What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***2011 Chicago Bears Regular Season Thread*** (1 Viewer)

I thought the Bears looked terrible on offense this past weekend. Martz only called 2 runs in the entire 2nd half and Cutler absorbed 5 sacks in the 4th quarter. Roy down, Bennett went down, and suddenly Cutler had Knox and Hester plus the rookie, not much to work with IMO. Are Bears fans optimistic about this week's match up? The OL losing Carimi can't be a good thing either.

 
I was at the game. People can say the Bears need to run the ball more, and that might be true, however, when your entire offense is either handing off to or throwing the ball to Matt Forte, that's the problem. People can blame Cutler or the offensive line if they want to, but the Bears wide receivers are probably the worst in the NFL and they did NOTHING to improve it. The one guy they did have that had the potential to be a consistent receiver, they let him go to Carolina.The Bears need to come into the 21st Century. It's a passing league. Look at the last several champions. Primarily passing teams.
I think you are right. The most successful offensive teams are very versatile. If you look at New England, they don't have elite WR talent, although Welker could be considered that. Instead they went out and drafted Gronk and Hernandez. Now they run lots of two TE sets that allow them to run with two TEs, and Woodhead in the backfield. They can split out both TEs and Woodhead to run empty backfield or leave the TEs on the line to have a power running formation. They can do all that while running hurry up. You look at New Orleans, they have lots of dynamic players with Sproles and Graham in addition to Colston, Lance Moore, Henderson, and Meacham. Indy has Wayne, Collie, and Garcon, in addition to Dallas Clark. As if Green Bay didn't have enough weapons with Jennings, Driver, Jordy Nelson, James Jones and Finley. Now they go get Randall Cobb. They all seem to believe that you can't have enough playmakers. The Bears, on the other hand, have Forte, and although both Knox and Hester could be called dynamic, they are also inconsistent. While most teams are looking for playmakers at TE, Gronk, Finley, Hernandez, Keller, Gates, Gresham, and all of these athletic TEs, the Bears are going after blockers. Olsen was dynamic, but they had no use for him. I think it is a passing league, and you have to have dynamic players to take advantage of that. The Bears need to catch up.
These two posts nail it right on the head. This is why several of us have been on a tear about GM Jerry and the front of the house organization. They just ignore the gaps and issues with this team and this is why I call them the Chicago Cubs of the NFL. They sell tradition and they give you what they want. They give you enough to keep you engaged and if they manage to back into the playoffs- well that is just a little icing on the cake. They sell out and they have amped up sales of all things Chicago Bears- hats, sweaters, coolers, T-shirts etc etc. They make their money and they give you stale bread and circus. They cannot even put a decent field in place.Every now and then they hit on a few talents, Hester, Briggs, Urlacher, Forte and Cutler but overall they are a very average team stuck in the 70s style of football- win with defense and get off the bus running. They play it conservative and they are cheap and they are very unwise in how they "try" to build a modern NFL team. They will just throw it in your face that they have gone to a SB and hosted the NFCC in the past several years but they really are just a phony NFL organization. GB and Detroit are going to show us a few things this year. It sure was a long painful road for the Lions but they look to have the pieces in place to win for many years and GB will be a consistent winner with their bevy of receivers and an MVP caliber QB. It is interesting that you make mention of the 2 TE system that NE now uses. I thought the Bears turned the corner with Olsen and figured (incorrectly) that they were going to get out there and get another stud pass catching TE. What we were sold was a bill of goods that the offense needed a blocking TE. We saw that result yesterday and now the Bears have two playmakers on offense- Cutler and Forte and Cutler will never get anything done running for his life and the Bears want to hold steady on giving Forte the money he deserves. Consider that Forte puts up these type of numbers with the bottom of the NFL OL.In looking at a team like the Patriots, their strength is the OL and the DL. That OL is just amazing and it gives Brady the time to carve up elite defenses. This OL has been a solid foundation for NE across a decade now and here they are just reaping the benefits. They take players like Welker, Woodhead, Gronkowski, Hernandez, Branch and Brady- plug them into a system with an elite OL and they win and win and win.
 
I thought the Bears looked terrible on offense this past weekend. Martz only called 2 runs in the entire 2nd half and Cutler absorbed 5 sacks in the 4th quarter. Roy down, Bennett went down, and suddenly Cutler had Knox and Hester plus the rookie, not much to work with IMO. Are Bears fans optimistic about this week's match up? The OL losing Carimi can't be a good thing either.
Not really. The one thing I did find interesting was that in Lovie's presser today when asked about the lack of balance in the offensive play calling, he simply said "That will be corrected this week." - but then declined follow up questions. I have a feeling Mr. Martz is about to get "The Speech"...again. Like at the bye week last season.

All that said, the Bears defense and special teams are good enough to keep them in games. The offense, when balanced, can be good. They also play much better on grass (when they're not playing in a blizzard) - so we'll see. :shrug:

 
Sounds like 4 weeks at least for Gabe
Yep, another 1st rounder bites the dust. Well, we have good backups, future Hall of Famer Edwin Williams. We'll be fine. :(
Who did you want them to get?Sidney Rice-missed 2 weeks and is still injuredWillie Colon? Done for the seasonRobert Gallery? Missed week 1, now missing 4-6 weeksAt some point you have to accept who is on the Bears roster and be a FAN, not a HATER.
 
I thought the Bears looked terrible on offense this past weekend. Martz only called 2 runs in the entire 2nd half and Cutler absorbed 5 sacks in the 4th quarter. Roy down, Bennett went down, and suddenly Cutler had Knox and Hester plus the rookie, not much to work with IMO. Are Bears fans optimistic about this week's match up? The OL losing Carimi can't be a good thing either.
The season is under way so I say go Bears. I know that I am not a fan of the front of the house but it is the Packers. Anything can happen in the NFL and the Bears have played Rodgers well. It is rather early in the week but the team might be getting a few players back. It looks like Gabe will be OK but he is a month out. One thing is for certain, at week 3 of the season- this is a game that will determine the fate of the team for 2011 IMHO. A win brings them back and a loss here will bring out the pitchforks and burning torches if they lose like they did to the Saints.
 
