bengalbuck
Footballguy
That's crazy. MJD should be worth way more than Bowe by himself.12 team PPRTeam A Gets: BoweTeam B Gets: MJD, M Williams (Tampa)
That's crazy. MJD should be worth way more than Bowe by himself.12 team PPRTeam A Gets: BoweTeam B Gets: MJD, M Williams (Tampa)
Not so sure about that. He's been trying to move MJD for awhile, and it would appear that a lot of people are scared off paying top dollar for whatever reason (past injury, workload, talk of him losing his explosivness, etc). I know I turned him down a time or two (for Mathews, for the AZ duo-plus, etc). But this time the price was right. But if he has a bad season, his value will plummet mightily.That's crazy. MJD should be worth way more than Bowe by himself.12 team PPRTeam A Gets: BoweTeam B Gets: MJD, M Williams (Tampa)
In this league, you can start as few as 1 RB and as many as 5 WR. Although you can also start as many as 4 RB, its always risky to carry so much value at RB when given the flexibility of carrying more WRs instead (due to longevity of RB vs WR, increased risk of injury, etc). As a result, WR generally trade at a premium over RBs. Straight up, in this league, I would probably call MJD and Bowe even.'jwb said:Not so sure about that. He's been trying to move MJD for awhile, and it would appear that a lot of people are scared off paying top dollar for whatever reason (past injury, workload, talk of him losing his explosivness, etc). I know I turned him down a time or two (for Mathews, for the AZ duo-plus, etc). But this time the price was right. But if he has a bad season, his value will plummet mightily.'bengalbuck said:That's crazy. MJD should be worth way more than Bowe by himself.'jwb said:12 team PPRTeam A Gets: BoweTeam B Gets: MJD, M Williams (Tampa)
And that.In this league, you can start as few as 1 RB and as many as 5 WR. Although you can also start as many as 4 RB, its always risky to carry so much value at RB when given the flexibility of carrying more WRs instead (due to longevity of RB vs WR, increased risk of injury, etc). As a result, WR generally trade at a premium over RBs. Straight up, in this league, I would probably call MJD and Bowe even.'jwb said:Not so sure about that. He's been trying to move MJD for awhile, and it would appear that a lot of people are scared off paying top dollar for whatever reason (past injury, workload, talk of him losing his explosivness, etc). I know I turned him down a time or two (for Mathews, for the AZ duo-plus, etc). But this time the price was right. But if he has a bad season, his value will plummet mightily.'bengalbuck said:That's crazy. MJD should be worth way more than Bowe by himself.'jwb said:12 team PPRTeam A Gets: BoweTeam B Gets: MJD, M Williams (Tampa)
I agree with this and considered it to be a very fair trade. I would prefer Bowe over MJD given the requirements, so adding Mike isn't that much to get the deal done and address a need. I can see why LP made the trade - he's the best team in his division now. Similarly, Falcons post-trade is still the best team in his division.In this league, you can start as few as 1 RB and as many as 5 WR. Although you can also start as many as 4 RB, its always risky to carry so much value at RB when given the flexibility of carrying more WRs instead (due to longevity of RB vs WR, increased risk of injury, etc). As a result, WR generally trade at a premium over RBs. Straight up, in this league, I would probably call MJD and Bowe even.'jwb said:Not so sure about that. He's been trying to move MJD for awhile, and it would appear that a lot of people are scared off paying top dollar for whatever reason (past injury, workload, talk of him losing his explosivness, etc). I know I turned him down a time or two (for Mathews, for the AZ duo-plus, etc). But this time the price was right. But if he has a bad season, his value will plummet mightily.'bengalbuck said:That's crazy. MJD should be worth way more than Bowe by himself.'jwb said:12 team PPRTeam A Gets: BoweTeam B Gets: MJD, M Williams (Tampa)
I'd still take Andre. DeSean can be frustrating to own, don't know if williams comes back from the patella, and Jenkins has Alex Smith throwing to him. When Andre plays, he plays big.Would be interested in thoughts on this one. Standard poor rulesTeam A Gave - Andre JohnsonTeam B Gave - Desean Jackson, Ryan Williams, AJ Jenkins
Wow. I'd say I'm higher than most on gates (Nelson for that matter too) but I'd much rather have Nelson. I have gates in a league and got no interest from anyone.14 Team No PPR DynastyTrade 2Gave: AGatesGot: JNelson
I agree with you, but I could understand if team A was rebuilding.I'd still take Andre. DeSean can be frustrating to own, don't know if williams comes back from the patella, and Jenkins has Alex Smith throwing to him. When Andre plays, he plays big.Would be interested in thoughts on this one. Standard poor rulesTeam A Gave - Andre JohnsonTeam B Gave - Desean Jackson, Ryan Williams, AJ Jenkins
With the TE rule I like it.Just made another deal in the same league. Standard ppr , but tight ends get double yardage (8 tight ends were top 40 scorers last year and we can start 3)...so Fred Davis held a lot of value for me. Gave - Lesean McCoy, Arrelious Benn, Dennis PittaGot - Jamaal Charles, Mike Wallace, Fred Davis
