i'd eliminate "someone else's speech" from your post.Whatever you think of Trumps' strengths - reading someone else's speech is not one of them...
We're not doing this here. Thanks.i'd eliminate "someone else's speech" from your post.
Fun Fact:Lutherman2112 said:Bookmarked this article listing retiring members of Congress...it seems they are updating it.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/461771-here-are-the-lawmakers-who-arent-seeking-reelection-in-2020
Fun fact: it was first posted 8 hours agoFun Fact:
There were 241 Republicans in the House of Representatives when Trump took office in 2017. Now, 101 of them have gone or have announced that they are leaving. "That's 41 percent of that original 241 in the 115th House."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/trump-s-house-gop-down-100-members-ahead-impeachment-fight-n1079431
Not doing either of those here. Thanks.We're not doing this here. Thanks.i'd eliminate "someone else's speech" from your post.
Lol, I feel like I'm looking into a mirror while holding a mirror! Where does it endddddddddddddddddddddddd?Not doing either of those here. Thanks.
Mr. Ham said:
This is not at all funny. President is in heavy medication, or some drug(s). He is mentally unfit and a danger to national security. At least, his supporters should support an intervention to get him sober.
He was quoting Roddy.This is not at all funny. President is in heavy medication, or some drug(s). He is mentally unfit and a danger to national security. At least, his supporters should support an intervention to get him sober.
Right, posting and spreading links like that are disingenuous and what most people would call fake news. I just call it twitter.I think that your sentiment is often justified, but in this particular case I think you are overreacting.
The line is taken out of context, but it seems to me that Trump is just reading an anecdote about a soldier, and his intent is to follow the anecdote with something to the effect of, "Wow, that story sure is something." But in a moment of distraction he forgets to say "Wow, that story sure is..."
It's just a bad segue, not a sign of being mentally unfit.
It isn't funny at all. Your plea for him to get help pales in comparison to the reaction of a lot of people out there. There are dozens of posts to that tweet that are the equivalent to this:This is not at all funny.
Almost like they're trying to solicit violence.We could try shooting just you and see how it goes.........
But Ukraine received military aide (including javelins) in 2016, 2018, 2018.
Jim Sciutto
!!!: The two policies Trump officials & defenders have cited as him being “tough on Russia” were -
1- the Ukraine military aid and -2- the javelins.
Now we know 1 was delayed for Biden investigation and 2 was blocked due to Russia reacting “negatively”.
I think that was the point of the original tweet - Trump has gone out of his way to be nice to Russia - not tough, like he portrays.But Ukraine received military aide (including javelins) in 2016, 2018, 2018.
Also, one could argue that withholding aide to Ukraine in 2019 was because Trump Russia, not as part of an extortion scheme.
One could argue that, but it's not consistent with the information coming out from testimonies from multiple folks.But Ukraine received military aide (including javelins) in 2016, 2018, 2018.
Also, one could argue that withholding aide to Ukraine in 2019 was because Trump Russia, not as part of an extortion scheme.
Factcheck linkAccording to the judgment, that money "was used for Mr. Trump's political campaign and disbursed by Mr. Trump's campaign staff, rather than by the Foundation," which is unlawful. However, Justice Saliann Scarpulla says the funds did eventually reach charity organizations supporting veterans.
Was the violation that the campaign staff, and not the actual foundation, distributed the funds? But the funds did actually go to the intended charities?“A review of the record … establishes that Mr. Trump breached his fiduciary duty to the Foundation and that waste occurred to the Foundation,” she wrote. “Mr. Trump’s fiduciary duty breaches included allowing his campaign to orchestrate the Fundraiser, allowing his campaign, instead of the Foundation, to direct distribution of the Funds, and using the Fundraiser and distribution of the Funds to further Mr. Trump’s political campaign.”
Scarpulla said that she found that the $2.8 million raised at the Iowa fundraiser “was used for Mr. Trump’s political campaign and disbursed by Mr. Trump’s campaign staff, rather than by the Foundation, in violation” of several laws. However, she ordered Trump to pay $2 million in waste damages — not the full $2.8 million sought by the attorney general — because “the Funds did ultimately reach their intended destinations, i.e., charitable organizations supporting veterans,” she wrote.
Those plates of glass travel almost everywhere he goes....especially overseas where they have to secure his accommodations.Is Trump behind bullet-proof glass?
It looks odd - and seems more likely to keep him from hearing protesters....
No - its that this was a campaign act disguised as a charity event.Could someone clarify this statement for me from Justice Saliann Scarpulla'
NPR link
Factcheck link
Was the violation that the campaign staff, and not the actual foundation, distributed the funds? But the funds did actually go to the intended charities?
I knew I shouldn't have asked those questions and just kept it to asking a clarification on the Justice's statement.No - its that this was a campaign act disguised as a charity event.
