2012 Offseason Dynasty Trades (1 Viewer)

[Prussian]

1 pprTeam A receives: Cam Newton/Demaryius ThomasTeam B receives: Vick/J. Charles

Love Team A.

 

[HAM]

NicksforM-BushLeShoureMeachemPick 1.10

I'd give that all day for nicks

 

[pghrob]

I see him getting his act together with Sanchez and playing up to his potential after his disastrous meltdown last season. I think his potential is greater than Harvin's. Better hands, better route runner, just as good YAC, on a slightly better offense in a division (AFC East) where the defenses are not as good as in the NFC North.

Even if you thought Harvin was ridiculously overrated, I can't imagine that you couldn't get at least a mid-first for him. As a Harvin owner in a non-ppr league, I have turned down multiple options better than what you got.

Time to come clean - Harvin for 1.09 was a fishing trip. There was no trade.I actually made what the SP thinks is a lowball offer for Harvin with the 1.09. All the posts were an attempt to validate the value of Harvin as being in the area of a 1.09 2012 rookie pick. The SP will be glad to know the trade offer I made was not accepted. Thanks for joining me on my fishing trip in the shark pool. Someone started another thread that this offseason is a joke. I disagree. It has been rather interesting thus far.

 

[jeter23]

I see him getting his act together with Sanchez and playing up to his potential after his disastrous meltdown last season. I think his potential is greater than Harvin's. Better hands, better route runner, just as good YAC, on a slightly better offense in a division (AFC East) where the defenses are not as good as in the NFC North.

Even if you thought Harvin was ridiculously overrated, I can't imagine that you couldn't get at least a mid-first for him. As a Harvin owner in a non-ppr league, I have turned down multiple options better than what you got.

Time to come clean - Harvin for 1.09 was a fishing trip. There was no trade.I actually made what the SP thinks is a lowball offer for Harvin with the 1.09. All the posts were an attempt to validate the value of Harvin as being in the area of a 1.09 2012 rookie pick. The SP will be glad to know the trade offer I made was not accepted. Thanks for joining me on my fishing trip in the shark pool. Someone started another thread that this offseason is a joke. I disagree. It has been rather interesting thus far.

If this keeps happening, this thread will get locked or sent to the ACF

 

[inzanitee]

I see him getting his act together with Sanchez and playing up to his potential after his disastrous meltdown last season. I think his potential is greater than Harvin's. Better hands, better route runner, just as good YAC, on a slightly better offense in a division (AFC East) where the defenses are not as good as in the NFC North.

Even if you thought Harvin was ridiculously overrated, I can't imagine that you couldn't get at least a mid-first for him. As a Harvin owner in a non-ppr league, I have turned down multiple options better than what you got.

Time to come clean - Harvin for 1.09 was a fishing trip. There was no trade.I actually made what the SP thinks is a lowball offer for Harvin with the 1.09. All the posts were an attempt to validate the value of Harvin as being in the area of a 1.09 2012 rookie pick. The SP will be glad to know the trade offer I made was not accepted. Thanks for joining me on my fishing trip in the shark pool. Someone started another thread that this offseason is a joke. I disagree. It has been rather interesting thus far.

I think the SP would be glad if you disappeared.

 

[pghrob]

I am sorry. I hope you guys can find it in yourselves to forgive me for being dishonest.

 

[Multiple Scores]

I am sorry. I hope you guys can find it in yourselves to forgive me for being dishonest.

I scan this thread and spend time seeing values of my current players. I don't own Harvin or 1.9 so I didn't spend any time looking at it, I forgive you for your sin.

 

[squistion]

I see him getting his act together with Sanchez and playing up to his potential after his disastrous meltdown last season. I think his potential is greater than Harvin's. Better hands, better route runner, just as good YAC, on a slightly better offense in a division (AFC East) where the defenses are not as good as in the NFC North.

Even if you thought Harvin was ridiculously overrated, I can't imagine that you couldn't get at least a mid-first for him. As a Harvin owner in a non-ppr league, I have turned down multiple options better than what you got.

Time to come clean - Harvin for 1.09 was a fishing trip. There was no trade.I actually made what the SP thinks is a lowball offer for Harvin with the 1.09. All the posts were an attempt to validate the value of Harvin as being in the area of a 1.09 2012 rookie pick. The SP will be glad to know the trade offer I made was not accepted. Thanks for joining me on my fishing trip in the shark pool. Someone started another thread that this offseason is a joke. I disagree. It has been rather interesting thus far.

If this keeps happening, this thread will get locked or sent to the ACF

And it should be, because it will become of no value if the entire purpose is to post fake trades with the idea of devaluing a player one is trying to acquire.

 

[identikit]

I see him getting his act together with Sanchez and playing up to his potential after his disastrous meltdown last season. I think his potential is greater than Harvin's. Better hands, better route runner, just as good YAC, on a slightly better offense in a division (AFC East) where the defenses are not as good as in the NFC North.

Even if you thought Harvin was ridiculously overrated, I can't imagine that you couldn't get at least a mid-first for him. As a Harvin owner in a non-ppr league, I have turned down multiple options better than what you got.

Time to come clean - Harvin for 1.09 was a fishing trip. There was no trade.I actually made what the SP thinks is a lowball offer for Harvin with the 1.09. All the posts were an attempt to validate the value of Harvin as being in the area of a 1.09 2012 rookie pick. The SP will be glad to know the trade offer I made was not accepted. Thanks for joining me on my fishing trip in the shark pool. Someone started another thread that this offseason is a joke. I disagree. It has been rather interesting thus far.

You should be banned for doing this.

 

[pghrob]

If someone wants to ban me after 10+ years here, well.... there is nothing I can do about that.

 

[doombringer]

12 ppr dynasty

Team 1 : Cam Newton, Demarco Murray, Mike Thomas

Team 2 : Mike Vick, Hakeem Nicks, Beanie Wells, Frank Gore, 1.5, 1.11

I suppose you CAN be forced to trade Cam Newton

Team 1 : Hakeem Nicks, Tony Romo, Brandon Lafell, Austin Collie

Team 2 : Antonio Brown, Matthew Stafford

 

[pghrob]

I see him getting his act together with Sanchez and playing up to his potential after his disastrous meltdown last season. I think his potential is greater than Harvin's. Better hands, better route runner, just as good YAC, on a slightly better offense in a division (AFC East) where the defenses are not as good as in the NFC North.

Even if you thought Harvin was ridiculously overrated, I can't imagine that you couldn't get at least a mid-first for him. As a Harvin owner in a non-ppr league, I have turned down multiple options better than what you got.

Time to come clean - Harvin for 1.09 was a fishing trip. There was no trade.I actually made what the SP thinks is a lowball offer for Harvin with the 1.09. All the posts were an attempt to validate the value of Harvin as being in the area of a 1.09 2012 rookie pick. The SP will be glad to know the trade offer I made was not accepted. Thanks for joining me on my fishing trip in the shark pool. Someone started another thread that this offseason is a joke. I disagree. It has been rather interesting thus far.

If this keeps happening, this thread will get locked or sent to the ACF

And it should be, because it will become of no value if the entire purpose is to post fake trades with the idea of devaluing a player one is trying to acquire.

I was not purposefully attempting to devalue a player for whom I was trying to obtain via trade. I legitimately thought he is valued at 1.09. I do not see Harvin ever being a WR1. I see him at his ceiling already which is low wr1 and more likely to remain wr2. I would be happy with that at 1.09. After these posts, I actually think that 1.09 this year offers a player who exceeds Harvin's future value in guys like Wright and maybe even Hill. My only fishing was to see if others shared my justification for NOT thinking I made a low ball offer for Harvin. Quite frankly, I am glad everybody disagrees with my valuation of Harvin. I stand by it and I guess I should consider myself lucky that the guy I offered the 1.09 refused it, as I might have a better player coming via the draft who will eclipse Harvin as a fantasy WR. Again, I do apologize if my dishonesty about who was wanting to trade the pick is somehow messing with the cleanliness of the shark pool water. The exercise was a learning experience for me and from what I can tell, my coming clean does not result in any permanent damage to this site. Frankly, all it did was if anythin, tarnish my own reputation. I can live with that. Again, I do apologize if I offended the members here.

 

[cstu]

Not part of this, and wondering if this is as lopsided to most as I see it?

Team A gives: Eli, Foster, Tate, Maclin, Branch

Team B gives: Freeman, Mathews, LeShoure, Harvin, Little

Looks like a bad deal to me. Eli > Freeman. Foster >>> Mathews. Tate > LeShoure (we'll see how LeShoure comes back this year). The only place Team A improves are the WR in Maclin vs. Harvin, I like Havrin more. And I'd prefer Little over Branch as well.