We'll have to agree to disagree. MJD outscored Bowe in PPR 289 to 213 last season. If you can use either guy as a flex, what is the benefit to Bowe? If one owner had MJD in the flex spot vs. Bowe in the flex spot, he'd have a 5 point advantage on average every single week. While WRs do generally last longer, MJD is younger than Bowe. Plus Bowe is possibly going to holdout this season, further lessening his value. Maybe 2 or 3 years from now, Bowe will be outscoring MJD and have a couple years in his 30s where he's still fantasy relevant, but is that worth likely giving up quite a few PPG in the medium-term? Especially when you can get Jennings as a super cheap handcuff/long-term replacement?I buy your explanation that your league values WRs more highly than RBs (and obviously starting requirements matter), but I'm not so sure that it should be that way. I suspect a smart owner might be able to win your league with a RB-heavy strategy if guys like MJD are worth less than Bowe.And that.In this league, you can start as few as 1 RB and as many as 5 WR. Although you can also start as many as 4 RB, its always risky to carry so much value at RB when given the flexibility of carrying more WRs instead (due to longevity of RB vs WR, increased risk of injury, etc). As a result, WR generally trade at a premium over RBs. Straight up, in this league, I would probably call MJD and Bowe even.Not so sure about that. He's been trying to move MJD for awhile, and it would appear that a lot of people are scared off paying top dollar for whatever reason (past injury, workload, talk of him losing his explosivness, etc). I know I turned him down a time or two (for Mathews, for the AZ duo-plus, etc). But this time the price was right. But if he has a bad season, his value will plummet mightily.That's crazy. MJD should be worth way more than Bowe by himself.12 team PPRTeam A Gets: BoweTeam B Gets: MJD, M Williams (Tampa)
That seems really cheap for Davis. With that scoring rule he could be worth almost as much as McCoy.'finito said:With the TE rule I like it.'solorca said:Just made another deal in the same league. Standard ppr , but tight ends get double yardage (8 tight ends were top 40 scorers last year and we can start 3)...so Fred Davis held a lot of value for me. Gave - Lesean McCoy, Arrelious Benn, Dennis PittaGot - Jamaal Charles, Mike Wallace, Fred Davis
Nice. Classic rookie RB overinflation12 team PPR. Gave: Steve Johnson, Ronnie HillmanGot: Dez Bryant
Stop the insanity folks there is no league where Bowe is worth more than MJD right now.'bengalbuck said:We'll have to agree to disagree. MJD outscored Bowe in PPR 289 to 213 last season. If you can use either guy as a flex, what is the benefit to Bowe? If one owner had MJD in the flex spot vs. Bowe in the flex spot, he'd have a 5 point advantage on average every single week. While WRs do generally last longer, MJD is younger than Bowe. Plus Bowe is possibly going to holdout this season, further lessening his value. Maybe 2 or 3 years from now, Bowe will be outscoring MJD and have a couple years in his 30s where he's still fantasy relevant, but is that worth likely giving up quite a few PPG in the medium-term? Especially when you can get Jennings as a super cheap handcuff/long-term replacement?I buy your explanation that your league values WRs more highly than RBs (and obviously starting requirements matter), but I'm not so sure that it should be that way. I suspect a smart owner might be able to win your league with a RB-heavy strategy if guys like MJD are worth less than Bowe.And that.In this league, you can start as few as 1 RB and as many as 5 WR. Although you can also start as many as 4 RB, its always risky to carry so much value at RB when given the flexibility of carrying more WRs instead (due to longevity of RB vs WR, increased risk of injury, etc). As a result, WR generally trade at a premium over RBs. Straight up, in this league, I would probably call MJD and Bowe even.Not so sure about that. He's been trying to move MJD for awhile, and it would appear that a lot of people are scared off paying top dollar for whatever reason (past injury, workload, talk of him losing his explosivness, etc). I know I turned him down a time or two (for Mathews, for the AZ duo-plus, etc). But this time the price was right. But if he has a bad season, his value will plummet mightily.That's crazy. MJD should be worth way more than Bowe by himself.12 team PPRTeam A Gets: BoweTeam B Gets: MJD, M Williams (Tampa)
I would glady take Nicks for D-Jax and a 1st/2nd I can't trade D-Jax for anythingTeam A (6-7 in 2011) gave up:Jackson, DeSean PHI WRYear 2013 Round 1 Draft Pick from Team AYear 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from Team ATeam B gave up Nicks, Hakeem NYG WRTeam C (6-7 in 2011) gave up:Moss, Randy SFO WR Year 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from Team CTeam D gave up:Meachem, Robert SDC WR
Not sure about this one. I guess it is fair but Maclin's value is trending up as talk of him breaking out in a major way after being slowed down last off season. While Roddy has admitted he's going to get less work with Julio emerging as the wr1Team A gives:Jeremy MaclinTeam B gives:Roddy White
Gotta go with Maclin.Team A gives:Jeremy MaclinTeam B gives:Roddy White
I prefer Stewart/Quick by a lot over Best/LittleContinued from Post #2426Team C gets Ponder, Christian MIN QB; Jacobs, Brandon SFO RB; Johnson, Chris TEN RB; Gettis, David CAR WR; Harvin, Percy MIN WRTeam E gets Cutler, Jay CHI QB; Hillman, Ronnie DEN RB; Murray, DeMarco DAL RB; Moore, Denarius OAK WR; Toon, Nick NOS WRTeam B gets Best, Jahvid DET RB; Little, Greg CLE WRTeam C gets Stewart, Jonathan CAR RB; Quick, Brian STL WR
Brown side for me.Team a got goreTeam b got d. Brown and 2013 2nd round pick
I'll take Roddy *unless* I'm completely rebuilding. I don't think Maclin's a perennial top 10 WR, he's more of a decent #2 IMO.Gotta go with Maclin.Team A gives:Jeremy MaclinTeam B gives:Roddy White
It is a 10 team league...team getting the best player (Britt) wins bigThe team getting britt got hosed.