Sounds like 4 weeks at least for Gabe
Yep, another 1st rounder bites the dust. Well, we have good backups, future Hall of Famer Edwin Williams. We'll be fine. :(
Who did you want them to get?Sidney Rice-missed 2 weeks and is still injuredWillie Colon? Done for the seasonRobert Gallery? Missed week 1, now missing 4-6 weeksAt some point you have to accept who is on the Bears roster and be a FAN, not a HATER.
I tend to overreact to the Bears. In my confidence pool I seldom put more than a few points one way or another on or against the Bears. When they win I think too highly of them, when they lose I am too down on them. But I think that what happened this week changed my expectations for the season. I see exactly the same problems they had last year. They did well last year, but they had no injuries, their schedule was softer. I think both the Packers and the Lions are better than they were last year. I will be pulling for the Bears, but I don't see the playoffs this year. They can't make the receivers better, and they can't teach Chris Williams or Webb to be better. They are who they are and we are stuck with them. But this is a good place to air your frustrations. It is a good place to vent.
 
Sounds like 4 weeks at least for Gabe
Yep, another 1st rounder bites the dust. Well, we have good backups, future Hall of Famer Edwin Williams. We'll be fine. :(
Who did you want them to get?Sidney Rice-missed 2 weeks and is still injuredWillie Colon? Done for the seasonRobert Gallery? Missed week 1, now missing 4-6 weeksAt some point you have to accept who is on the Bears roster and be a FAN, not a HATER.
Are really making the argument that players got injured on the teams that they went to, so they would've been injured with us too? Gotta be kidding me. Since you're trying to poke holes in everything I say, shouldn't you be aware of all of the FA's we missed out on, not Rice and Gallery? If you look back through this thread instead of making a million excuses for the problems on offense, you will see who I said we could've picked up. The trouble is a couple of you guys haven't kept up with the thread enough to know of any player mentioned, just blindly agreeing with management and telling me how all I do is whine. Our QB is going to continue getting killed and odds are he will be knocked out for a few games at this rate, at minimum. I'm sorry you can't see that. What will the excuses be then? We picked up everyone we could on OL? There were too many injuries? That doesn't fly in the NFL. Ask the Pack how injuries affected them last year. If that happened to the Bears, they wouldn't win five games. Step into reality. The window is closing on Urlacher and Briggs, and the bane of their existence has been the offense for all of these years. Two of the best linebackers in the league deserve more, but it's not happening. At this point, I'm sure Cutler regrets the day he ever signed with the Bears and believed all of their lies about them surrounding him with the weapons to succeed. Tell me who they have picked up since he's been here. One offensive lineman worth a damn in the draft. Nothing else worth crap, and they just traded away his most reliable receiver in Olsen for a freaking 3rd round pick. Now, he has no one to bail him out. Now, blow up this argument too. I know this team and the problems they have. Most others do too. As great as this defense is, if the offense continues at this rate, the defense doesn't stand a chance. If Lovie doesn't force Martz to start running the ball, Jay will get knocked out for the season again. All you have to do is look at Jay on the sidelines and in the post-game interview. He's sick and tired of it too, and I guarantee he doesn't want to hear about excuses why he's getting crushed. This is the last time I'm discussing this on here. We will have to agree to disagree on these points.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
While I agree that there are a lot of posters in this thread that are overly pessimistic I tend to agree with much of the thought process from the previous posts. IMHO the Bears were the luckiest team in football last year and everything seemed to go their way. Jerry Angelo needs to go! The Bears have no depth on the offensive side of the ball and the organization has only drafted and developed one star on the offensive side of the ball since he has been got here (Forte). He has neglected the offensive line and the ones that he has chosen have been pretty bad. He has had a few hits on the defensive side of the ball and got bailed out by the acquisition of Peppers. Yes it was a great signing but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that Peppers is a stud and will make everyone around him better.

 
Let's face it, there Bears are never going to truly be a great team until they get new ownership. Unfortunately, the McCaskeys run the Bears as a business (as is their right to) but it is their only source of income. Unlike other owners, Virginia did not come from other successful business money and thus has never had other sources of income besides the Bears. As long as the Bears will continue to be profitable, nothing major will ever change. And the Bears likely always will be profitable because the city is passionate about football and the team is good enough to sprinkle a division title or a playoff run in there every couple years.

So blame the GM, coaches, players, whoever, but the problem starts at the top. Until the culture of being average is no longer acceptable, the Bears will continue to be an average team.

 
Just a random thought. Bears fans who think Cutler is bad or not a franchise QB - do all of us a huge favor and watch a tivo'd version of Eli Manning from tonight - especially the first half. I actually used to think Eli was good. And he beat the almost undefeated Patriots. Relax - Jay is better than that...now if we can only get him and o-line and some WRs...

 
While I agree that there are a lot of posters in this thread that are overly pessimistic I tend to agree with much of the thought process from the previous posts. IMHO the Bears were the luckiest team in football last year and everything seemed to go their way. Jerry Angelo needs to go! The Bears have no depth on the offensive side of the ball and the organization has only drafted and developed one star on the offensive side of the ball since he has been got here (Forte). He has neglected the offensive line and the ones that he has chosen have been pretty bad. He has had a few hits on the defensive side of the ball and got bailed out by the acquisition of Peppers. Yes it was a great signing but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that Peppers is a stud and will make everyone around him better.
I can deal with being pessimistic if I'm saying what's true.
 
Just a random thought. Bears fans who think Cutler is bad or not a franchise QB - do all of us a huge favor and watch a tivo'd version of Eli Manning from tonight - especially the first half. I actually used to think Eli was good. And he beat the almost undefeated Patriots. Relax - Jay is better than that...now if we can only get him and o-line and some WRs...
I don't think many think Jay is the problem at this point. Most just feel sorry for the guy. Jay is the man. He could have an lustrous career if given any help around here. Right, now he has Forte and a bunch of scrubs that wouldn't start on any other team.
 
