Amused to Death
Footballguy
I know right? Look at all those fools who started Charles this week too. FFL rooks I tells ya.Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.
I know right? Look at all those fools who started Charles this week too. FFL rooks I tells ya.Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.
RIGHT - The comparison to Jamaal Charles is exactly the same as Moreno. I know I drafted Moreno in round 1. Excellent work there.I know right? Look at all those fools who started Charles this week too. FFL rooks I tells ya.Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.
Excellent work by you to think Moreno owners wasted a draft pick because he got injured in week 2.RIGHT - The comparison to Jamaal Charles is exactly the same as Moreno. I know I drafted Moreno in round 1. Excellent work there.I know right? Look at all those fools who started Charles this week too. FFL rooks I tells ya.Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.
Exactly! Why can't my leagues be filled with guys who think like this guy? Is win championships every year!Excellent work by you to think Moreno owners wasted a draft pick because he got injured in week 2.RIGHT - The comparison to Jamaal Charles is exactly the same as Moreno. I know I drafted Moreno in round 1. Excellent work there.I know right? Look at all those fools who started Charles this week too. FFL rooks I tells ya.Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.![]()
I'll be looking for TT's thread about RBs that will be injured in week 3 so I can sit them.Exactly! Why can't my leagues be filled with guys who think like this guy? Is win championships every year!Excellent work by you to think Moreno owners wasted a draft pick because he got injured in week 2.RIGHT - The comparison to Jamaal Charles is exactly the same as Moreno. I know I drafted Moreno in round 1. Excellent work there.I know right? Look at all those fools who started Charles this week too. FFL rooks I tells ya.Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.![]()
I was very clear before the season started that Moreno was a wasted draft pick. Nearly no one started him week one, but the 17% who did probably did so because they took a guy like Ray Rice in the 5th on draft day and just wanted to ride out the first two weeks. Most redrafts do not have IR spots, so if you are a Moreno believer you now have a decision to make on whether or not the Dolphins #2 RB is going to sit on your fantasy roster for 4-6 weeks with a guaranteed 0 or if you are going to drop him.I'll be looking for TT's thread about RBs that will be injured in week 3 so I can sit them.Exactly! Why can't my leagues be filled with guys who think like this guy? Is win championships every year!Excellent work by you to think Moreno owners wasted a draft pick because he got injured in week 2.RIGHT - The comparison to Jamaal Charles is exactly the same as Moreno. I know I drafted Moreno in round 1. Excellent work there.I know right? Look at all those fools who started Charles this week too. FFL rooks I tells ya.Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.![]()
So you knew he would be injured in week 2? How else would he be considered a wasted pick since he was clearly the lead back in Miami prior to getting hurt? But you say Charles wasn't a wasted pick even though he bombed in week 1 and got injured the same week as Moreno. You were clearly wrong about Moreno in week 1 and you can not claim he's a bust because of injury. Unless you claimed he was an injury risk. Did you warn people Mark Ingram would be a wasted pick as well?I was very clear before the season started that Moreno was a wasted draft pick. Nearly no one started him week one, but the 17% who did probably did so because they took a guy like Ray Rice in the 5th on draft day and just wanted to ride out the first two weeks. Most redrafts do not have IR spots, so if you are a Moreno believer you now have a decision to make on whether or not the Dolphins #2 RB is going to sit on your fantasy roster for 4-6 weeks with a guaranteed 0 or if you are going to drop him.I'll be looking for TT's thread about RBs that will be injured in week 3 so I can sit them.Exactly! Why can't my leagues be filled with guys who think like this guy? Is win championships every year!Excellent work by you to think Moreno owners wasted a draft pick because he got injured in week 2.RIGHT - The comparison to Jamaal Charles is exactly the same as Moreno. I know I drafted Moreno in round 1. Excellent work there.I know right? Look at all those fools who started Charles this week too. FFL rooks I tells ya.Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.![]()
Dude....don't even bother. he is clearly trolling this thread with idiotic statements. That or he is such a FF rookie that he doesn't even understand how silly what he is saying sounds.So you knew he would be injured in week 2? How else would he be considered a wasted pick since he was clearly the lead back in Miami prior to getting hurt? But you say Charles wasn't a wasted pick even though he bombed in week 1 and got injured the same week as Moreno. You were clearly wrong about Moreno in week 1 and you can not claim he's a bust because of injury. Unless you claimed he was an injury risk.I was very clear before the season started that Moreno was a wasted draft pick. Nearly no one started him week one, but the 17% who did probably did so because they took a guy like Ray Rice in the 5th on draft day and just wanted to ride out the first two weeks. Most redrafts do not have IR spots, so if you are a Moreno believer you now have a decision to make on whether or not the Dolphins #2 RB is going to sit on your fantasy roster for 4-6 weeks with a guaranteed 0 or if you are going to drop him.I'll be looking for TT's thread about RBs that will be injured in week 3 so I can sit them.Exactly! Why can't my leagues be filled with guys who think like this guy? Is win championships every year!Excellent work by you to think Moreno owners wasted a draft pick because he got injured in week 2.RIGHT - The comparison to Jamaal Charles is exactly the same as Moreno. I know I drafted Moreno in round 1. Excellent work there.I know right? Look at all those fools who started Charles this week too. FFL rooks I tells ya.Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.![]()
Who's going to get hurt in week 3 so I leave them on my bench.
