Lots of very accurate words here about a lack of backbone, but let's just leave it at that lest I end up on vaca.The OP hid it.
Why? A lot of us agreed to continue mocking her like he was. It was a point to unify us....what was his issue?SaintsInDome2006 said:The OP hid it.
Not always since the change to allow hiding. Some threads can be deemed so offensive as per content (i.e., advocating white supremacy) that the mods don't want people to be able to continue to read what was said. There have been couple that were started for the purposes of trolling that were not locked, but disappeared and I am sure it was not because the OP had a change of heart and hid it.Makes sense. In the past when a mod kills a thread they just lock it.
You really gonna trust what a magician has to say? His whole job is a lie. Dude's been fake cutting people in half his whole life.With the Omarosa thread axed, where the heck to we go to discuss Penn of Penn & Teller fame?
Have we actually ever had one of these?Not always since the change to allow hiding. Some threads can be deemed so offensive as per content (i.e., advocating white supremacy) that the mods don't want people to be able to continue to read what was said. There have been couple that were started for the purposes of trolling that were not locked, but disappeared and I am sure it was not because the OP had a change of heart and hid it.
No, I'm not, but Joe, Aaron & Co. have been quite helpful verifying that kind of thing in the past.Are you sure of that?
I'd say the Qanon thread could fit that, perhaps, but not the Omarosa thread.Not always since the change to allow hiding. Some threads can be deemed so offensive as per content (i.e., advocating white supremacy) that the mods don't want people to be able to continue to read what was said. There have been couple that were started for the purposes of trolling that were not locked, but disappeared and I am sure it was not because the OP had a change of heart and hid it.
Golly, if there was only a space to discuss this.The traitor Omarosa basically has two options.
I just started a new one, I find it impossible to believe that the mods would want to deny us the ability to discuss this groundbreaking and influential woman.Golly, if there was only a space to discuss this.
Many thanks and in all truth the original title was awful.I just started a new one, I find it impossible to believe that the mods would want to deny us the ability to discuss this groundbreaking and influential woman.
Thanks, apologies to Mr. Nfl2df, and hey Squiz you were right.It was hidden by a mod. I don't know the exact reason, but the very first post in the thread (including the title) seemed like trolling.
I think that was the OP's only post in the thread, too. Very Jim11ish.It was hidden by a mod. I don't know the exact reason, but the very first post in the thread (including the title) seemed like trolling.
Always loved his avatar.I think that was the OP's only post in the thread, too. Very Jim11ish.
Don’t let him get you down @squistionSad. I suggest you grow some thicker skin. Otherwise people might start confusing you with Squistion.
No but he's the ringleader so it flies.
To be fair it's a pretty lame insult, comparatively, coming from him. Mods are desensitized by frequency.
Probably not excellent but it’s accurate. You blamed the Boston Globe for a threat of violence against the Boston Globe. It’s pretty much the definition of a pathetic comment.
I'm perfectly fine, thanks for asking.Are you okay? Maybe you should take a break from the forums for a bit?
There are a lot of things that are accurate that would be against the rules to say here.Probably not excellent but it’s accurate. You blamed the Boston Globe for a threat of violence against the Boston Globe. It’s pretty much the definition of a pathetic comment.
I'm great, I don't spend 24/7 in here like you rallying the crazy. Guess you've "earned" your ability to not get in trouble.Are you going to be okay?
Truth not OK?
You didn't just say something negative. You made a sweeping generalization ("Democrats are actively trying to destroy the country") without providing any substance or evidence to back it up. It's exactly the kind of thing that the moderators are trying to curtail.butcher boy said:
These kind of attacks are ok, but I say something negative about the Democratic Party and it gets a "Don't" from the anonymous moderator???
Lol overreact much? I’m sure joe needs you in here policing things for himYou didn't just say something negative. You made a sweeping generalization ("Democrats are actively trying to destroy the country") without providing any substance or evidence to back it up. It's exactly the kind of thing that the moderators are trying to curtail.
Also, the moderators are anonymous for a reason. The Footballguys staffers use their real names for their usernames, and they don't want to end up getting stalked in real life by unstable posters who get bent out of shape because they got a warning. If you can't understand that concept, then you should seriously rethink your decision to utilize these forums.