Just a random thought. Bears fans who think Cutler is bad or not a franchise QB - do all of us a huge favor and watch a tivo'd version of Eli Manning from tonight - especially the first half. I actually used to think Eli was good. And he beat the almost undefeated Patriots. Relax - Jay is better than that...now if we can only get him and o-line and some WRs...
I don't think many think Jay is the problem at this point. Most just feel sorry for the guy. Jay is the man. He could have an lustrous career if given any help around here. Right, now he has Forte and a bunch of scrubs that wouldn't start on any other team.
Jay isn't so much of the problem as he is just not the answer. For 2 firsts, a third and a starting QB my standards are higher than 'average qb'.
 
Just a random thought. Bears fans who think Cutler is bad or not a franchise QB - do all of us a huge favor and watch a tivo'd version of Eli Manning from tonight - especially the first half. I actually used to think Eli was good. And he beat the almost undefeated Patriots. Relax - Jay is better than that...now if we can only get him and o-line and some WRs...
I don't think many think Jay is the problem at this point. Most just feel sorry for the guy. Jay is the man. He could have an lustrous career if given any help around here. Right, now he has Forte and a bunch of scrubs that wouldn't start on any other team.
Jay isn't so much of the problem as he is just not the answer. For 2 firsts, a third and a starting QB my standards are higher than 'average qb'.
Seriously?First off, don't hold it against Cutler that JA is an idiot and overpayed for him. Secondly, I would not call him an "average" QB - generally speaking, average QBs don't go to Pro Bowls in their 3rd season in the NFL (see, that was back when he played behind an NFL offensive line and had actual NFL WRs)
 
'flapgreen said:
'benson_will_lead_the_way said:
'flapgreen said:
'RBM said:
Sounds like 4 weeks at least for Gabe
Yep, another 1st rounder bites the dust. Well, we have good backups, future Hall of Famer Edwin Williams. We'll be fine. :(
Who did you want them to get?Sidney Rice-missed 2 weeks and is still injuredWillie Colon? Done for the seasonRobert Gallery? Missed week 1, now missing 4-6 weeksAt some point you have to accept who is on the Bears roster and be a FAN, not a HATER.
Are really making the argument that players got injured on the teams that they went to, so they would've been injured with us too? Gotta be kidding me. Since you're trying to poke holes in everything I say, shouldn't you be aware of all of the FA's we missed out on, not Rice and Gallery? If you look back through this thread instead of making a million excuses for the problems on offense, you will see who I said we could've picked up. The trouble is a couple of you guys haven't kept up with the thread enough to know of any player mentioned, just blindly agreeing with management and telling me how all I do is whine. Our QB is going to continue getting killed and odds are he will be knocked out for a few games at this rate, at minimum. I'm sorry you can't see that. What will the excuses be then? We picked up everyone we could on OL? There were too many injuries? That doesn't fly in the NFL. Ask the Pack how injuries affected them last year. If that happened to the Bears, they wouldn't win five games. Step into reality. The window is closing on Urlacher and Briggs, and the bane of their existence has been the offense for all of these years. Two of the best linebackers in the league deserve more, but it's not happening. At this point, I'm sure Cutler regrets the day he ever signed with the Bears and believed all of their lies about them surrounding him with the weapons to succeed. Tell me who they have picked up since he's been here. One offensive lineman worth a damn in the draft. Nothing else worth crap, and they just traded away his most reliable receiver in Olsen for a freaking 3rd round pick. Now, he has no one to bail him out. Now, blow up this argument too. I know this team and the problems they have. Most others do too. As great as this defense is, if the offense continues at this rate, the defense doesn't stand a chance. If Lovie doesn't force Martz to start running the ball, Jay will get knocked out for the season again. All you have to do is look at Jay on the sidelines and in the post-game interview. He's sick and tired of it too, and I guarantee he doesn't want to hear about excuses why he's getting crushed. This is the last time I'm discussing this on here. We will have to agree to disagree on these points.
Literally too lazy to read another of your run ons in a huge paragraph
 
'tenaka said:
'flapgreen said:
'DoubleG said:
Just a random thought. Bears fans who think Cutler is bad or not a franchise QB - do all of us a huge favor and watch a tivo'd version of Eli Manning from tonight - especially the first half. I actually used to think Eli was good. And he beat the almost undefeated Patriots. Relax - Jay is better than that...now if we can only get him and o-line and some WRs...
I don't think many think Jay is the problem at this point. Most just feel sorry for the guy. Jay is the man. He could have an lustrous career if given any help around here. Right, now he has Forte and a bunch of scrubs that wouldn't start on any other team.
Jay isn't so much of the problem as he is just not the answer. For 2 firsts, a third and a starting QB my standards are higher than 'average qb'.
IMO you couldn't be more wrong, Jay Cutler is a very good QB and has the skillset to be elite. We both could be wrong, but IMO we haven't seen his potential yet. Maybe the best way to find out what a QB has is to have him learn a new offensive scheme his first two years with the team, surround him with mediocre WR talent, and field an O-line that gets him hit like a pinata every season while ignoring the running game. I'm guessing it's not.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
On a side note, would you guys please stop quoting benson_will_lead_the_way so I don't have to read his drivel? Better yet, stop replying and maybe he'll just go away.

 
As much as we need to run the ball, we need to throw on 3 step drops as well. Slants, outs, seams, screens, whips, unders, hitches.

On a side, I don't think it could be a better time to play GB.

GB defense is without Nick Collins, but later in the year they should be move adjusted to his absence. Tramon Williams is still injured and if back this week, may not be at full strength(pressing/tackling because it's a shoulder).

GB Defense ranks 30th in the NFL in yards allowed, tied for 24th in PPG.

Because of all that, the passing game may be really good this week.

