholly on the outcomes of the games (3 losses) or on his play on the field? What about his play in particular leads you to believe he CAN'T be the guy long term?He could also be Mark Sanchez, Josh Freeman, or Matt Cassel after their first year of starting where the same kind of optimism existed.It really does look like it .I had no idea who this guy was until a month and half ago, I may be dazzled by the kool aid, but I love this guy. It has been a long time since I have been "wowed" by a young quarterbacks play. I think hes got it.
ANd just to remind ourselves of what a fine line perception of "franchise QBS" is, think about this for a second:
Had they pulled off the upset in KC and held on to beat Indy and won yesterday (I know, big IF but they were in all three games and really had a lead in the Indy game), can you imagine what the chatter would be about Keenum right now.
Everyone would be talking about how he just has that "it" and he's a winner. In general, he would Russell Wilson from last year. Not the biggest of stats or stature but just gets it done.
For me it isn't about how much slack anyone gets, it is about evaluating their play objectively. Keenum has played well enough the Texans should give him the chance to grow and see what he can do the rest of the year. To date, there is nothing he's done that suggests yet that he will or should be the starter next year though, let alone an actual franchise QB.
I'm not anti-Keenum at all. But I think there is a lack of objectivity about him. Particularly in the local fan base. Sports radio right now is tough to listen to.
I said he played well enough he should continue the rest of the season. I said he hasn't shown enough YET that he should be ordained as the starter for next year. I never said there is something about him that means he CAN'T be a long term starter.
And it has nothing to do with the outcomes of his games. He's done some things well and some things he's done poorly. That for 3 games he's been a refreshing change from Matt Schaub is not reason enough to hand him the starter's reins for the long term future. Yet.
He's played well enough that compared to the only options for this year (Schaub, Yates, guy from street who doesn't know offense) he should definitely continue starting and show us what he can do and if he can improve in the areas he needs.
Last edited by a moderator: