msommer
Footballguy
Raking? Not applicable? How about sweeping?You have a big fire? Have you tried water?
Raking? Not applicable? How about sweeping?You have a big fire? Have you tried water?
HFSThis is nothing short of incredible. Fox News talking about the President:
https://twitter.com/nyinla2121/status/1118363073801261058
If they were going to Photoshop Trump in front of a microphone you would think they would make it less Hitlery. Unless that's the point of course.
"ADULTERER". would believe good too.Hmmm. Looks like there's no minimum donation required to get one of those sweet free shirts.
I just donated $0.01 and requested a shirt with "LIAR" on the back. I look forward to wearing this shirt at the next rally.
I would go with:"ADULTERER". would believe good too.Hmmm. Looks like there's no minimum donation required to get one of those sweet free shirts.
I just donated $0.01 and requested a shirt with "LIAR" on the back. I look forward to wearing this shirt at the next rally.
Who am I kidding, there's about 50 funny things that are true to put on there.
Huh.
Republicans that hitch their wagon to Trump remind me of the racist that looks all over before dropping an N bomb because they are most certainly racist but they aren't so sure they want anyone to know and certainly realize it's wrong to be that way.Huh.
Not found, error 404
The page you are looking for no longer exists. Perhaps you can return back to the homepage and see if you can find what you are looking for. Or, you can try finding it by using the search form below.
I can't remember if I posted it here but when I was at the AZ Dem reorganization (when state parties elect officials, etc.) the crowd erupted when we learned the AZ GOP elected Kelli Ward as chair. This is why.Huh.
Not found, error 404
The page you are looking for no longer exists. Perhaps you can return back to the homepage and see if you can find what you are looking for. Or, you can try finding it by using the search form below.
Here’s some comfirmation, but even more surprising from that story: she’s apparently fluent in jive.Laura Ingraham's father was a a nazi sympathizer. Shocking.
What in the.. I mean, I just... Seriously what a freaking whacko.Here’s some comfirmation, but even more surprising from that story: she’s apparently fluent in jive.
Sounds and looks like a pretty stable individual
"Are you using your time most efficiently?"
Militia? Sounds like a terrorist.
He’s weird.
Militias are 'MuricansMilitia? Sounds like a terrorist.
Reuters/Ipsos poll yday (the first with only polling after report was published) showed a drop from 40 to 37% approval. It also shwed virtual dead heat between for and against impeachment (40 resp 42%). 42% is not a majority (nor is 40)The politico poll shows a huge drop. It also shows that most Americans don’t want impeachment.
The message is: most Americans know what they have in Trump and they don’t like it. Give them the opportunity to vote him out.
MSNBC says 34% for impeachment.Reuters/Ipsos poll yday (the first with only polling after report was published) showed a drop from 40 to 37% approval. It also shwed virtual dead heat between for and against impeachment (40 resp 42%). 42% is not a majority (nor is 40)
Well the bolded seems pretty odd...first the tea party rebelling against what? And Trump has reduced the size of government?Listening to Mike Lee on CBS This Morning. Amazing. The Mueller report is “unflattering”. But the process worked as designed, Trump was surrounded by good people who pushed back against his “bad ideas”. All presidents have “bad ideas” and are talked out of them by their advisors. All presidents engage in bad behavior. Just remember the “tea party” where we rebelled against the very same system that existed pre-Trump. (This last statement was in support of Trump’s policies reducing the size of government).
He quotes a Rasmussen poll showing minimal changes in Trump’s approval rating post Mueller report. When the host pushed back by referencing a Politico poll showing a significant drop in approval following the report, Lee mumbles something like (paraphrasing) “Well, yeah, short term, that’s to be expected. The American people don’t really care”.
Minimizing and excuses.
Big government, government intrusion, . I guess the “reducing the size of government” means not staffing, defunding? Effectively hamstringing? Dunno.Well the bolded seems pretty odd...first the tea party rebelling against what? And Trump has reduced the size of government?
Yeah...not sure how anyone can try to honestly claim he reduced the size of government given the deficit.Big government, government intrusion, . I guess the “reducing the size of government” means not staffing, defunding? Effectively hamstringing? Dunno.
