2007 Cleveland Browns Thread (1 Viewer)

[Bracie Smathers]

How about determining your starting QB by a coin flip, then yanking the guy after a quarter and a half? I'd say that's about the worst set of decisions I've seen by a HC in my entire life.

Lets get this on the record for all to see so they can judge the football IQ of Evil Grin.- a QB start decision

- made in worthless preseason game

- concerning two QBs who have identical QB passer ratings

- team has drafted a 1st rd. QB so either would be lame a lame duck till the kid is ready to take over

- coach understands the situation that it doesn't matter who is named starter

- makes a flippant remark

- MORONS on ESPN make a big deal of it

- MORONS like Evil Grin say ITS THE WORST COACHING DECISION THAT HE'S EVER SEEN IN HIS LIFE



Let me guess, your a POS Steeler troll?

Holy cow. OK, so let's review.Crennel determines his starting QB by flipping a coin.

And EVIL GRIN said it was the worst coaching decision that he's EVER seen in his ENTIRE LIFE.Yeah, you want to stand by those words? No.

Instead you want to change the subject. Thought so.

Unless you want to address what you call the worst coaching decision that you've seen your ENTIRE LIFE then consider yourself...

Busted!

Hyperbole down? It was the worst coaching move I've seen in recent memory and I can't think of a worse set of personnel decisions, period. So, yeah, I'll stand by it. And my entire previous post addressed it.#1 - You don't choose your starting QB by coin toss. And if you do, you don't say so. Even if he didn't, saying so made him look like a fool.

#2 - Once you choose a starting QB, stick with him for more than 15 minutes. Not doing so makes you look indecisive and sends a terrible message to the team that the coach has no clue. Justifying it by saying "I wanted the team to know I was doing everything possible to win" is asinine. If Anderson was the guy to beat Pittsburgh (and you yourself made that case earlier) then he should have been starting.

#3 - Trading away your "#1" QB after 1 week to make room for Ken Dorsey also looks absurd. Whether it is or not, it appears as if you've all but given up on the season. This isn't just my opinion, either - this has been the pervading sentiment in the national media. It makes the front office/coaching staff look like they have no idea what they're doing and absolutely deteriorates team morale. Obviously, the front office makes those decisions, but don't tell me Romeo isn't involved.

So, there you go. Not even touching on the awful job he did preparing the team to play, there are three reasons why the QB situation in Cleveland has been mishandled as poorly as anything I've seen. So, go ahead and keep defending it and looking like a clown. Even your fellow Browns fans disagree with you for God's sake.

1. You stand by your statement that a decision on who starts in a worthless preseason game with two lame ducks with identical QB passer ratings when the coach was making fun of morons like YOU who place undue importance on who is named the starter in that situation as one of the worst coaching decisions you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE huh?Begs the question of how old you are kid. If that is the worst coaching decision you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE and you stand by that then you are an idiot and not worth my time. Buh bye.

 

[Bobcat10]

I still have a hard time believing Romeo flipped a coin, but I don't ever think he said he didn't. It's just so stupid.

 

[amnesiac]

i'm just so happy they got rid of Frye, i don't really care how it happened.

 

[AhrnCityPahnder]

How about determining your starting QB by a coin flip, then yanking the guy after a quarter and a half? I'd say that's about the worst set of decisions I've seen by a HC in my entire life.

Lets get this on the record for all to see so they can judge the football IQ of Evil Grin.- a QB start decision

- made in worthless preseason game

- concerning two QBs who have identical QB passer ratings

- team has drafted a 1st rd. QB so either would be lame a lame duck till the kid is ready to take over

- coach understands the situation that it doesn't matter who is named starter

- makes a flippant remark

- MORONS on ESPN make a big deal of it

- MORONS like Evil Grin say ITS THE WORST COACHING DECISION THAT HE'S EVER SEEN IN HIS LIFE



Let me guess, your a POS Steeler troll?

Holy cow. OK, so let's review.Crennel determines his starting QB by flipping a coin.

And EVIL GRIN said it was the worst coaching decision that he's EVER seen in his ENTIRE LIFE.Yeah, you want to stand by those words? No.

Instead you want to change the subject. Thought so.

Unless you want to address what you call the worst coaching decision that you've seen your ENTIRE LIFE then consider yourself...

Busted!

With BGP suspended (banned?) it's good to see someone is picking up the torch of completely irrational homer for the Browns. Well done.

 

[mr blond]

I still have a hard time believing Romeo flipped a coin, but I don't ever think he said he didn't. It's just so stupid.

I hear you. It is so completely absurd that I hope it was just his way of saying that these guys are too neck-to-neck in the QB competition to choose from, and an attempt to keep both guys positive about their standing in the competition. What I'm trying to say is... I hope he didn't actually flip a coin.

 

[3C's]

With BGP suspended (banned?)

What? Is this true? Can't say I didn't see it coming.Oh wait, That's a personal attack. Shame on me.

 

[amnesiac]

With BGP suspended (banned?)

What? Is this true? Can't say I didn't see it coming.Oh wait, That's a personal attack. Shame on me.

we should shut down the shark pool.

 

[nxmehta]

WTAM 1100 AM drive time host Mike Trivisonno had this to say this afternoon (paraphrased):

Mike had said since last year that Romeo Crennel simply is not a head coach. He's a good defensive coordinator but that's it.
Browns GM Phil Savage is also over-promoted - he is not a GM - he is a scout and has not shown any growth since he took over.
Mike heard that Browns owner Randy Lerner was at the game and at some point, got up, left his booth, walked into the Browns locker room and sat there alone and quiet.
Mike said the Browns offered the head coaching job to two people this past offseason, and both turned them down.
If Romeo is fired in mid-season, Mike said that Browns Defensive Coordinator Todd Grantham would be named interim head coach.
Mike said that no expert predicted that Romeo was not the right choice. No expert predicted that Savage was not the right choice. So how can it be Lerner's fault if he hired the guys he was supposed to hire?
Mike said that if Romeo is fired, and Savage is let go, expect Randy Lerner to put the franchise up for sale.

OMFG THE SKY IS FALLING!!!

Seriously, the talk radio folks need to calm the F down and stop reporting every bizarre sob story they hear from guys off the street make up.

 

[Evilgrin 72]

How about determining your starting QB by a coin flip, then yanking the guy after a quarter and a half? I'd say that's about the worst set of decisions I've seen by a HC in my entire life.

Lets get this on the record for all to see so they can judge the football IQ of Evil Grin.- a QB start decision

- made in worthless preseason game

- concerning two QBs who have identical QB passer ratings

- team has drafted a 1st rd. QB so either would be lame a lame duck till the kid is ready to take over

- coach understands the situation that it doesn't matter who is named starter

- makes a flippant remark

- MORONS on ESPN make a big deal of it

- MORONS like Evil Grin say ITS THE WORST COACHING DECISION THAT HE'S EVER SEEN IN HIS LIFE



Let me guess, your a POS Steeler troll?

Holy cow. OK, so let's review.Crennel determines his starting QB by flipping a coin.

And EVIL GRIN said it was the worst coaching decision that he's EVER seen in his ENTIRE LIFE.Yeah, you want to stand by those words? No.

Instead you want to change the subject. Thought so.

Unless you want to address what you call the worst coaching decision that you've seen your ENTIRE LIFE then consider yourself...

Busted!

Hyperbole down? It was the worst coaching move I've seen in recent memory and I can't think of a worse set of personnel decisions, period. So, yeah, I'll stand by it. And my entire previous post addressed it.#1 - You don't choose your starting QB by coin toss. And if you do, you don't say so. Even if he didn't, saying so made him look like a fool.

#2 - Once you choose a starting QB, stick with him for more than 15 minutes. Not doing so makes you look indecisive and sends a terrible message to the team that the coach has no clue. Justifying it by saying "I wanted the team to know I was doing everything possible to win" is asinine. If Anderson was the guy to beat Pittsburgh (and you yourself made that case earlier) then he should have been starting.

#3 - Trading away your "#1" QB after 1 week to make room for Ken Dorsey also looks absurd. Whether it is or not, it appears as if you've all but given up on the season. This isn't just my opinion, either - this has been the pervading sentiment in the national media. It makes the front office/coaching staff look like they have no idea what they're doing and absolutely deteriorates team morale. Obviously, the front office makes those decisions, but don't tell me Romeo isn't involved.

So, there you go. Not even touching on the awful job he did preparing the team to play, there are three reasons why the QB situation in Cleveland has been mishandled as poorly as anything I've seen. So, go ahead and keep defending it and looking like a clown. Even your fellow Browns fans disagree with you for God's sake.

1. You stand by your statement that a decision on who starts in a worthless preseason game with two lame ducks with identical QB passer ratings when the coach was making fun of morons like YOU who place undue importance on who is named the starter in that situation as one of the worst coaching decisions you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE huh?Begs the question of how old you are kid. If that is the worst coaching decision you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE and you stand by that then you are an idiot and not worth my time. Buh bye.

I have a hard time remembering a series of events that were more ridiculous. Flipping a coin to determine your starter, preseason or not, makes you look like a fool. Then you choose Frye to start the Pittsburgh game saying he gives you the best chance to win of all your QBs, only to bench him after a quarter and then trade him away days later.If it's not the worst I've seen, I can't remember a more absurd sequence than this one. Stop clinging to the last desperate vestiges of an argument by focusing on two words and remember what the original point is. You challenged someone to come up with a reason why Crennel is not a good coach. I gave you one. Are you going to defend it or just continue to play the semantics game? Your BS is transparent. Your fellow Browns fans, BGP included, can at least see what the problems are here. You can continue to stick your head in the sand, but that attitude is going to doom the Browns to failure.

Best thing you can do here is be quiet please. Seriously.

 

[Evilgrin 72]

S T E U now gets edited to "be quiet."

 

[wadegarrett]

Already looking forward to this week's tailgate!

 

[kupcho1]

Mike said that no expert predicted that Romeo was not the right choice. No expert predicted that Savage was not the right choice. So how can it be Lerner's fault if he hired the guys he was supposed to hire?

What does this even mean, he hired the guys he was supposed to hire? I don't think conventional wisdom ever one anything. It seems like Lerner was more of a follower than a leader in this regard. I don't think he shoulders most of the blame, but he's not entirely off the hook. These are his hires.

 

[Evilgrin 72]

Already looking forward to this week's tailgate!

Toss one for me, GB - then let's see the Browns go out there and HOUSE Cincinnati !

 

[Bobcat10]

How do we get this thread's title changed since BGP is ? I can't look at it being Steelers week for another day.

 

[ChrisHenrysDD]

I really hope the Browns can turn it around. At least then, on the off chance the Steelers do lose to them, at least we can say we lost to a good team. Put Quinn in for gods sake.

 

[AhrnCityPahnder]

Already looking forward to this week's tailgate!

Toss one for me, GB - then let's see the Browns go out there and HOUSE Cincinnati !

On board with this. Go Browns!

 

[Bracie Smathers]

How about determining your starting QB by a coin flip, then yanking the guy after a quarter and a half? I'd say that's about the worst set of decisions I've seen by a HC in my entire life.

Lets get this on the record for all to see so they can judge the football IQ of Evil Grin.- a QB start decision

- made in worthless preseason game

- concerning two QBs who have identical QB passer ratings

- team has drafted a 1st rd. QB so either would be lame a lame duck till the kid is ready to take over

- coach understands the situation that it doesn't matter who is named starter

- makes a flippant remark

- MORONS on ESPN make a big deal of it

- MORONS like Evil Grin say ITS THE WORST COACHING DECISION THAT HE'S EVER SEEN IN HIS LIFE



Let me guess, your a POS Steeler troll?

Holy cow. OK, so let's review.Crennel determines his starting QB by flipping a coin.

And EVIL GRIN said it was the worst coaching decision that he's EVER seen in his ENTIRE LIFE.Yeah, you want to stand by those words? No.

Instead you want to change the subject. Thought so.

Unless you want to address what you call the worst coaching decision that you've seen your ENTIRE LIFE then consider yourself...

Busted!

Hyperbole down? It was the worst coaching move I've seen in recent memory and I can't think of a worse set of personnel decisions, period. So, yeah, I'll stand by it. And my entire previous post addressed it.#1 - You don't choose your starting QB by coin toss. And if you do, you don't say so. Even if he didn't, saying so made him look like a fool.

#2 - Once you choose a starting QB, stick with him for more than 15 minutes. Not doing so makes you look indecisive and sends a terrible message to the team that the coach has no clue. Justifying it by saying "I wanted the team to know I was doing everything possible to win" is asinine. If Anderson was the guy to beat Pittsburgh (and you yourself made that case earlier) then he should have been starting.

#3 - Trading away your "#1" QB after 1 week to make room for Ken Dorsey also looks absurd. Whether it is or not, it appears as if you've all but given up on the season. This isn't just my opinion, either - this has been the pervading sentiment in the national media. It makes the front office/coaching staff look like they have no idea what they're doing and absolutely deteriorates team morale. Obviously, the front office makes those decisions, but don't tell me Romeo isn't involved.

So, there you go. Not even touching on the awful job he did preparing the team to play, there are three reasons why the QB situation in Cleveland has been mishandled as poorly as anything I've seen. So, go ahead and keep defending it and looking like a clown. Even your fellow Browns fans disagree with you for God's sake.

1. You stand by your statement that a decision on who starts in a worthless preseason game with two lame ducks with identical QB passer ratings when the coach was making fun of morons like YOU who place undue importance on who is named the starter in that situation as one of the worst coaching decisions you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE huh?Begs the question of how old you are kid. If that is the worst coaching decision you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE and you stand by that then you are an idiot and not worth my time. Buh bye.

