Casting Couch
Footballguy
Fair trade, lean towards Floyd and Gordon long term.Gave: Michael Floyd and Josh GordonReceived: Kenny Britt
Fair trade, lean towards Floyd and Gordon long term.Gave: Michael Floyd and Josh GordonReceived: Kenny Britt
This seems reasonable. Willing to bet both owners improved their team.16 team ppr dynasty:Team A tradesJonathan StewartTeam B tradesMike Williams TB2013 1st rounder (prob 7-10 pick)
I don't think it is an unreasonable trade, but the future value of the Stewart side could be through the roof.'Jersey35 said:This seems reasonable. Willing to bet both owners improved their team.'Matt said:16 team ppr dynasty:Team A tradesJonathan StewartTeam B tradesMike Williams TB2013 1st rounder (prob 7-10 pick)
I wouldn't trade Stewart for that. Mike Williams can be had for a song right now and throw in a late first next year, it seems like a pretty cheap price. Especially considering you're not getting the return on the pick until next year when Stewart could find himself on a new team as the lead back at that point.I don't think it is an unreasonable trade, but the future value of the Stewart side could be through the roof.'Jersey35 said:This seems reasonable. Willing to bet both owners improved their team.'Matt said:16 team ppr dynasty:Team A tradesJonathan StewartTeam B tradesMike Williams TB2013 1st rounder (prob 7-10 pick)
I really like Starks, but I feel like Rivers is worth all three of those by himself. Maybe I am too high on Rivers.Team A trades:
Phillip Rivers
Dan Herron
DeVier Posey
Team B trades:
Brandon Weeden
James Starks
Josh Gordon
------------
12 team standard scoring (non PPR). Team A needed more help at rb and was fine at qb; Team B needed more help at qb and was fine at rb.
You're not. Bad trade for the guy who gave away riversI really like Starks, but I feel like Rivers is worth all three of those by himself. Maybe I am too high on Rivers.Team A trades:
Phillip Rivers
Dan Herron
DeVier Posey
Team B trades:
Brandon Weeden
James Starks
Josh Gordon
------------
12 team standard scoring (non PPR). Team A needed more help at rb and was fine at qb; Team B needed more help at qb and was fine at rb.
How long is Davis' suspension.14 team PPR where TE's get 1.5 PPRGave: Kendall WrightGot: Fred Davis
ok, lots of guys to keep track of. I like the deal for both sides to be honest. IN the 1.5 PPR deal I think Davis is going to outscore Wright for the next few seasons at least. I'm always a fan of adding starters.How long is Davis' suspension.14 team PPR where TE's get 1.5 PPRGave: Kendall WrightGot: Fred Davis
Davis wins huge here with the 14 team aspect AND the 1.5 PPR aspect.14 team PPR where TE's get 1.5 PPRGave: Kendall WrightGot: Fred Davis
Or back to more of the same as he's ever been as a low RB2/flex option.I wouldn't trade Stewart for that. Mike Williams can be had for a song right now and throw in a late first next year, it seems like a pretty cheap price. Especially considering you're not getting the return on the pick until next year when Stewart could find himself on a new team as the lead back at that point.I don't think it is an unreasonable trade, but the future value of the Stewart side could be through the roof.'Jersey35 said:This seems reasonable. Willing to bet both owners improved their team.'Matt said:16 team ppr dynasty:
Team A trades
Jonathan Stewart
Team B trades
Mike Williams TB
2013 1st rounder (prob 7-10 pick)
That's actually not that bad for Rodgers. I doubt I'd trade Rodgers for that in either of the start 2 QB leagues I own him in but the seller is getting one of Luck/RG3 and also Richardson. Pretty decent haul if you believe in those 3.Wow. 2qb leagueAaron RodgersFor1.2, 1.3, and (2) 2013 first rounders.Team trading away Rodgers also has Rivers, Romo, and Palmer
WowJust made this trade in a league where I already have V. Davis at TE.Gave:Jacob Tamme2013 3rdGot:Jon BaldwinSidney RiceAustin Collie
I was the other side of that trade. Worth pointing out that there's no required TE in the league, so even though TE get 1.5 PPR, they are effectively WRs from a lineup standpoint. The way I see it there is risk on both sides. Davis has had off-field issues and has only logged one elite season. He might end up being a perennial monster or he might drop back to the pack ala Alge Crumpler or Zach Miller. Hard to say, really. That was my main problem with him. I've drafted Wright in a bunch of leagues and I feel like I know what I'm getting there. I think he's another Santonio, hopefully without the character issues.Davis wins huge here with the 14 team aspect AND the 1.5 PPR aspect.14 team PPR where TE's get 1.5 PPRGave: Kendall WrightGot: Fred Davis
