Chadstroma
Footballguy
6 year $141M with $90 guaranteed
We like the high risk, high reward moves. If you go for them you have to live with the downside tooReleased Bryant? Didn't they just trade a 3rd for him?
The Bears gave up first-round picks in 2019 and 2020, a third-round pick in 2020 and a sixth-round pick in 2019 to acquire Mack earlier Saturday, a source told ESPN. In return, the Bears also received s a second-round pick in 2020 and a conditional fifth-round pick in 2020.Okay so what was the final deal for Mack? I see the Bears signed him for $100 billion and all but what was the actual trade?
Yep. His second indefinite one. Nobody has ever come back from two.Florio says Bryant is facing a suspension.
The Bears are still the worst team in their own division until proven otherwise. I guess a lot of any speculation comes down to their QB play moving forward though. I think the pick(s) are as likely to be 5 as 25; it will be interesting to see how it plays out.Raiders are likely looking at 2 1st round picks between 15 and 25 the next 2 years, probably closer to 15 this year and 25 the next. Educated guess.
Not even close. I'll come back in here when the time comes.The Bears are still the worst team in their own division until proven otherwise. I guess a lot of any speculation comes down to their QB play moving forward though. I think the pick(s) are as likely to be 5 as 25; it will be interesting to see how it plays out.
I disagree. Adding Mack clearly makes them better than Detroit.The Bears are still the worst team in their own division until proven otherwise. I guess a lot of any speculation comes down to their QB play moving forward though. I think the pick(s) are as likely to be 5 as 25; it will be interesting to see how it plays out.
Though I do not expect top 5 picks from them, I think you are coloring your view with homer colored lenses.Raiders are likely looking at 2 1st round picks between 15 and 25 the next 2 years, probably closer to 15 this year and 25 the next. Educated guess.
There is a politics section. Keep your politics posts there buddy.Chuckie's team looking like Trump's cabinet.
Only the best people ?
I thought it was Buchanan and Napoleon Harris? A MLBTrivia time!! The Raiders got 2 1sts when they shipped Gruden to Tampa Bay. What Pro Bowl quality, once-in-a-decade players did they parley those picks into?
Why, cornerback Phillip Buchanan and defensive end Tyler Brayton, of course.
Could be. Just grabbed from a column I read and did not double check...I thought it was Buchanan and Napoleon Harris? A MLB
Thanks for the insight. Everyone can celebrate here when the Bears win the Super Bowl after winning 5, 6, 3, and 5 games the last 4 years.Could be. Just grabbed from a column I read and did not double check...
I think Chicago is going to be better than 5 wins with their defense as it is now. trent dilfer won a superbowl with a great defense and pretty below average offense. Chicago is approaching that level with this trade.this is a GREAT move for Oakland..they're not winning this year, they're not winning next year.but they want the building blocks..Oakland figures to win about 5-6 games this season, maybe less than that..
Chicago is BY FAR one of the 4-5 worst teams in the NFL. I've got Chicago, Indy, Oakland, Detroit and Buffalo., I can't imagine Chicago winning 5 games, they might win 3 or 4 games.so Oakland is looking at having 2 top 5 picks in next years draft. and probably a top 10 in 2020 when Chicago once again wets the bed.
this was a brilliant move for Oakland!!!
there's simply no other way to look at this.they've freed up a TON of cap space for next year, and acquired TOP picks in the process..
The Bears won 5 games last year. They got rid of Fox, have a QB that is no longer a rookie and have added Mack, Roquan and weapons at receiver. They are definitely better than last year and are not one of the 4-5 worst teams in the NFL.this is a GREAT move for Oakland..they're not winning this year, they're not winning next year.but they want the building blocks..Oakland figures to win about 5-6 games this season, maybe less than that..
Chicago is BY FAR one of the 4-5 worst teams in the NFL. I've got Chicago, Indy, Oakland, Detroit and Buffalo., I can't imagine Chicago winning 5 games, they might win 3 or 4 games.so Oakland is looking at having 2 top 5 picks in next years draft. and probably a top 10 in 2020 when Chicago once again wets the bed.
this was a brilliant move for Oakland!!!
there's simply no other way to look at this.they've freed up a TON of cap space for next year, and acquired TOP picks in the process..
Raiders fans can hope.Lost in all this is the hope and feeling that Arden Key is the 2nd coming of Mack.
Chicago had the makings of a solid defense before Mack. A decent front 3, a decent secondary and if Smith is as advertised and adding Mack along with a healthy Floyd and Trevathan- IMO the best LB corps in the league.I think Chicago is going to be better than 5 wins with their defense as it is now. trent dilfer won a superbowl with a great defense and pretty below average offense. Chicago is approaching that level with this trade.
I do agree, Chicago has a ways to go. It's going to be a big kick to the balls to Bear fans when they are .500 at the midway point looking at the very tough second half of their schedule. This has potential to be a top 15 pick, which is always nice.
