Biabreakable
Footballguy
Not saying he is any good but Hiliman did play 65% of the snaps for the Giants in their most recent game.Why would you ever consider Hillman? He shouldn't even be rostered IMO.
Not saying he is any good but Hiliman did play 65% of the snaps for the Giants in their most recent game.Why would you ever consider Hillman? He shouldn't even be rostered IMO.
Because barkley and Gallman are out?Why would you ever consider Hillman? He shouldn't even be rostered IMO.
How can you say that Gurley is the only hurdle when Henderson is firmly behind Brown too? Henderson has only been in on 2 snaps - he’s not even a handcuff.Obviously there are a lot of examples of rookie running backs who were fantasy forces from game 1 onward. And there are a lot of examples of rookie running backs who took half a season or more to get going. Henderson not getting snaps to begin the year doesn't even come close to precluding him from being fantasy elite later in the season. A healthy Gurley is the only serious hurdle.
2019 Henderson owners should go have a beer with 2018 John Kelly owners.How can you say that Gurley is the only hurdle when Henderson is firmly behind Brown too? Henderson has only been in on 2 snaps - he’s not even a handcuff.
We may not have much insight into the details, but there is a reason he’s not playing, something he’s not bringing to the table that they expected him to when they drafted him. I highly doubt that is remedied by an injury to Gurley.
Henderson is young and his dynasty owners shouldn’t cut bait yet, but I see no reason for redraft optimism. Most redraft rosters aren’t big enough to roster 3rd stringers.
I guess if he is an emergency sub sure. But he's the definition of fungible asset. Biodegradable to the max. In reading @Dr. Dan's nightmare league scenario I suppose he's worth a spot start. But IMO when you're staring down the barrel of starting a guy like this, it's time to make a trade.Not saying he is any good but Hiliman did play 65% of the snaps for the Giants in their most recent game.
Tried. I offered Corey Davis for Chris Thompson...I guess if he is an emergency sub sure. But he's the definition of fungible asset. Biodegradable to the max. In reading @Dr. Dan's nightmare league scenario I suppose he's worth a spot start. But IMO when you're staring down the barrel of starting a guy like this, it's time to make a trade.
Now we’re all emotionally invested. I think I speak for everyone when I say please provide a running update and how your team doesI dropped my kicker, Matt Bryant, for Henderson. I can pick up Prater on Monday night if I need it to win. Neither my opponent nor I have any other players going on Monday so I will go without a kicker unless I am trailing. I will be taking the risk that someone could pick up Prater to block me. My opponent doesn't have any players to drop to pick Prater up. High point scorer gets $50 so I might have to pick up and start Prater to win that.
StrategeryNow we’re all emotionally invested. I think I speak for everyone when I say please provide a running update and how your team does
Also curious about the lack of hype.Shocked there isn't more hype going into the weekend. Gurley is all but OUT this week, makes you wonder about the following week.
Rams have a Bye in Week 9, after the Niners they have two easier games in Atlanta and Cinci, combined 1-9 record, it's possible Gurley isn't used much until they come back in Week 10...could Brown hold the job down by himself? I doubt it but anything is possible.
It would appear as though there is some kind of light now shining in this direction with the injury bug popping up.
Cone of Uncertainty...I'm starting to smell a TS Warning or Watch being posted tonight along the Treasure Coast, here we go!
Shocked there isn't more hype going into the weekend.
I get enough flack from the trolls. at this point let's see what he does! I'm excited for his opportunity and I hope McVay gives it to himAlso curious about the lack of hype.
I don’t think I’d start digging Gurleys grave just yetAlso curious about the lack of hype.
This could be the beginning of the end for Gurley and the beginning of the beginning for Henderson.
May take some time, but the LAR didn't invest an early 3rd on this guy for no good reason.
You could say this about very bust ever.May take some time, but the LAR didn't invest an early 3rd on this guy for no good reason.
True but he’s not a bust quite yet. Worth a speculative add on the cheap before Sunday in case it hits. If not then it’s an easy drop.You could say this about very bust ever.
He could double his yards for the year. Wait 2x0 is still 0.Also curious about the lack of hype.
This could be the beginning of the end for Gurley and the beginning of the beginning for Henderson.
May take some time, but the LAR didn't invest an early 3rd on this guy for no good reason.
RB 15 in ppr, 7 pts from top 10kittenmittens said:Gurleys grave was dug last offseason. He's halfway in it.
He's not dead, we just have his grave prepared and he's heading towards it.RB 15 in ppr, 7 pts from top 10
Yep, and now comes the enjoyment for Gurley owners of trying to guess how much workload he gets in each and every game once he returns. My guess? Not as much as the max 16 carries he’s been limited to ever since he was injured last year.RB 15 in ppr, 7 pts from top 10
#Rams played Todd Gurley on a season-high 93% of snaps last Thursday night, he picked up a quad injury be Seattle, now not going to play on a long week.RB 15 in ppr, 7 pts from top 10
I believe it. Like a previous post pointed out, you don't burn a 3rd round pick on a guy to warm the bench for Malcome Brown.Take it for what it's worth, but Torry Holt, who struck me as pretty locked in with the Rams organization still, was on Cowherd's show a few weeks back and spoke pretty highly of Henderson and thinks he will shine once he gets opportunities.
