Thank you. I guess it shouldn't surprise me as everything seems this way now but it seems from what I see that NYC has two very different takes. One is it's near disaster. The other is Cuomo is guiding it well and it'll be ok.
Do you have an opinion there on balancing the two?
Cuomo has been great at the state level. Mayor Deblasio, on the other hand, has been an absolute train wreck. He was fighting back on school closures when everyone around the coutnry and in the NYC suburbs was implementing closures. He's had his head in the sand. Unfortunately with such a dense population, and so much reliance on public transportation, I have no doubt his refusal to act will end in tens of thousands of additional infections in the area.
I also have no doubt that the NYC "shelter in place" order is coming, any minute. I don't see how you avoid it with the steep jump in infections and the density here. If they're doing this in NorCal, how in god's name do you not do it in Manhattan? The pressure will just become overwhelming.
Deblasio just doing a really poor job here. I get there are a lot of competing concerns, and concerns about putting kids at home and child care issues, but the major public health issue should trump all of this. They've found a way to get it done in other places, and you need to get it done here.
Most everyone I know in the area lives in the suburbs now and have been telecommuting all week, and will be for the foreseeable future. As I understand from my colleagues who are still heading into our office in 30 Rock, Manhattan is a ghost town. So, even if Deblasio isn't acting, at least the people, in general, are.
But yeah, I have great concerns about the NYC area. It's not surprising to me there has been a run on gun purchases in the Long Island suburbs. People are anxious, and scared, and don't know what to do. The guns will be totally useless--we're not about to come under massive looting and home invasion scenarios--but it's a sign of how people are feeling.