I have a hard time remembering a series of events that were more ridiculous. Flipping a coin to determine your starter, preseason or not, makes you look like a fool. Then you choose Frye to start the Pittsburgh game saying he gives you the best chance to win of all your QBs, only to bench him after a quarter and then trade him away days later.If it's not the worst I've seen, I can't remember a more absurd sequence than this one. Stop clinging to the last desperate vestiges of an argument by focusing on two words and remember what the original point is. You challenged someone to come up with a reason why Crennel is not a good coach. I gave you one. Are you going to defend it or just continue to play the semantics game? Your BS is transparent. Your fellow Browns fans, BGP included, can at least see what the problems are here. You can continue to stick your head in the sand, but that attitude is going to doom the Browns to failure.

Best thing you can do here is be quiet please. Seriously.

You took facetious words which were used to make fun of fools like you about flipping a coin at face value to the point that you, smirk, actually believed them and went off your meds going melty saying it was the worst coaching decision that you had EVER SEEN IN YOUR ENTIRE LIFE. You then said you stand by your words that it was the worst coaching decision that you had EVER SEEN in your ENTIRE LIFE even after it was pointed out to you that the statement was a joke made at your expense. Your misguided outrage is laughable and so are you. The one bit of evidence that you, smirk, came up with to support that Romeo can't coach is one play where four penalties were called.

That is your evidence?

Cleveland 6 penalties

Pittsburgh 6 penalties

I have no idea why you would care about things happening on another team or why morons go around trolling other boards. But your, smirk, outrage was based off of a shot taken at idiots who were losing their mind and kept pestering the coach about who the starter was. You haven't listened to the PC or the rest of the context of the sound bite that the morons at ESPN went yard on. Your six degrees of separation in making comments on a team whom you dislike and not having a clue about anything so you base your, smirk, knowledge off of sound bites and posters. One play is your evidence that Romeo Crennel can't coach? The words of some fan? Your outrage over a facetious statement?

Yeah, you cetainly know your stuff moron, go troll some other board, apparently you are getting edited and I would guess banning isn't far off.

 

[kupcho1]

How about determining your starting QB by a coin flip, then yanking the guy after a quarter and a half? I'd say that's about the worst set of decisions I've seen by a HC in my entire life.

Lets get this on the record for all to see so they can judge the football IQ of Evil Grin.- a QB start decision

- made in worthless preseason game

- concerning two QBs who have identical QB passer ratings

- team has drafted a 1st rd. QB so either would be lame a lame duck till the kid is ready to take over

- coach understands the situation that it doesn't matter who is named starter

- makes a flippant remark

- MORONS on ESPN make a big deal of it

- MORONS like Evil Grin say ITS THE WORST COACHING DECISION THAT HE'S EVER SEEN IN HIS LIFE



Let me guess, your a POS Steeler troll?

Holy cow. OK, so let's review.Crennel determines his starting QB by flipping a coin.

And EVIL GRIN said it was the worst coaching decision that he's EVER seen in his ENTIRE LIFE.Yeah, you want to stand by those words? No.

Instead you want to change the subject. Thought so.

Unless you want to address what you call the worst coaching decision that you've seen your ENTIRE LIFE then consider yourself...

Busted!

Hyperbole down? It was the worst coaching move I've seen in recent memory and I can't think of a worse set of personnel decisions, period. So, yeah, I'll stand by it. And my entire previous post addressed it.#1 - You don't choose your starting QB by coin toss. And if you do, you don't say so. Even if he didn't, saying so made him look like a fool.

#2 - Once you choose a starting QB, stick with him for more than 15 minutes. Not doing so makes you look indecisive and sends a terrible message to the team that the coach has no clue. Justifying it by saying "I wanted the team to know I was doing everything possible to win" is asinine. If Anderson was the guy to beat Pittsburgh (and you yourself made that case earlier) then he should have been starting.

#3 - Trading away your "#1" QB after 1 week to make room for Ken Dorsey also looks absurd. Whether it is or not, it appears as if you've all but given up on the season. This isn't just my opinion, either - this has been the pervading sentiment in the national media. It makes the front office/coaching staff look like they have no idea what they're doing and absolutely deteriorates team morale. Obviously, the front office makes those decisions, but don't tell me Romeo isn't involved.

So, there you go. Not even touching on the awful job he did preparing the team to play, there are three reasons why the QB situation in Cleveland has been mishandled as poorly as anything I've seen. So, go ahead and keep defending it and looking like a clown. Even your fellow Browns fans disagree with you for God's sake.

1. You stand by your statement that a decision on who starts in a worthless preseason game with two lame ducks with identical QB passer ratings when the coach was making fun of morons like YOU who place undue importance on who is named the starter in that situation as one of the worst coaching decisions you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE huh?Begs the question of how old you are kid. If that is the worst coaching decision you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE and you stand by that then you are an idiot and not worth my time. Buh bye.

I have a hard time remembering a series of events that were more ridiculous. Flipping a coin to determine your starter, preseason or not, makes you look like a fool. Then you choose Frye to start the Pittsburgh game saying he gives you the best chance to win of all your QBs, only to bench him after a quarter and then trade him away days later.If it's not the worst I've seen, I can't remember a more absurd sequence than this one. Stop clinging to the last desperate vestiges of an argument by focusing on two words and remember what the original point is. You challenged someone to come up with a reason why Crennel is not a good coach. I gave you one. Are you going to defend it or just continue to play the semantics game? Your BS is transparent. Your fellow Browns fans, BGP included, can at least see what the problems are here. You can continue to stick your head in the sand, but that attitude is going to doom the Browns to failure.

Best thing you can do here is be quiet please. Seriously.

You took facetious words which were used to make fun of fools like you about flipping a coin at face value to the point that you, smirk, actually believed them and went off your meds going melty saying it was the worst coaching decision that you had EVER SEEN IN YOUR ENTIRE LIFE. You then said you stand by your words that it was the worst coaching decision that you had EVER SEEN in your ENTIRE LIFE even after it was pointed out to you that the statement was a joke made at your expense. Your misguided outrage is laughable and so are you. The one bit of evidence that you, smirk, came up with to support that Romeo can't coach is one play where four penalties were called.

That is your evidence?

Cleveland 6 penalties

Pittsburgh 6 penalties

I have no idea why you would care about things happening on another team or why morons go around trolling other boards. But your, smirk, outrage was based off of a shot taken at idiots who were losing their mind and kept pestering the coach about who the starter was. You haven't listened to the PC or the rest of the context of the sound bite that the morons at ESPN went yard on. Your six degrees of separation in making comments on a team whom you dislike and not having a clue about anything so you base your, smirk, knowledge off of sound bites and posters. One play is your evidence that Romeo Crennel can't coach? The words of some fan? Your outrage over a facetious statement?