Not really accurate at all. He came on in week 3 of preseason and absolutely looked like the better RB so yea I would say he did earn the playing time over Miller. He absolutely looked like the better RB after week one as well, it's not just because Miller fumbled. He ran better in his one week with the Dolphins than Miller has since he's been in the NFL. He was the offense in week one. That's the facts.Yup, moving right along to Moreno sitting on the bench for a LONG time. The facts are that Moreno only saw extra action in week 1 because of Lamar Miller's fumble. He did not earn the spot in camp or pre-season games, nor was he named the starter in week 2. Terrible draft pick on a guy that started off season conditioning late because of the Super Bowl, then was not signed by the Broncos, then missed nearly all of OTA's, then had knee surgery and missed most of camp. Those are the facts.
One week does not a good pick make. Lots of guys patting themselves on the back after week 1 and nearly all of them did not start Moreno. Straight up wasted pick that killed many fantasy rosters this week.
Precisely. I have tons of patience for rookies who are humble and eager to learn.One week does not a good pick make. Lots of guys patting themselves on the back after week 1 and nearly all of them did not start Moreno. Straight up wasted pick that killed many fantasy rosters this week.![]()
If grabbing Moreno in the late rounds "killed many fantasy rosters" this week then I'm going to have to assume said rosters were affected by more than Moreno's injury. That's like saying Carlos Hyde not panning out is killing many fantasy rosters right now. What a joke.
Hasn't the play of Lamar Miller alone shown everyone with eyes that he is not an RB1 by any means?I was very clear before the season started that Moreno was a wasted draft pick. Nearly no one started him week one, but the 17% who did probably did so because they took a guy like Ray Rice in the 5th on draft day and just wanted to ride out the first two weeks. Most redrafts do not have IR spots, so if you are a Moreno believer you now have a decision to make on whether or not the Dolphins #2 RB is going to sit on your fantasy roster for 4-6 weeks with a guaranteed 0 or if you are going to drop him.I'll be looking for TT's thread about RBs that will be injured in week 3 so I can sit them.Exactly! Why can't my leagues be filled with guys who think like this guy? Is win championships every year!Excellent work by you to think Moreno owners wasted a draft pick because he got injured in week 2.RIGHT - The comparison to Jamaal Charles is exactly the same as Moreno. I know I drafted Moreno in round 1. Excellent work there.I know right? Look at all those fools who started Charles this week too. FFL rooks I tells ya.Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.![]()
Good post.menobrown said:Not really accurate at all. He came on in week 3 of preseason and absolutely looked like the better RB so yea I would say he did earn the playing time over Miller. He absolutely looked like the better RB after week one as well, it's not just because Miller fumbled. He ran better in his one week with the Dolphins than Miller has since he's been in the NFL. He was the offense in week one. That's the facts.Touchdown There said:Yup, moving right along to Moreno sitting on the bench for a LONG time. The facts are that Moreno only saw extra action in week 1 because of Lamar Miller's fumble. He did not earn the spot in camp or pre-season games, nor was he named the starter in week 2. Terrible draft pick on a guy that started off season conditioning late because of the Super Bowl, then was not signed by the Broncos, then missed nearly all of OTA's, then had knee surgery and missed most of camp. Those are the facts.
Personally I'm gong to hold onto him because when he comes back he'll again be the best RB on the team.
The I told you so posts came from Moreno owners, who did not start him in week 1, nor does a single week a season make.I didn't see any criticism posts after Moreno led all RBs in rushing week 1. The I told you so posts were conspicuously absent then.
No one said he was an RB1. He is an RB2 averaging 4.8 yards per carry this season. He is also right around RB #23 (low RB2) after two games, even with his fumble punishment and Moreno's succubus. If his ankle is not seriously injured he will be getting his shot in the next 4-6 weeks and it will be really hard to perform worse than RB2 with his expected load.Hasn't the play of Lamar Miller alone shown everyone with eyes that he is not an RB1 by any means?