That was my thought too. In 10 teamers, studs rule. Britt might not be there yet, but he is the closest among those players.It is a 10 team league...team getting the best player (Britt) wins bigThe team getting britt got hosed.
Better be a start 3-QB league.12 Team pprTeam A gave up:Luck, Andrew IND QBTeam B gave up:Cruz, Victor NYG WR
Ehh. If I had traded Joey Galloway for Peyton Manning before Manning's rookie year, I would have been happy. Galloway was one year older in 1997 than Cruz was in 2011, but both were top 5 WRs the season before our "trade for Colts early 1st round QB" scenarios.Galloway went on to put up 178 points of VBD over the course of the rest of his career, registering VBD points in only 5 more discrete seasons. Peyton went on to put up 1081 points of VBD in the time since that hypothetical trade. You would have been set at QB every single year from 1998-2010 with no questions asked.If Luck truly is someone you believe to be that good, then he is overwhelmingly worth more than Cruz...who isn't even the best receiver on his team and has likely already had the best season of his career.I'll take Luck.Better be a start 3-QB league.12 Team pprTeam A gave up:Luck, Andrew IND QBTeam B gave up:Cruz, Victor NYG WR
Now imagine your scenario but you're trading for Ryan Leaf, Akili Smith or Heath Shuler instead of Peyton Manning. It's not that I don't think Luck will be great, I just think it's very strange that you're picking Manning/Galloway in this specific scenario - I don't think it really is applicable unless you think Cruz's career will be derailed by injuries like Galloway's was.Ehh. If I had traded Joey Galloway for Peyton Manning before Manning's rookie year, I would have been happy. Galloway was one year older in 1997 than Cruz was in 2011, but both were top 5 WRs the season before our "trade for Colts early 1st round QB" scenarios.Galloway went on to put up 178 points of VBD over the course of the rest of his career, registering VBD points in only 5 more discrete seasons. Peyton went on to put up 1081 points of VBD in the time since that hypothetical trade. You would have been set at QB every single year from 1998-2010 with no questions asked.If Luck truly is someone you believe to be that good, then he is overwhelmingly worth more than Cruz...who isn't even the best receiver on his team and has likely already had the best season of his career.I'll take Luck.Better be a start 3-QB league.12 Team pprTeam A gave up:Luck, Andrew IND QBTeam B gave up:Cruz, Victor NYG WR
Honestly, I was 5 years old back then, so I have no idea what happened to Galloway. I just went to 1997, picked a top 5 WR with a comparable VBD and age vs the top 2 WRs as Cruz had last year, and five minutes later...And the reason you make the trade is because you think Luck is a Manning type of player. Sure, he could be Leaf. And then the Cruz side would be better. My larger point was simply that it's a pretty good deal, though risky, that pays off big if Luck hits and may or may not hurt big if he doesn't. I don't know that I would make the trade, but to say "It better be a start 3 QB league" is simply an uneducated statement. That was my only point: that it is an entirely plausible deal backed with solid reasoning in a standard dynasty league.Now imagine your scenario but you're trading for Ryan Leaf, Akili Smith or Heath Shuler instead of Peyton Manning. It's not that I don't think Luck will be great, I just think it's very strange that you're picking Manning/Galloway in this specific scenario - I don't think it really is applicable unless you think Cruz's career will be derailed by injuries like Galloway's was.Ehh. If I had traded Joey Galloway for Peyton Manning before Manning's rookie year, I would have been happy. Galloway was one year older in 1997 than Cruz was in 2011, but both were top 5 WRs the season before our "trade for Colts early 1st round QB" scenarios.Galloway went on to put up 178 points of VBD over the course of the rest of his career, registering VBD points in only 5 more discrete seasons. Peyton went on to put up 1081 points of VBD in the time since that hypothetical trade. You would have been set at QB every single year from 1998-2010 with no questions asked.If Luck truly is someone you believe to be that good, then he is overwhelmingly worth more than Cruz...who isn't even the best receiver on his team and has likely already had the best season of his career.I'll take Luck.Better be a start 3-QB league.12 Team pprTeam A gave up:Luck, Andrew IND QBTeam B gave up:Cruz, Victor NYG WR
Wow, give me Roddy and Miles10 team non-PPRDem.Thomas, RudolphforStarks, Austin, R.White