Jaysus
Good times!
Lol, it sure is...It's crazy to think the US might be the first team to break that streak.
Lol, it sure is...It's crazy to think the US might be the first team to break that streak.
Well it is clearly the longest of long shots but I could make a VERY strong argument that the US has the best collection of U23 talent outside of the two big regions, so if any one is poised to do the impossible, the US is as well situated as any other country.Lol, it sure is...
he's been fantastic. Only, what 18? Too bad he's stuck at Barca at the end of their Messi coattail riding.My totally unique, not at all obvious, Euro take is that Pedri is ridiculously good.
Those two Italian center backs are sn all time classic pairing.
No Madagascar disrespect in hereEuros > WC for me for a while.
Yeah you get Brazil, Argentina, Australia but you also get Madagascar, Bolivia and the US…waters it down
It'll be one and done...then they'll go to 56 teams...I thought the 16 team Euro was stronger than a 32 team WC.
Currently I think a 32 team WC is stronger/more enjoyable than a 24 team Euro.
The Euro's might be technically better but the tournament is dying for just a little color and flair and some of the zaniness the other countries can bring.
That being said, a 24 team Euro is almost certainly going to be better than the 48 team abomination greedy FIFA came up with for 2026. I really hope that is a one and done but I fear it won't be.
So many of those 3rd games in the groups are going to be go along to get along games - terrible.At some point, you think an exception will take place, but the reality is that the World Cup has been won by a UEFA (12) or CONMEBOL (9) team since it started over 90 years ago. In fact, the final match has only been made up of countries from those 2 confederations. For CONMEBOL, it's been either Brazil, Argentina, or Uruguay. At least Europe has been more varied.
It's crazy to think the US might be the first team to break that streak.
When you expand to 48 teams, it's going to make some matches difficult to watch.
I'm a little surprised by 4-3-3 but not a ton. Will be interesting if Denmark are able to have a decent amount of possession.Early scuttlebutt (hehe "butt") is that Saka will be back in to replace Sancho, but otherwise an unchanged line-up for England.
as much as I have disagreed with Southgate's lineups (no Sancho, Mount over Graelish/Foden/Jude, Sterling), its hard to argue when they haven't lost, are in the semis and conceded 0 goals.Early scuttlebutt (hehe "butt") is that Saka will be back in to replace Sancho, but otherwise an unchanged line-up for England.
I added kane and Sterling…hoping the jinx is in.

Classic.Kasper with the “was it ever here?” Reply to the question of what he thought about the “it’s coming home” line everyone hates from England.
love it
Of course, there is another clip where Kasper is asked about being the goal keeper who has given up the most goals to Kane, and Hojbjerg, who was next to Kasper, turned and laughed...Kasper with the “was it ever here?” Reply to the question of what he thought about the “it’s coming home” line everyone hates from England.
love it
Every England/Denmark game at Wembley in history has ended 1-0 to someone. Seems like some plausible plays.Bet on a draw for the first half and Under 2 goals for the game.
I also am pretty bad at this.
London dry? I’ll allow it.@AAABatteries I substituted gin for vodka in my bloody marry. This acceptable for the London game?
is that AHC, GM?Under 2 goals for the game.
Son would have gotten to it...That was a beauty of a pass by Kane
And probably scored it. Don't have faith Sterling would haveSon would have gotten to it...
Guy just never shows up in the Euros. The Korean Messi.Son would have gotten to it...
Harsh. But, fair.Guy just never shows up in the Euros. The Korean Messi.