Then report it rather than whine about it here?
And he is lucky he hasn’t been permananmed for his continued plagiarism after already being told not to do it multiple times.You didn't just say something negative. You made a sweeping generalization ("Democrats are actively trying to destroy the country") without providing any substance or evidence to back it up. It's exactly the kind of thing that the moderators are trying to curtail.
Also, the moderators are anonymous for a reason. The Footballguys staffers use their real names for their usernames, and they don't want to end up getting stalked in real life by unstable posters who get bent out of shape because they got a warning. If you can't understand that concept, then you should seriously rethink your decision to utilize these forums.
A few. Not too many, and not in this case.There are a lot of things that are accurate that would be against the rules to say here.
More than you think. I thought your post about a certain poster being "on the spectrum" was pretty accurate but was probably against the rules too.A few. Not too many, and not in this case.
I agree with GoBirds: truth is a good defense in almost all situations. HellToupee wrote a pathetic post.
He posed a question and I responded that Spectrum was my cable TV provider, so I was not offended (they are a bit pricy and I have been thinking about switching to DIRECT TV).More than you think. I thought your post about a certain poster being "on the spectrum" was pretty accurate but was probably against the rules too.
Also, there's a lot of pathetic posts on this forum. By a lot of people. It is what it is.
You should check out Sling or Youtube. No silly contract and cheaper.He posed a question and I responded that Spectrum was my cable TV provider, so I was not offended (they are a bit pricy and I have been thinking about switching to DIRECT TV).
Shouldn't this post give credit to the writer, actor, or movie?He’s palmin’ it.
Every party ever has claimed the other party was destroying the country. That pretty much sums up politics. That's why the warning was laughable.You didn't just say something negative. You made a sweeping generalization ("Democrats are actively trying to destroy the country") without providing any substance or evidence to back it up. It's exactly the kind of thing that the moderators are trying to curtail.
Also, the moderators are anonymous for a reason. The Footballguys staffers use their real names for their usernames, and they don't want to end up getting stalked in real life by unstable posters who get bent out of shape because they got a warning. If you can't understand that concept, then you should seriously rethink your decision to utilize these forums.
I doubt this is part of the board functionality.Mods, just a thought as the "line" seems to vary from time to time and side to side how about time-outs specific to the forum. As this forum is where the issues occur and it's been said that punishments can vary depending on who the poster which makes it hard to track the line please consider time outs just from this forum so we can cool off in the stock thread or see how our idating friends are doing.
Thanks!
It is possible, it is just a pain to implement.I doubt this is part of the board functionality.Mods, just a thought as the "line" seems to vary from time to time and side to side how about time-outs specific to the forum. As this forum is where the issues occur and it's been said that punishments can vary depending on who the poster which makes it hard to track the line please consider time outs just from this forum so we can cool off in the stock thread or see how our idating friends are doing.
Thanks!
Good to know. I agree with GoBirds here. Calling Trump a moron shouldn't mean I can't check in on the bourbon thread.toshiba said:It is possible, it is just a pain to implement.Slapdash said:I doubt this is part of the board functionality.GoBirds said:Mods, just a thought as the "line" seems to vary from time to time and side to side how about time-outs specific to the forum. As this forum is where the issues occur and it's been said that punishments can vary depending on who the poster which makes it hard to track the line please consider time outs just from this forum so we can cool off in the stock thread or see how our idating friends are doing.
Thanks!
Well of course not, it should get you honors and privileges...Good to know. I agree with GoBirds here. Calling Trump a moron shouldn't mean I can't check in on the bourbon thread.toshiba said:It is possible, it is just a pain to implement.Slapdash said:I doubt this is part of the board functionality.GoBirds said:Mods, just a thought as the "line" seems to vary from time to time and side to side how about time-outs specific to the forum. As this forum is where the issues occur and it's been said that punishments can vary depending on who the poster which makes it hard to track the line please consider time outs just from this forum so we can cool off in the stock thread or see how our idating friends are doing.
Thanks!
ReportedWell of course not, it should get you honors and privileges...
Report ignored :XReportedWell of course not, it should get you honors and privileges...