I can see a scenario where the Bears are 9-7 and looking at potential playoffs. but I dont see them at .500 this season. so oakland has an opportunity to land a playmaker.
and who knows. maybe trubisky falls flat and absolutely blows and this turns into a top 10 pick. could happen.
ETA: if I were a raiders fan I'd be pretty bummed about this trade. Chicago fans should be pumped. Just as I would be stoked if GB landed him.
As a man who's been twice divorced. I know how to move on. It is what it is, Mack ain't coming back and this is obviously Grudens team. What choice do I (we) have but to hope for the best. Go Raiders!Raiders fans can hope.
Gruden said the Raider D wasn't very good even WITH Mack last year. Fair enough. But can you imagine how great Mack could be this year--and elevate the D with him--if Key and Hall and Hurst are the players the Raiders think they may be. Mack was having to fight off two and sometimes three guys last year. Those days were potentially over. Now they are over but for the wrong reason.
How much value the Raiders get out of this trade is all about the Bear QB.
Along with throwing away a 3rd on Martavis and a 5th on McCarron. Great draft management right there.We got a 7th from Seattle for Shalom Luani
I'd take that risk again, but I might drive a harder bargain for it to be a fourth. I'm surprised you'd call it throwing it away. See: your work in the Josh Gordon thread. Not perfectly analogous situations, but a bit on point.Along with throwing away a 3rd on Martavis and a 5th on McCarron. Great draft management right there.
I don't think I can. Trubisky is still on his rookie deal, so that's not a concern for the Bears.Can one person explain why putting 50 million a year into two players was going to help the Raiders?
Gordon>>>>>>Bryant and no one would give a 3rd for Gordon.I'd take that risk again, but I might drive a harder bargain for it to be a fourth. I'm surprised you'd call it throwing it away. See: your work in the Josh Gordon thread. Not perfectly analogous situations, but a bit on point.
absolutelyChicago had the makings of a solid defense before Mack. A decent front 3, a decent secondary and if Smith is as advertised and adding Mack along with a healthy Floyd and Trevathan- IMO the best LB corps in the league.
The offense is all riding on Trubisky developing or not. If he doesn't.... I can see a top 15 pick over the next two years as the Bears won't have the money to get a FA QB to replace him and not the 1st rounders to draft one. If he makes decent progression this year, I think we can expect a 15-20 pick and a playoff slot pick in 2020.
How much value the Raiders get out of this trade is all about the Bear QB.
Yeah, Gordon > Bryant, and if I accept your premise (bolded), I accept that it's a different situation and you're emphasizing that the Raiders were cavalier in what they gave up for him.Gordon>>>>>>Bryant and no one would give a 3rd for Gordon.
right, but maybe that's what made Chicago the most attractive trade partner.I don't think I can. Trubisky is still on his rookie deal, so that's not a concern for the Bears.
What's weird, though, is most people are calling it a win-lose trade either way. I think it's lose-lose. The Bears might be an eight win team next year. The Raiders are going to have to find a dynamo, two position All-Pro in the draft to replace Mack. Good luck with that.
The teams don't make sense for each other. I guess Mack really forced hands here.
That's a really good point. Give him to the worst team and improve your own first round picks in doing so. People were commenting today that they were surprised nobody offered more or that the trading partner was weird. Maybe that's why.Maybe Chicago was offering what seemed to be the highest picks of all teams interested
Everyone is ignoring the salary cap; like the Raiders have to take a 1st round pick and replace Mack to just break even.I don't think I can. Trubisky is still on his rookie deal, so that's not a concern for the Bears.
What's weird, though, is most people are calling it a win-lose trade either way. I think it's lose-lose. The Bears might be an eight win team next year. The Raiders are going to have to find a dynamo, two position All-Pro in the draft to replace Mack. Good luck with that.
The teams don't make sense for each other. I guess Mack really forced hands here.
Agree or not Martavis has never come close to flashing Gordon like ability. How many 3rd round picks get cut?Yeah, Gordon > Bryant, and if I accept your premise (bolded), I accept that it's a different situation and you're emphasizing that the Raiders were cavalier in what they gave up for him.
I'm not sure I can do that. Bryant changes games, too, though not to the extent of Josh Gordon.
Yeah. I think it was you that made the point that there isn't a team with two guys making over twenty million dollars a year. It's sort of like the Garappolo situation last year in NE. You can't have two guys at those wages (when there's a mandatory ceiling on wages) and still expect to compete in all aspects of the game.Everyone is ignoring the salary cap; like the Raiders have to take a 1st round pick and replace Mack to just break even.
Your can sign a DE for 23.5m/year over 6 years
or
you can draft two 1st round picks at 3m/year each and bring in two FAs at 8-11m/year each (Hudson/Osemele) over that time. One of those 1st round picks doesn't have to equate to Mack to break even.