Bojang0301
Omar4Heisman
Just a gut feeling but I'm guessing a Ben extension is imminent given the current restructures today.
				
			
			
				Last edited by a moderator: 
			
		
	
								
								
									
								
							
							Would be a good fit but only if he comes cheap.Reggie Bush, anyone?
Agreed. He'd get 2 starts to begin the season and then rotate in a every 3-4 series. Could probably count on 100 carries and maybe 30 catches, which is not much different from what he was getting in Detroit.Would be a good fit but only if he comes cheap.Reggie Bush, anyone?
Kind of why I was asking, I had contemplated this, then Wexell wrote about it, and now: Daniel Jeremiah’s Latest Has Virginia OLB Eli Harold Going To Steelers. With rankings like on CBS that would be too early, reaching. Of course a lot of fans want CB. So wondering if the preference is to "reach" for someone like Harold (even though it might not be a reach), take what might be BPA (by some rankings) in Malcom Brown or go for CB (fan choice)?Collins the S, definitely. Collins the CB, not so sure. Not seeing other OL really worth a top 20 but there could be 1 or 2. DL outside of Shelton/Williams (have Ray as an OLB) doesn't have top 20. Could see Gordon going top 20. It's close for someone like Dupree. Not that that matters, the question was if all those guys are gone who would you want? A DT like Brown, a CB like Peters?C & C said:Doing the math...you listed 8 players ( Waynes, Shelton, Collins, Gregory, Fowler, Ray, Beasley, and Dupree (all the players we want/need) are all gone.). Steelers pick 22.3C said:Not that much has changed but post combine I'm figuring Waynes, Shelton, Collins, Gregory, Fowler, Ray, Beasley, and Dupree (all the players we want/need) are all gone. Who's the pick? Malcom Brown, Jordan Phillips? I don't want the other CB's (Peters, Williams) in the first. Do they reach (a little) for Eli Harold (they like him)? Or maybe Owa (not spelling his name out, not that I can)?
So who else will/should go before 22...
QB (Winston/Mariotta)
RB (none)
WR (Cooper/White/Parker)
TE (none)
OL (Scheriff/Peat)
DL (Williams/Ray/Shelton)
LB (Fowler/Gregory/Beasley/Dawson/Dupree)
CB (Waynes/Collins)
S (Collins maybe?)
That's 18.
And I hope there will be more o-line and d-line go, they always do. Another WR might get into the top 20. So, they need those 7 offensive guys listed to go and 3 guys not listed to get one of the defensive prospects. And they may be high on a defensive guy not listed. Right now, I think they are in ok shape.
ETA: add Shaq Richardson in there as gone. Trying to get a sense of what would be a preference if those guys are not available. I'm not enamored with the 2 DT that would be available and depending on who you ask CB out side Waynes is late 1st early 2nd at best.
Use this as a guide (though you may disagree) for who is available at 22. They did move Owa up quite a bit and that probably would be a good pick. http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/2015/all
Yeah, they're still on board with the young guy Harris and they likely could get a guy in the mid rounds like one of the Davids (they did talk to Cobb) so they don't need to break the bank on a rb.Agreed. He'd get 2 starts to begin the season and then rotate in a every 3-4 series. Could probably count on 100 carries and maybe 30 catches, which is not much different from what he was getting in Detroit.Would be a good fit but only if he comes cheap.Reggie Bush, anyone?
Yep. It also looks like Worilds is going to hitting the open market.Just a gut feeling but I'm guessing a Ben extension is imminent given the current restructures today.
Ideally, they trade down is all those guys are gone. But again, that's not the question you are asking.Collins the S, definitely. Collins the CB, not so sure. Not seeing other OL really worth a top 20 but there could be 1 or 2. DL outside of Shelton/Williams (have Ray as an OLB) doesn't have top 20. Could see Gordon going top 20. It's close for someone like Dupree. Not that that matters, the question was if all those guys are gone who would you want? A DT like Brown, a CB like Peters?
ETA: add Shaq Richardson in there as gone. Trying to get a sense of what would be a preference if those guys are not available. I'm not enamored with the 2 DT that would be available and depending on who you ask CB out side Waynes is late 1st early 2nd at best.
Use this as a guide (though you may disagree) for who is available at 22. They did move Owa up quite a bit and that probably would be a good pick. http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/2015/all
The only real suspense here is who offers him the better deal - Arizona or Tennessee?Yep. It also looks like Worilds is going to hitting the open market.Just a gut feeling but I'm guessing a Ben extension is imminent given the current restructures today.
The only real suspense here is who offers him the better deal - Arizona or Tennessee?Yep. It also looks like Worilds is going to hitting the open market.Just a gut feeling but I'm guessing a Ben extension is imminent given the current restructures today.