Per NYT:
Among Mr. Trump’s admissions in court papers: The charity gave his campaign complete control over disbursing the $2.8 million that the foundation had raised at a fund-raiser for veterans in Iowa in January 2016, only days before the state’s presidential nominating caucuses. The fund-raiser, he acknowledged, was in fact a campaign event.
The president also admitted to using the foundation to settle the legal obligations of companies he owned, including Mar-a-Lago, his private club in Florida, and the Trump National Golf Club in Westchester County, N.Y. And he acknowledged that the foundation purchased the $10,000 portrait of Mr. Trump, which was ultimately displayed at one of his Florida hotels.
I do appreciate the answer Sinn and since you mentioned it, were the funds used here taken from the Iowa event or just the foundation in general? Not that it excuses using them, just want to know the details.The president also admitted to using the foundation to settle the legal obligations of companies he owned, including Mar-a-Lago, his private club in Florida, and the Trump National Golf Club in Westchester County, N.Y. And he acknowledged that the foundation purchased the $10,000 portrait of Mr. Trump, which was ultimately displayed at one of his Florida hotels.
I am assuming that the funds from the Iowa campaign event did eventually go to Veterans charities.I knew I shouldn't have asked those questions and just kept it to asking a clarification on the Justice's statement.
Why did she say: "the Funds did ultimately reach their intended destinations, i.e., charitable organizations supporting veterans"
I think that is true.This seems like ages ago, so forgive me if I have the details wrong, but I THOUGHT the funds only got to the vets after it was shown that the foundation had yet to give the funds to vets after many months, if not a year's time....is that incorrect?
Yeah, I was wondering if that was it but couldn't find a timeline and the Justice's comment confused me.This seems like ages ago, so forgive me if I have the details wrong, but I THOUGHT the funds only got to the vets after it was shown that the foundation had yet to give the funds to vets after many months, if not a year's time....is that incorrect?
Your question is what made me think about it. I think that's correct and most likely what the comments were alluding to. When I read the comments I read them as "well, the funds did eventually get back to where they were supposed to but it took some intervention to get there".Yeah, I was wondering if that was it but couldn't find a timeline and the Justice's comment confused me.
When Trump isn't Trumpy enough don't you have to pause and wonder WTF is going on?
The money raised during Trump’s special event to benefit veterans initially went to the Donald J. Trump Foundation, but it’s inaccurate to say that the money ended up in the candidate’s personal account or will be used to fund his presidential campaign.
In response to queries over the matter, on 31 May 2016 Donald Trump held a press conference to announce that he eventually gave “close to six million dollars” to veterans’ groups and that the press “should be ashamed of themselves” for asking questions about the money he donated.
“I have never received such bad publicity for doing such a good job,” Trump said in a press conference at Trump Tower in Manhattann. He issued a list of the veterans groups who received the money, saying that “As of this moment, [the total amount donated] is $5.6 million. All of the money has been spent.”
Trump said he didn’t release the names of the veterans organizations sooner because he wanted to respect their privacy and asserted that the money for a number of these groups had already been delivered some time earlier.
Trump’s list of checks already issued read as follows:
22Kill: $200,000.
Achilles International : $200,000
American Hero Adventures: $100,000
Americas for equal living: $100,000
America’s vet dogs: the veteran canine corp Inc: $75,000
AmVets: $75,000
Armed Services YMCA: $75,000
Bob Woodruff Family Foundation Inc: $75,000
Central Iowa Shelter and Services: $100,000
Connected Warriors Inc: $75,000
Disabled American Veterans Charity: $115,000
Fisher House Foundation: $115,000
Folds of Honor Foundation: $200,000
Foundation for American Veterans: $75,000
Freedom Alliance : $75,000
Green Beret Foundation: $350,000
Higher Heroes USA: $75,000
Homes for our Troops: $100,000
Honoring America’s Warriors: $100,000
Hope for the Warriors: $65,000
Intrepid Fallen Heroes Fund: $175,000
Canines for Warriors: $50,000
Liberty House: $100,00
Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation: $1.1m (including $1m from Trump himself, he says)
Navy Seal Foundation: $465,000
Navy Marine Corps Relief Society: $75,000
New England Wounded Vets Inc: $75,000
Operation Home Front: $65,000
Project for Patriots: $100,000 (this “check is check is ready to go” but Trump is still vetting the group, he says, awaiting an “IRS determination letter”. “They have to give us that final document”.
Puppy Jake Foundation: $100,000
Racing for Heroes, Inc: $200,000
Support Siouxland Soldiers: $100,000
Task Force Dagger Foundation: $50,000
The Mission Continues: $75,000
National Military Families Inc: $75,000
Veterans Airlift Command: $100,000
Veterans Count: $25,000
Veterans in Command Inc: $150,000
Vietnam Veterans Workshop Inc: $75,000
Warriors for Freedom Foundation: $50,000
“And I believe we’re going to have some more coming in.”