Yeah, you cetainly know your stuff moron, go troll some other board, apparently you are getting edited and I would guess banning isn't far off.

smirk, :subscribe: , smirk

 

[ChrisHenrysDD]

While I do think "worst coaching decision ever" is a bit of hyperbole, the Browns certainly weren't prepared for this game at all. I have no idea why you're sticking up for Crennel with such fervor. I think yanking Frye after a quarter and a half is evidence of the lack of preparation. Shouldn't he have figured out that Frye was awful in the 4 pre-season games? Anderson outplayed him by far. Shouldn't Crennel have figured this out before he was getting shellacked 17-0 at home in the season opener?

 

[Fallerjw]

i'm just so happy they got rid of Frye, i don't really care how it happened.

I can't recall a QB who looked more inept. Tuesday was probably the best day for the organization since draft day. Getting anything for Frye was a coup.

 

[Evilgrin 72]

How about determining your starting QB by a coin flip, then yanking the guy after a quarter and a half? I'd say that's about the worst set of decisions I've seen by a HC in my entire life.

Lets get this on the record for all to see so they can judge the football IQ of Evil Grin.- a QB start decision

- made in worthless preseason game

- concerning two QBs who have identical QB passer ratings

- team has drafted a 1st rd. QB so either would be lame a lame duck till the kid is ready to take over

- coach understands the situation that it doesn't matter who is named starter

- makes a flippant remark

- MORONS on ESPN make a big deal of it

- MORONS like Evil Grin say ITS THE WORST COACHING DECISION THAT HE'S EVER SEEN IN HIS LIFE



Let me guess, your a POS Steeler troll?

Holy cow. OK, so let's review.Crennel determines his starting QB by flipping a coin.

And EVIL GRIN said it was the worst coaching decision that he's EVER seen in his ENTIRE LIFE.Yeah, you want to stand by those words? No.

Instead you want to change the subject. Thought so.

Unless you want to address what you call the worst coaching decision that you've seen your ENTIRE LIFE then consider yourself...

Busted!

Hyperbole down? It was the worst coaching move I've seen in recent memory and I can't think of a worse set of personnel decisions, period. So, yeah, I'll stand by it. And my entire previous post addressed it.#1 - You don't choose your starting QB by coin toss. And if you do, you don't say so. Even if he didn't, saying so made him look like a fool.

#2 - Once you choose a starting QB, stick with him for more than 15 minutes. Not doing so makes you look indecisive and sends a terrible message to the team that the coach has no clue. Justifying it by saying "I wanted the team to know I was doing everything possible to win" is asinine. If Anderson was the guy to beat Pittsburgh (and you yourself made that case earlier) then he should have been starting.

#3 - Trading away your "#1" QB after 1 week to make room for Ken Dorsey also looks absurd. Whether it is or not, it appears as if you've all but given up on the season. This isn't just my opinion, either - this has been the pervading sentiment in the national media. It makes the front office/coaching staff look like they have no idea what they're doing and absolutely deteriorates team morale. Obviously, the front office makes those decisions, but don't tell me Romeo isn't involved.

So, there you go. Not even touching on the awful job he did preparing the team to play, there are three reasons why the QB situation in Cleveland has been mishandled as poorly as anything I've seen. So, go ahead and keep defending it and looking like a clown. Even your fellow Browns fans disagree with you for God's sake.

1. You stand by your statement that a decision on who starts in a worthless preseason game with two lame ducks with identical QB passer ratings when the coach was making fun of morons like YOU who place undue importance on who is named the starter in that situation as one of the worst coaching decisions you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE huh?Begs the question of how old you are kid. If that is the worst coaching decision you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE and you stand by that then you are an idiot and not worth my time. Buh bye.

I have a hard time remembering a series of events that were more ridiculous. Flipping a coin to determine your starter, preseason or not, makes you look like a fool. Then you choose Frye to start the Pittsburgh game saying he gives you the best chance to win of all your QBs, only to bench him after a quarter and then trade him away days later.If it's not the worst I've seen, I can't remember a more absurd sequence than this one. Stop clinging to the last desperate vestiges of an argument by focusing on two words and remember what the original point is. You challenged someone to come up with a reason why Crennel is not a good coach. I gave you one. Are you going to defend it or just continue to play the semantics game? Your BS is transparent. Your fellow Browns fans, BGP included, can at least see what the problems are here. You can continue to stick your head in the sand, but that attitude is going to doom the Browns to failure.

Best thing you can do here is be quiet please. Seriously.

You took facetious words which were used to make fun of fools like you about flipping a coin at face value to the point that you, smirk, actually believed them and went off your meds going melty saying it was the worst coaching decision that you had EVER SEEN IN YOUR ENTIRE LIFE. You then said you stand by your words that it was the worst coaching decision that you had EVER SEEN in your ENTIRE LIFE even after it was pointed out to you that the statement was a joke made at your expense. Your misguided outrage is laughable and so are you. The one bit of evidence that you, smirk, came up with to support that Romeo can't coach is one play where four penalties were called.

That is your evidence?

Cleveland 6 penalties

Pittsburgh 6 penalties

I have no idea why you would care about things happening on another team or why morons go around trolling other boards. But your, smirk, outrage was based off of a shot taken at idiots who were losing their mind and kept pestering the coach about who the starter was. You haven't listened to the PC or the rest of the context of the sound bite that the morons at ESPN went yard on. Your six degrees of separation in making comments on a team whom you dislike and not having a clue about anything so you base your, smirk, knowledge off of sound bites and posters. One play is your evidence that Romeo Crennel can't coach? The words of some fan? Your outrage over a facetious statement?

Yeah, you cetainly know your stuff moron, go troll some other board, apparently you are getting edited and I would guess banning isn't far off.

You want to side-bet on who gets banned first?

First of all, give me one shred of proof that his flipping a coin was a facetious remark. It happened. Even if it didn't, he made himself look like a fool with that comment. He wasn't having some private laugh at the expense of everyone who believed it.

Secondly, one bit of evidence that he's a bad coach? What about his 30% career winning percentage? Come on, man.. that basically says it all. How about the fact that the team came out flat from the get-go and were down 17-0 by the end of the first quarter? How about the fact that their game plan was horrible?

How about the fact that the Browns were 31st out of 32 teams in total offense last year? 27th out of 32 in total defense? That they've declined each year of Crennel's tenure in every major statistical category? What more do you want? You keep challenging me to come up with reasons why he's no good and you haven't provided one single reason why he IS good ! You can cry about the QBs he's had to work with all you want, but a coach like Bill Cowher had equally bad (or worse) QBs year in and year out and he won consistently. NEVER had a year as bad as Crennel had last year, not in his whole career. THAT'S a coach. Crennel is only a good coach if you measure not by success or even progress, but on waist measurements.