Exactly. A vote to impeach, simply to be laughed at by the senate, would just be something Trump and his base can claim as a victory. Mueller could have discovered dismembered bodies in Trump's freezer and the Republican senate isn't going to vote for removal from office. In four years of virtually zero victories, why hand him one? We have this cool thing called an election. "Impeach" him there.The politico poll shows a huge drop. It also shows that most Americans don’t want impeachment.
The message is: most Americans know what they have in Trump and they don’t like it. Give them the opportunity to vote him out.
Deregulation? Like making asbestos great again? #magaBig government, government intrusion, . I guess the “reducing the size of government” means not staffing, defunding? Effectively hamstringing? Dunno.
With identifiable teeth marksMueller could have discovered dismembered bodies in Trump's freezer
Careful. @Ditkaless Wonders Is going to start comparing you to Pilate and Neville Chamberlain.Exactly. A vote to impeach, simply to be laughed at by the senate, would just be something Trump and his base can claim as a victory. Mueller could have discovered dismembered bodies in Trump's freezer and the Republican senate isn't going to vote for removal from office. In four years of virtually zero victories, why hand him one? We have this cool thing called an election. "Impeach" him there.
Uh, those would be identifiable denture marks......With identifiable teeth marks
He's hardly the first to compare you to Neville thoughCareful. @Ditkaless Wonders Is going to start comparing you to Pilate and Neville Chamberlain.
Sure, if you want to be pedanticUh, those would be identifiable denture marks......
Yeah. we should definitely allow the President to break the law as much as he wants as long as his party holds the Senate.Exactly. A vote to impeach, simply to be laughed at by the senate, would just be something Trump and his base can claim as a victory. Mueller could have discovered dismembered bodies in Trump's freezer and the Republican senate isn't going to vote for removal from office. In four years of virtually zero victories, why hand him one? We have this cool thing called an election. "Impeach" him there.
And it always cracks me up. Peace in our time!He's hardly the first to compare you to Neville though
Sure I could put that in the tweets thread...this one is funny though...in the middle of a 12 tweet barage this morning...he claims that the Republican agenda must be working because the left has gone insane.Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
The Radical Left Democrats, together with their leaders in the Fake News Media, have gone totally insane! I guess that means that the Republican agenda is working. Stay tuned for more!
He can compare me to anyone he wants. Getting him out of office in 2020 should be everyone's goal. Not some lame going-through-the-motions dog and pony impeachment that has zero percent chance of accomplishing his removal. Bill Clinton got a huge popularity bump after his failed impeachment hearings and left office with a 60% approval. Trump is at 37%. No need to help him.Careful. @Ditkaless Wonders Is going to start comparing you to Pilate and Neville Chamberlain.
And how does impeaching him punish him for breaking the law? When there is exactly a zero point zero chance of him being removed from office?Yeah. we should definitely allow the President to break the law as much as he wants as long as his party holds the Senate.
Sounds like a good precedent to set.
Tim, I think you've always taken the investigation from the POV of it as a political matter, which is that the point is to drag down Trump and push him from office. It just so happens that is the Trumpite view as well. - If you take that approach then IMO it creates its own end result, such things are never justified. But if you act from principle then you do what is necessary and appropriate under the constitution.The politico poll shows a huge drop. It also shows that most Americans don’t want impeachment.
The message is: most Americans know what they have in Trump and they don’t like it. Give them the opportunity to vote him out.
I think this is a good discussion to take. And how does impeaching him punish him for breaking the law? When there is exactly a zero point zero chance of him being removed from office?Yeah. we should definitely allow the President to break the law as much as he wants as long as his party holds the Senate.
Sounds like a good precedent to set.
While this is the truth, it’s not the whole truth. I don’t come to this POV in a vacuum.Tim, I think you've always taken the investigation from the POV of it as a political matter
Every Democrat who comes out against impeachment is handing Trump (and senate Republicans) a gratuitous victory.Exactly. A vote to impeach, simply to be laughed at by the senate, would just be something Trump and his base can claim as a victory. Mueller could have discovered dismembered bodies in Trump's freezer and the Republican senate isn't going to vote for removal from office. In four years of virtually zero victories, why hand him one? We have this cool thing called an election. "Impeach" him there.