I know you're trolling at this point but I gotta ask you....Do you think he looked like a wasted mid-round draft pick following week 1 or did you think Moreno was the better Miami RB in that game? Forget the % start that you seem to be basing your position on, are you saying Moreno's a wasted pick because he got hurt? After the great week 1, were you predicting a big drop off for the rest of the year? If so, what were you basing that on?The I told you so posts came from Moreno owners, who did not start him in week 1, nor does a single week a season make.I didn't see any criticism posts after Moreno led all RBs in rushing week 1. The I told you so posts were conspicuously absent then.
SengerCJ - Yes IR slots are uncommon in redraft, but seem pretty common in dynasty/keeper leagues.
You can't forget the % start, because he killed 50% of owners in week 2 in their fantasy matchup. That is the game we play, unless you are in pads on Sunday.Forget the % start.
What percentage drafted Moreno as a starter?Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.
95%+ of the Moreno owners thought he would overtake Lamar Miller, that is why you drafted him.What percentage drafted Moreno as a starter?Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.
So because he got hurt he's a bust. So every injured player is a bust?You can't forget the % start, because he killed 50% of owners in week 2 in their fantasy matchup. That is the game we play, unless you are in pads on Sunday.Forget the % start.
You did not calculate any risk pre-draft. Late start to off season workouts, showed up out of shape, missed most of OTAs then had knee surgery. He was never going to make it the season.So because he got hurt he's a bust. So every injured player is a bust?You can't forget the % start, because he killed 50% of owners in week 2 in their fantasy matchup. That is the game we play, unless you are in pads on Sunday.Forget the % start.
So, injury 100% needs to be taken into account when determining bust status. It's why people have become more wary of drafting RBs early and often over the years. Ultimately however, it's all relative to ADP. If Charles, for instance, is forced to miss a lot of time/is ineffective for a majority of year due to his injury than he will indeed be considered a huge bust. Moreno could have been had for cheap (taken in the 9th round on average in MFL). He wasn't "free" but cheap enough that even if he does "bust" it shouldn't be a death knell for your team.So because he got hurt he's a bust. So every injured player is a bust?You can't forget the % start, because he killed 50% of owners in week 2 in their fantasy matchup. That is the game we play, unless you are in pads on Sunday.Forget the % start.
Missed you buddy.Please stop responding to / quoting the fisherman as it circumvents the "ignore user" feature. TIA. He's not here for honest discussion anyway.
I think the point was you couldn't predict a Charles injury. Did you predict the A.J. Green injury?RIGHT - The comparison to Jamaal Charles is exactly the same as Moreno. I know I drafted Moreno in round 1. Excellent work there.I know right? Look at all those fools who started Charles this week too. FFL rooks I tells ya.Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.
This thread is 10 pages of crowing after week 1 from Moreno owners. There is now 1/2 a page of sensibility.The only thing straight up about that is how silly it is to crow about it after the fact.
I meant what percentage drafted him as one of their top 2 RBs in start 1-2 RB leagues?95%+ of the Moreno owners thought he would overtake Lamar Miller, that is why you drafted him.What percentage drafted Moreno as a starter?Yahoo start percentage week 1 = 17%
Yahoo start percentage week 2 = 65% and he totals .4 fantasy points.
Can you point to the extensive medical literature that shows a greater incidence of dislocated elbows due to these things?You did not calculate any risk pre-draft. Late start to off season workouts, showed up out of shape, missed most of OTAs then had knee surgery. He was never going to make it the season.So because he got hurt he's a bust. So every injured player is a bust?You can't forget the % start, because he killed 50% of owners in week 2 in their fantasy matchup. That is the game we play, unless you are in pads on Sunday.Forget the % start.
I'd like to hold but the situation is precarious.Can we get back to current news on Moreno's injury and how to deal with it? Some of us who drafted him aren't giving up yet.
I meant on his team. He's clearly the second tier RB behind Moreno to everyone who's not trolling.No one said he was an RB1. He is an RB2 averaging 4.8 yards per carry this season. He is also right around RB #23 (low RB2) after two games, even with his fumble punishment and Moreno's succubus. If his ankle is not seriously injured he will be getting his shot in the next 4-6 weeks and it will be really hard to perform worse than RB2 with his expected load.Hasn't the play of Lamar Miller alone shown everyone with eyes that he is not an RB1 by any means?