Also, n00b, if you weren't in the 20,000s in member #, you'd know that there are pre-programmed edits on the board that you typically aren't aware of until you come across one. Learn the ropes before you shoot off at the mouth. Actually, don't bother, because you're not long for this place.

 

[Evilgrin 72]

While I do think "worst coaching decision ever" is a bit of hyperbole, the Browns certainly weren't prepared for this game at all. I have no idea why you're sticking up for Crennel with such fervor. I think yanking Frye after a quarter and a half is evidence of the lack of preparation. Shouldn't he have figured out that Frye was awful in the 4 pre-season games? Anderson outplayed him by far. Shouldn't Crennel have figured this out before he was getting shellacked 17-0 at home in the season opener?

Look at my quote - what I said was "it was about the worst set of coaching decisions I've seen in my life." About the worst and absolute worst are two different things to begin with. Second, it wasn't one thing, it was the entire handling of the QB situation. Gracie has tried to turn this discussion away from "Crennel is not a good coach" and into "this wasn't the single worst coaching move ever" because it's the only defense he has, to change the argument. Last act of a desperate man.

 

[ChrisHenrysDD]

While I do think "worst coaching decision ever" is a bit of hyperbole, the Browns certainly weren't prepared for this game at all. I have no idea why you're sticking up for Crennel with such fervor. I think yanking Frye after a quarter and a half is evidence of the lack of preparation. Shouldn't he have figured out that Frye was awful in the 4 pre-season games? Anderson outplayed him by far. Shouldn't Crennel have figured this out before he was getting shellacked 17-0 at home in the season opener?

Look at my quote - what I said was "it was about the worst set of coaching decisions I've seen in my life." About the worst and absolute worst are two different things to begin with. Second, it wasn't one thing, it was the entire handling of the QB situation. Gracie has tried to turn this discussion away from "Crennel is not a good coach" and into "this wasn't the single worst coaching move ever" because it's the only defense he has, to change the argument. Last act of a desperate man.

Ah, my mistake, I still have no idea why a Browns fan would stick up for Crennel. Personally, I hope he stays forever.

 

[Bobcat10]

While I do think "worst coaching decision ever" is a bit of hyperbole, the Browns certainly weren't prepared for this game at all. I have no idea why you're sticking up for Crennel with such fervor. I think yanking Frye after a quarter and a half is evidence of the lack of preparation. Shouldn't he have figured out that Frye was awful in the 4 pre-season games? Anderson outplayed him by far. Shouldn't Crennel have figured this out before he was getting shellacked 17-0 at home in the season opener?

Look at my quote - what I said was "it was about the worst set of coaching decisions I've seen in my life." About the worst and absolute worst are two different things to begin with. Second, it wasn't one thing, it was the entire handling of the QB situation. Gracie has tried to turn this discussion away from "Crennel is not a good coach" and into "this wasn't the single worst coaching move ever" because it's the only defense he has, to change the argument. Last act of a desperate man.

Ah, my mistake, I still have no idea why a Browns fan would stick up for Crennel still. Personally, I hope he stays forever.

I say the same thing about Lloyd up North.Go Tribe!How's that for changing the subject twice?

 

[Evilgrin 72]

While I do think "worst coaching decision ever" is a bit of hyperbole, the Browns certainly weren't prepared for this game at all. I have no idea why you're sticking up for Crennel with such fervor. I think yanking Frye after a quarter and a half is evidence of the lack of preparation. Shouldn't he have figured out that Frye was awful in the 4 pre-season games? Anderson outplayed him by far. Shouldn't Crennel have figured this out before he was getting shellacked 17-0 at home in the season opener?

Look at my quote - what I said was "it was about the worst set of coaching decisions I've seen in my life." About the worst and absolute worst are two different things to begin with. Second, it wasn't one thing, it was the entire handling of the QB situation. Gracie has tried to turn this discussion away from "Crennel is not a good coach" and into "this wasn't the single worst coaching move ever" because it's the only defense he has, to change the argument. Last act of a desperate man.

Ah, my mistake, I still have no idea why a Browns fan would stick up for Crennel still. Personally, I hope he stays forever.

I say the same thing about Lloyd up North.Go Tribe!How's that for changing the subject twice?

Brilliant !

 

[nxmehta]

This thread is starting to look as disorganized and crappy as the game last Sunday. Settle down people.

I was sticking up for Crennel until last Sunday. I think it was clear that for the last two years he didn't have much talent to work with. I wasn't expecting the Browns to win much this year, but you can't go out and lay an egg like last week with the talent we have now. It was possible to make the argument that it wasn't Crennel and it was just the players for the last two years. However, if the Browns don't bounce back this week (at least play a competitive game!) it will become indisputably obvious that Crennel just can't get his players to win for him.

We're not even looking for wins in Cleveland right now- we're just looking for a team that looks like it belongs in the NFL.

 

[Evilgrin 72]

This thread is starting to look as disorganized and crappy as the game last Sunday. Settle down people.

I was sticking up for Crennel until last Sunday. I think it was clear that for the last two years he didn't have much talent to work with. I wasn't expecting the Browns to win much this year, but you can't go out and lay an egg like last week with the talent we have now. It was possible to make the argument that it wasn't Crennel and it was just the players for the last two years. However, if the Browns don't bounce back this week (at least play a competitive game!) it will become indisputably obvious that Crennel just can't get his players to win for him.

We're not even looking for wins in Cleveland right now- we're just looking for a team that looks like it belongs in the NFL.

 

[Peak]

This thread is starting to look as disorganized and crappy as the game last Sunday. Settle down people.

I was sticking up for Crennel until last Sunday. I think it was clear that for the last two years he didn't have much talent to work with. I wasn't expecting the Browns to win much this year, but you can't go out and lay an egg like last week with the talent we have now. It was possible to make the argument that it wasn't Crennel and it was just the players for the last two years. However, if the Browns don't bounce back this week (at least play a competitive game!) it will become indisputably obvious that Crennel just can't get his players to win for him.

We're not even looking for wins in Cleveland right now- we're just looking for a team that looks like it belongs in the NFL.

I gave Crennel the benefit of the doubt the last two years for the same reasons you gave. But supposedly this team is full of his (and Savage's) boys. The cast-offs are gone and we've trimmed the roster to remove deadweight. (not counting Ted Washington as we think he's still breathing....maybe.... )

But to come out and play that badly last week is a slap in the face to all of us Browns fans, IMO. He had the entire preseason to prepare for this one game. This wasn't a game, it was like watching girl scouts mixing it up with Hell's Angels. They just didn't match up. Sure we made mistakes (dropped punt, penalties, poor QB/Oline play), but I still hold Crennel responsible as he was to have them ready. They weren't ready, for any number of reasons, and for that he should be let go. My only concern is that if they don't bounce back this week, then Crennel looks worse in the team's eye and they may begin to stop following his lead. If that happens, the season is over, IMO.

