*** 2006 Chicago Bears Thread *** (1 Viewer)

[Pictus Cat]

Rex just needs to take care of the ball.

 

[boubucarow]

The Seahawks are barely a shell of their NFC championship team. The only way I see them having a fighting chance is if the game is handed to them. Chicago is by far the most talented team in the NFC and the only teams that can play with them when they are at their best reside in the AFC. That isn't the homer talking.

The homer is thinking that despite that a ticket in the Super Bowl should be reserved, Grossman or something else will destroy it all.

But, sink or sail, I will never forget the roller coaster the Bears have been this season and being too young to enjoy 85, this is the most entertaining Bears team I will have ever seen and I will always remember the pure insanity of this season.

 

[MrPack]

All the Bears have to do is run the ball, run the ball and run the ball.

The ONLY way they can lose is if Grossman or Hester start turning the ball over.

It ain't gonna happen.

The only NFC team that can beat the Bears are the Bears themselves.

Dec. 31st-Green Bay 26

Chicago 7

Dec. 24th

Chicago 26

Detroit 21

Duhhhh Bearsssss had to score 9pts in the 4th Qtr to escape with a win.

Dec. 17th

Chicago 34

Tampa Bay 31

Duhhhh Bearsssss had to kick a field goal in OT after giving up 21pts in the 4th Qtr to escape with a win.

Yep, Duhhhh Bearsssss are playing some steallr ball in December and look ready to rip it up.

:(

 

[wilked]

Wow, talk about an overrated team. How many teams have they beaten with a winning record? 2

They played exactly one good team this year - the Pats. Anyone remember how that game turned out?

Luckily the get the Seahawks this week, who are dreadful. Anything less than a 14 point win would be a suprise. Will be interesting to see what happens next week though...

 

[GRIDIRON ASSASSIN]

Wow, talk about an overrated team. How many teams have they beaten with a winning record? 2They played exactly one good team this year - the Pats. Anyone remember how that game turned out?Luckily the get the Seahawks this week, who are dreadful. Anything less than a 14 point win would be a suprise. Will be interesting to see what happens next week though...

They've beaten three playoff teams, so I don't know what you're talking about: Seattle, NY Giants and NY Jets. So I have no idea how they only beat two teams with winning records.And yes.. they played the Patriots - and they lost AT NEW ENGLAND, just as was predicted by odds-makers. Most playoff teams are expected to win at home.The Bears can only play the teams that are on their schedule, which included San Francisco - who they obliterated. How did San Francisco do against Seattle this year?

 

[wilked]

Wow, talk about an overrated team. How many teams have they beaten with a winning record? 2They played exactly one good team this year - the Pats. Anyone remember how that game turned out?Luckily the get the Seahawks this week, who are dreadful. Anything less than a 14 point win would be a suprise. Will be interesting to see what happens next week though...

They've beaten three playoff teams, so I don't know what you're talking about: Seattle, NY Giants and NY Jets. So I have no idea how they only beat two teams with winning records.

I will give you a do-over on this one....

 

[ImTheScientist]

Bears ..... thanks for the free pass to the NFC Championship!

 

[ImTheScientist]

The Bears can only play the teams that are on their schedule, which included San Francisco - who they obliterated. How did San Francisco do against Seattle this year?

The Seahawks can only play the teams that are on their schedule, which included Green Bay - who they obliterated. How did Chicago do against Green Bay?When people try to make an argument like this it is lame!

 

[Hamstring]

The Bear shutout Favre for the first time in his career.

 

[PatytonsGhost]

The Bears can only play the teams that are on their schedule, which included San Francisco - who they obliterated. How did San Francisco do against Seattle this year?

The Seahawks can only play the teams that are on their schedule, which included Green Bay - who they obliterated. How did Chicago do against Green Bay?When people try to make an argument like this it is lame!

34-24 Seattle win over the Packers is not considered obliterating, (check proper use of definition)Chicago beat the Packers 26-0 when it was a meaningful game they lost the last game against the Pack because they had the division and playoffs wrapped up and could care less. Bears beat San Fran 41-10 Seattle Lost Twice to the 49ersHow is this argument lame ?, i think its a good measure of comparing Seattle vs Chicago I hope you were being sarcastic but if you weren't

 

[GRIDIRON ASSASSIN]

The Bears beat three playoff teams this year.

It's indisputable.

 

[Peyton Marino]

Wow, talk about an overrated team. How many teams have they beaten with a winning record? 2They played exactly one good team this year - the Pats. Anyone remember how that game turned out?Luckily the get the Seahawks this week, who are dreadful. Anything less than a 14 point win would be a suprise. Will be interesting to see what happens next week though...