I like getting McFadden for essentially two lottery tickets.Gave D Moore WR Oak Pick 1:07Got D Mc Fadden
Me too, though I think it's it's pretty fair overall.I like getting McFadden for essentially two lottery tickets.Gave D Moore WR Oak Pick 1:07Got D Mc Fadden
I don't think it is close to fair. I'd make this trade 100 times out of 100 to get McFadden. Easily.'todisco1 said:Me too, though I think it's it's pretty fair overall.'Sabertooth said:I like getting McFadden for essentially two lottery tickets.'tarheel1unc said:Gave D Moore WR Oak Pick 1:07Got D Mc Fadden
I don't think it is close to fair. I'd make this trade 100 times out of 100 to get McFadden. Easily.'todisco1 said:Me too, though I think it's it's pretty fair overall.'Sabertooth said:I like getting McFadden for essentially two lottery tickets.'tarheel1unc said:Gave D Moore WR Oak Pick 1:07Got D Mc Fadden

Yep, well worth the risk there.Davis wins huge here with the 14 team aspect AND the 1.5 PPR aspect.14 team PPR where TE's get 1.5 PPRGave: Kendall WrightGot: Fred Davis
I don't think it is close to fair. I'd make this trade 100 times out of 100 to get McFadden. Easily.Me too, though I think it's it's pretty fair overall.I like getting McFadden for essentially two lottery tickets.Gave D Moore WR Oak Pick 1:07Got D Mc Fadden

Give me Cruz and Baldwin. I don't think Maclin's ceiling is anywhere near Cruz's.'The Clamface said:Team A gave : Victor Cruz and Doug BaldwinTeam B gave : Jeremy Maclin and James Jones
Don't miss the boat on Helu/Royster Dragon. The most yards Hightower has ever had in a year is 736, and that was before his ACL tear.Not sure who would want to be trading 1st round picks for anybody involved in the Redskin running game. Neither of those guys may even be the starter.
I love how you had to preface it with you already having Davis, as if you wouldn't have done it otherwise.Just made this trade in a league where I already have V. Davis at TE.Gave:Jacob Tamme2013 3rdGot:Jon BaldwinSidney RiceAustin Collie
Amazing to see these trades. After being in 3 startups this year value comes more into focus on this kind of deal and most of the dealsMcFadden ADP is like 15, Moore is like 70, 1.07 is like 80I am sure I would deal 70/80 for 15I don't think it is close to fair. I'd make this trade 100 times out of 100 to get McFadden. Easily.Me too, though I think it's it's pretty fair overall.I like getting McFadden for essentially two lottery tickets.Gave D Moore WR Oak Pick 1:07Got D Mc Fadden![]()
seems fair. i traded a 2nd to get just royster in one league so getting both for a late 1st is a deal i'd takenot sure what side you were onTeam A gave up Helu, Roy WAS RB;Royster, Evan WAS RBTeam B gave up Year 2013 Round 1 Draft Pick from Team B;Year 2013 Round 3 Draft Pick from Team B; Holmes, Andre DAL WRTeam B finished in 4th place last season.Have a feeling I'm going to get blasted on this one.![]()
ya, one thing you'll notice is players are valued differently depending on the means of acquisitionfor example, wright has a lot more value in a rookie draft than he does in a startup dyno draft done at the same timeex2: turner is usually picked before hillman in a start up draft, but you wont be able to trade turner to get the 1.8 rookie pick.makes no sense, take advantage of that kind of stuffvaluing players in terms of where they would go in a startup dyno draft is a very good way to make sure you make good tradesAmazing to see these trades. After being in 3 startups this year value comes more into focus on this kind of deal and most of the dealsMcFadden ADP is like 15, Moore is like 70, 1.07 is like 80I am sure I would deal 70/80 for 15I don't think it is close to fair. I'd make this trade 100 times out of 100 to get McFadden. Easily.Me too, though I think it's it's pretty fair overall.I like getting McFadden for essentially two lottery tickets.Gave D Moore WR Oak Pick 1:07Got D Mc Fadden![]()