By the end of next season, we may be removing at least 2 of the >s.

By next season this team will not even be close in favor of Team A.

 

[Skeletore Eh]

I see him getting his act together with Sanchez and playing up to his potential after his disastrous meltdown last season. I think his potential is greater than Harvin's. Better hands, better route runner, just as good YAC, on a slightly better offense in a division (AFC East) where the defenses are not as good as in the NFC North.

Even if you thought Harvin was ridiculously overrated, I can't imagine that you couldn't get at least a mid-first for him. As a Harvin owner in a non-ppr league, I have turned down multiple options better than what you got.

Time to come clean - Harvin for 1.09 was a fishing trip. There was no trade.I actually made what the SP thinks is a lowball offer for Harvin with the 1.09. All the posts were an attempt to validate the value of Harvin as being in the area of a 1.09 2012 rookie pick. The SP will be glad to know the trade offer I made was not accepted. Thanks for joining me on my fishing trip in the shark pool. Someone started another thread that this offseason is a joke. I disagree. It has been rather interesting thus far.

If this keeps happening, this thread will get locked or sent to the ACF

And it should be, because it will become of no value if the entire purpose is to post fake trades with the idea of devaluing a player one is trying to acquire.

I was not purposefully attempting to devalue a player for whom I was trying to obtain via trade. I legitimately thought he is valued at 1.09. I do not see Harvin ever being a WR1. I see him at his ceiling already which is low wr1 and more likely to remain wr2. I would be happy with that at 1.09. After these posts, I actually think that 1.09 this year offers a player who exceeds Harvin's future value in guys like Wright and maybe even Hill. My only fishing was to see if others shared my justification for NOT thinking I made a low ball offer for Harvin. Quite frankly, I am glad everybody disagrees with my valuation of Harvin. I stand by it and I guess I should consider myself lucky that the guy I offered the 1.09 refused it, as I might have a better player coming via the draft who will eclipse Harvin as a fantasy WR. Again, I do apologize if my dishonesty about who was wanting to trade the pick is somehow messing with the cleanliness of the shark pool water. The exercise was a learning experience for me and from what I can tell, my coming clean does not result in any permanent damage to this site. Frankly, all it did was if anythin, tarnish my own reputation. I can live with that. Again, I do apologize if I offended the members here.

Honestly, that's one of the dumbest things I've ever read. And I just got done reading your argument for santonio Holmes or the 1.9 over Harvin.

 

[sihaokills]

Not part of this, and wondering if this is as lopsided to most as I see it?

Team A gives: Eli, Foster, Tate, Maclin, Branch

Team B gives: Freeman, Mathews, LeShoure, Harvin, Little

Looks like a bad deal to me. Eli > Freeman. Foster >>> Mathews. Tate > LeShoure (we'll see how LeShoure comes back this year). The only place Team A improves are the WR in Maclin vs. Harvin, I like Havrin more. And I'd prefer Little over Branch as well.

By the end of next season, we may be removing at least 2 of the >s.

By next season this team will not even be close in favor of Team A.

Please explain what you mean...

 

[squistion]

I see him getting his act together with Sanchez and playing up to his potential after his disastrous meltdown last season. I think his potential is greater than Harvin's. Better hands, better route runner, just as good YAC, on a slightly better offense in a division (AFC East) where the defenses are not as good as in the NFC North.

Even if you thought Harvin was ridiculously overrated, I can't imagine that you couldn't get at least a mid-first for him. As a Harvin owner in a non-ppr league, I have turned down multiple options better than what you got.

Time to come clean - Harvin for 1.09 was a fishing trip. There was no trade.I actually made what the SP thinks is a lowball offer for Harvin with the 1.09. All the posts were an attempt to validate the value of Harvin as being in the area of a 1.09 2012 rookie pick. The SP will be glad to know the trade offer I made was not accepted. Thanks for joining me on my fishing trip in the shark pool. Someone started another thread that this offseason is a joke. I disagree. It has been rather interesting thus far.

If this keeps happening, this thread will get locked or sent to the ACF

And it should be, because it will become of no value if the entire purpose is to post fake trades with the idea of devaluing a player one is trying to acquire.

I was not purposefully attempting to devalue a player for whom I was trying to obtain via trade. I legitimately thought he is valued at 1.09. I do not see Harvin ever being a WR1. I see him at his ceiling already which is low wr1 and more likely to remain wr2. I would be happy with that at 1.09. After these posts, I actually think that 1.09 this year offers a player who exceeds Harvin's future value in guys like Wright and maybe even Hill. My only fishing was to see if others shared my justification for NOT thinking I made a low ball offer for Harvin. Quite frankly, I am glad everybody disagrees with my valuation of Harvin. I stand by it and I guess I should consider myself lucky that the guy I offered the 1.09 refused it, as I might have a better player coming via the draft who will eclipse Harvin as a fantasy WR. Again, I do apologize if my dishonesty about who was wanting to trade the pick is somehow messing with the cleanliness of the shark pool water. The exercise was a learning experience for me and from what I can tell, my coming clean does not result in any permanent damage to this site. Frankly, all it did was if anythin, tarnish my own reputation. I can live with that. Again, I do apologize if I offended the members here.

OK, now that you explained your thinking, I see where you were coming from. Let's forget it and move on to the more recent trades.

 

[cstu]

Not part of this, and wondering if this is as lopsided to most as I see it?

Team A gives: Eli, Foster, Tate, Maclin, Branch

Team B gives: Freeman, Mathews, LeShoure, Harvin, Little

Looks like a bad deal to me. Eli > Freeman. Foster >>> Mathews. Tate > LeShoure (we'll see how LeShoure comes back this year). The only place Team A improves are the WR in Maclin vs. Harvin, I like Havrin more. And I'd prefer Little over Branch as well.

By the end of next season, we may be removing at least 2 of the >s.

By next season this team will not even be close in favor of Team A.

Please explain what you mean...

Next year:Freeman > Eli (may be close but Eli will be 32 and Freeman is 7 years younger)

Foster > Mathews (this will be a lot closer than people think)

Harvin > Maclin

Leshoure and Little >>>>>>> Tate and Branch(retired?)

 

[sihaokills]

Not part of this, and wondering if this is as lopsided to most as I see it?

Team A gives: Eli, Foster, Tate, Maclin, Branch

Team B gives: Freeman, Mathews, LeShoure, Harvin, Little

Looks like a bad deal to me. Eli > Freeman. Foster >>> Mathews. Tate > LeShoure (we'll see how LeShoure comes back this year). The only place Team A improves are the WR in Maclin vs. Harvin, I like Havrin more. And I'd prefer Little over Branch as well.

By the end of next season, we may be removing at least 2 of the >s.

By next season this team will not even be close in favor of Team A.

Please explain what you mean...

Next year:Freeman > Eli (may be close but Eli will be 32 and Freeman is 7 years younger)

Foster > Mathews (this will be a lot closer than people think)

Harvin > Maclin

Leshoure and Little >>>>>>> Tate and Branch(retired?)

Im just happy because im Team B lol. I hope I didn't get entirely raped

 

[pghrob]

I see him getting his act together with Sanchez and playing up to his potential after his disastrous meltdown last season. I think his potential is greater than Harvin's. Better hands, better route runner, just as good YAC, on a slightly better offense in a division (AFC East) where the defenses are not as good as in the NFC North.

Even if you thought Harvin was ridiculously overrated, I can't imagine that you couldn't get at least a mid-first for him. As a Harvin owner in a non-ppr league, I have turned down multiple options better than what you got.

Time to come clean - Harvin for 1.09 was a fishing trip. There was no trade.I actually made what the SP thinks is a lowball offer for Harvin with the 1.09. All the posts were an attempt to validate the value of Harvin as being in the area of a 1.09 2012 rookie pick. The SP will be glad to know the trade offer I made was not accepted. Thanks for joining me on my fishing trip in the shark pool. Someone started another thread that this offseason is a joke. I disagree. It has been rather interesting thus far.

If this keeps happening, this thread will get locked or sent to the ACF

And it should be, because it will become of no value if the entire purpose is to post fake trades with the idea of devaluing a player one is trying to acquire.

I was not purposefully attempting to devalue a player for whom I was trying to obtain via trade. I legitimately thought he is valued at 1.09. I do not see Harvin ever being a WR1. I see him at his ceiling already which is low wr1 and more likely to remain wr2. I would be happy with that at 1.09. After these posts, I actually think that 1.09 this year offers a player who exceeds Harvin's future value in guys like Wright and maybe even Hill. My only fishing was to see if others shared my justification for NOT thinking I made a low ball offer for Harvin. Quite frankly, I am glad everybody disagrees with my valuation of Harvin. I stand by it and I guess I should consider myself lucky that the guy I offered the 1.09 refused it, as I might have a better player coming via the draft who will eclipse Harvin as a fantasy WR. Again, I do apologize if my dishonesty about who was wanting to trade the pick is somehow messing with the cleanliness of the shark pool water. The exercise was a learning experience for me and from what I can tell, my coming clean does not result in any permanent damage to this site. Frankly, all it did was if anythin, tarnish my own reputation. I can live with that. Again, I do apologize if I offended the members here.

Honestly, that's one of the dumbest things I've ever read. And I just got done reading your argument for santonio Holmes or the 1.9 over Harvin.

 

[sihaokills]

I gave Matt Forte, Rob Gronkowski, David Nelson

I got Lesean Mccoy, Pierre Garcon, Ed dickson, Marcedes Lewis

 

[jwb]

14 team PPR. 14 College devys rostered.

Team A Gives: J Best, Alex Smith, 1.04, 1.09, Team B's 2013 #1

Team B Gives: S Rice, Hankerson, 1.06, 2014 #1

 

[buck56]

14 team PPR. 14 College devys rostered. Team A Gives: J Best, Alex Smith, 1.04, 1.09, Team B's 2013 #1Team B Gives: S Rice, Hankerson, 1.06, 2014 #1

I'll take team Bs side all day.Terrible trade for team A.

 

[cstu]

14 team PPR. 14 College devys rostered.

Team A Gives: J Best, Alex Smith, 1.04, 1.09, Team B's 2013 #1

Team B Gives: S Rice, Hankerson, 1.06, 2014 #1

I'll take team Bs side all day.Terrible trade for team A.

Let's see, for the sake of argument:1.04 and Alex Smith for 1.06

1.09 for Hankerson

Best for Rice

2013 #1 for 2014 #1

The only part of that that makes sense to me is Best for Rice, someone must have a thing for him.

 

[Sabertooth]

Team A gave up Blaine GabbertTeam B gave up Matt Flynn Start 2 QB league (10 teams - 24 man rosters)

Wow. I don't know why anyone who give up Matt Flynn for Blaine Gabbert, even with where he'll end up being a complete unknown.

I personally think people are closing the book way too quickly on Gabbert. He hasn't even had a full offseason to learn how to play. He just got thrown to the wolves last season with below average weapons.

 

[HAM]

Not part of this, and wondering if this is as lopsided to most as I see it?

Team A gives: Eli, Foster, Tate, Maclin, Branch

Team B gives: Freeman, Mathews, LeShoure, Harvin, Little

Looks like a bad deal to me. Eli > Freeman. Foster >>> Mathews. Tate > LeShoure (we'll see how LeShoure comes back this year). The only place Team A improves are the WR in Maclin vs. Harvin, I like Havrin more. And I'd prefer Little over Branch as well.

By the end of next season, we may be removing at least 2 of the >s.

By next season this team will not even be close in favor of Team A.

Please explain what you mean...

Next year:Freeman > Eli (may be close but Eli will be 32 and Freeman is 7 years younger)

Foster > Mathews (this will be a lot closer than people think)

Harvin > Maclin

Leshoure and Little >>>>>>> Tate and Branch(retired?)

Not so sure leshoure and little are 7 times better than Tate and branch. I myself would still take Tate over both of them even with the big foster signing. Leshoure has A LOT to prove

 

[cstu]

Team A gave up Blaine GabbertTeam B gave up Matt Flynn Start 2 QB league (10 teams - 24 man rosters)

Wow. I don't know why anyone who give up Matt Flynn for Blaine Gabbert, even with where he'll end up being a complete unknown.

I personally think people are closing the book way too quickly on Gabbert. He hasn't even had a full offseason to learn how to play. He just got thrown to the wolves last season with below average weapons.

I knew he needed time to adjust to the NFL but he looked awful. It's possible he figures it out but I'd rather take my chances with a guy I've seen play like an NFL QB.

 

[jwb]

14 team PPR. 14 College devys rostered.

Team A Gives: J Best, Alex Smith, 1.04, 1.09, Team B's 2013 #1

Team B Gives: S Rice, Hankerson, 1.06, 2014 #1

I'll take team Bs side all day.Terrible trade for team A.