Anyone that drafted him this yr knew what they were getting into, imoYep, and now comes the enjoyment for Gurley owners of trying to guess how much workload he gets in each and every game once he returns. My guess? Not as much as the max 16 carries he’s been limited to ever since he was injured last year.
The original post that I quoted pretty much stated that Henderson was going to take Gurleys job#Rams played Todd Gurley on a season-high 93% of snaps last Thursday night, he picked up a quad injury be Seattle, now not going to play on a long week.
On the field:
* Career-low 4.9 yards/reception
* 4 straight games below 4.0 yards/carry
* 8 straight games below 20 touches
https://twitter.com/evansilva/status/1182747313980219394?s=21
So, they limit the carries, but he's out there to pick up just about every blitz sent their way?Yep, and now comes the enjoyment for Gurley owners of trying to guess how much workload he gets in each and every game once he returns. My guess? Not as much as the max 16 carries he’s been limited to ever since he was injured last year.
Believe a blitz pickup = RB carry all you want. Haven’t seen too many RBs suffer significant injuries blocking a blitzing linebacker.So, they limit the carries, but he's out there to pick up just about every blitz sent their way?
He's not the same player, but this myopic look at touches without any other context doesn't tell anything close to the full story.
Totally agree its a trend. And the results speak for themselves... but to best understand the situation we need to be honest with ourselves about what is injury VS. degradation of talent VS. lines play VS usage. Personally, I believe he's not nearly as explosive a back but a better than average overall skilled runner, solid all around, but no longer spectacular. But if he was being babied, I just don't see why they'd expose him to so many extra points of contact.Believe a blitz pickup = RB carry all you want. Haven’t seen too many RBs suffer significant injuries blocking a blitzing linebacker.
At this stage, it doesn’t really matter if there is an “other context” limiting his carries, nor what anyone assumes that narrative might be. It’s been ten straight games over two seasons in which he hasn’t had more than 16 carries. The Gurley fanboys can believe it’s a 6/1 defense, a weak offensive line, or an incompetent coach. I could care less. It’s pretty clearly a trend, and whatever injury he’s dealing with just five weeks into the season isn’t going to increase the likelihood that he receives more workload upon his return.
I could care less about your sorry pet peeve...couldnt care less...
sorry pet peeve
I could too. I just choose not to. (two? too?)I could care less about your sorry pet peeve...
I was going to comment about the societally tragic misuse of the apostrophe, too, but I figured why add to it?I could too. I just choose not to. (two? too?)
Couldn't.I could care less.
But we took Gurley with full understanding of the likely lower usage?Yep, and now comes the enjoyment for Gurley owners of trying to guess how much workload he gets in each and every game once he returns. My guess? Not as much as the max 16 carries he’s been limited to ever since he was injured last year.
But we took Gurley with full understanding of the likely lower usage?
Awesome, on both accounts? Good luck from here on out deciding whether or not to start him.At the price I paid for him, he has been a value to this point.
Seems no more or less complicated than any other player?Awesome, on both accounts? Good luck from here on out deciding whether or not to start him.
Guess we’ll find out.Seems no more or less complicated than any other player?
If he starts he starts?
Is there something harder about this than any other player? I am not following.Guess we’ll find out.
Nope, seems the exact same situation as every other RB. Mysterious injury (or not) late in 2018, workhorse RB that’s “fine” getting limited touches on a run to the Super Bowl, talk about a degenerative knee during the offseason, team trading two picks to move up in the draft to grab a RB, limited practice participation in the preseason, trend of not receiving more than 16 carries in a game continues into 2019, “quad injury” significant enough to keep him out of a game 10 days after it occurred after playing just five games. Pretty much nothing out of the ordinary compared to other RBs over the last ten months. Status quo, I’d say.Is there something harder about this than any other player? I am not following.
You seem hellbent on some conspiracy theory.Nope, seems the exact same situation as every other RB. Mysterious injury (or not) late in 2018, workhorse RB that’s “fine” getting limited touches on a run to the Super Bowl, talk about a degenerative knee during the offseason, team trading two picks to move up in the draft to grab a RB, limited practice participation in the preseason, trend of not receiving more than 16 carries in a game continues into 2019, “quad injury” significant enough to keep him out of a game 10 days after it occurred after playing just five games. Pretty much nothing out of the ordinary compared to other RBs over the last ten months. Status quo, I’d say.
Look, I’m glad Gurley has been “a value to you thus far for what you paid for him” (not sure how that’s quite possible as he’s RB17 in my ppr league, but ok). I have a hunch he’s about to become just just a bit more complicated for you than “if he starts he starts.” But like I said, we’ll see. Let’s double back on this in a month.