 I'm definitely high on Owa and Eli and considering Worilds is 50/50 to be in Pitt next year they'd have a real need for OLB if they don't sign a free agent (looking at you Brandon Graham).Ideally, they trade down is all those guys are gone. But again, that's not the question you are asking.Collins the S, definitely. Collins the CB, not so sure. Not seeing other OL really worth a top 20 but there could be 1 or 2. DL outside of Shelton/Williams (have Ray as an OLB) doesn't have top 20. Could see Gordon going top 20. It's close for someone like Dupree. Not that that matters, the question was if all those guys are gone who would you want? A DT like Brown, a CB like Peters?
ETA: add Shaq Richardson in there as gone. Trying to get a sense of what would be a preference if those guys are not available. I'm not enamored with the 2 DT that would be available and depending on who you ask CB out side Waynes is late 1st early 2nd at best.
Use this as a guide (though you may disagree) for who is available at 22. They did move Owa up quite a bit and that probably would be a good pick. http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/2015/all
It might not be popular but I'd be ok with an offensive tackle. Seems there a few of them right in that range.
They also need depth along the d-line. After reading about the two nose tackle prospects (Jordan Phillips, Eddie Goldman) I like them, but I'm not a fan of drafting a NT in the first in general.
I'm not sure about the LB prospects. There are so many of first/second round guys it's hard to differentiate, but I'd rather have them take another position than reach.
As for CB, if we are assuming Jalen Collins is gone, then I'd rather not see them take PJ Williams.
So, if the guys we all prefer are gone, I'd take a lineman. As I research more in the coming weeks/months my guess is I'll have a better expectation of who I want them to take. Typically, I find a guy a like about this time of year that's projected to be available at their pick, but rises up the draft board as time goes on. I haven't done enough research to have that guy yet.
Bush? Would be fine with that, if the price was right(although I doubt he'd have playing caddy to Bell as his first choice, fwiw). Woodley? Aw, HELL naw!Of the recent/imminent cuts, two guys I can see being brought in are Bush and Woodley. The former if he's willing to sign a deal like Blount did last year rather than a MoJo Drew deal (unlikely) and Woodley if he's willing to sign an incentive based "prove it" deal (possible.)
True, but he knows the system and isn't likely to draw any interest. If he was willing to sign a vet minimum deal with sack incentives, it might be a better fit for the short term than a FA from another team or a rookie. They are absolutely decimated at OLB if/when Worilds walks and Harrison signs elsewhere.Bush? Would be fine with that, if the price was right(although I doubt he'd have playing caddy to Bell as his first choice, fwiw). Woodley? Aw, HELL naw!Of the recent/imminent cuts, two guys I can see being brought in are Bush and Woodley. The former if he's willing to sign a deal like Blount did last year rather than a MoJo Drew deal (unlikely) and Woodley if he's willing to sign an incentive based "prove it" deal (possible.)
He was already a smacked ### the last season, or so, before he left Pittsburgh. He didn't get any less smacked last year in Oakland. Pass.
Sign Harrison then. A 1 year deal with him at 2M is better than anything Woodley has to offer.True, but he knows the system and isn't likely to draw any interest. If he was willing to sign a vet minimum deal with sack incentives, it might be a better fit for the short term than a FA from another team or a rookie. They are absolutely decimated at OLB if/when Worilds walks and Harrison signs elsewhere.Bush? Would be fine with that, if the price was right(although I doubt he'd have playing caddy to Bell as his first choice, fwiw). Woodley? Aw, HELL naw!Of the recent/imminent cuts, two guys I can see being brought in are Bush and Woodley. The former if he's willing to sign a deal like Blount did last year rather than a MoJo Drew deal (unlikely) and Woodley if he's willing to sign an incentive based "prove it" deal (possible.)
He was already a smacked ### the last season, or so, before he left Pittsburgh. He didn't get any less smacked last year in Oakland. Pass.
Agreed, I'd MUCH rather have Harrison, but if he asks for a prohibitive salary or decides he only wants to play for LeBeau, that may not be an option.Sign Harrison then. A 1 year deal with him at 2M is better than anything Woodley has to offer.True, but he knows the system and isn't likely to draw any interest. If he was willing to sign a vet minimum deal with sack incentives, it might be a better fit for the short term than a FA from another team or a rookie. They are absolutely decimated at OLB if/when Worilds walks and Harrison signs elsewhere.Bush? Would be fine with that, if the price was right(although I doubt he'd have playing caddy to Bell as his first choice, fwiw). Woodley? Aw, HELL naw!Of the recent/imminent cuts, two guys I can see being brought in are Bush and Woodley. The former if he's willing to sign a deal like Blount did last year rather than a MoJo Drew deal (unlikely) and Woodley if he's willing to sign an incentive based "prove it" deal (possible.)