These Stewart guys crack me up."if - If's and buts were candys and nuts, we'd all have a merry xmas"Or back to more of the same as he's ever been as a low RB2/flex option.I wouldn't trade Stewart for that. Mike Williams can be had for a song right now and throw in a late first next year, it seems like a pretty cheap price. Especially considering you're not getting the return on the pick until next year when Stewart could find himself on a new team as the lead back at that point.I don't think it is an unreasonable trade, but the future value of the Stewart side could be through the roof.This seems reasonable. Willing to bet both owners improved their team.16 team ppr dynasty:
Team A trades
Jonathan Stewart
Team B trades
Mike Williams TB
2013 1st rounder (prob 7-10 pick)
I must be one of the "Stewart guys" because that looks like a good buy low on him to me.Stewart is 25 and a UFA after this year. He's been stellar thus far (1050 YFS / 7 TDs a year @ 4.8 YPC) despite splitting carries with another Pro Bowl RB. If he stays in Carolina, he's a good flex player until the 29 year old DeAngelo slows down in a year or two. If he leaves, he's probably significantly better than that based on what he has done on the rare occasions he has had the Carolina job to himself.These Stewart guys crack me up."if - If's and buts were candys and nuts, we'd all have a merry xmas"Or back to more of the same as he's ever been as a low RB2/flex option.I wouldn't trade Stewart for that. Mike Williams can be had for a song right now and throw in a late first next year, it seems like a pretty cheap price. Especially considering you're not getting the return on the pick until next year when Stewart could find himself on a new team as the lead back at that point.I don't think it is an unreasonable trade, but the future value of the Stewart side could be through the roof.This seems reasonable. Willing to bet both owners improved their team.16 team ppr dynasty:
Team A trades
Jonathan Stewart
Team B trades
Mike Williams TB
2013 1st rounder (prob 7-10 pick)
It's like Linus waiting for the great pumpkin while everyone else is trick or treating
I don't think it really matters if you are a Stewart guy or not. Mike Williams and a late first next year is a cheap price'Coeur de Lion said:I must be one of the "Stewart guys" because that looks like a good buy low on him to me.Stewart is 25 and a UFA after this year. He's been stellar thus far (1050 YFS / 7 TDs a year @ 4.8 YPC) despite splitting carries with another Pro Bowl RB. If he stays in Carolina, he's a good flex player until the 29 year old DeAngelo slows down in a year or two. If he leaves, he's probably significantly better than that based on what he has done on the rare occasions he has had the Carolina job to himself.'bicycle_seat_sniffer said:These Stewart guys crack me up."if - If's and buts were candys and nuts, we'd all have a merry xmas"Or back to more of the same as he's ever been as a low RB2/flex option.I wouldn't trade Stewart for that. Mike Williams can be had for a song right now and throw in a late first next year, it seems like a pretty cheap price. Especially considering you're not getting the return on the pick until next year when Stewart could find himself on a new team as the lead back at that point.I don't think it is an unreasonable trade, but the future value of the Stewart side could be through the roof.This seems reasonable. Willing to bet both owners improved their team.16 team ppr dynasty:
Team A trades
Jonathan Stewart
Team B trades
Mike Williams TB
2013 1st rounder (prob 7-10 pick)
It's like Linus waiting for the great pumpkin while everyone else is trick or treating
He was overvalued when he was a 1st round startup pick a few years ago, after he lit up the league at the end of the year and in anticipation of DeAngelo's free agency. Now he's a good value at his current price (late 4th / early 5th startup, or in exchange for Mike Williams and a late 1st).
Wow, give me Wilson and a 1st. Even in a PPR.Could be solid for both teams though - a win now move for BSaw this trade happen this morning in one of my leagues:A trades: Darren SprolesB trades: David Wilson, 2013 1st (likely late)
If I had nothing at TE, I may not have, despite the value. Tamme should be a TE1 for a season or two, and I'm trying to win.I love how you had to preface it with you already having Davis, as if you wouldn't have done it otherwise.Just made this trade in a league where I already have V. Davis at TE.Gave:Jacob Tamme2013 3rdGot:Jon BaldwinSidney RiceAustin Collie