They've beaten three playoff teams, so I don't know what you're talking about: Seattle, NY Giants and NY Jets. So I have no idea how they only beat two teams with winning records.

I will give you a do-over on this one....

 

[Peyton Marino]

The Bears beat three playoff teams this year.It's indisputable.

 

[MrPack]

The Bears beat three playoff teams this year.It's indisputable.

They lost to Green Bay a weak 8-8 teamThey lost to Miami a weak 6-10 teamAnd it took miracle finishes to beat Arizona, Tampa and Detroit.What's your point?One n' done as usual

 

[bullitt]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

 

[Zigg]

The Bears can only play the teams that are on their schedule, which included San Francisco - who they obliterated. How did San Francisco do against Seattle this year?

The Seahawks can only play the teams that are on their schedule, which included Green Bay - who they obliterated. How did Chicago do against Green Bay?When people try to make an argument like this it is lame!

34-24 Seattle win over the Packers is not considered obliterating, (check proper use of definition)Chicago beat the Packers 26-0 when it was a meaningful game they lost the last game against the Pack because they had the division and playoffs wrapped up and could care less. Bears beat San Fran 41-10 Seattle Lost Twice to the 49ersHow is this argument lame ?, i think its a good measure of comparing Seattle vs Chicago I hope you were being sarcastic but if you weren't

No, it's not a good measure when comparing Seattle vs Chicago. Not at all.

 

[wilked]

lmfao...delusional bears fans can't admit they had a very weak, maybe the weakest, schedule in the NFL.

Hey, they are a good team, but they are a tad overrated. Luckily they have a cake walk to the championship game. Thing is, I think that is as far as they go

 

[flapgreen]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

 

[flapgreen]

lmfao...delusional bears fans can't admit they had a very weak, maybe the weakest, schedule in the NFL. Hey, they are a good team, but they are a tad overrated. Luckily they have a cake walk to the championship game. Thing is, I think that is as far as they go

OVERRATED? I don't anyone picking them to go to the Super Bowl and they're the #1 seed. This board and the media has done nothing but criticize them since midseason. If it's one thing the Bears aren't, it's overrated. You lost me with this one, gb.

 

[MrPack]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

NFL Year 1996-97: Playoffs #1 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super Bowl Champ - Green BayChicago? 7-9NfL Year 1997-98: Playoffs #2 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super BowlChicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1998-99: Playoffs #5 Seed - Green Bay, one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1999-00: Green Bay 8-8, Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2000-01: Green Bay 9-7, Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2001-02: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay, Lost in 2nd rd Divisional Playoffs

Chicago? 13-3; Playoffs #2 Seed - One and done

NFL Year 2002-03: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay; one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 2003-04: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay - Lost in 2nd rd

Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2004-05: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay - Lost Wild Card Game

Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2005-06: Green Bay 4-12

Chicago?; Playoffs #2 Seed - One N Done

Yea as usual the Packers are none and done.

That makes 7 playoff appearances in the past 10yrs for Green Bay, one Super Bowl Victory, another Super Bowl Appearance, and 2 more divisional semi final appearances.

And 2 playoff appearances and 2 "one and done's" for Chicago.

Guess who's here?

 

[geoff8695]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

NFL Year 1996-97: Playoffs #1 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super Bowl Champ - Green BayChicago? 7-9NfL Year 1997-98: Playoffs #2 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super BowlChicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1998-99: Playoffs #5 Seed - Green Bay, one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1999-00: Green Bay 8-8, Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2000-01: Green Bay 9-7, Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2001-02: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay, Lost in 2nd rd Divisional Playoffs

Chicago? 13-3; Playoffs #2 Seed - One and done

NFL Year 2002-03: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay; one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 2003-04: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay - Lost in 2nd rd

Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2004-05: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay - Lost Wild Card Game

Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2005-06: Green Bay 4-12

Chicago?; Playoffs #2 Seed - One N Done

Yea as usual the Packers are none and done.

That makes 7 playoff appearances in the past 10yrs for Green Bay, one Super Bowl Victory, another Super Bowl Appearance, and 2 more divisional semi final appearances.

And 2 playoff appearances and 2 "one and done's" for Chicago.

Guess who's here?

The one constant over that successful 10yr. stretch is retiring very soon.

Hmmm. I wonder how successful the green and yellow will be sans Favre...

Well at least you'll always have those years to cherish. You'll need them, because the Bears are going to OWN the Pack and the NFC North for the foreseeable future.