 
As much as we need to run the ball, we need to throw on 3 step drops as well. Slants, outs, seams, screens, whips, unders, hitches.
Sorry Stats, but I gotta do this. I actually agree with this 100%. 7 step drops when you have bad tackles (i.e. after Carimi left the lineup) is magnifying the weakness. Not only does the QB need more time, but the DE's speed rush the two slow tackles right to the spot where he is dropping to. Basically (as happened several timesin the 4th quarter) as soon as Cutler gets to the top of his drop 1 if not both DEs are there to meet him. At least if you 3 step once in a while, the tackles can just protect against the inside rush and let the DEs try to go wide.Incidentally, DEs getting faster and faster is part of the reason many offenses use the 3 step to begin with. Martz is kinda fighting against the evolution of the game as it is - doing it with weak tackles and not mixing in enough run is a "recipe for disssssasterrrr."
 
As much as we need to run the ball, we need to throw on 3 step drops as well. Slants, outs, seams, screens, whips, unders, hitches.
Sorry Stats, but I gotta do this. I actually agree with this 100%. 7 step drops when you have bad tackles (i.e. after Carimi left the lineup) is magnifying the weakness. Not only does the QB need more time, but the DE's speed rush the two slow tackles right to the spot where he is dropping to. Basically (as happened several timesin the 4th quarter) as soon as Cutler gets to the top of his drop 1 if not both DEs are there to meet him. At least if you 3 step once in a while, the tackles can just protect against the inside rush and let the DEs try to go wide.Incidentally, DEs getting faster and faster is part of the reason many offenses use the 3 step to begin with. Martz is kinda fighting against the evolution of the game as it is - doing it with weak tackles and not mixing in enough run is a "recipe for disssssasterrrr."
The other part that doesn't make sense is Tice likes bigger OL. Bigger OL would be better in shorter drops vs deep drops. The other thing bigger OL help out in is the RUN game, they should get more push.Now i'm a QB guy(only position i've coached for 6 years) so getting deep drops is okay, as long as the QB has a spot to step up into. But in Chicago that's an issue as well.
 
'flapgreen said:
'benson_will_lead_the_way said:
'flapgreen said:
'RBM said:
Sounds like 4 weeks at least for Gabe
Yep, another 1st rounder bites the dust. Well, we have good backups, future Hall of Famer Edwin Williams. We'll be fine. :(
Who did you want them to get?Sidney Rice-missed 2 weeks and is still injuredWillie Colon? Done for the seasonRobert Gallery? Missed week 1, now missing 4-6 weeksAt some point you have to accept who is on the Bears roster and be a FAN, not a HATER.
Are really making the argument that players got injured on the teams that they went to, so they would've been injured with us too? Gotta be kidding me. Since you're trying to poke holes in everything I say, shouldn't you be aware of all of the FA's we missed out on, not Rice and Gallery? If you look back through this thread instead of making a million excuses for the problems on offense, you will see who I said we could've picked up. The trouble is a couple of you guys haven't kept up with the thread enough to know of any player mentioned, just blindly agreeing with management and telling me how all I do is whine. Our QB is going to continue getting killed and odds are he will be knocked out for a few games at this rate, at minimum. I'm sorry you can't see that. What will the excuses be then? We picked up everyone we could on OL? There were too many injuries? That doesn't fly in the NFL. Ask the Pack how injuries affected them last year. If that happened to the Bears, they wouldn't win five games. Step into reality. The window is closing on Urlacher and Briggs, and the bane of their existence has been the offense for all of these years. Two of the best linebackers in the league deserve more, but it's not happening. At this point, I'm sure Cutler regrets the day he ever signed with the Bears and believed all of their lies about them surrounding him with the weapons to succeed. Tell me who they have picked up since he's been here. One offensive lineman worth a damn in the draft. Nothing else worth crap, and they just traded away his most reliable receiver in Olsen for a freaking 3rd round pick. Now, he has no one to bail him out. Now, blow up this argument too. I know this team and the problems they have. Most others do too. As great as this defense is, if the offense continues at this rate, the defense doesn't stand a chance. If Lovie doesn't force Martz to start running the ball, Jay will get knocked out for the season again. All you have to do is look at Jay on the sidelines and in the post-game interview. He's sick and tired of it too, and I guarantee he doesn't want to hear about excuses why he's getting crushed. This is the last time I'm discussing this on here. We will have to agree to disagree on these points.
Literally too lazy to read another of your run ons in a huge paragraph
Pretty much what I expected.
 
'tenaka said:
'flapgreen said:
'DoubleG said:
Just a random thought. Bears fans who think Cutler is bad or not a franchise QB - do all of us a huge favor and watch a tivo'd version of Eli Manning from tonight - especially the first half. I actually used to think Eli was good. And he beat the almost undefeated Patriots. Relax - Jay is better than that...now if we can only get him and o-line and some WRs...
I don't think many think Jay is the problem at this point. Most just feel sorry for the guy. Jay is the man. He could have an lustrous career if given any help around here. Right, now he has Forte and a bunch of scrubs that wouldn't start on any other team.
Jay isn't so much of the problem as he is just not the answer. For 2 firsts, a third and a starting QB my standards are higher than 'average qb'.
IMO you couldn't be more wrong, Jay Cutler is a very good QB and has the skillset to be elite. We both could be wrong, but IMO we haven't seen his potential yet. Maybe the best way to find out what a QB has is to have him learn a new offensive scheme his first two years with the team, surround him with mediocre WR talent, and field an O-line that gets him hit like a pinata every season while ignoring the running game. I'm guessing it's not.
Imo, average QBs play to the level of the talent around them. Great QBs elevate it. Cutler hasn't elevated anyone, unless these guys would get cut from a high school team. I fully admit that Jay Cutler would do very well in a skills competition or the punt/pass/kick contest. Those things don't win NFL games though. I see him routinely getting hit by unblocked defenders. Its his job to recognize the blitz at the line and call out the protection. A lot of the time he doesn't read the defense well, and this on top of his questionable decisionmaking in general.To DoubleG - Orton also would have gone to the pro bowl had he not gotten injured with that same Denver offense (minus stud Brandon Marshall). So I'm not really impressed with Jay's lone pro bowl appearance. It more proves that a great line and receivers is going to make anyone look good at least temporarily.
 