Let's see, for the sake of argument:1.04 and Alex Smith for 1.06

1.09 for Hankerson

Best for Rice

2013 #1 for 2014 #1

The only part of that that makes sense to me is Best for Rice, someone must have a thing for him.

I was Team A. I looked at it like Rice was quite a bit over Best. I know both have had injury concerns, but I think Rice has a decent shot at being relevent 2 years from now. Best, not so much. my .02 anyway. My view was Best and 1.4 for Rice and 1.6. Probbaly wasn't happening.

Pick swap and 1.9 for Hankerson to even it up.

Smith to push it over.

*shrug* - I'm ok w/ it

 

[cstu]

At least you got rid of Best, he's not long for the NFL.

 

[Buck Stop]

Made this trade today, 12 team PPR

I gave: Sproles, 1.2, 1.3, 2.12

I got: 1.1, 1.7, 1.11, Hillis

 

[The Comedian]

I see him getting his act together with Sanchez and playing up to his potential after his disastrous meltdown last season. I think his potential is greater than Harvin's. Better hands, better route runner, just as good YAC, on a slightly better offense in a division (AFC East) where the defenses are not as good as in the NFC North.

Even if you thought Harvin was ridiculously overrated, I can't imagine that you couldn't get at least a mid-first for him. As a Harvin owner in a non-ppr league, I have turned down multiple options better than what you got.

Time to come clean - Harvin for 1.09 was a fishing trip. There was no trade.I actually made what the SP thinks is a lowball offer for Harvin with the 1.09. All the posts were an attempt to validate the value of Harvin as being in the area of a 1.09 2012 rookie pick. The SP will be glad to know the trade offer I made was not accepted. Thanks for joining me on my fishing trip in the shark pool. Someone started another thread that this offseason is a joke. I disagree. It has been rather interesting thus far.

If this keeps happening, this thread will get locked or sent to the ACF

And it should be, because it will become of no value if the entire purpose is to post fake trades with the idea of devaluing a player one is trying to acquire.

I was not purposefully attempting to devalue a player for whom I was trying to obtain via trade. I legitimately thought he is valued at 1.09. I do not see Harvin ever being a WR1. I see him at his ceiling already which is low wr1 and more likely to remain wr2. I would be happy with that at 1.09. After these posts, I actually think that 1.09 this year offers a player who exceeds Harvin's future value in guys like Wright and maybe even Hill. My only fishing was to see if others shared my justification for NOT thinking I made a low ball offer for Harvin. Quite frankly, I am glad everybody disagrees with my valuation of Harvin. I stand by it and I guess I should consider myself lucky that the guy I offered the 1.09 refused it, as I might have a better player coming via the draft who will eclipse Harvin as a fantasy WR. Again, I do apologize if my dishonesty about who was wanting to trade the pick is somehow messing with the cleanliness of the shark pool water. The exercise was a learning experience for me and from what I can tell, my coming clean does not result in any permanent damage to this site. Frankly, all it did was if anythin, tarnish my own reputation. I can live with that. Again, I do apologize if I offended the members here.

Honestly, that's one of the dumbest things I've ever read. And I just got done reading your argument for santonio Holmes or the 1.9 over Harvin.

Yeah no, he's right. This whole "fishing trip" was really stupid and didn't really make any sense.

 

[jeter23]

12 team PPR

A gave: M Bennett/2.12

B gave: 2.09/2013 3rd/2014 3rd

Then...

A gave: J Thomas/1.09/2.09

C gave: 1.06/Shipley

 

[Donsmith753]

16 team 0.5 PPR

Kaunas Buckeyes gave up:

Lumpkin, Kregg TBB RB

Carlson, John MIN TE

Year 2012 Draft Pick 1.05

Year 2012 Draft Pick 3.07

Melbourne Patriots gave up:

Year 2012 Draft Pick 1.03

 

[King of the Jungle]

16 team 0.5 PPRKaunas Buckeyes gave up:Lumpkin, Kregg TBB RBCarlson, John MIN TEYear 2012 Draft Pick 1.05Year 2012 Draft Pick 3.07Melbourne Patriots gave up:Year 2012 Draft Pick 1.03

Seems like an inexpensive upgrade from 1.05 to 1.03.