CHEERS

 

[SmoovySmoov]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

NFL Year 1996-97: Playoffs #1 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super Bowl Champ - Green BayChicago? 7-9NfL Year 1997-98: Playoffs #2 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super BowlChicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1998-99: Playoffs #5 Seed - Green Bay, one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1999-00: Green Bay 8-8, Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2000-01: Green Bay 9-7, Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2001-02: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay, Lost in 2nd rd Divisional Playoffs

Chicago? 13-3; Playoffs #2 Seed - One and done

NFL Year 2002-03: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay; one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 2003-04: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay - Lost in 2nd rd

Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2004-05: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay - Lost Wild Card Game

Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2005-06: Green Bay 4-12

Chicago?; Playoffs #2 Seed - One N Done

Yea as usual the Packers are none and done.

That makes 7 playoff appearances in the past 10yrs for Green Bay, one Super Bowl Victory, another Super Bowl Appearance, and 2 more divisional semi final appearances.

And 2 playoff appearances and 2 "one and done's" for Chicago.

Guess who's here?

Pack. Come on buddy. You're slipping here. Very Al Bundyish. "Well, back in my day, the Packers were good." Is that what you're coming with? Seriously?You're a Packers fan, and you hate the Bears. Granted. Understandable. But to throw into a conversation about the Bears, who are in the playoffs while the Packers sit at home wondering if their franchise player is retiring, Green Bay's stats over the past 10 years, like that means anything at all right now, is kinda a little sad. I'm sorry I had to break it to you.

 

[flapgreen]

 

[Limp Ditka]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

NFL Year 1996-97: Playoffs #1 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super Bowl Champ - Green BayChicago? 7-9NfL Year 1997-98: Playoffs #2 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super BowlChicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1998-99: Playoffs #5 Seed - Green Bay, one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1999-00: Green Bay 8-8, Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2000-01: Green Bay 9-7, Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2001-02: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay, Lost in 2nd rd Divisional Playoffs

Chicago? 13-3; Playoffs #2 Seed - One and done

NFL Year 2002-03: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay; one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 2003-04: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay - Lost in 2nd rd

Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2004-05: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay - Lost Wild Card Game

Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2005-06: Green Bay 4-12

Chicago?; Playoffs #2 Seed - One N Done

Yea as usual the Packers are none and done.

That makes 7 playoff appearances in the past 10yrs for Green Bay, one Super Bowl Victory, another Super Bowl Appearance, and 2 more divisional semi final appearances.

And 2 playoff appearances and 2 "one and done's" for Chicago.

Guess who's here?

YesterdayWhen Brett Favre used to play in January

Now we won't know if he'll be back til May

Oh, Mr Pack, lives in yesterday.

Suddenly,

They aren't half the team they used to be

post season goes on without thee

Oh yesteday, came suddenly

Will he

come back, they don't know, he will not say

I say

Mr Pack, lives in yesterday

 

[Doctor Detroit]

I can never get away from Chicago fans (Detroit fan for all sports but football) but I always like the banter.

Good luck today although most of you don't think you need it.

Signed,

29 year Seahawks fan

 

[Doctor Detroit]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

NFL Year 1996-97: Playoffs #1 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super Bowl Champ - Green BayChicago? 7-9NfL Year 1997-98: Playoffs #2 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super BowlChicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1998-99: Playoffs #5 Seed - Green Bay, one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1999-00: Green Bay 8-8, Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2000-01: Green Bay 9-7, Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2001-02: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay, Lost in 2nd rd Divisional Playoffs

Chicago? 13-3; Playoffs #2 Seed - One and done

NFL Year 2002-03: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay; one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 2003-04: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay - Lost in 2nd rd

Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2004-05: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay - Lost Wild Card Game

Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2005-06: Green Bay 4-12

Chicago?; Playoffs #2 Seed - One N Done

Yea as usual the Packers are none and done.

That makes 7 playoff appearances in the past 10yrs for Green Bay, one Super Bowl Victory, another Super Bowl Appearance, and 2 more divisional semi final appearances.

And 2 playoff appearances and 2 "one and done's" for Chicago.

Guess who's here?

YesterdayWhen Brett Favre used to play in January

Now we won't know if he'll be back til May

Oh, Mr Pack, lives in yesterday.

Suddenly,

They aren't half the team they used to be

post season goes on without thee

Oh yesteday, came suddenly

Will he

come back, they don't know, he will not say

I say

Mr Pack, lives in yesterday

 

[el-gato-grande]

There is a reason they call this the second season. Indy was playing like crap leading up the playoffs. But now their defense is playing like a top 10 unit, which heading into the season is what many experts said they needed in order to make the Superbowl.