'tenaka said:
'flapgreen said:
'DoubleG said:
Just a random thought. Bears fans who think Cutler is bad or not a franchise QB - do all of us a huge favor and watch a tivo'd version of Eli Manning from tonight - especially the first half. I actually used to think Eli was good. And he beat the almost undefeated Patriots. Relax - Jay is better than that...now if we can only get him and o-line and some WRs...
I don't think many think Jay is the problem at this point. Most just feel sorry for the guy. Jay is the man. He could have an lustrous career if given any help around here. Right, now he has Forte and a bunch of scrubs that wouldn't start on any other team.
Jay isn't so much of the problem as he is just not the answer. For 2 firsts, a third and a starting QB my standards are higher than 'average qb'.
IMO you couldn't be more wrong, Jay Cutler is a very good QB and has the skillset to be elite. We both could be wrong, but IMO we haven't seen his potential yet. Maybe the best way to find out what a QB has is to have him learn a new offensive scheme his first two years with the team, surround him with mediocre WR talent, and field an O-line that gets him hit like a pinata every season while ignoring the running game. I'm guessing it's not.
Imo, average QBs play to the level of the talent around them. Great QBs elevate it. Cutler hasn't elevated anyone, unless these guys would get cut from a high school team. I fully admit that Jay Cutler would do very well in a skills competition or the punt/pass/kick contest. Those things don't win NFL games though. I see him routinely getting hit by unblocked defenders. Its his job to recognize the blitz at the line and call out the protection. A lot of the time he doesn't read the defense well, and this on top of his questionable decisionmaking in general.To DoubleG - Orton also would have gone to the pro bowl had he not gotten injured with that same Denver offense (minus stud Brandon Marshall). So I'm not really impressed with Jay's lone pro bowl appearance. It more proves that a great line and receivers is going to make anyone look good at least temporarily.
IMO you don't know anything about a Martz run offense - especially one that can't block. Martz went back to his playcalling from last year that nearly got Cutler killed against the Saints. He wants the QB to stand in there and absorb hits because he has them oftentimes take huge drops to allow for a receiver to get open. Cutler made great reads against the Falcons and took what the defense gave him. He got killed against the Saints because the Bears O line couldn't block anyone. He does take some unnecessary hits every now and then but I think most of the hits he takes are not because he doesn't recognize the blitz. I also think you underestimate the garbage that the Bears have at wide receiver. The 3rd and 4th WRs on the Packers are better than the Bears. Many of Cutler's interceptions last year were squarely on the receiver not being in the right place. The Hester experiment is a joke! He does not have the instincts to ever be a top receiver.Cutler still needs to develop but he can be a much better QB than he has shown so far. I don't know if he is a top tiered QB and doubt he will ever be mistaken for Brady, Rodgers, Manning, Brees, or Rivers but I think he should be in that next tier of QBs (6-10) which isn't bad.
 
'tenaka said:
'flapgreen said:
'DoubleG said:
Just a random thought. Bears fans who think Cutler is bad or not a franchise QB - do all of us a huge favor and watch a tivo'd version of Eli Manning from tonight - especially the first half. I actually used to think Eli was good. And he beat the almost undefeated Patriots. Relax - Jay is better than that...now if we can only get him and o-line and some WRs...
I don't think many think Jay is the problem at this point. Most just feel sorry for the guy. Jay is the man. He could have an lustrous career if given any help around here. Right, now he has Forte and a bunch of scrubs that wouldn't start on any other team.
Jay isn't so much of the problem as he is just not the answer. For 2 firsts, a third and a starting QB my standards are higher than 'average qb'.
IMO you couldn't be more wrong, Jay Cutler is a very good QB and has the skillset to be elite. We both could be wrong, but IMO we haven't seen his potential yet. Maybe the best way to find out what a QB has is to have him learn a new offensive scheme his first two years with the team, surround him with mediocre WR talent, and field an O-line that gets him hit like a pinata every season while ignoring the running game. I'm guessing it's not.
Imo, average QBs play to the level of the talent around them. Great QBs elevate it. Cutler hasn't elevated anyone, unless these guys would get cut from a high school team. I fully admit that Jay Cutler would do very well in a skills competition or the punt/pass/kick contest. Those things don't win NFL games though. I see him routinely getting hit by unblocked defenders. Its his job to recognize the blitz at the line and call out the protection. A lot of the time he doesn't read the defense well, and this on top of his questionable decisionmaking in general.To DoubleG - Orton also would have gone to the pro bowl had he not gotten injured with that same Denver offense (minus stud Brandon Marshall). So I'm not really impressed with Jay's lone pro bowl appearance. It more proves that a great line and receivers is going to make anyone look good at least temporarily.
IMO you don't know anything about a Martz run offense - especially one that can't block. Martz went back to his playcalling from last year that nearly got Cutler killed against the Saints. He wants the QB to stand in there and absorb hits because he has them oftentimes take huge drops to allow for a receiver to get open. Cutler made great reads against the Falcons and took what the defense gave him. He got killed against the Saints because the Bears O line couldn't block anyone. He does take some unnecessary hits every now and then but I think most of the hits he takes are not because he doesn't recognize the blitz. I also think you underestimate the garbage that the Bears have at wide receiver. The 3rd and 4th WRs on the Packers are better than the Bears. Many of Cutler's interceptions last year were squarely on the receiver not being in the right place. The Hester experiment is a joke! He does not have the instincts to ever be a top receiver.Cutler still needs to develop but he can be a much better QB than he has shown so far. I don't know if he is a top tiered QB and doubt he will ever be mistaken for Brady, Rodgers, Manning, Brees, or Rivers but I think he should be in that next tier of QBs (6-10) which isn't bad.
This problem is that he will never have the chance to develop in an offense like this one. Unless something changes drastically, he will be no more than an average QB. If they actually surround him with some decent talent, I think he could be top 10 at least, maybe even higher. There's no way to know, though. :shrug:
 