 

[GamerBoy61]

This thread is starting to look as disorganized and crappy as the game last Sunday. Settle down people.

I was sticking up for Crennel until last Sunday. I think it was clear that for the last two years he didn't have much talent to work with. I wasn't expecting the Browns to win much this year, but you can't go out and lay an egg like last week with the talent we have now. It was possible to make the argument that it wasn't Crennel and it was just the players for the last two years. However, if the Browns don't bounce back this week (at least play a competitive game!) it will become indisputably obvious that Crennel just can't get his players to win for him.

We're not even looking for wins in Cleveland right now- we're just looking for a team that looks like it belongs in the NFL.

I had high hopes for the Browns and thought that Crennel would be at least an okay coach. The way the whole QB fiasco has gone has lead me to believe that Crennel has no clue what is going on.

 

[amnesiac]

While I do think "worst coaching decision ever" is a bit of hyperbole, the Browns certainly weren't prepared for this game at all. I have no idea why you're sticking up for Crennel with such fervor. I think yanking Frye after a quarter and a half is evidence of the lack of preparation. Shouldn't he have figured out that Frye was awful in the 4 pre-season games? Anderson outplayed him by far. Shouldn't Crennel have figured this out before he was getting shellacked 17-0 at home in the season opener?

in Crennel's defense, Anderson looked AWFUL in the preseason. he almost looked like a quarterback a few times on Sunday.

 

[Irish]

How about determining your starting QB by a coin flip, then yanking the guy after a quarter and a half? I'd say that's about the worst set of decisions I've seen by a HC in my entire life.

Lets get this on the record for all to see so they can judge the football IQ of Evil Grin.- a QB start decision

- made in worthless preseason game

- concerning two QBs who have identical QB passer ratings

- team has drafted a 1st rd. QB so either would be lame a lame duck till the kid is ready to take over

- coach understands the situation that it doesn't matter who is named starter

- makes a flippant remark

- MORONS on ESPN make a big deal of it

- MORONS like Evil Grin say ITS THE WORST COACHING DECISION THAT HE'S EVER SEEN IN HIS LIFE



Let me guess, your a POS Steeler troll?

Holy cow. OK, so let's review.Crennel determines his starting QB by flipping a coin.

And EVIL GRIN said it was the worst coaching decision that he's EVER seen in his ENTIRE LIFE.Yeah, you want to stand by those words? No.

Instead you want to change the subject. Thought so.

Unless you want to address what you call the worst coaching decision that you've seen your ENTIRE LIFE then consider yourself...

Busted!

Hyperbole down? It was the worst coaching move I've seen in recent memory and I can't think of a worse set of personnel decisions, period. So, yeah, I'll stand by it. And my entire previous post addressed it.#1 - You don't choose your starting QB by coin toss. And if you do, you don't say so. Even if he didn't, saying so made him look like a fool.

#2 - Once you choose a starting QB, stick with him for more than 15 minutes. Not doing so makes you look indecisive and sends a terrible message to the team that the coach has no clue. Justifying it by saying "I wanted the team to know I was doing everything possible to win" is asinine. If Anderson was the guy to beat Pittsburgh (and you yourself made that case earlier) then he should have been starting.

#3 - Trading away your "#1" QB after 1 week to make room for Ken Dorsey also looks absurd. Whether it is or not, it appears as if you've all but given up on the season. This isn't just my opinion, either - this has been the pervading sentiment in the national media. It makes the front office/coaching staff look like they have no idea what they're doing and absolutely deteriorates team morale. Obviously, the front office makes those decisions, but don't tell me Romeo isn't involved.

So, there you go. Not even touching on the awful job he did preparing the team to play, there are three reasons why the QB situation in Cleveland has been mishandled as poorly as anything I've seen. So, go ahead and keep defending it and looking like a clown. Even your fellow Browns fans disagree with you for God's sake.

1. You stand by your statement that a decision on who starts in a worthless preseason game with two lame ducks with identical QB passer ratings when the coach was making fun of morons like YOU who place undue importance on who is named the starter in that situation as one of the worst coaching decisions you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE huh?Begs the question of how old you are kid. If that is the worst coaching decision you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE and you stand by that then you are an idiot and not worth my time. Buh bye.

I have a hard time remembering a series of events that were more ridiculous. Flipping a coin to determine your starter, preseason or not, makes you look like a fool. Then you choose Frye to start the Pittsburgh game saying he gives you the best chance to win of all your QBs, only to bench him after a quarter and then trade him away days later.If it's not the worst I've seen, I can't remember a more absurd sequence than this one. Stop clinging to the last desperate vestiges of an argument by focusing on two words and remember what the original point is. You challenged someone to come up with a reason why Crennel is not a good coach. I gave you one. Are you going to defend it or just continue to play the semantics game? Your BS is transparent. Your fellow Browns fans, BGP included, can at least see what the problems are here. You can continue to stick your head in the sand, but that attitude is going to doom the Browns to failure.

Best thing you can do here is be quiet please. Seriously.

You took facetious words which were used to make fun of fools like you about flipping a coin at face value to the point that you, smirk, actually believed them and went off your meds going melty saying it was the worst coaching decision that you had EVER SEEN IN YOUR ENTIRE LIFE. You then said you stand by your words that it was the worst coaching decision that you had EVER SEEN in your ENTIRE LIFE even after it was pointed out to you that the statement was a joke made at your expense. Your misguided outrage is laughable and so are you. The one bit of evidence that you, smirk, came up with to support that Romeo can't coach is one play where four penalties were called.

That is your evidence?

Cleveland 6 penalties

Pittsburgh 6 penalties

I have no idea why you would care about things happening on another team or why morons go around trolling other boards. But your, smirk, outrage was based off of a shot taken at idiots who were losing their mind and kept pestering the coach about who the starter was. You haven't listened to the PC or the rest of the context of the sound bite that the morons at ESPN went yard on. Your six degrees of separation in making comments on a team whom you dislike and not having a clue about anything so you base your, smirk, knowledge off of sound bites and posters. One play is your evidence that Romeo Crennel can't coach? The words of some fan? Your outrage over a facetious statement?

Yeah, you cetainly know your stuff moron, go troll some other board, apparently you are getting edited and I would guess banning isn't far off.

You want to side-bet on who gets banned first?

First of all, give me one shred of proof that his flipping a coin was a facetious remark. It happened. Even if it didn't, he made himself look like a fool with that comment. He wasn't having some private laugh at the expense of everyone who believed it.

Secondly, one bit of evidence that he's a bad coach? What about his 30% career winning percentage? Come on, man.. that basically says it all. How about the fact that the team came out flat from the get-go and were down 17-0 by the end of the first quarter? How about the fact that their game plan was horrible?