I have this funny feeling that the Bears have been waiting to redeem themselves for that Carolina game last year. A talented team that underachieved a year ago and couldn't get through the season fast enough to get back to this point. Hmmmm...sounds a little like the Colts doesn't it?

Bears 34 Seahawks 13

 

[GRIDIRON ASSASSIN]

There is a reason they call this the second season. Indy was playing like crap leading up the playoffs. But now their defense is playing like a top 10 unit....

...and now their offense is playing like crap.

 

[Captain Quinoa]

Wow, talk about an overrated team. How many teams have they beaten with a winning record? 2They played exactly one good team this year - the Pats. Anyone remember how that game turned out?Luckily the get the Seahawks this week, who are dreadful. Anything less than a 14 point win would be a suprise. Will be interesting to see what happens next week though...

They've beaten three playoff teams, so I don't know what you're talking about: Seattle, NY Giants and NY Jets. So I have no idea how they only beat two teams with winning records.

I will give you a do-over on this one....

Wait... 8-9 isn't a winning record?

 

[Captain Quinoa]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

NFL Year 1996-97: Playoffs #1 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super Bowl Champ - Green BayChicago? 7-9NfL Year 1997-98: Playoffs #2 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super BowlChicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1998-99: Playoffs #5 Seed - Green Bay, one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1999-00: Green Bay 8-8, Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2000-01: Green Bay 9-7, Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2001-02: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay, Lost in 2nd rd Divisional Playoffs

Chicago? 13-3; Playoffs #2 Seed - One and done

NFL Year 2002-03: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay; one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 2003-04: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay - Lost in 2nd rd

Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2004-05: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay - Lost Wild Card Game

Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2005-06: Green Bay 4-12

Chicago?; Playoffs #2 Seed - One N Done

Yea as usual the Packers are none and done.

That makes 7 playoff appearances in the past 10yrs for Green Bay, one Super Bowl Victory, another Super Bowl Appearance, and 2 more divisional semi final appearances.

And 2 playoff appearances and 2 "one and done's" for Chicago.

Guess who's here?

Pack. Come on buddy. You're slipping here. Very Al Bundyish. "Well, back in my day, the Packers were good." Is that what you're coming with? Seriously?You're a Packers fan, and you hate the Bears. Granted. Understandable. But to throw into a conversation about the Bears, who are in the playoffs while the Packers sit at home wondering if their franchise player is retiring, Green Bay's stats over the past 10 years, like that means anything at all right now, is kinda a little sad. I'm sorry I had to break it to you.

how else is he supposed to show that the "pack is none and done as usual" statement was completely incorrect while the bears "one and done as usual" statement was spot on? Mr Pack's not the one that brought it up, he simply owned the bears chooch who did.and No, i am not a packers or favre fan.

BYE CHITCAGO.

 

[scott72]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

NFL Year 1996-97: Playoffs #1 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super Bowl Champ - Green BayChicago? 7-9NfL Year 1997-98: Playoffs #2 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super BowlChicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1998-99: Playoffs #5 Seed - Green Bay, one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1999-00: Green Bay 8-8, Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2000-01: Green Bay 9-7, Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2001-02: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay, Lost in 2nd rd Divisional Playoffs

Chicago? 13-3; Playoffs #2 Seed - One and done

NFL Year 2002-03: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay; one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 2003-04: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay - Lost in 2nd rd

Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2004-05: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay - Lost Wild Card Game

Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2005-06: Green Bay 4-12

Chicago?; Playoffs #2 Seed - One N Done

Yea as usual the Packers are none and done.

That makes 7 playoff appearances in the past 10yrs for Green Bay, one Super Bowl Victory, another Super Bowl Appearance, and 2 more divisional semi final appearances.

And 2 playoff appearances and 2 "one and done's" for Chicago.

Guess who's here?

Pack. Come on buddy. You're slipping here. Very Al Bundyish. "Well, back in my day, the Packers were good." Is that what you're coming with? Seriously?You're a Packers fan, and you hate the Bears. Granted. Understandable. But to throw into a conversation about the Bears, who are in the playoffs while the Packers sit at home wondering if their franchise player is retiring, Green Bay's stats over the past 10 years, like that means anything at all right now, is kinda a little sad. I'm sorry I had to break it to you.

how else is he supposed to show that the "pack is none and done as usual" statement was completely incorrect while the bears "one and done as usual" statement was spot on? Mr Pack's not the one that brought it up, he simply owned the bears chooch who did.and No, i am not a packers or favre fan.