This problem is that he will never have the chance to develop in an offense like this one. Unless something changes drastically, he will be no more than an average QB. If they actually surround him with some decent talent, I think he could be top 10 at least, maybe even higher. There's no way to know, though. :shrug:
If we're talking about FF numbers, in 2008 when he played with the Broncos, Cutler finished as QB3 (Brees was first and Cutler was 2 fantasy points behind Aaron Rodgers in my league - which is fairly standard scoring) - ahead of guys like Rivers, Manning (both), Warner, Favre, Romo, etc.But I am sure he is "just average". :unsure:

 
This problem is that he will never have the chance to develop in an offense like this one. Unless something changes drastically, he will be no more than an average QB. If they actually surround him with some decent talent, I think he could be top 10 at least, maybe even higher. There's no way to know, though. :shrug:
If we're talking about FF numbers, in 2008 when he played with the Broncos, Cutler finished as QB3 (Brees was first and Cutler was 2 fantasy points behind Aaron Rodgers in my league - which is fairly standard scoring) - ahead of guys like Rivers, Manning (both), Warner, Favre, Romo, etc.But I am sure he is "just average". :unsure:
Also, Cutler was sacked 11 times in the entire 2008, the same amount of times he has been sacked in the first 2 weeks of this season, but he's been just as much to blame as the OL and WR's over the last 2 seasons. Sure. :unsure:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In college it was the programs fault he couldn't win. In Denver it was the defenses fault. Then it was McDaniels' fault he wanted to leave. Then it was Turner's fault he was bad. And the receivers fault. And the line's fault. And Lovie's fault. And the mcCaskey's fault. And now Martz's fault. Let me know what decade we have to get to before anything is ever Cutler's own fault.

And please, someone explain to me how a 6th year QB (6th year starter, not someone who sat on the bench forever) is still waiting to develop...

 
In college it was the programs fault he couldn't win. In Denver it was the defenses fault. Then it was McDaniels' fault he wanted to leave. Then it was Turner's fault he was bad. And the receivers fault. And the line's fault. And Lovie's fault. And the mcCaskey's fault. And now Martz's fault. Let me know what decade we have to get to before anything is ever Cutler's own fault.

And please, someone explain to me how a 6th year QB (6th year starter, not someone who sat on the bench forever) is still waiting to develop...
I'd say making the Pro Bowl and setting numerous single season passing records during his last season in Denver was progression. No? Then he came to Chicago and everything went down the ####ter.
 
In college it was the programs fault he couldn't win. In Denver it was the defenses fault. Then it was McDaniels' fault he wanted to leave. Then it was Turner's fault he was bad. And the receivers fault. And the line's fault. And Lovie's fault. And the mcCaskey's fault. And now Martz's fault. Let me know what decade we have to get to before anything is ever Cutler's own fault.

And please, someone explain to me how a 6th year QB (6th year starter, not someone who sat on the bench forever) is still waiting to develop...
I'd say making the Pro Bowl and setting numerous single season passing records during his last season in Denver was progression. No? Then he came to Chicago and everything went down the ####ter.
I'm not the one saying he "still needs to develop". That was your comment. I'm asking you to defend it. Now you're saying he already has developed?
 
In college it was the programs fault he couldn't win. In Denver it was the defenses fault. Then it was McDaniels' fault he wanted to leave. Then it was Turner's fault he was bad. And the receivers fault. And the line's fault. And Lovie's fault. And the mcCaskey's fault. And now Martz's fault. Let me know what decade we have to get to before anything is ever Cutler's own fault.And please, someone explain to me how a 6th year QB (6th year starter, not someone who sat on the bench forever) is still waiting to develop...
Your comments show your ignorance. That What was the Bears record last year? How many games were they away from the Super bowl? Do you know how many times Vanderbilt has had a winning record in the last 20 years? Once or Twice? It is not a football powerhouse and you can't expect 1 player to make them elite when the other college teams are stacked with top players. When Steve Young went to the Bucs and had no talent around him I think he never won anything. Troy Aikman got killed when he had no line. I never saw Archie Manning play but was told he was actually a great QB with awful talent around him and never won. Jay Cutler has been roughly a .500 QB most of the years he has been in the league. He definitely deserves blame for not working on his mechanics enough (which he finally acknowledged) due to his immaturity. He also was a jerk to John Elway who was trying to help him develop although in the Tebow thread people were making silly comments about how he wants everyone to fail because he wants to remain the top dog in Denver. If a team does not have a good line on either side of the ball they will usually lose. The Bears offensive line has been absolutely pathetic. If you want to question that then I don't think you have watched any Bears games. They do not have a #1 WR which has been discussed ad nauseum in this thread. From your post you state that he does not make the players better around him better and therefore isn't a winner. I think you underestimate just how bad the talent is around him other than Forte. Most top teams have a #1 bailout wr who can go 1 on 1 and win a matchup consistently. Greg Williams system is built on pressure and taking away the hot read. With no protection and no #1 WR got Cutler plastered yesterday. I can think of a few instances where he held the ball too long and took unnecessary shots but for the most part he was running for his life. You could Brady, Rodgers, Manning, etc. and they couldn't have done anything last Sunday either. Two reasons he is still developing after 6 seasons is because he started working on his mechanics late (his fault entirely) and is constantly running for his life which makes it hard to get comfortable and progress through your reads.
 
When have I questioned any of the Bears' shortcomings? All I said was 'Jay Cutler is average' and everyone wants to string me up. How dare I insult the golden boy... He's our "franchise QB".

Well let me know when he acts like one. He is average.