How about the fact that the Browns were 31st out of 32 teams in total offense last year? 27th out of 32 in total defense? That they've declined each year of Crennel's tenure in every major statistical category? What more do you want? You keep challenging me to come up with reasons why he's no good and you haven't provided one single reason why he IS good ! You can cry about the QBs he's had to work with all you want, but a coach like Bill Cowher had equally bad (or worse) QBs year in and year out and he won consistently. NEVER had a year as bad as Crennel had last year, not in his whole career. THAT'S a coach. Crennel is only a good coach if you measure not by success or even progress, but on waist measurements.

Also, n00b, if you weren't in the 20,000s in member #, you'd know that there are pre-programmed edits on the board that you typically aren't aware of until you come across one. Learn the ropes before you shoot off at the mouth. Actually, don't bother, because you're not long for this place.

Good coaches get the most out of their teams regardless of talent, ala Jeff Fisher.

 

[Bracie Smathers]

How about determining your starting QB by a coin flip, then yanking the guy after a quarter and a half? I'd say that's about the worst set of decisions I've seen by a HC in my entire life.

Lets get this on the record for all to see so they can judge the football IQ of Evil Grin.- a QB start decision

- made in worthless preseason game

- concerning two QBs who have identical QB passer ratings

- team has drafted a 1st rd. QB so either would be lame a lame duck till the kid is ready to take over

- coach understands the situation that it doesn't matter who is named starter

- makes a flippant remark

- MORONS on ESPN make a big deal of it

- MORONS like Evil Grin say ITS THE WORST COACHING DECISION THAT HE'S EVER SEEN IN HIS LIFE



Let me guess, your a POS Steeler troll?

Holy cow. OK, so let's review.Crennel determines his starting QB by flipping a coin.

And EVIL GRIN said it was the worst coaching decision that he's EVER seen in his ENTIRE LIFE.Yeah, you want to stand by those words? No.

Instead you want to change the subject. Thought so.

Unless you want to address what you call the worst coaching decision that you've seen your ENTIRE LIFE then consider yourself...

Busted!

Hyperbole down? It was the worst coaching move I've seen in recent memory and I can't think of a worse set of personnel decisions, period. So, yeah, I'll stand by it. And my entire previous post addressed it.#1 - You don't choose your starting QB by coin toss. And if you do, you don't say so. Even if he didn't, saying so made him look like a fool.

#2 - Once you choose a starting QB, stick with him for more than 15 minutes. Not doing so makes you look indecisive and sends a terrible message to the team that the coach has no clue. Justifying it by saying "I wanted the team to know I was doing everything possible to win" is asinine. If Anderson was the guy to beat Pittsburgh (and you yourself made that case earlier) then he should have been starting.

#3 - Trading away your "#1" QB after 1 week to make room for Ken Dorsey also looks absurd. Whether it is or not, it appears as if you've all but given up on the season. This isn't just my opinion, either - this has been the pervading sentiment in the national media. It makes the front office/coaching staff look like they have no idea what they're doing and absolutely deteriorates team morale. Obviously, the front office makes those decisions, but don't tell me Romeo isn't involved.

So, there you go. Not even touching on the awful job he did preparing the team to play, there are three reasons why the QB situation in Cleveland has been mishandled as poorly as anything I've seen. So, go ahead and keep defending it and looking like a clown. Even your fellow Browns fans disagree with you for God's sake.

1. You stand by your statement that a decision on who starts in a worthless preseason game with two lame ducks with identical QB passer ratings when the coach was making fun of morons like YOU who place undue importance on who is named the starter in that situation as one of the worst coaching decisions you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE huh?Begs the question of how old you are kid. If that is the worst coaching decision you've ever seen in your ENTIRE LIFE and you stand by that then you are an idiot and not worth my time. Buh bye.

I have a hard time remembering a series of events that were more ridiculous. Flipping a coin to determine your starter, preseason or not, makes you look like a fool. Then you choose Frye to start the Pittsburgh game saying he gives you the best chance to win of all your QBs, only to bench him after a quarter and then trade him away days later.If it's not the worst I've seen, I can't remember a more absurd sequence than this one. Stop clinging to the last desperate vestiges of an argument by focusing on two words and remember what the original point is. You challenged someone to come up with a reason why Crennel is not a good coach. I gave you one. Are you going to defend it or just continue to play the semantics game? Your BS is transparent. Your fellow Browns fans, BGP included, can at least see what the problems are here. You can continue to stick your head in the sand, but that attitude is going to doom the Browns to failure.

Best thing you can do here is be quiet please. Seriously.

You took facetious words which were used to make fun of fools like you about flipping a coin at face value to the point that you, smirk, actually believed them and went off your meds going melty saying it was the worst coaching decision that you had EVER SEEN IN YOUR ENTIRE LIFE. You then said you stand by your words that it was the worst coaching decision that you had EVER SEEN in your ENTIRE LIFE even after it was pointed out to you that the statement was a joke made at your expense. Your misguided outrage is laughable and so are you. The one bit of evidence that you, smirk, came up with to support that Romeo can't coach is one play where four penalties were called.

That is your evidence?

Cleveland 6 penalties

Pittsburgh 6 penalties

I have no idea why you would care about things happening on another team or why morons go around trolling other boards. But your, smirk, outrage was based off of a shot taken at idiots who were losing their mind and kept pestering the coach about who the starter was. You haven't listened to the PC or the rest of the context of the sound bite that the morons at ESPN went yard on. Your six degrees of separation in making comments on a team whom you dislike and not having a clue about anything so you base your, smirk, knowledge off of sound bites and posters. One play is your evidence that Romeo Crennel can't coach? The words of some fan? Your outrage over a facetious statement?

Yeah, you cetainly know your stuff moron, go troll some other board, apparently you are getting edited and I would guess banning isn't far off.

You want to side-bet on who gets banned first?

First of all, give me one shred of proof that his flipping a coin was a facetious remark. It happened. Even if it didn't, he made himself look like a fool with that comment. He wasn't having some private laugh at the expense of everyone who believed it.

Secondly, one bit of evidence that he's a bad coach? What about his 30% career winning percentage? Come on, man.. that basically says it all. How about the fact that the team came out flat from the get-go and were down 17-0 by the end of the first quarter? How about the fact that their game plan was horrible?

How about the fact that the Browns were 31st out of 32 teams in total offense last year? 27th out of 32 in total defense? That they've declined each year of Crennel's tenure in every major statistical category? What more do you want? You keep challenging me to come up with reasons why he's no good and you haven't provided one single reason why he IS good ! You can cry about the QBs he's had to work with all you want, but a coach like Bill Cowher had equally bad (or worse) QBs year in and year out and he won consistently. NEVER had a year as bad as Crennel had last year, not in his whole career. THAT'S a coach. Crennel is only a good coach if you measure not by success or even progress, but on waist measurements.

Also, n00b, if you weren't in the 20,000s in member #, you'd know that there are pre-programmed edits on the board that you typically aren't aware of until you come across one. Learn the ropes before you shoot off at the mouth. Actually, don't bother, because you're not long for this place.