He was already a smacked ### the last season, or so, before he left Pittsburgh. He didn't get any less smacked last year in Oakland. Pass.
Harrison's not doing either IMO. He wants to stay in town and play for a decent salary. Steelers really are being the one that are hard headed in that regard. Don't really blame them as long as they get some longer term players in. My thinking is he'd prefer to play in Pittsburgh for one more year and he's not looking to break the bank, but if Pittsburgh doesn't want him he'll go to Tenn is they want him.Agreed, I'd MUCH rather have Harrison, but if he asks for a prohibitive salary or decides he only wants to play for LeBeau, that may not be an option.Sign Harrison then. A 1 year deal with him at 2M is better than anything Woodley has to offer.True, but he knows the system and isn't likely to draw any interest. If he was willing to sign a vet minimum deal with sack incentives, it might be a better fit for the short term than a FA from another team or a rookie. They are absolutely decimated at OLB if/when Worilds walks and Harrison signs elsewhere.Bush? Would be fine with that, if the price was right(although I doubt he'd have playing caddy to Bell as his first choice, fwiw). Woodley? Aw, HELL naw!Of the recent/imminent cuts, two guys I can see being brought in are Bush and Woodley. The former if he's willing to sign a deal like Blount did last year rather than a MoJo Drew deal (unlikely) and Woodley if he's willing to sign an incentive based "prove it" deal (possible.)
He was already a smacked ### the last season, or so, before he left Pittsburgh. He didn't get any less smacked last year in Oakland. Pass.
Woodley may be a hump, but if he'll sign for 2 years at 1.5 million total and they build in escalators based on sack or TFL totals, that may be better than starting Howard Jones or paying a guy like Orakpo 5 million per. If they fail to significantly upgrade the secondary, I'm petrified of what might happen if they have zero pass rush. It was bad enough last year with Harrison and Worilds. Without either, they may allow 500 points.
The alternative is to build through the draft but starting 2 rookies along with Jones and Shazier, neither of whom is anything resembling a known commodity, makes me extremely nervous. Especially with a first time coordinator.
I just looked it up, vet minimum for Woodley on a 2-year deal would be $1.755M (I think it was $865,000 and $890,000 or something), so not too far off. I'd take him at that salary with performance escalators. Nothing more. A one year deal would be just as good. Seems unrealistic, but who is going to pay him at this point with all the injuries he's had? He's made a bunch of money, so he may be willing to sign a "prove it" deal someplace with the hopes that he can rehab his image as lazy and/or injury prone and earn himself one more contract of significance before he retires. Where better to do that in a single season than somewhere he already knows the terrain, the players, many of the defensive principles, etc?3C said:Harrison's not doing either IMO. He wants to stay in town and play for a decent salary. Steelers really are being the one that are hard headed in that regard. Don't really blame them as long as they get some longer term players in. My thinking is he'd prefer to play in Pittsburgh for one more year and he's not looking to break the bank, but if Pittsburgh doesn't want him he'll go to Tenn is they want him.Agreed, I'd MUCH rather have Harrison, but if he asks for a prohibitive salary or decides he only wants to play for LeBeau, that may not be an option.Sign Harrison then. A 1 year deal with him at 2M is better than anything Woodley has to offer.True, but he knows the system and isn't likely to draw any interest. If he was willing to sign a vet minimum deal with sack incentives, it might be a better fit for the short term than a FA from another team or a rookie. They are absolutely decimated at OLB if/when Worilds walks and Harrison signs elsewhere.Bush? Would be fine with that, if the price was right(although I doubt he'd have playing caddy to Bell as his first choice, fwiw). Woodley? Aw, HELL naw!Of the recent/imminent cuts, two guys I can see being brought in are Bush and Woodley. The former if he's willing to sign a deal like Blount did last year rather than a MoJo Drew deal (unlikely) and Woodley if he's willing to sign an incentive based "prove it" deal (possible.)
He was already a smacked ### the last season, or so, before he left Pittsburgh. He didn't get any less smacked last year in Oakland. Pass.
Woodley may be a hump, but if he'll sign for 2 years at 1.5 million total and they build in escalators based on sack or TFL totals, that may be better than starting Howard Jones or paying a guy like Orakpo 5 million per. If they fail to significantly upgrade the secondary, I'm petrified of what might happen if they have zero pass rush. It was bad enough last year with Harrison and Worilds. Without either, they may allow 500 points.
The alternative is to build through the draft but starting 2 rookies along with Jones and Shazier, neither of whom is anything resembling a known commodity, makes me extremely nervous. Especially with a first time coordinator.
Woodley is not coming in at 1.5M for 2 years (pretty sure that's below league min). Of course the way the BS contracts work they could pretend to pay him X amount in year 1 to cover the min...