 

[dickey moe]

I gave Matt Forte, Rob Gronkowski, David NelsonI got Lesean Mccoy, Pierre Garcon, Ed dickson, Marcedes Lewis

You must've REALLY wanted McCoy.

 

[Buck Stop]

Did I make a good deal or blow it? This was a BIG trade. 12 team PPR dynasty.

I gave: AP, MJD, Marshall, Little, Vick

I got: Foster, 1.1 (Richardson), 2.1, Bradford

My roster is below

Bradford, Flacco, Sanchez

Foster, Richardson, DeAngleo, J.Rodgers, LeShoure, Starks, McCluster

Calvin, AJ Green, D.Moore, Hankerson, Damian Williams

Hernandez, Gates

1.11, 2.1, 2.11 rookie picks

 

[pghrob]

Did I make a good deal or blow it? This was a BIG trade. 12 team PPR dynasty.

I gave: AP, MJD, Marshall, Little, Vick

I got: Foster, 1.1 (Richardson), 2.1, Bradford

My roster is below

Bradford, Flacco, Sanchez

Foster, Richardson, DeAngleo, J.Rodgers, LeShoure, Starks, McCluster

Calvin, AJ Green, D.Moore, Hankerson, Damian Williams

Hernandez, Gates

1.11, 2.1, 2.11 rookie picks

I think you did exceedingly fine. You got better and younger in all positions and can draft a good rookie wr at 2.1

 

[Skeletore Eh]

2.3

2013 Second Round Pick

For

Deangelo Williams

 

[Buck Stop]

2nd trade in same league, 12 team PPR dynasty.

I gave: LeShoure, Sanchez, 2.1, 2.11

I got: Big Ben, Antonio Brown, 3.11

So I started the day with:

Vick, Flacco, Sanchez

MJD, AP, DeAngelo, J. Rodgers, LeShoure, Starks, McCluster

Calvin, AJGreen, Marshall, D. Moore, Little, Hankerson, Damian Williams

Hernandez, Gates

Rookie picks 1.11, 2.11

And now my roster is:

Big Ben, Bradford, Flacco

Foster, Richardson, DeAngelo, J. Rodgers, Starks, McCluster

Calvin, AJ Green, A. Brown, D. Moore, Hankerson, Damian Williams

Hernandez, Gates

Rookie picks 1.11, 3.11

 

[Banemorth]

2.32013 Second Round PickForDeangelo Williams

I'd rather have the picks.

 

[LBH]

Team 1 gives DMcfadden/MTurner

Team 2 gives Chris Johnson/JRinger

 

[Couch Potato]

12 team PPR

Team X gave up:

Floyd, Malcom SDC WR

Meachem, Robert SDC WR

Fighting Couch Potatoes gave up:

Best, Jahvid DET RB

Hankerson, Leonard WAS WR

 

[thriftyrocker]

12 tm nonppr

* A gets Frank Gore RB SF; 2012 3rd round pick #1 (25th overall), 2012 1st round pick #1 (1st overall)

* B gets Matt Flynn QB GB, Mark Ingram RB NO, Vincent Brown WR SD, DeMarco Murray RB DAL; 2012 1st round pick #10 (10th overall), 2013 1st round pick (late)

 

[cstu]

12 tm nonppr* A gets Frank Gore RB SF; 2012 3rd round pick #1 (25th overall), 2012 1st round pick #1 (1st overall)* B gets Matt Flynn QB GB, Mark Ingram RB NO, Vincent Brown WR SD, DeMarco Murray RB DAL; 2012 1st round pick #10 (10th overall), 2013 1st round pick (late)

I love Richardson and all, but wow...

 

[r0llin_game]

Really curious to hear thoughts on this. 16 team .5 PPR dynasty (I wasn't involved)

Jambo Broncos gave up:

Year 2012 Draft Pick 1.03

Year 2012 Draft Pick 1.16

Year 2012 Draft Pick 2.11

Dunedin Buccaneers gave up:

Brees, Drew NOS QB

Year 2012 Draft Pick 1.10

I should add that the Team that got the 1.3 has a deal in principal to move up to 1.02 for the late second rounder

In a 16 team league, having a high end QB like Drew Brees is huge, much more valuable than the 1.03 in my mind. The 1.10 > 1.16 and 2.11 as well, so I would much rather be on the Jambo Broncos side.If however, the team giving up Brees isn't in a "win now" mode, then I can understand it (but think he could have gotten more).