BYE CHITCAGO.

Bear fans aren't smart enough to realize why someone is responding to their comments the way they are...Its also fairly obvious why Bear fans want to avoid the past at all costs...

 

[Pygmy Marmoset]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

NFL Year 1996-97: Playoffs #1 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super Bowl Champ - Green BayChicago? 7-9NfL Year 1997-98: Playoffs #2 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super BowlChicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1998-99: Playoffs #5 Seed - Green Bay, one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1999-00: Green Bay 8-8, Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2000-01: Green Bay 9-7, Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2001-02: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay, Lost in 2nd rd Divisional Playoffs

Chicago? 13-3; Playoffs #2 Seed - One and done

NFL Year 2002-03: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay; one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 2003-04: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay - Lost in 2nd rd

Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2004-05: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay - Lost Wild Card Game

Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2005-06: Green Bay 4-12

Chicago?; Playoffs #2 Seed - One N Done

Yea as usual the Packers are none and done.

That makes 7 playoff appearances in the past 10yrs for Green Bay, one Super Bowl Victory, another Super Bowl Appearance, and 2 more divisional semi final appearances.

And 2 playoff appearances and 2 "one and done's" for Chicago.

Guess who's here?

Pack. Come on buddy. You're slipping here. Very Al Bundyish. "Well, back in my day, the Packers were good." Is that what you're coming with? Seriously?You're a Packers fan, and you hate the Bears. Granted. Understandable. But to throw into a conversation about the Bears, who are in the playoffs while the Packers sit at home wondering if their franchise player is retiring, Green Bay's stats over the past 10 years, like that means anything at all right now, is kinda a little sad. I'm sorry I had to break it to you.

how else is he supposed to show that the "pack is none and done as usual" statement was completely incorrect while the bears "one and done as usual" statement was spot on? Mr Pack's not the one that brought it up, he simply owned the bears chooch who did.and No, i am not a packers or favre fan.

BYE CHITCAGO.

Bear fans aren't smart enough to realize why someone is responding to their comments the way they are...Its also fairly obvious why Bear fans want to avoid the past at all costs...

Eh. You go far enough back, and there's no reason to avoid it. More NFL championships than any other team - just not in the Super Bowl era.

 

[flapgreen]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

NFL Year 1996-97: Playoffs #1 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super Bowl Champ - Green BayChicago? 7-9NfL Year 1997-98: Playoffs #2 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super BowlChicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1998-99: Playoffs #5 Seed - Green Bay, one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1999-00: Green Bay 8-8, Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2000-01: Green Bay 9-7, Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2001-02: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay, Lost in 2nd rd Divisional Playoffs

Chicago? 13-3; Playoffs #2 Seed - One and done

NFL Year 2002-03: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay; one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 2003-04: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay - Lost in 2nd rd

Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2004-05: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay - Lost Wild Card Game

Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2005-06: Green Bay 4-12

Chicago?; Playoffs #2 Seed - One N Done

Yea as usual the Packers are none and done.

That makes 7 playoff appearances in the past 10yrs for Green Bay, one Super Bowl Victory, another Super Bowl Appearance, and 2 more divisional semi final appearances.

And 2 playoff appearances and 2 "one and done's" for Chicago.

Guess who's here?

Pack. Come on buddy. You're slipping here. Very Al Bundyish. "Well, back in my day, the Packers were good." Is that what you're coming with? Seriously?You're a Packers fan, and you hate the Bears. Granted. Understandable. But to throw into a conversation about the Bears, who are in the playoffs while the Packers sit at home wondering if their franchise player is retiring, Green Bay's stats over the past 10 years, like that means anything at all right now, is kinda a little sad. I'm sorry I had to break it to you.

how else is he supposed to show that the "pack is none and done as usual" statement was completely incorrect while the bears "one and done as usual" statement was spot on? Mr Pack's not the one that brought it up, he simply owned the bears chooch who did.and No, i am not a packers or favre fan.

BYE CHITCAGO.

Bear fans aren't smart enough to realize why someone is responding to their comments the way they are...Its also fairly obvious why Bear fans want to avoid the past at all costs...

Eh. You go far enough back, and there's no reason to avoid it. More NFL championships than any other team - just not in the Super Bowl era.

They only see what they want to see. Some will have blind hatred for the Bears no matter what.