The inside should be fine with Shazier, Timmons, Spence and Williams. Outside there's Jones and Moats. The guy they signed (Lemon) is seriously intriguing but there's a big step up from CFL to NFL. Get another OLB in the draft and/or free agency and there's a little more breathing room, no need to fret over Worilds or Harrison. Regardless, really want Harrison back one more year. He has the ability and desire, he deserves it.
Both. I want as many inexpensive bodies in camp as they can get, if that's the route they're going to go (i.e. not sign a high $$$ free agent at OLB.) Right now, how many OLBs do they even have under contract? Jarvis Jones, Howard Jones, Shawn Lemon, Roosevelt Nix, and is that it? A high draft pick who has really yet to flash and has 3 career sacks going into his third season, and three undrafted PS players, none of whom has ever seen an NFL field on Sunday. That's it. Worilds, Harrison, and Moats are all free agents and thus far, Moats is the only one I've heard say in the press that he definitely wants back in Pittsburgh.If they can bring Woodley back cheap, then I'm for it. The question might be: Would you rather have Woodley or Arthur Moats?
 That's the most likely scenario, but anyone you're going to get for a bargain-basement price is going to come with the same or equally staggering risk. At least Woodley is something of a known commodity, has had success in Pittsburgh in the past, and is still only 30. I'm only suggesting he could be an option in place of signing a guy like Orakpo, who has a similar skill set, similarly unappealing injury history, and is only 2 years younger, yet is likely to command triple the $ (if not much more.) If Woodley was willing to sign a vet min deal with incentives, and ends up chilling in the tub again, he would receive so little as to possibly not even count against the cap under the rule of 51, or at the very least be easily cuttable if he doesn't play.Woodley can't provide any pass rush from the hot tub. May as well light 1.7M on fire as give it to him. Guy is falling apart. That was my point.
They could get him for free and he's unlikely to provide much of anything.
If that's the case, he's not coming back no matter what. I always chalk that kind of stuff up to rumor, but if it's legit, then there's no way they bring him back at any price.Bouchette, and I acknowledge most around here consider him a blow hard, quoted on a veteran on the team saying he didn't believe Woodley ever worked out and was very out of shape after his extension with Pitt. I've always heard some minor rumblings he was a malcontent or at very least a bad influence. I was admittedly never a Woodley fan and took some heat for criticizing his bloated contract and him never living up to it. I would prefer Harrison still over Woodley and would be doubly thrilled if they spent the extra on Orakpo for a high risk option.
Well, Bouchette may be a curmudgeon(He is. I love him, FWIW), but he's dialed in to the team more than any other beat guy. If he says it, you can pretty much take it as fact.Bouchette, and I acknowledge most around here consider him a blow hard, quoted on a veteran on the team saying he didn't believe Woodley ever worked out and was very out of shape after his extension with Pitt. I've always heard some minor rumblings he was a malcontent or at very least a bad influence. I was admittedly never a Woodley fan and took some heat for criticizing his bloated contract and him never living up to it. I would prefer Harrison still over Woodley and would be doubly thrilled if they spent the extra on Orakpo for a high risk option.
I'd guess that would be best for the Steelers. No potential PR nightmare of cutting him.So reports are the Steelers hope troy retires?
I don't think I would call it a PR nightmare if they cut him. I think most Steelers fans realize that Troy has become a liability. It will be sad if he pulls a Franco and plays his final season with another team but if he does I wish him the best.I'd guess that would be best for the Steelers. No potential PR nightmare of cutting him.So reports are the Steelers hope troy retires?
Of course he will always be a Steeler and no matter what happens he'll be big there forever. PR nightmare though if the staff doesn't want him back (apparently they don't) but he wants to continue on (could be), then goes to play somewhere else while the Steelers struggle to replace him.I don't think I would call it a PR nightmare if they cut him. I think most Steelers fans realize that Troy has become a liability. It will be sad if he pulls a Franco and plays his final season with another team but if he does I wish him the best.I'd guess that would be best for the Steelers. No potential PR nightmare of cutting him.So reports are the Steelers hope troy retires?
He will always be remembered as a Steeler no matter what happens.
THANK YOU BRETT! #99!Keisel released
BigSteelThrill said:THANK YOU BRETT! #99!Keisel released
What an absolute wonderful player and representative of what it is to be a Steeler .
 I am too but it is worse holding on to them too long. This is a lesson I think the Steelers learned the hard way in the early 80s.BigSteelThrill said:THANK YOU BRETT! #99!Keisel released
What an absolute wonderful player and representative of what it is to be a Steeler .![]()
I understand the need to infuse youth and speed but seeing guys like Keisel, Ike, and Troy get released is tough for me. I'm a very sentimental guy by nature.