 
Whether you like it or not Cutler is the franchise QB. As for when Cutler stops being an "average" QB, I'm guessing it's about the same time the offensive line quits being the worst in the NFL. According to whoever's rankings you want to believe (I use Football Outsiders) the pass blocking has ranked 13th (2009), 32nd (2010), and 31st (2011) during Cutler's time as a Bear. The fact that he's been merely "average" during that time is impressive IMO.

 
Whether you like it or not Cutler is the franchise QB. As for when Cutler stops being an "average" QB, I'm guessing it's about the same time the offensive line quits being the worst in the NFL. According to whoever's rankings you want to believe (I use Football Outsiders) the pass blocking has ranked 13th (2009), 32nd (2010), and 31st (2011) during Cutler's time as a Bear. The fact that he's been merely "average" during that time is impressive IMO.
You also forgot to mention is amazing group of WRs. Last season he took an undersized, 5th round draft pick for a small school and turned him into an (almost) 1000 yard WR (which IMHO, also addresses the whole "makes players around him better" argument). The other receivers he has are:- a "Number One WR" - who is a converted DB and has never played WR at any level prior to 3 years ago (who is also undersized)

- Earl Bennet, who has 103 receptions...in his career.

- the afore mentioned undersized, 5th round pick.

after that, the WRs are mainly cast-offs from other teams and practice squad players.

 
This is Mike Tice talking about the loss of Carimi. I believe the term is "damning with feint praise"

"It’s unfortunate because he was playing some of the best ball of all our guys," OL coach Mike Tice said. "He’s an elite player. And when you lose a player like that for an extended period of time, it’s never good."
The bolded part - let me get this straight - the 29th pick of the draft, with no TC to speak of is playing better than several guys with much more experience, including a former first rounder? If that doesn't tell you how bad this line really is...ruh roh.Mike Martz better learn to run the ball and call 3 step drops... either that or he better have about 6 QBs activated for the Packer game.

 
'Statcruncher said:
Whether you like it or not Cutler is the franchise QB. As for when Cutler stops being an "average" QB, I'm guessing it's about the same time the offensive line quits being the worst in the NFL. According to whoever's rankings you want to believe (I use Football Outsiders) the pass blocking has ranked 13th (2009), 32nd (2010), and 31st (2011) during Cutler's time as a Bear. The fact that he's been merely "average" during that time is impressive IMO.
The Cutler hate gets so old. Name one Bears QB in the past 25 years that, in his prime, you'd rather have than Cutler.
 
Mike Tice on OL: "I don't think we have the wrong guys. I think we have the right guys and I think we'll get it fixed."

 
If all people calling out Cutler, it's his on lineman, the worst one. :lmao: "You don't want to take those (sacks) on the blitz," Omiyale said. "When the defense brings one more than you can (block), sometimes you've just got to get it out or get rid of it." lol

 
They need to throw Davis's butt on the bench. He's horrible. However, due to the coaches not wanting to look foolish after letting Olsen go and hyping Davis for all of the preseason, they will keep him in the starting lineup. He's a bum. Put Spaeth in.

 
This is Mike Tice talking about the loss of Carimi. I believe the term is "damning with feint praise"

"It’s unfortunate because he was playing some of the best ball of all our guys," OL coach Mike Tice said. "He’s an elite player. And when you lose a player like that for an extended period of time, it’s never good."
The bolded part - let me get this straight - the 29th pick of the draft, with no TC to speak of is playing better than several guys with much more experience, including a former first rounder? If that doesn't tell you how bad this line really is...ruh roh.Mike Martz better learn to run the ball and call 3 step drops... either that or he better have about 6 QBs activated for the Packer game.
Why would Martz change now? After the success of the team during the last half of the season, he's reverted back to his old way already. If he hasn't learned yet, I don't see why he would now, unless Lovie takes over and forces him to. "The offensive wizard!"
 
When have I questioned any of the Bears' shortcomings? All I said was 'Jay Cutler is average' and everyone wants to string me up. How dare I insult the golden boy... He's our "franchise QB". Well let me know when he acts like one. He is average.
Anyone would be "average" in this offense, except for the the top 3-5 guys.
 
If all people calling out Cutler, it's his on lineman, the worst one. :lmao: "You don't want to take those (sacks) on the blitz," Omiyale said. "When the defense brings one more than you can (block), sometimes you've just got to get it out or get rid of it." lol
For Frank Omygod, if the defense sent 1, that would be 1 more than he could block. The only reason he's playing is because Carimi's hurt and Williams didn't pan out. Dude got beat out by Webb - who was drafted in the 478th round. (okay the round is a slight exaggeration). Frank Omygod should spend less time talking and more time working on technique - and NOT false starting.
 
If all people calling out Cutler, it's his on lineman, the worst one. :lmao: "You don't want to take those (sacks) on the blitz," Omiyale said. "When the defense brings one more than you can (block), sometimes you've just got to get it out or get rid of it." lol
For Frank Omygod, if the defense sent 1, that would be 1 more than he could block. The only reason he's playing is because Carimi's hurt and Williams didn't pan out. Dude got beat out by Webb - who was drafted in the 478th round. (okay the round is a slight exaggeration). Frank Omygod should spend less time talking and more time working on technique - and NOT false starting.
He had two false starts in the fourth quarter, no? You've just got to get rid of the ball before the false start. Eh, Omelete? I can't believe this loser ever made it back to the starting lineup. This is a travesty and an embarrassment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Statcruncher said:
Whether you like it or not Cutler is the franchise QB. As for when Cutler stops being an "average" QB, I'm guessing it's about the same time the offensive line quits being the worst in the NFL. According to whoever's rankings you want to believe (I use Football Outsiders) the pass blocking has ranked 13th (2009), 32nd (2010), and 31st (2011) during Cutler's time as a Bear. The fact that he's been merely "average" during that time is impressive IMO.
The Cutler hate gets so old. Name one Bears QB in the past 25 years that, in his prime, you'd rather have than Cutler.
I would but everyone will just disagree anyway. I'm apparently not allowed to have a different opinion of Cutler than other people. Its not enough to just disagree. I have to have 'not watched the game' and 'not understand football' or 'not know anything about the Martz offense'.The king of turds is still a turd.