 

[flapgreen]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

NFL Year 1996-97: Playoffs #1 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super Bowl Champ - Green BayChicago? 7-9NfL Year 1997-98: Playoffs #2 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super BowlChicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1998-99: Playoffs #5 Seed - Green Bay, one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1999-00: Green Bay 8-8, Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2000-01: Green Bay 9-7, Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2001-02: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay, Lost in 2nd rd Divisional Playoffs

Chicago? 13-3; Playoffs #2 Seed - One and done

NFL Year 2002-03: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay; one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 2003-04: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay - Lost in 2nd rd

Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2004-05: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay - Lost Wild Card Game

Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2005-06: Green Bay 4-12

Chicago?; Playoffs #2 Seed - One N Done

Yea as usual the Packers are none and done.

That makes 7 playoff appearances in the past 10yrs for Green Bay, one Super Bowl Victory, another Super Bowl Appearance, and 2 more divisional semi final appearances.

And 2 playoff appearances and 2 "one and done's" for Chicago.

Guess who's here?

Pack. Come on buddy. You're slipping here. Very Al Bundyish. "Well, back in my day, the Packers were good." Is that what you're coming with? Seriously?You're a Packers fan, and you hate the Bears. Granted. Understandable. But to throw into a conversation about the Bears, who are in the playoffs while the Packers sit at home wondering if their franchise player is retiring, Green Bay's stats over the past 10 years, like that means anything at all right now, is kinda a little sad. I'm sorry I had to break it to you.

how else is he supposed to show that the "pack is none and done as usual" statement was completely incorrect while the bears "one and done as usual" statement was spot on? Mr Pack's not the one that brought it up, he simply owned the bears chooch who did.and No, i am not a packers or favre fan.

BYE CHITCAGO.

Making your constant Bear hate all the more ridiculous. Pack's hate is understandable. He's a Packer fan. You've done nothing but cut down the Bears this whole season and don't even have a reason behind it. All the while they locked up the #1 seed in the NFC. But you never seemed to let up on how bad they sucked. Whenever the NFL decides the best regular season team in their respective conference isn't the team with the best record, come get me. Until then, come up with something with some substance or kindly dissappear.

 

[GRIDIRON ASSASSIN]

There are currently TWENTY SIX other NFL teams and fan bases that are envious of the Chicago Bears and their loyal fan base.

Eat your hearts out....

We're in the playoffs baby!!!

 

[el-gato-grande]

There is a reason they call this the second season. Indy was playing like crap leading up the playoffs. But now their defense is playing like a top 10 unit....

...and now their offense is playing like crap.

Well, they are running the football well when they have to and playing good defense. If the Bears do the same thing, then we'll be in the Superbowl Grid. There is nothing magical about the formula. It has been a constant over the years.

 

[GRIDIRON ASSASSIN]

There is a reason they call this the second season. Indy was playing like crap leading up the playoffs. But now their defense is playing like a top 10 unit....

...and now their offense is playing like crap.

Well, they are running the football well when they have to and playing good defense. If the Bears do the same thing, then we'll be in the Superbowl Grid. There is nothing magical about the formula. It has been a constant over the years.

Agreed. All passing numbers imho have been lacking in the playoffs.

 

[RBM]

There are currently TWENTY SIX other NFL teams and fan bases that are envious of the Chicago Bears and their loyal fan base.Eat your hearts out....We're in the playoffs baby!!!

 

[Captain Quinoa]

Making your constant Bear hate all the more ridiculous.

why do you (and all other burrs fans) construe any criticism of your team as "hate"?

You've done nothing but cut down the Bears this whole season and don't even have a reason behind it.

the reason i've cut them down all season (actually it started when Arizona exposed them) is because they were clearly not as good of a team as their record indicated. they have no talent on offense and the shakiest QB in the league. in the regular season you can capitalize on the ineptitude of poor teams like Arizona, but come playoff time you can't expect to get bailed out by punt and int returns.

All the while they locked up the #1 seed in the NFC. But you never seemed to let up on how bad they sucked.

actually i didn't say they sucked. i said they were a good team that would not win in the playoffs. once again bears fans turning any criticism into hate. they locked up the #1 seed because the majority of the NFC blows.

Whenever the NFL decides the best regular season team in their respective conference isn't the team with the best record, come get me. Until then, come up with something with some substance or kindly dissappear.

the NFL doesn't decide who the best team is based on record. that's why they have the playoffs... to expose teams like the Bears.