The heart of the allegations stems from a Jan. 28, 2016, nationally televised fundraiser Trump held in Des Moines four days before Iowa’s first-in-the-nation caucuses.So it seems like, while there are other issues with the foundation, the only one related to the Iowa fundraiser is that the money was distributed by the campaign and not the foundation itself and that the funds intended to go to Veterans groups did make it there.
Nationalism is a beast that must be constantly fed lest it devour the rider.When Trump isn't Trumpy enough don't you have to pause and wonder WTF is going on?
As others have mentioned, it took more than a year to send the money where it was going. So for a year, the headlines were correctOK, but the headlines I'm seeing is that Trump kept money raised for veterans charities at the Iowa event for himself and his campaign. That millions of dollars that were supposed to go to these charities, didn't go there. That, at least, appears not to be true.
You mean as others incorrectly recalled. The list I posted above from Snopes was from 4 months after the event. And the headlines and outrage I've been seeing on social media was from days ago after the ruling.As others have mentioned, it took more than a year to send the money where it was going. So for a year, the headlines were correct
Jamny, I appreciate your effort here in bribing nuance and detail to the discussion.You mean as others incorrectly recalled. The list I posted above from Snopes was from 4 months after the event. And the headlines and outrage I've been seeing on social media was from days ago after the ruling.
Like this, which was posted in another thread here.
Sure, and I won't likely dispute most of it. I'm just trying to clarify what the court's decision was regarding the use of the donations obtained during the Iowa event. There have been so many claims that Trump used the money from the event for himself and stiffed the Veterans groups and it seems that, in this instance, it isn't true.Jamny, I appreciate your effort here in bribing nuance and detail to the discussion.
For those reasons, shouldn’t we hold a bit more skepticism toward the Trump family in general considering their multiple issues in the past, including the fact that the Trumps have been deemed not worthy/trustworthy enough to run a charity in the state of NY due to past misdealings and malfeasance?
Bolton is interesting. he seems more loyal to ideas than people.In private speech, John Bolton suggests some of Trump's policy on Turkey is guided by personal interest.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/private-speech-bolton-suggests-some-trump-s-foreign-policy-decisions-n1080651
So many things to love about the Trump Jr book tour
That's not his wife, right? Why is she even there????So many things to love about the Trump Jr book tour
1. It is called Triggered and he then runs off the stage when heckled
2. From what I have seen he mostly just sits there when he gets any criticism and let's his wife handle everything
Remember all of this when conservatives try to tell you how "snowflakes" are a liberal thing
You can't make this stuff up.So many things to love about the Trump Jr book tour
1. It is called Triggered and he then runs off the stage when heckled
2. From what I have seen he mostly just sits there when he gets any criticism and let's his wife handle everything
Remember all of this when conservatives try to tell you how "snowflakes" are a liberal thing
Stephen Miller emailed Breitbart 900+ times from 2015-2016 to lay out his anti-immigrant policies.hammerva said:Because she has bigger balls. Anyone that seen that mess of a show called the Five in the last 4 years can see that
Also in the "in other news water is wet" category
https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2019/11/12/stephen-millers-affinity-white-nationalism-revealed-leaked-emails
He also declared today that the deficit is a big problem.Today...
Amazing that Ivanka has created 14 million jobs. Amazing work by her.
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1194323905835667462
He also said he wants negative interest rates and "give me some of that money". It's always amusing how he begs for money. Buffet, Gates, Bezos, Branson, you know, actual billionaires, never act so desperate all the time.He also declared today that the deficit is a big problem.
My point is that people on social media and even here on this board are claiming the money never got to the vets when it appears that it did. Whether it was because of prodding by other people or not, there is no reason to be claiming that now based on the Justice's comments.It isn't true because David Fahrenthold, a reporter for the Washington Post, hounded the campaign for months and shamed them into it. That they gave anything at all was exceptional for a Trump-related charity, as Fahrenthold documented in a series of articles that won him the Pulitzer: https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/david-fahrenthold
Just like everything else about the man, Trump's generosity was fake, too.
Yes. Agreed. If people are saying that the money never eventually went to the vets they are wrong. I've also seen some noise about stealing from a children's cancer charity, which I don't think is 100% correct either on its face. Also, I think the most recent settlement has not included the ban on the Trumps running charities in NY - that was an original request by the DA, but it doesn't look like it was part of the final settlement.My point is that people on social media and even here on this board are claiming the money never got to the vets when it appears that it did. Whether it was because of prodding by other people or not, there is no reason to be claiming that now based on the Justice's comments.
Frustrating when someone spreads information that isn't 100% factual, isn't it? Makes you realize why people get frustrated with 98% of the tweets coming from the POTUS.My point is that people on social media and even here on this board are claiming the money never got to the vets when it appears that it did. Whether it was because of prodding by other people or not, there is no reason to be claiming that now based on the Justice's comments.