Why does it have to be the line and wrs OR the qb? Why can't it be the line and wrs AND the qb? No one was saying sunday that the only good players on offense are forte and cutler. They were saying the only good player is forte.

 
'Statcruncher said:
Whether you like it or not Cutler is the franchise QB. As for when Cutler stops being an "average" QB, I'm guessing it's about the same time the offensive line quits being the worst in the NFL. According to whoever's rankings you want to believe (I use Football Outsiders) the pass blocking has ranked 13th (2009), 32nd (2010), and 31st (2011) during Cutler's time as a Bear. The fact that he's been merely "average" during that time is impressive IMO.
The Cutler hate gets so old. Name one Bears QB in the past 25 years that, in his prime, you'd rather have than Cutler.
I would but everyone will just disagree anyway. I'm apparently not allowed to have a different opinion of Cutler than other people. Its not enough to just disagree. I have to have 'not watched the game' and 'not understand football' or 'not know anything about the Martz offense'.The king of turds is still a turd.

Why does it have to be the line and wrs OR the qb? Why can't it be the line and wrs AND the qb? No one was saying sunday that the only good players on offense are forte and cutler. They were saying the only good player is forte.
No one said you couldn't have a different opinion of Cutler, but please be prepared to engage in a discussion about. I seldom blindly accepting other people's opinions even if they're as well thought out as "king of turds". Likewise, you'd be foolish to blindly accept my assertions. A civil discussion with differing viewpoints is not a traumatic thing, no need to take your ball and go home.Your point about it being all 3 is valid. No one knows exactly where the problems are. Play calling, WR's, o-line, and QB have all been called out. Of those factors I would rank them in order of biggest problem to least as:

1. Playcalling

2. O-line

3. WR's

4. Cutler

I would imagine if the first 2 are fixed the 3rd would prove to be adequate/serviceable and the 4th turns out to be a huge asset.

And Wolfman I think you might have misunderstood my post, I'm a fan of Cutler.

For the record, here are the Bears' QB's for the past 25 years and how many (starts) they had:

2011 Jay Cutler (2)

2010 Jay Cutler (15)

2010 Todd Collins (1)

2009 Jay Cutler (16)

2008 Kyle Orton (15)

2008 Rex Grossman (1)

2007 Rex Grossman (7)

2007 Brian Griese (6)

2007 Kyle Orton (3)

2006 Rex Grossman (16)

2005 Kyle Orton (15)

2005 Rex Grossman (1)

2004 Craig Krenzel (5)

2004 Chad Hutchinson (5)

2004 Jonathan Quinn (3)

2004 Rex Grossman (3)

2003 Kordell Stewart (7)

2003 Chris Chandler (6)

2003 Rex Grossman (3)

2002 Jim Miller (8)

2002 Chris Chandler (7)

2002 Henry Burris (1)

2001 Jim Miller (13)

2001 Shane Matthews (3)

2000 Cade McNown (9)

2000 Shane Matthews (5)

2000 Jim Miller (2)

1999 Shane Matthews (7)

1999 Cade McNown (6)

1999 Jim Miller (3)

1998 Erik Kramer (8)

1998 Steve Stenstrom (7)

1998 Moses Moreno (1)

1997 Erik Kramer (13)

1997 Rick Mirer (3)

1996 Dave Krieg (12)

1996 Erik Kramer (4)

1995 Erik Kramer (16)

1994 Steve Walsh (11)

1994 Erik Kramer (5)

1993 Jim Harbaugh (15)

1993 Peter Tom Willis (1)

1992 Jim Harbaugh (13)

1992 Peter Tom Willis (2)

1992 Will Furrer (1)

1991 Jim Harbaugh (16)

1990 Jim Harbaugh (14)

1990 Mike Tomczak (2)

1989 Mike Tomczak (11)

1989 Jim Harbaugh (5)

1988 Jim McMahon (9)

1988 Mike Tomczak (5)

1988 Jim Harbaugh (2)

1987 Jim McMahon (6)

1987 Mike Tomczak (6)

1987 Mike Hohensee (2)

1987 Steve Bradley (1)

1986 Mike Tomczak (7)

1986 Jim McMahon (6)

1986 Steve Fuller (2)

1986 Doug Flutie (1)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Glad to see someone is at least willing to attempt to be reasonable. from the other responses to me calling Cutler average so far, I was expecting that regardless of who I named I would be told that the player had a better line and wrs and thats why they looked better.

As far as king of turds, the point is that the bear history at qb is irrelevant in measuring cutler. If we had drafted ryan leaf for 25 consecutive years then cutler would still be the exact same quality he is today. If we were the packers (favre, rodgers) or 49ers (montana, young) then cutler would still be the same quality he is today. So I'm not sure what the relevance is in comparing him to our past qbs.

But for the record, McMahon and Kramer were both better in my eyes. If Miller could have stayed upright, I'd say he was at least as good if not better.

You say we don't know where the problem lies. First, I'd say its all 4 of your list. As far as order I'd move your first one down to #3 and then its about right. The evidence is in our last QB. We thought he was the problem, so we brought in someone else. The offense hasn't scored more points, and has led the league in 3-and-outs since. Meanwhile our former QB put up some fine numbers because he has had a good line and receivers. So each did well with a good line/wrs/system and each did poorly with a bad line/wrs/system. I would call a 'great' qb, or a 'franchise' qb, someone who is going to do well regardless. If the requirement is a top 5 line and top 5 receiver, well then there are 20-25 other guys in the league who will also do well under those circumstances and thats why they are considered average.

 
Stat, should have been more clear in my post. I agree with what you said and I think people take it for granted that Cutler is probably the best QB the Bears have ever had. He gets next to no help from his O-line, has a bunch of WRs that would be #3/4 WRs on other teams and still manages to have some success, despite all this and an O-coordinator hell bent on getting him killed.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top