 

[MrPack]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

NFL Year 1996-97: Playoffs #1 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super Bowl Champ - Green BayChicago? 7-9NfL Year 1997-98: Playoffs #2 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super BowlChicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1998-99: Playoffs #5 Seed - Green Bay, one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1999-00: Green Bay 8-8, Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2000-01: Green Bay 9-7, Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2001-02: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay, Lost in 2nd rd Divisional Playoffs

Chicago? 13-3; Playoffs #2 Seed - One and done

NFL Year 2002-03: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay; one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 2003-04: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay - Lost in 2nd rd

Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2004-05: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay - Lost Wild Card Game

Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2005-06: Green Bay 4-12

Chicago?; Playoffs #2 Seed - One N Done

Yea as usual the Packers are none and done.

That makes 7 playoff appearances in the past 10yrs for Green Bay, one Super Bowl Victory, another Super Bowl Appearance, and 2 more divisional semi final appearances.

And 2 playoff appearances and 2 "one and done's" for Chicago.

Guess who's here?

Pack. Come on buddy. You're slipping here. Very Al Bundyish. "Well, back in my day, the Packers were good." Is that what you're coming with? Seriously?You're a Packers fan, and you hate the Bears. Granted. Understandable. But to throw into a conversation about the Bears, who are in the playoffs while the Packers sit at home wondering if their franchise player is retiring, Green Bay's stats over the past 10 years, like that means anything at all right now, is kinda a little sad. I'm sorry I had to break it to you.

how else is he supposed to show that the "pack is none and done as usual" statement was completely incorrect while the bears "one and done as usual" statement was spot on? Mr Pack's not the one that brought it up, he simply owned the bears chooch who did.and No, i am not a packers or favre fan.

BYE CHITCAGO.

Thank you. This is EXACTLY the statement I was responding to.Funny how Bear fans can't even comprehend what they write.

 

[flapgreen]

Making your constant Bear hate all the more ridiculous.

why do you (and all other burrs fans) construe any criticism of your team as "hate"?

You've done nothing but cut down the Bears this whole season and don't even have a reason behind it.

the reason i've cut them down all season (actually it started when Arizona exposed them) is because they were clearly not as good of a team as their record indicated. they have no talent on offense and the shakiest QB in the league. in the regular season you can capitalize on the ineptitude of poor teams like Arizona, but come playoff time you can't expect to get bailed out by punt and int returns.

All the while they locked up the #1 seed in the NFC. But you never seemed to let up on how bad they sucked.

actually i didn't say they sucked. i said they were a good team that would not win in the playoffs. once again bears fans turning any criticism into hate. they locked up the #1 seed because the majority of the NFC blows.

Whenever the NFL decides the best regular season team in their respective conference isn't the team with the best record, come get me. Until then, come up with something with some substance or kindly dissappear.

the NFL doesn't decide who the best team is based on record. that's why they have the playoffs... to expose teams like the Bears.

What does not as a good as their record even mean guy? Not win what in the playoffs? The Super Bowl or one game? That's a general statement and gives you an outlet if they do anything short of win the Super Bowl.

I said the best team in the regular season. What else can they be expected to do during the regular season but have the best record?

Lets just go ahead see how bad they get EXPOSED because they're such an average team.

 

[RBM]

BYE CHITCAGO.

Thank you. This is EXACTLY the statement I was responding to.Funny how Bear fans can't even comprehend what they write.

How bout you go sit and wait for Brett's press conference

 

[MrPack]

BYE CHITCAGO.

Thank you. This is EXACTLY the statement I was responding to.Funny how Bear fans can't even comprehend what they write.

How bout you go sit and wait for Brett's press conference

 

[scott72]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

NFL Year 1996-97: Playoffs #1 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super Bowl Champ - Green BayChicago? 7-9NfL Year 1997-98: Playoffs #2 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super BowlChicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1998-99: Playoffs #5 Seed - Green Bay, one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1999-00: Green Bay 8-8, Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2000-01: Green Bay 9-7, Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2001-02: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay, Lost in 2nd rd Divisional Playoffs

Chicago? 13-3; Playoffs #2 Seed - One and done

NFL Year 2002-03: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay; one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 2003-04: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay - Lost in 2nd rd

Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2004-05: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay - Lost Wild Card Game

Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2005-06: Green Bay 4-12

Chicago?; Playoffs #2 Seed - One N Done

Yea as usual the Packers are none and done.

That makes 7 playoff appearances in the past 10yrs for Green Bay, one Super Bowl Victory, another Super Bowl Appearance, and 2 more divisional semi final appearances.

And 2 playoff appearances and 2 "one and done's" for Chicago.

Guess who's here?

