What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2010 Offseason Dynasty Trades (1 Viewer)

idp only league

Saints gave up:

Maualuga, Rey CIN LB

Reed, Edward BAL S

Year 2011 Round 1 Draft Pick from Saints (2010 pick is #1.1)

Year 2011 Round 3 Draft Pick from Saints

49ers gave up:

Year 2010 Round 1.09 Draft Pick from 49ers

Year 2010 Round 2.09 Draft Pick from 49ers

Year 2010 Round 4.09 Draft Pick from 49ers

 
PPR dynasty start RB (1-3), WR (2-4)

Team A gave MSW, Jacoby Jones

Team B gave Jamaal Charles

Team A was loaded at WR (AJ, Calvin, Roddy)

Team B was loaded at RB (Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, Pierre Thomas)

 
PPR dynasty start RB (1-3), WR (2-4)Team A gave MSW, Jacoby JonesTeam B gave Jamaal CharlesTeam A was loaded at WR (AJ, Calvin, Roddy)Team B was loaded at RB (Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, Pierre Thomas)
This trade should be vetoed, and i dont ever say that.
I assume you think the team getting Charles is getting the better end of the deal? I'm not that high on Charles so the trade is fair to me.
 
PPR dynasty start RB (1-3), WR (2-4)Team A gave MSW, Jacoby JonesTeam B gave Jamaal CharlesTeam A was loaded at WR (AJ, Calvin, Roddy)Team B was loaded at RB (Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, Pierre Thomas)
This trade should be vetoed, and i dont ever say that.
I assume you think the team getting Charles is getting the better end of the deal? I'm not that high on Charles so the trade is fair to me.
Wether you like Charles or not, he should fetch way more than a couple of bye week fillers.
 
PPR dynasty start RB (1-3), WR (2-4)Team A gave MSW, Jacoby JonesTeam B gave Jamaal CharlesTeam A was loaded at WR (AJ, Calvin, Roddy)Team B was loaded at RB (Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, Pierre Thomas)
This trade should be vetoed, and i dont ever say that.
I assume you think the team getting Charles is getting the better end of the deal? I'm not that high on Charles so the trade is fair to me.
Wether you like Charles or not, he should fetch way more than a couple of bye week fillers.
Assuming you are correct, why's that a reason to veto the trade?
 
PPR dynasty start RB (1-3), WR (2-4)Team A gave MSW, Jacoby JonesTeam B gave Jamaal CharlesTeam A was loaded at WR (AJ, Calvin, Roddy)Team B was loaded at RB (Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, Pierre Thomas)
This trade should be vetoed, and i dont ever say that.
I assume you think the team getting Charles is getting the better end of the deal? I'm not that high on Charles so the trade is fair to me.
Wether you like Charles or not, he should fetch way more than a couple of bye week fillers.
Assuming you are correct, why's that a reason to veto the trade?
Alright, its not really vetoable, unless the league allows trades to be vetoed for reasons other than collusion.
 
Well, I think it's a very subjective issue. If you think Charles, after one very good half-season with no competition in the backfield (and not much anywhere else on the field for that matter), is going to continue to put up those kind of numbers, or anything close, with Thomas Jones stealing carries and TD's. And whether or not you see Mike Sims-Walker as a bye week fill-in, or a potential WR1 or even a solid WR2. You're getting two 25 yr old WR's with some upside for possibly the 3rd or 4th best FF RB on your roster. I'm in this league and I don't think it's that bad. And the fact is, you just don't even know yet.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Alright, its not really vetoable, unless the league allows trades to be vetoed for reasons other than collusion.
Since when is MSW a bye week filler? Most have him as a top 20 dynasty WR as The WR1 in Jacksonville.
 
I preface this deal by saying that Team A finshed 2nd in the league in points last year and Team B finished 1st in the league in points last year, however neither team won the league.

Team A traded: Jonathan Stewart and Steve Smith(Giants)

Team B traded: Pierre Thomas and Reggie Wayne

I'm thinking Team A wins in the short term, but if/when Stewart gets more work, then team B will win the deal.

 
Well, I think it's a very subjective issue. If you think Charles, after one very good half-season with no competition in the backfield (and not much anywhere else on the field for that matter), is going to continue to put up those kind of numbers, or anything close, with Thomas Jones stealing carries and TD's. And whether or not you see Mike Sims-Walker as a bye week fill-in, or a potential WR1 or even a solid WR2. You're getting two 25 yr old WR's with some upside for possibly the 3rd or 4th best FF RB on your roster. I'm in this league and I don't think it's that bad. And the fact is, you just don't even know yet.
I don't think it's that bad of a trade. As a JC owner, do I do this trade, really doubt it as I think I can get a bit more value out of him.
Team A gives: Kevin KolbTeam B gives: Stephen Gostkowski2 kicker league, FG's over 50 yards are worth 6 points.
Is Herman the commish of this league?
:mellow: ------------12 team ppr QB, 2RB, 2WR, TE, K, RB/WR/TE flexTraded: Maclin + 2.03Got: Boldin + 3.02.
 
I made a couple of deals last night...

Trade #1

Gave: 1.13 and 2.04

Got: Forte

Trade #2

Gave: C. Benson, 4.04, 2011 2nd

Got: F. Jackson, L. Robinson & Chester Taylor

 
Well, I think it's a very subjective issue. If you think Charles, after one very good half-season with no competition in the backfield (and not much anywhere else on the field for that matter), is going to continue to put up those kind of numbers, or anything close, with Thomas Jones stealing carries and TD's. And whether or not you see Mike Sims-Walker as a bye week fill-in, or a potential WR1 or even a solid WR2. You're getting two 25 yr old WR's with some upside for possibly the 3rd or 4th best FF RB on your roster. I'm in this league and I don't think it's that bad. And the fact is, you just don't even know yet.
I don't think it's that bad of a trade. As a JC owner, do I do this trade, really doubt it as I think I can get a bit more value out of him.
As a MSW owner, I wouldn't take Charles straight up for him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As a MSW owner, I wouldn't take Charles straight up for him.