You would have to be pretty dumb to flat out drop him. Even if it is an 8 week injury, you hold on until you literally cannot anymore. Remember last year with Vereen? Those who held on were rewarded.I'd like to hold but the situation is precarious.Can we get back to current news on Moreno's injury and how to deal with it? Some of us who drafted him aren't giving up yet.
PFT says 4 weeks.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/09/14/knowshon-moreno-has-dislocated-elbow/
Has Dr. Bramel spoken on this yet?
Absolutely. It's not like Miller or the newly resigned Daniel Thomas will "run" away with it. They might make it three yards, but then fall down.You would have to be pretty dumb to flat out drop him. Even if it is an 8 week injury, you hold on until you literally cannot anymore. Remember last year with Vereen? Those who held on were rewarded.I'd like to hold but the situation is precarious.Can we get back to current news on Moreno's injury and how to deal with it? Some of us who drafted him aren't giving up yet.
PFT says 4 weeks.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/09/14/knowshon-moreno-has-dislocated-elbow/
Has Dr. Bramel spoken on this yet?
Knowshon Moreno - RB - Dolphins
Knowshon Moreno (elbow) has told teammates that he plans to be back in the lineup Week 6.
Moreno was originally given a 4-8 week timetable for recovery after dislocating his elbow last week against the Bills. A Week 6 return would be right at four weeks, and comes directly after the Dolphins' Week 5 bye. Players are always more optimistic about their own injuries, so we're not going to hold Moreno to this. Owners need to continue to stash Moreno. Lamar Miller will handle lead-back duties in his absence. Damien Williams and Orleans Darkwa are Nos. 2 and 3.
Source: Miami Herald
Sep 19 - 11:07 AM
He missed all those valuable elbow strengthening exercises during OTAs. Who didn't see this coming?You did not calculate any risk pre-draft. Late start to off season workouts, showed up out of shape, missed most of OTAs then had knee surgery. He was never going to make it the season.So because he got hurt he's a bust. So every injured player is a bust?You can't forget the % start, because he killed 50% of owners in week 2 in their fantasy matchup. That is the game we play, unless you are in pads on Sunday.Forget the % start.
That's okay my young stud brother.I feel like I was just ready to unleash my secret weapon and then it exploded just as I was leaving the missile silo. ####.
![]()
I drafted Vereen and held on all year and was rewarded. I also had Andre Brown and he was very useful too. It's just that there is a big difference between Moreno coming back week 6, after the bye, and week 10. That was really my original question, what's most likely?You would have to be pretty dumb to flat out drop him. Even if it is an 8 week injury, you hold on until you literally cannot anymore. Remember last year with Vereen? Those who held on were rewarded.I'd like to hold but the situation is precarious.Can we get back to current news on Moreno's injury and how to deal with it? Some of us who drafted him aren't giving up yet.
PFT says 4 weeks.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/09/14/knowshon-moreno-has-dislocated-elbow/
Has Dr. Bramel spoken on this yet?
or those of us who have a really short bench (i.e. 3 spots) and can't afford to stash him during critical bye weeks.I drafted Vereen and held on all year and was rewarded. I also had Andre Brown and he was very useful too. It's just that there is a big difference between Moreno coming back week 6, after the bye, and week 10. That was really my original question, what's most likely?You would have to be pretty dumb to flat out drop him. Even if it is an 8 week injury, you hold on until you literally cannot anymore. Remember last year with Vereen? Those who held on were rewarded.I'd like to hold but the situation is precarious.Can we get back to current news on Moreno's injury and how to deal with it? Some of us who drafted him aren't giving up yet.
PFT says 4 weeks.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/09/14/knowshon-moreno-has-dislocated-elbow/
Has Dr. Bramel spoken on this yet?
Who plays in 3 bench leagues? I guess if its a 16 team league that could make sense but would still make juggling for bye weeks awful. Even standard yahoo/ESPN leagues have 6 player benches.or those of us who have a really short bench (i.e. 3 spots) and can't afford to stash him during critical bye weeks.I drafted Vereen and held on all year and was rewarded. I also had Andre Brown and he was very useful too. It's just that there is a big difference between Moreno coming back week 6, after the bye, and week 10. That was really my original question, what's most likely?You would have to be pretty dumb to flat out drop him. Even if it is an 8 week injury, you hold on until you literally cannot anymore. Remember last year with Vereen? Those who held on were rewarded.I'd like to hold but the situation is precarious.Can we get back to current news on Moreno's injury and how to deal with it? Some of us who drafted him aren't giving up yet.
PFT says 4 weeks.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/09/14/knowshon-moreno-has-dislocated-elbow/
Has Dr. Bramel spoken on this yet?