Pack. Come on buddy. You're slipping here. Very Al Bundyish. "Well, back in my day, the Packers were good." Is that what you're coming with? Seriously?You're a Packers fan, and you hate the Bears. Granted. Understandable. But to throw into a conversation about the Bears, who are in the playoffs while the Packers sit at home wondering if their franchise player is retiring, Green Bay's stats over the past 10 years, like that means anything at all right now, is kinda a little sad. I'm sorry I had to break it to you.

how else is he supposed to show that the "pack is none and done as usual" statement was completely incorrect while the bears "one and done as usual" statement was spot on? Mr Pack's not the one that brought it up, he simply owned the bears chooch who did.and No, i am not a packers or favre fan.

BYE CHITCAGO.

Bear fans aren't smart enough to realize why someone is responding to their comments the way they are...Its also fairly obvious why Bear fans want to avoid the past at all costs...

Eh. You go far enough back, and there's no reason to avoid it. More NFL championships than any other team - just not in the Super Bowl era.

They only see what they want to see. Some will have blind hatred for the Bears no matter what.

Show me a Bears fan that doesn't have blind hatred for the Packers?

 

[flapgreen]

One n' done as usual

The Pack were none and done , as usual/

NFL Year 1996-97: Playoffs #1 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super Bowl Champ - Green BayChicago? 7-9NfL Year 1997-98: Playoffs #2 NFC Seed - Green Bay, NFC Champ - Green Bay, Super BowlChicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1998-99: Playoffs #5 Seed - Green Bay, one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 1999-00: Green Bay 8-8, Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2000-01: Green Bay 9-7, Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2001-02: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay, Lost in 2nd rd Divisional Playoffs

Chicago? 13-3; Playoffs #2 Seed - One and done

NFL Year 2002-03: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay; one n done

Chicago? 4-12

NFL Year 2003-04: Playoffs #4 Seed - Green Bay - Lost in 2nd rd

Chicago? 7-9

NFL Year 2004-05: Playoffs #3 Seed - Green Bay - Lost Wild Card Game

Chicago? 5-11

NFL Year 2005-06: Green Bay 4-12

Chicago?; Playoffs #2 Seed - One N Done

Yea as usual the Packers are none and done.

That makes 7 playoff appearances in the past 10yrs for Green Bay, one Super Bowl Victory, another Super Bowl Appearance, and 2 more divisional semi final appearances.

And 2 playoff appearances and 2 "one and done's" for Chicago.

Guess who's here?

Pack. Come on buddy. You're slipping here. Very Al Bundyish. "Well, back in my day, the Packers were good." Is that what you're coming with? Seriously?You're a Packers fan, and you hate the Bears. Granted. Understandable. But to throw into a conversation about the Bears, who are in the playoffs while the Packers sit at home wondering if their franchise player is retiring, Green Bay's stats over the past 10 years, like that means anything at all right now, is kinda a little sad. I'm sorry I had to break it to you.

how else is he supposed to show that the "pack is none and done as usual" statement was completely incorrect while the bears "one and done as usual" statement was spot on? Mr Pack's not the one that brought it up, he simply owned the bears chooch who did.and No, i am not a packers or favre fan.

BYE CHITCAGO.

Bear fans aren't smart enough to realize why someone is responding to their comments the way they are...Its also fairly obvious why Bear fans want to avoid the past at all costs...

Eh. You go far enough back, and there's no reason to avoid it. More NFL championships than any other team - just not in the Super Bowl era.

They only see what they want to see. Some will have blind hatred for the Bears no matter what.

Show me a Bears fan that doesn't have blind hatred for the Packers?

No. Blind hatred from a Packers fan is fine. I totally agree with this.

 

[GRIDIRON ASSASSIN]

Rex is looking alright today...

 

[prosopis]

I really want the Bears to lose today. Whiny fans

 

[Captain Quinoa]

Not win what in the playoffs? The Super Bowl or one game? That's a general statement and gives you an outlet if they do anything short of win the Super Bowl.

no out. I said they would not win a game in the playoffs. there's a lot you can say about this game and this team but a win is a win and i'll leave it at that. commence pile on.

 

[Johnny Ice]

Not win what in the playoffs? The Super Bowl or one game? That's a general statement and gives you an outlet if they do anything short of win the Super Bowl.

no out. I said they would not win a game in the playoffs. there's a lot you can say about this game and this team but a win is a win and i'll leave it at that. commence pile on.

Trust me, I know what you mean.

 

[scott72]

Not win what in the playoffs? The Super Bowl or one game? That's a general statement and gives you an outlet if they do anything short of win the Super Bowl.

no out. I said they would not win a game in the playoffs. there's a lot you can say about this game and this team but a win is a win and i'll leave it at that. commence pile on.

Have fun with these guys New Orleans...