He's in the toughest Divison and doesn't have a hope this year. Has three first rounders this year (one for RG3/Luck) and two next year (one which should be top 4) so I can see why he did it. Negotiations for this have been going on a long time.

Second trades been done, it's got a stipulation that he can't choose Blackmon with the pick but he wasn't going to anyway.Overall it's now

Brees

1.10

For

1.02

1.16

You can do this???

It can be agreed on, but I don't see how it is enforceable. Once the pick is made the other trade partner would have to immediately demand that the draft be stopped and the pick voided, along with the trade being reversed. That is assuming the Commish would be agreeable to intervene and that this situation is somehow covered by the rules. Plus if several picks were made after this before the draft was stopped, you might have several angry owners who didn't get the player(s) they thought they had drafted.

That awkward moment when the guy with 1.01 takes Blackmon.

 

[Donsmith753]

Really curious to hear thoughts on this. 16 team .5 PPR dynasty (I wasn't involved)

Jambo Broncos gave up:

Year 2012 Draft Pick 1.03

Year 2012 Draft Pick 1.16

Year 2012 Draft Pick 2.11

Dunedin Buccaneers gave up:

Brees, Drew NOS QB

Year 2012 Draft Pick 1.10

I should add that the Team that got the 1.3 has a deal in principal to move up to 1.02 for the late second rounder

In a 16 team league, having a high end QB like Drew Brees is huge, much more valuable than the 1.03 in my mind. The 1.10 > 1.16 and 2.11 as well, so I would much rather be on the Jambo Broncos side.If however, the team giving up Brees isn't in a "win now" mode, then I can understand it (but think he could have gotten more).

He's in the toughest Divison and doesn't have a hope this year. Has three first rounders this year (one for RG3/Luck) and two next year (one which should be top 4) so I can see why he did it. Negotiations for this have been going on a long time.

Second trades been done, it's got a stipulation that he can't choose Blackmon with the pick but he wasn't going to anyway.Overall it's now

Brees

1.10

For

1.02

1.16

You can do this???

It can be agreed on, but I don't see how it is enforceable. Once the pick is made the other trade partner would have to immediately demand that the draft be stopped and the pick voided, along with the trade being reversed. That is assuming the Commish would be agreeable to intervene and that this situation is somehow covered by the rules. Plus if several picks were made after this before the draft was stopped, you might have several angry owners who didn't get the player(s) they thought they had drafted.

That awkward moment when the guy with 1.01 takes Blackmon.

Nah he's a stick on for Richardson. Absolutely guaranteed....

 

[gianmarco]

12 team PPRTeam X gave up:Floyd, Malcom SDC WRMeachem, Robert SDC WRFighting Couch Potatoes gave up:Best, Jahvid DET RBHankerson, Leonard WAS WR

Crazy!!

 

[No Way Jose]

Team A gets: Gore, Hunter, Brees, Rudolph

Team B gets: Rivers, Forte, D Moore, E. Dickson

 

[JohnnyU]

12 team PPRTeam X gave up:Floyd, Malcom SDC WRMeachem, Robert SDC WRFighting Couch Potatoes gave up:Best, Jahvid DET RBHankerson, Leonard WAS WR

Crazy!!

How? I'm in this league and just shrugged my shoulders when I saw this trade.

 

[Banemorth]

12 team PPRTeam X gave up:Floyd, Malcom SDC WRMeachem, Robert SDC WRFighting Couch Potatoes gave up:Best, Jahvid DET RBHankerson, Leonard WAS WR

Crazy!!

How? I'm in this league and just shrugged my shoulders when I saw this trade.

Best and Hankerson aren't worth anything IMO. One more hit and Best is out for good and Hankerson is, what, the number 3 or 4 WR in Washington now? The guy getting Floyd and Meachem killed it.

 

[thriftyrocker]

12 team PPRTeam X gave up:Floyd, Malcom SDC WRMeachem, Robert SDC WRFighting Couch Potatoes gave up:Best, Jahvid DET RBHankerson, Leonard WAS WR

Crazy!!

How? I'm in this league and just shrugged my shoulders when I saw this trade.

Best and Hankerson aren't worth anything IMO. One more hit and Best is out for good and Hankerson is, what, the number 3 or 4 WR in Washington now? The guy getting Floyd and Meachem killed it.

Floyd/Meachem is a gamble on short term WR2 production. Best is a gamble on short term RB1 production.