<_< Good coaches get the most out of their teams regardless of talent, ala Jeff Fisher.

 

[duaneok66]

I am glad your team won Bracie . . .

 

[wadegarrett]

Wow. What a 180 that was. Great game to be at.

 

[schaef2k]

Wow. What a 180 that was. Great game to be at.

Indeed, that stadium was rockin

 

[Godsbrother]

Didn't see any of the game except for the score but it must have been a great game to watch.

Congrats Browns fans and thanks to the Browns for knocking off the Bengals!

 

[mr blond]

Chad Johnson jumping into Dawg Pound

 

[amnesiac]

Chad Johnson jumping into Dawg Pound

damn, i was hoping it was going to be a picture with all the birds in it.Cleveland: Keeping it Classy!

 

[amnesiac]

soooo... what do you think the Brownies will look like this week against the Radiers?

could they actually be 2-1, and have a (gasp!) winning record??

 

[Bobcat10]

Chad Johnson jumping into Dawg Pound

damn, i was hoping it was going to be a picture with all the birds in it.Cleveland: Keeping it Classy!

When they showed the replay, you saw a guy to the left nail CJ with about a half a beer. I'm sure that wasn't the only one. Then he was on the sidelines getting towell dryed by coaches/equipment dudes.

 

[amnesiac]

Chad Johnson jumping into Dawg Pound

damn, i was hoping it was going to be a picture with all the birds in it.Cleveland: Keeping it Classy!

When they showed the replay, you saw a guy to the left nail CJ with about a half a beer. I'm sure that wasn't the only one. Then he was on the sidelines getting towell dryed by coaches/equipment dudes.

yeah, you could see him trying to get the beer out of his eyes.

they cut the replay short a little bit though...

 

[Fallerjw]

Chad Johnson jumping into Dawg Pound

damn, i was hoping it was going to be a picture with all the birds in it.Cleveland: Keeping it Classy!

When they showed the replay, you saw a guy to the left nail CJ with about a half a beer. I'm sure that wasn't the only one. Then he was on the sidelines getting towell dryed by coaches/equipment dudes.

yeah, you could see him trying to get the beer out of his eyes.

they cut the replay short a little bit though...

Pretty funny seeing the beer being dumped on him. At least he didn't complain about it.

 

[chris1969]

Chad Johnson jumping into Dawg Pound

damn, i was hoping it was going to be a picture with all the birds in it.Cleveland: Keeping it Classy!

When they showed the replay, you saw a guy to the left nail CJ with about a half a beer. I'm sure that wasn't the only one. Then he was on the sidelines getting towell dryed by coaches/equipment dudes.

yeah, you could see him trying to get the beer out of his eyes.

they cut the replay short a little bit though...

Pretty funny seeing the beer being dumped on him. At least he didn't complain about it.

The funny part was the guys trying to pull him up into the stands and he is already fighting to get back down. He knew if they got him all the way into the pound, he wasn't getting out easily.

 

[Irish]

Chad Johnson jumping into Dawg Pound

damn, i was hoping it was going to be a picture with all the birds in it.Cleveland: Keeping it Classy!

When they showed the replay, you saw a guy to the left nail CJ with about a half a beer. I'm sure that wasn't the only one. Then he was on the sidelines getting towell dryed by coaches/equipment dudes.

yeah, you could see him trying to get the beer out of his eyes.

they cut the replay short a little bit though...

Pretty funny seeing the beer being dumped on him. At least he didn't complain about it.

The funny part was the guys trying to pull him up into the stands and he is already fighting to get back down. He knew if they got him all the way into the pound, he wasn't getting out easily.

Dog Pound sure has gotten soft over the years.

 

[chris1969]

The owner has cracked down on fan mischief the last 2 years, that was actually pretty tame. The guys didn't want to loose their psl's.

 

[Bobcat10]

The owner has cracked down on fan mischief the last 2 years, that was actually pretty tame. The guys didn't want to loose their psl's.

Yeah, the old Pound was great. I was frightened sometimes as a kid. Lots of swearing, fighting, pot, etc. Good stuff.Now we have a family section. And if you curse anywhere in the stadium you could get booted. Callers yesterday said some of the CJ beer throwers got tossed. Didn't see the Monday PD or anything else about it.

 

[wadegarrett]

The owner has cracked down on fan mischief the last 2 years, that was actually pretty tame. The guys didn't want to loose their psl's.

Yeah, the old Pound was great. I was frightened sometimes as a kid. Lots of swearing, fighting, pot, etc. Good stuff.Now we have a family section.

And if you curse anywhere in the stadium you could get booted.

Callers yesterday said some of the CJ beer throwers got tossed. Didn't see the Monday PD or anything else about it.

Which is total . Anyone who jumps in the stands should be fair game for anything.ETA: BGP...change the thread title already man.

 

[Bobcat10]

The owner has cracked down on fan mischief the last 2 years, that was actually pretty tame. The guys didn't want to loose their psl's.

Yeah, the old Pound was great. I was frightened sometimes as a kid. Lots of swearing, fighting, pot, etc. Good stuff.Now we have a family section.

And if you curse anywhere in the stadium you could get booted.

Callers yesterday said some of the CJ beer throwers got tossed. Didn't see the Monday PD or anything else about it.

Which is total . Anyone who jumps in the stands should be fair game for anything.ETA: BGP...change the thread title already man.

Are you saying it's BS they got tossed (I would agree) or the callers were BSing about people getting tossed?

 

[Fallerjw]

The owner has cracked down on fan mischief the last 2 years, that was actually pretty tame. The guys didn't want to loose their psl's.

Yeah, the old Pound was great. I was frightened sometimes as a kid. Lots of swearing, fighting, pot, etc. Good stuff.Now we have a family section.

And if you curse anywhere in the stadium you could get booted.

Callers yesterday said some of the CJ beer throwers got tossed. Didn't see the Monday PD or anything else about it.

Which is total . Anyone who jumps in the stands should be fair game for anything.ETA: BGP...change the thread title already man.

CJ should know what goes on in there. I just don't get why you'd want to jump into the crowd at an opposing team's stadium?

 

[wadegarrett]

The owner has cracked down on fan mischief the last 2 years, that was actually pretty tame. The guys didn't want to loose their psl's.

Yeah, the old Pound was great. I was frightened sometimes as a kid. Lots of swearing, fighting, pot, etc. Good stuff.Now we have a family section. :X

And if you curse anywhere in the stadium you could get booted.

Callers yesterday said some of the CJ beer throwers got tossed. Didn't see the Monday PD or anything else about it.

Which is total . Anyone who jumps in the stands should be fair game for anything.ETA: BGP...change the thread title already man.

Are you saying it's BS they got tossed (I would agree) or the callers were BSing about people getting tossed?

BS they got tossed