Why wouldn't you take Charles for MSW? Unless you are loaded at RB (and even if you are) I think Charles clearly has more value.

 
I don't think Charles will ever have the same role he had the last half of the season. That was just because they didn't really have any other options.

I can see someone wanting to roll with MSW instead.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think Charles will ever have the same role he had the last half of the season. That was just because they didn't really have any other options.I can see someone wanting to roll with MSW instead.
What are you basing this on? Opinion only? Haley came out and said he screwed up in thinking Charles couldn't carry a load. Take a gander back at the last few games and see the 25 carry games scattered in there. If you watched the games, his talent was undeniable and it was a crime he wasn't on the field sooner. Thomas Jones won't keep him off the field. Steal goal line carries, maybe, but Charles is the future that this team will build around.
 
I don't think Charles will ever have the same role he had the last half of the season. That was just because they didn't really have any other options.I can see someone wanting to roll with MSW instead.
What are you basing this on? Opinion only? Haley came out and said he screwed up in thinking Charles couldn't carry a load. Take a gander back at the last few games and see the 25 carry games scattered in there. If you watched the games, his talent was undeniable and it was a crime he wasn't on the field sooner. Thomas Jones won't keep him off the field. Steal goal line carries, maybe, but Charles is the future that this team will build around.
I agree.. and at the very least, if I wasn't sold on Charles, I'd at the very least trade for value, then turn around and shop Charles..
 
I don't think Charles will ever have the same role he had the last half of the season. That was just because they didn't really have any other options.I can see someone wanting to roll with MSW instead.
What are you basing this on? Opinion only? Haley came out and said he screwed up in thinking Charles couldn't carry a load. Take a gander back at the last few games and see the 25 carry games scattered in there. If you watched the games, his talent was undeniable and it was a crime he wasn't on the field sooner. Thomas Jones won't keep him off the field. Steal goal line carries, maybe, but Charles is the future that this team will build around.
I just get the feeling they don't want to build around a smaller back, despite what they might have said. I think Jones will get more work than some think. Yeah, some opinion and some reading between the lines maybe.
 
I tend to agree that TJ will get more touches than most expect. He is not the "scat back" type like Charles, but with the limited OL in KC, he could excel with the little openings they can achieve.

Coach Speak is to support the in house player. New players brought in are to "support" the team and help get them to the next level.... TJ has next level ability.

I don't care what the pundits say... TJ will eat >40% of the touches in KC. It will be based on talent and performance, not coach speak.

 
It will be based on talent and performance, not coach speak.
Agreed. And Thomas Jones has had a run of games like Charles did behind a bad O-line exactly when? Seems to me in AZ and CHI he was pretty average. Only behind a top line as a compiler did he put up great numbers.
 
It will be based on talent and performance, not coach speak.
Agreed. And Thomas Jones has had a run of games like Charles did behind a bad O-line exactly when? Seems to me in AZ and CHI he was pretty average. Only behind a top line as a compiler did he put up great numbers.
The Jets have not had a "top line" for TJ's entire time there. Also anyone who has watched his career can tell you that Jones became a better runner himself and reinvented his style.I agree that Charles is over-hyped and will be the bigger part of what should be a RBBC in KC. I also think MSW is under-rated, but when you put those two facts together, Charles should buy you a good bit more than MSW.
 
12 team PPR, start 1 RB, 2 WR, 2 flex

Team A gets: Kenny Britt + Slaton + Arian Foster

Team B gets: Michael Turner + Snelling + Nate Washington + Zach Miller OAK TE + 2.01

 
Last edited by a moderator:
16 team keep 12 league.

Gave Jason Campbell.

Got 3rd round veteran pick in 2011*

*2012 if there is a work stoppage.

 
Team A Gets: Peyton Manning, Larry Fitzgerald, 2.02 rookieTeam B Gets: Kevin Kolb, Brandon Jacobs, Dwayne Bowe, 1.10 rookie
No reach-around for Team B?
Thats what I was wondering.... Just joined a new league and that was the first trade completed since I have been in. Not sure what to think about that really.
Umm...usually when people sell off studs, they get nice value. I'm not sure Fitz isn't worth more than Jacobs, Bowe, 1.10 and Kolb by himself.Ouch!
 
It will be based on talent and performance, not coach speak.
Agreed. And Thomas Jones has had a run of games like Charles did behind a bad O-line exactly when? Seems to me in AZ and CHI he was pretty average. Only behind a top line as a compiler did he put up great numbers.
The Jets have not had a "top line" for TJ's entire time there. Also anyone who has watched his career can tell you that Jones became a better runner himself and reinvented his style.I agree that Charles is over-hyped and will be the bigger part of what should be a RBBC in KC. I also think MSW is under-rated, but when you put those two facts together, Charles should buy you a good bit more than MSW.
I agree that Charles should be able to buy you more than MSW, but that doesn't mean I'd give Sky-Walker for him. I don't always follow general perception of value and will "overpay" for guys I like. MSW is one of those guys. I'm not down on Charles, and I liked his splash reel coming out of college but just though he would need a couple years of NFL conditioning and to stay away from the track team. He's done that, and is on his way to being a good NFL RB, but I think MSW is more valuable to my teams as I find it easy to get bye week RBs and I play only PPR.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top